An e-commerce manufacturer sent its inbound sales and service calls to Speak AI, where each became a speaker-labelled transcript with a structured summary, so leaders could search conversations and follow up the same day.
The company handled a high volume of sales and service calls. Notes were taken by hand, so what got written down depended on who took the call and how busy the day was.
It routed calls into organised folders in Speak. Each call was transcribed with speakers labelled and timestamps, then summarised with saved prompts and custom fields that pulled the same points from every conversation.
Calls were transcribed and summarised over about two years. The figures below are as reported on the previous version of this page in October 2025.

Call notes were inconsistent, and the useful details stayed in recordings no one had time to hear.
Calls land in folders, become transcripts, and are summarised by saved prompts into the same fields every time.
Leaders could search conversations and follow up from structured summaries instead of memory.
Calls held product questions, objections and competitor mentions, but little of it reached the people who could act on it.

Each team member wrote call notes in their own way, so two similar calls produced two very different records.
Product questions, objections and next steps sat inside recordings. Finding a pattern meant listening to many calls.
Without consistent summaries, leaders found it hard to coach reps or forecast from what customers actually said.
The cost: The old way cost time on note-taking, left follow-ups slower than they needed to be, and dropped the detail that did not make it into a note.
The turning point was seeing the same prompt applied to a stack of different calls and producing the same structured fields each time: product mentioned, competitor, objection, next step. That consistency was what the team had never been able to get from hand-written notes.
What had to be settled first was whether this could run at volume without manual rework. Filtering, batch editing and one-click re-analysis meant a prompt could be improved and run again across the whole library, rather than redone call by call.
The flow moves from raw calls to structured summaries that other teams can use.
Meetings, phone calls and training sessions are routed into folders so teams can find them straight away.
Each recording becomes a transcript with timestamps and speakers labelled.
Saved prompts and custom fields pull product mentions, competitors, objections and next steps in the same format every time.
Summaries and transcripts are sent to downstream systems through connectors, so sales, support and leadership see them without asking.
Honest friction: Fields and prompts take a few rounds to get right, and speaker labels on short calls need checking. Volume figures here are as reported in October 2025 and have not been re-verified.

The previous version of this page reported more than two thousand hours of sales, support and training calls processed, which is the figure shown here, labelled with its original date.
Paraphrased from our own conversations with the team. Not quotes.
Call volume is not the problem, because inconsistent notes are. The same summary fields applied to every call make conversations comparable.
Paraphrased from our calls with the team
Short service and sales calls hide patterns that only show up once a few thousand of them are searchable in one place.
Paraphrased from our calls with the team
A saved prompt that can be rerun across a whole library turns summary design into an experiment instead of a one-off.
Paraphrased from our calls with the team

Customer name withheld at their request. Figures are from Speak usage records, frozen as of October 2025.
Talk to us about turning your sales and service calls into structured, searchable summaries.