Case study vs. narrative research on Speak AI

Know which method fits
before you design the study.

Case study research bounds itself to one context and studies it in depth. Narrative research follows how people tell the story of their experience. Both start as hours of interviews, and Speak AI helps you transcribe, code, and defend either approach with the transcript as evidence.

★★★★★ 4.9 på G2 250 000+ lag Siden 2018
yourteam.speakai.co
00:13 / 07:08
AO
Dr. Amara Osei 00:38
We have twelve interviews from the same nonprofit. Is this one case study or twelve narratives?
AO
Dr. Amara Osei 01:15
Code it as one bounded case, cross-participant themes, not twelve separate life stories.
Kjører på modellene og kobles til verktøyene du allerede bruker
Claude ChatGPT Gemini Zoom Lag Meet Slack Zapier og hundrevis til
95%+
Transkripsjonsnøyaktighet
100+
Støttede språk
100+
MCP-verktøy for din AI
6
Måter å samle inn
Bevis

Seieren lagene leverer.

Tid til et live-produkt, timer spart per fil og dollar spart. Samme plattform, veldig ulike anvendelser.

$100K+
spart · 8 måneder raskere

Juridisk teknologiselskap bygger en white-label deposisjonsplattform, 8 måneder raskere.

Juridisk · Hvitmarkplattform
$100K+
sparert · 983 timer

Globalt forskningsbyrå lanserer en white-label kvalitativ forskningsplattform.

Forskning · White-label-plattform
$700K+
sparti · 5 100+ timer

Juridisk intelligensselskap behandler 5 100+ timer med operatørsamtaler, 95% raskere.

Jus · Intelligence i skala
$190K+
sparret · 10 000+ timer

Helsekonsulentfirma reduserte øktsbehandling fra 8 timer til 0,3.

Helsevesen · Rådgivning
$185K+
sparti · 3 700+ timer

E-handelsproducent sentraliserer anmeldelse av samtaler og reduserer med 85%.

E-handel · Produksjon
96%
raskere · 1 100+ timer

Rekrutteringsfirma reduserer rapporttid for kandidater fra 5 timer til 10 minutter.

Rekruttering · Rapportering
Den gratis konsultasjonen

Bring én transkripsjon. Forlat den kodet.

En arbeidssesjon, ikke en salgspitch. Ingen forpliktelse.

Trinn 1

Du bringer en virkelig transkripsjon

An interview, a focus group, a set of case documents. Whatever your team is coding by hand today.

Trinn 2

We map your coding framework

The codes in your codebook, your case boundaries, your narrative arc categories. Your words, your definitions. Not a template.

Trinn 3

Du ser det kodet, direkte

Your own transcript, coded against your own framework, with a rollout plan for the rest of the project.

One engine, every kind of study

Case study and narrative coding for every kind of researcher.

The same coding engine, pointed at the interviews and cases your team actually has.

Akademiske forskere

Thesis & dissertation coding

Keep case boundaries and narrative arcs straight across dozens of interviews, with every code traceable to a quote.

UX-forskere

Usability & discovery studies

Code sessions as bounded cases or participant narratives, then compare themes across the whole study.

Markedsforskere

Client-facing case work

Turn raw interviews into a case narrative or cross-case comparison a client can act on, not just a transcript.

Grad students

Methods chapter support

Defend your case study or narrative inquiry design with a coded, auditable transcript trail behind every claim.

Program evaluators

Evaluation & impact studies

Bound each site or cohort as its own case, or follow individual participant stories, on the same platform.

Oral historians & journalists

Life story & narrative work

Preserve the sequence and voice of a lived story while still being able to search and compare across subjects.

A different approach to case study vs. narrative research.

Case study research and narrative research are both qualitative approaches built on the same raw material: interviews, observations, and documents. The difference is what you do with them. A case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a single site, and studies that context in depth, often pulling in multiple sources of evidence to triangulate a finding. Narrative research follows how a person makes sense of their own experience, structured as a story with a beginning, turning points, and an ending, and analyzed for that structure as much as for its content.

Why the line gets blurry

The confusion is not really about definitions. It is about what happens once the interviews are done. A researcher sits down with twelve transcripts from the same nonprofit and has to decide, by hand, whether this is one case with twelve data sources or twelve separate stories. Get the boundary wrong and the analysis wobbles: cross-participant themes get treated as personal narrative arcs, or a genuinely individual story gets flattened into a generic organizational finding. Most methods texts group case studies into four broad types: descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, and intrinsic, a single case studied for its own sake rather than to build theory. Narrative inquiry does not sort as neatly. A typical example follows one person, a teacher moving into a new role, a patient managing a diagnosis, through in-depth interviews, then analyzes how they structure that transition as a story: what changed, when, and what it meant to them.

Reading the transcript for method, not just words

Speak AI transcribes every interview in your language, with 100+ supported, and then reads the recording itself: the tone and pacing of the account, where a participant's energy shifts, the moments that sound like a turning point versus a routine detail. That distinction matters for narrative coding specifically, since a story's meaning often sits in how something was told, not only in what was said. For case study work, the same transcripts get tagged by site, participant role, and data source, so cross-case comparison stays organized instead of scattered across folders and file names.

Then you can ask questions across the whole project with AI chat, using the same coding logic a research team would apply by hand, now running natively over every transcript with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini built in.

Case study or narrative inquiry: the actual differences

  • Focus: a case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a site. Narrative research bounds itself to a person's account of their experience.
  • Data: case studies typically triangulate interviews, documents, and observation across a bounded case. Narrative research relies mainly on first-person interviews and the stories people tell.
  • Analysis: case studies compare within and across cases for patterns. Narrative research analyzes plot, sequence, and turning points to find how meaning gets constructed.
  • Output: a case study produces a context-rich account of one bounded situation. Narrative research produces an account of how someone experienced and now tells that situation.

From twelve transcripts to a defensible method

The result is a coding pass you can actually defend in a methods chapter or a client deliverable: every code traceable to a quote, every case boundary or narrative arc documented instead of remembered. Trends across a full project become a report instead of a hunch, and instrumentbord du kan tilpasse og white-label track theme frequency and case comparisons over time, so this round of interviews is measured against the last one. A global market research firm put its multi-country qualitative interviews through this workflow and saved $60K+ and 950+ hours, shifting analyst time back to interpretation instead of administrative coding.

And because the same engine reads case documents, narrative interviews, and everyday conversations on the same platform, you can query all of it, or hand it to an AI assistant through the MCP server, without switching tools between methods.

Your codes, auto-extracted
MethodCase study
Case boundarySingle organization
Coding passThematic
Participants12 interviews
Theme frequency across 12 interviews
Konstruert sammen med deg

Engineered with you, coded your way from day one.

A generic AI tool starts from zero. We shape the codebook, case boundaries, and prompts around your actual research design, then prime the application on your existing transcripts so it is useful from the first interview. You get structured, traceable codes back, not just a transcript.

  • We design the codebook, case boundaries, and scoring around your research design, not a template.
  • Dine historiske intervjuer og transkripsjoner forbedrer kunnskapsbase før go-live.
  • Structured, quote-traceable codes on every transcript, queryable from Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor through the MCP server.
Enhetlig innsamling

Ét system for alt som teamet ditt sier.

Personlig og virtuelt, på ett sted. Ingen behov for å sy sammen et møteverktøy, en stemmeopptaker og tre andre apper. Speak AI fanger alt inn i én søkbar kunnskapsbasis som applikasjonene dine er bygget på.

Møteassistent
Auto-slutter seg til Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet og Webex.
Integrerbar opptaker
Slipp en merkevarepunkt på et hvilket som helst nettsted, portal eller inntak.
iOS & Android-apper
Opptak i felten, på farten, hvor som helst du møtes. White-label tilgjengelig.
Last opp, telefon & stemmesystemer
Dra inn lyd eller video, transkriber innkommende samtaler, eller la en agent gjennomføre samtalen.
Meeting Bot
virtuell
Opptaker
personlig møte
Mobilapp
felt
Bygg inn
web
Last opp
filer
Voice Agent
samtaler
Ett Speak AI-bibliotek
Transkribert, strukturert, søkbar, delbar
Bygget for å forbli fleksibel

Én plattform. Ikke én modell.

Et generisk AI-verktøy låser deg til en modell og en motor. Speak AI velger riktig modell, talemotor og språk for hver oppgave, filtype og team, slik at applikasjonene dine aldri er låst til en enkelt leverandør.

Modeller

Multi-modell

Claude, ChatGPT og Gemini. Ditt valg per oppgave, eller ta med din egen nøkkel.

Tale

Multi-engine

Transkripsjon rutes på tvers av flere motorer for din lyd, aksenter og termer.

Språk

100+ språk

Transkribér og oversett inn og ut, for globale og flerspråklige team.

Integrasjoner

MCP, API & integrasjoner

100+ MCP-verktøy og et integrasjonslag som kobler til hundrevis av apper du allerede kjører.

★★★★★  4.9 på G2

Team bygger på Speak AI.

Ekte tilbakemelding fra team som bruker Speak AI for forskning, transkribering, møter og klientarbeid.

"Vi gikk fra uker av kvalitativ analyse til en dag. Enkelt å bruke, enkelt å implementere, og støtten har vært utrolig."
C
Connor H.
Data & Impact Analyst
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering
«Høy nøyaktighet, flerspråklig støtte og innsiktfull analyse. Integrasjoner med Google og Zapier gjør det enkelt å strømlinjeforme alt.»
V
Volker B.
COO, småbedrift
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering
"Jeg bruker Speak AI i Fransk og engelsk for møter på opptil to timer. Det sparer tid og øker presisjonen i rapportene mine."
F
François L.
Finansiell rådgiver
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering
Jeg pleide å bruke 45 minutter på å transkribere notater. Nå er det gjort på sekunder, og jeg skriver på minutter.
T
Ted H.
Eier, småbedrift
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering
“Enkelt å bruke for møter. Gjør det enkelt å ta notater og gjøre dem om til en ren, delbar rapport.”
N
Naison S.
Prosjektleder
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering
“Det er enkelt å bruke, og jeg kan faktisk komme i kontakt med teamet bak produktet. Verdifullt å snakke med” ekte menneske."
M
Markus B.
Medisinsk direktør
★★★★★ Verifisert G2-vurdering

Spørsmål vi får

Ditt første resultatkort kjører på en ekte opptak under konsultasjonen. Teamutruling tar dager, ikke måneder, fordi vi bygger det med deg og primer det på dine eksisterende opptak.

Samlet bruk, ikke per-setning, uten volumminimum. Piloter kreditteres fullt ut. Vi tilpasser prising for ditt nøyaktige arbeidsflyt under samtalen.

Speak AI håndterer 100+ språk, inkludert samtaler som bytter språk midt i setningen, og kan oversette inn og ut.

Ja. White-label-utplasseringer kjører på ditt eget domene med din logo, inkludert klientplattformer som byråer selger videre, pluss merkevarebundne iOS- og Android-apper.

A case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a single site, and studies it in depth using multiple sources of evidence. Narrative inquiry follows how one person or a small group makes sense of their own experience, structured and analyzed as a story with a sequence and turning points.

A study that follows one teacher through in-depth interviews as she moves into a new role, then analyzes how she structures that transition as a story, what changed, when, and what it meant to her, rather than treating her answers as isolated data points.

Most methods texts group case studies into descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, and intrinsic, a single case studied for its own sake rather than to build theory. Multiple-case (collective) designs extend any of these across more than one bounded case for comparison.

In practice the terms are used interchangeably. Where a distinction is drawn, narrative inquiry usually refers to the broader methodological approach, treating experience itself as story, while narrative research is used more generally for any study that collects and analyzes people's stories as data.

Enterprise inkluderer BAA-støtte, egendefinerte databehandlingsavtaler, SSO og dataoppholdsalternativer. Vi deler sikkerhetsdokumentasjon på forespørsel og tilpasser hver build til dine krav.

From twelve transcripts to a defensible method.

Book a free consult, bring a real transcript, and watch it coded as a case or a narrative before the meeting ends. Consults include early access to new features, an extended trial, and implementation credits.

Ingen forpliktelse. · Foretrekker du å utforske på egen hånd? Prøv Speak gratis