Case study vs. narrative research on Speak AI

Know which method fits
before you design the study.

Case study research bounds itself to one context and studies it in depth. Narrative research follows how people tell the story of their experience. Both start as hours of interviews, and Speak AI helps you transcribe, code, and defend either approach with the transcript as evidence.

★★★★★ 4.9 op G2 250.000+ teams Sinds 2018
yourteam.speakai.co
00:13 / 07:08
AO
Dr. Amara Osei 00:38
We have twelve interviews from the same nonprofit. Is this one case study or twelve narratives?
AO
Dr. Amara Osei 01:15
Code it as one bounded case, cross-participant themes, not twelve separate life stories.
Draait op de modellen en maakt verbinding met de tools die u al gebruikt
Claude ChatGPT Gemini Zoom Teams Meet Slack Zapier en nog honderden meer
95%+
Transcriptienauwkeurigheid
100+
Ondersteunde talen
100+
MCP tools voor uw AI
6
Manieren om op te nemen
Bewijs

De winsten die teams behalen.

Tijd tot een live product, uren bespaard per bestand en dollars bespaard. Hetzelfde platform, zeer verschillende toepassingen.

$100K+
bespaard · 8 maanden sneller

Legal tech bedrijf bouwt white-label depositoriumplatform, 8 maanden sneller.

Juridisch · White-label platform
$100K+
bespaard · 983 uur

Wereldwijd onderzoeksbureau lanceert white-label platform voor kwalitatief onderzoek.

Onderzoek · White-label platform
$700K+
bespaard · 5.100+ uren

Legal intelligence bedrijf verwerkt 5.100+ uur drageroproepen, 95% sneller.

Juridisch · Intelligentie op schaal
$190K+
bespaard · 10.000+ uren

Healthcare consultancybedrijf reduceerde sessieverwerkingstijd van 8 uur naar 0,3.

Healthcare · Consulting
$185K+
bespaard · 3.700+ uren

E-commerce fabrikant centraliseert oproepbeoordeling en vermindert deze met 85%.

E-Commerce · Productie
96%
sneller · 1.100+ uur

Wervingsbedrijf reduceert tijd voor kandidaatrapporten van 5 uur naar 10 minuten.

Recruitment · Rapportage
Het gratis adviesgesprek

Breng één transcript mee. Vertrek ermee gecodeerd.

Een werkzitting, geen verkooppraat. Geen verplichting.

Stap 1

U brengt een echt transcript mee

An interview, a focus group, a set of case documents. Whatever your team is coding by hand today.

Stap 2

We map your coding framework

The codes in your codebook, your case boundaries, your narrative arc categories. Your words, your definitions. Not a template.

Stap 3

Je ziet het live gecodeerd

Your own transcript, coded against your own framework, with a rollout plan for the rest of the project.

One engine, every kind of study

Case study and narrative coding for every kind of researcher.

The same coding engine, pointed at the interviews and cases your team actually has.

Academische onderzoekers

Thesis & dissertation coding

Keep case boundaries and narrative arcs straight across dozens of interviews, with every code traceable to a quote.

UX-onderzoekers

Usability & discovery studies

Code sessions as bounded cases or participant narratives, then compare themes across the whole study.

Marktonderzoekers

Client-facing case work

Turn raw interviews into a case narrative or cross-case comparison a client can act on, not just a transcript.

Grad students

Methods chapter support

Defend your case study or narrative inquiry design with a coded, auditable transcript trail behind every claim.

Program evaluators

Evaluation & impact studies

Bound each site or cohort as its own case, or follow individual participant stories, on the same platform.

Oral historians & journalists

Life story & narrative work

Preserve the sequence and voice of a lived story while still being able to search and compare across subjects.

A different approach to case study vs. narrative research.

Case study research and narrative research are both qualitative approaches built on the same raw material: interviews, observations, and documents. The difference is what you do with them. A case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a single site, and studies that context in depth, often pulling in multiple sources of evidence to triangulate a finding. Narrative research follows how a person makes sense of their own experience, structured as a story with a beginning, turning points, and an ending, and analyzed for that structure as much as for its content.

Why the line gets blurry

The confusion is not really about definitions. It is about what happens once the interviews are done. A researcher sits down with twelve transcripts from the same nonprofit and has to decide, by hand, whether this is one case with twelve data sources or twelve separate stories. Get the boundary wrong and the analysis wobbles: cross-participant themes get treated as personal narrative arcs, or a genuinely individual story gets flattened into a generic organizational finding. Most methods texts group case studies into four broad types: descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, and intrinsic, a single case studied for its own sake rather than to build theory. Narrative inquiry does not sort as neatly. A typical example follows one person, a teacher moving into a new role, a patient managing a diagnosis, through in-depth interviews, then analyzes how they structure that transition as a story: what changed, when, and what it meant to them.

Reading the transcript for method, not just words

Speak AI transcribes every interview in your language, with 100+ supported, and then reads the recording itself: the tone and pacing of the account, where a participant's energy shifts, the moments that sound like a turning point versus a routine detail. That distinction matters for narrative coding specifically, since a story's meaning often sits in how something was told, not only in what was said. For case study work, the same transcripts get tagged by site, participant role, and data source, so cross-case comparison stays organized instead of scattered across folders and file names.

Then you can ask questions across the whole project with AI chat, using the same coding logic a research team would apply by hand, now running natively over every transcript with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini built in.

Case study or narrative inquiry: the actual differences

  • Focus: a case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a site. Narrative research bounds itself to a person's account of their experience.
  • Data: case studies typically triangulate interviews, documents, and observation across a bounded case. Narrative research relies mainly on first-person interviews and the stories people tell.
  • Analysis: case studies compare within and across cases for patterns. Narrative research analyzes plot, sequence, and turning points to find how meaning gets constructed.
  • Output: a case study produces a context-rich account of one bounded situation. Narrative research produces an account of how someone experienced and now tells that situation.

From twelve transcripts to a defensible method

The result is a coding pass you can actually defend in a methods chapter or a client deliverable: every code traceable to a quote, every case boundary or narrative arc documented instead of remembered. Trends across a full project become a report instead of a hunch, and dashboards die u kunt aanpassen en white-label track theme frequency and case comparisons over time, so this round of interviews is measured against the last one. A global market research firm put its multi-country qualitative interviews through this workflow and saved $60K+ and 950+ hours, shifting analyst time back to interpretation instead of administrative coding.

And because the same engine reads case documents, narrative interviews, and everyday conversations on the same platform, you can query all of it, or hand it to an AI assistant through the MCP server, without switching tools between methods.

Your codes, auto-extracted
MethodCase study
Case boundarySingle organization
Coding passThematic
Participants12 interviews
Theme frequency across 12 interviews
Ontwikkeld samen met u

Engineered with you, coded your way from day one.

A generic AI tool starts from zero. We shape the codebook, case boundaries, and prompts around your actual research design, then prime the application on your existing transcripts so it is useful from the first interview. You get structured, traceable codes back, not just a transcript.

  • We design the codebook, case boundaries, and scoring around your research design, not a template.
  • Uw historische interviews en transcripten vormen de basis voor de kennisbank voordat u live gaat.
  • Structured, quote-traceable codes on every transcript, queryable from Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor through the MCP server.
Eenduidige opname

Eén systeem van waarheid voor alles wat uw team zegt.

Ter plaatse en virtueel, op één plek. Geen combinatie van een vergaderingtool, een spraakrecorder en drie andere apps. Speak AI vangt alles in één doorzoekbare kennisbank waarop uw applicaties zijn gebouwd.

Vergaderassistent
Auto-joins voor Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet en Webex.
Integreerbare recorder
Plaats een gebrandmerkte recorder op elke site, portal of innamescherm.
iOS & Android apps
Neem op in het veld, onderweg, overal waar u samenkomt. White-label beschikbaar.
Upload, telefoon- & spraakagenten
Sleep audio of video in, transcribeer inkomende oproepen, of laat een agent het gesprek voeren.
Meeting Bot
virtueel
Recorder
persoonlijk
Mobiele app
veld
Insluiten
web
Uploaden
bestanden
Voice Agent
gesprekken
Één Speak AI bibliotheek
Getranscribeerd, gestructureerd, doorzoekbaar, deelbaar
Gebouwd om flexibel te blijven

Één platform. Niet één model.

Een generiek AI-tool bindt u aan één model en één engine. Speak AI kiest het juiste model, spraakengine en taal voor elke taak, bestandstype en team, zodat uw applicaties nooit aan een enkele leverancier zijn gebonden.

Modellen

Multi-model

Claude, ChatGPT en Gemini. Uw keuze per taak, of breng uw eigen sleutel mee.

Spraak

Multi-engine

Transcriptie gerouteerd over meerdere engines voor uw audio, accenten en termen.

Taal

Meer dan 100 talen

Transcribeer en vertaal in en uit, voor globale en meertalige teams.

Integraties

MCP, API & integraties

100+ MCP tools en een integratielaag die verbinding maakt met honderden apps die u al gebruikt.

★★★★★  4.9 op G2

Teams bouwen op Speak AI.

Echte feedback van teams die Speak AI gebruiken voor onderzoek, transcriptie, meetings en klantwerk.

""We gingen van weken van kwalitatieve analyse tot een dag. "Het is gebruiksvriendelijk, eenvoudig te implementeren en de ondersteuning is fantastisch.""
C
Connor H.
Data & Impact Analist
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review
“Hoge nauwkeurigheid, meertalige ondersteuning en inzichtvolle analyse. Integraties met Google en Zapier maken het gemakkelijk om alles te stroomlijnen.”
V
Volker B.
COO, MKB
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review
""Ik gebruik Speak AI in Frans en Engels Voor vergaderingen van maximaal twee uur. Het bespaart tijd en verhoogt de nauwkeurigheid van mijn rapporten.""
F
François L.
Financieel Adviseur
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review
“Ik besteedde vroeger 45 minuten aan het uitwerken van notities. Nu is het in seconden, en ik schrijf in minuten.
T
Ted H.
Eigenaar, klein bedrijf
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review
“Eenvoudig in gebruik voor meetings. Maakt het gemakkelijk om notulen te maken en deze om te zetten in een schoon, deelbaar rapport.”
N
Naison S.
Projectmanager
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review
“Het is gemakkelijk in gebruik, en ik kan daadwerkelijk contact opnemen met het team achter het product. Waardevol om te spreken met een” echt mens."
M
Markus B.
Medisch directeur
★★★★★ Geverifieerde G2-review

Veelgestelde vragen

Uw eerste scorecard draait op een echte opname tijdens het consult. Team-rollout duurt dagen, niet maanden, omdat we het samen met u bouwen en het op uw bestaande opnamen instellen.

Gepoolde gebruik, niet per-seat, zonder volume minimums. Pilots worden volledig gecrediteerd. We bepalen de prijzen voor uw exacte workflow op het gesprek.

Speak AI verwerkt meer dan 100 talen, inclusief gesprekken die halverwege de zin van taal wisselen, en kan in en uit vertalen.

Ja. White-label-implementaties draaien op uw eigen domein met uw logo, inclusief clientplatformen die agentschappen doorverkopen, plus gebrande iOS- en Android-apps.

A case study bounds itself to a context, a program, an organization, a single site, and studies it in depth using multiple sources of evidence. Narrative inquiry follows how one person or a small group makes sense of their own experience, structured and analyzed as a story with a sequence and turning points.

A study that follows one teacher through in-depth interviews as she moves into a new role, then analyzes how she structures that transition as a story, what changed, when, and what it meant to her, rather than treating her answers as isolated data points.

Most methods texts group case studies into descriptive, exploratory, explanatory, and intrinsic, a single case studied for its own sake rather than to build theory. Multiple-case (collective) designs extend any of these across more than one bounded case for comparison.

In practice the terms are used interchangeably. Where a distinction is drawn, narrative inquiry usually refers to the broader methodological approach, treating experience itself as story, while narrative research is used more generally for any study that collects and analyzes people's stories as data.

Enterprise-builds ondersteunen BAA’s, aangepaste gegevensverwerkingsovereenkomsten, SSO en opties voor gegevensresidentie. We delen beveiligingsdocumentatie op aanvraag en bepalen elke build naar uw vereisten.

From twelve transcripts to a defensible method.

Book a free consult, bring a real transcript, and watch it coded as a case or a narrative before the meeting ends. Consults include early access to new features, an extended trial, and implementation credits.

Geen verplichtingen. · Wilt u liever zelf verkennen? Probeer Speak gratis