You can listen to the #2236 – Ken Burns using Speak’s shareable media player:
#2236 – Ken Burns Podcast Episode Description
Ken Burns is an award-winning documentary filmmaker known for “The Civil War,” “The Vietnam War,” “Jazz,” “Country Music,” among many others. His next project, “The American Revolution,” a six-part series, will premiere November 16, 2025 on PBS.www.kenburns.com
Try ZipRecruiter for FREE at https://ziprecruiter.com/rogan
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
This interactive media player was created automatically by Speak. Want to generate intelligent media players yourself? Sign up for Speak!
#2236 – Ken Burns Podcast Episode Top Keywords
#2236 – Ken Burns Podcast Episode Summary
In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, Joe Rogan interviews Ken Burns, a renowned documentarian known for his extensive work on American history, particularly through PBS. Burns discusses his career journey, emphasizing his commitment to storytelling and the importance of taking time to deeply explore historical subjects. He shares insights into his filmmaking process, highlighting the autonomy and creative freedom he enjoys with PBS, which allows him to produce comprehensive and nuanced documentaries.
Burns reflects on his early influences, including the impact of his mother’s illness and his father’s emotional response to films, which inspired his passion for authentic storytelling. He discusses the significance of history in understanding American identity and the complexities of human nature, emphasizing the need for a balanced portrayal of historical figures and events.
The conversation touches on several of Burns’ notable works, including his documentaries on the Vietnam War, the Civil War, and Muhammad Ali. Burns explains the challenges of capturing the multifaceted nature of historical events and figures, advocating for a storytelling approach that embraces complexity and avoids simplistic narratives.
Throughout the episode, recurring themes include the value of patience and perseverance in creative endeavors, the transformative power of nature, and the importance of understanding history to gain perspective on contemporary issues. Burns also discusses the role of public broadcasting in providing educational content that reaches diverse audiences across the country.
Overall, the episode offers a deep dive into Ken Burns’ philosophy on documentary filmmaking, his dedication to historical accuracy, and his belief in the power of storytelling to foster understanding and connection.
This summary was created automatically by Speak. Want to transcribe, analyze and summarize yourself? Sign up for Speak!
#2236 – Ken Burns Podcast Episode Transcript (Unedited)
Speaker: 0
00:01
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. The Joe Rogan experience. Showing my day. Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day.
Speaker: 1
00:12
Alright. We’re up. Mister Burns, pleasure to meet you.
Speaker: 0
00:14
It’s my pleasure. Thank you.
Speaker: 1
00:16
I’m a huge fan, dude. I’ve been watching your work for so long, and I’ve always had so many questions about how a person like you becomes a person like you, how you become the preeminent documentarian of our time. I mean, you have so much work out there. It’s really extraordinary. And all of it on PBS. Right?
Speaker: 0
00:35
Right. All of it. All of it.
Speaker: 1
00:36
Which is also extraordinary.
Speaker: 0
00:38
You know, it’s the public broadcasting service. It’s, the Declaration of Independence applied to communications, just as the national parks, you could say, was the declaration of independence applied to the landscape. Sai mean, like like, manifestations of really American things that may not seem obvious to us, but it seemed obvious to me that that’s where I should go.
Speaker: 0
00:57
So I had lots of, you know I I headed for the hills out of New York, you know, forty six years ago because I thought I was taking a vow of anonymity and poverty to do this stuff. And I’ve lived in the same house that I’ve lived in since there, in the same bedroom for forty six years in this tiny tyler village in in New Hampshire.
Speaker: 0
01:14
And when the film was nominated for an Academy Award, that was a film called Brooklyn Bridge, everybody said, oh, you’re coming back to New York, you’re going to LA. And I said, you know, I’m staying here. It’s so labor intensive. And I I can sit here in front of you and tell you that every single one of my films is a director’s cut.
Speaker: 0
01:32
I’m not gonna sit here and give you an excuse. Well, that one, they they wouldn’t let me do this, or they didn’t give me this amount of time. And so I I could, with the reputation I have, go into a streaming service or a premium cable and say, I need $30,000,000 to do a history of the Vietnam War, and they give it to me.
Speaker: 0
01:48
Well, they wouldn’t they wouldn’t give me the ten and a half years it took me to take. Oh. You see what I mean?
Speaker: 1
01:53
It’s the time.
Speaker: 0
01:54
It’s the time and the ability to marinate the ideas, to do the deep dive into the scholarship, to triangulate the various scholarships sai you know better than anybody. There’s lots of different viewpoints and perspectives, and you wanna find a way in which you can kind of if if not average them out, you can find a way in which you can understand them and you can have a a conversation, a a sort of a campfire around which you can discuss the complexity and the undertow of any subject.
Speaker: 0
02:22
You pick it, the Brooklyn Bridge, the American Revolution most recently.
Speaker: 1
02:25
Yeah. How early on did you realize that the only way to get this, like, full autonomy was to to to do with PBS?
Speaker: 0
02:35
Ai like to attribute some consciousness to it, and I honestly can’t do it. I I realized that I was striking out ai to raise funds from folks. And the people who were interested in helping me, like the National Endowment for the, Humanities or this all required me to give it for free, as I still do, to PBS.
Speaker: 0
02:54
And we’ve had foundations and and that. And so suddenly that dream of being a filmmaker, which I’d had since 12, I wanted to be a filmmaker at 12, of of the communion of of strangers in dark rooms, the cinematic experiences. Suddenly, I had to go, you know what? It’s okay. I’m trading hundreds or maybe thousands of viewers for millions of viewers on a smaller screen, and they’re not watching it together, but they’re they’re having an experience, and I can I can do something over time?
Speaker: 0
03:21
I can do a civil war series and it can be eleven and a half, twelve hours and get deep, deep into that experience. Or Vietnam, which is eighteen hours, 10 episodes, or country music, the national parks, jazz, baseball. I mean, there are, like, 40 different different things.
Speaker: 1
03:36
American Buffalo?
Speaker: 0
03:37
American Buffalo. Most most recently, ai Leonardo da Vinci, the non American topic or just finishing the American Revolution is just it was right for me. It’s it was right for meh. And I like the fact that they have PBS has one foot in the marketplace and the and and the other out.
Speaker: 0
03:55
You know, the that foot is tentatively there. And so it also reaches all parts of the country. It’s the largest network in the country. It’s 330 stations, and they really serve rural stations mostly. It’s not this Upper West Ai, Nob Hill, snobby
Speaker: 1
04:11
kind
Speaker: 0
04:12
of thing. It’s homeland security and crop reports and weather and continuing education and classroom of the air as well as children’s programming and what I think is a pretty damn good ai time schedule. You know? So it it it works in the context of all of America, not just some of America.
Speaker: 1
04:31
So this is sort of a fortuitous sort of a thing that you came to be
Speaker: 0
04:36
I think so. I mean
Speaker: 1
04:36
cooperative with them?
Speaker: 0
04:37
The filmmaking thing was born in tragedy. My mom got cancer when I was two years old. There’s never a moment when she wasn’t dying that I was aware. She died when I was 11, a few months short of my my twelfth birthday. And, my dad had a pretty tough curfew for my younger brother and me, but he forgave it if there was a movie on TV that might go tyler 1AM on a school ai, a school night.
Speaker: 0
05:01
Or he’d take me out to the, you know, the cinnamon speak, ai, old silence or French new wave that was happening in in the mid sixties. And I saw my dad cry for the time. He didn’t cry when she was ai. Didn’t cry when she died. Didn’t cry at this impossibly sad funeral.
Speaker: 0
05:17
But we’re watching this movie called Odd Man Out by sai Carol Reid, about the Irish troubles in the 1910 nineteen teens and twenties. James Mason, you know, very tragic. And and I saw him cry, and I got it immediately. I just that provided him with this safe haven to express himself in a way nothing in his ai, for whatever reasons, for his own psychology, his own history, his own traumas, his own whatever it is, it didn’t and I ai, that’s what I wanna do.
Speaker: 0
05:46
And it and it wasn’t about sentimentality or nostalgia. It was about authentic emotional stuff, higher emotional stuff. The way our founders would talk about, we’d be able to create a republic where you’d have higher emotions. Nothing sentimental about it. It’s it’s that you would just get closer, be more virtuous.
Speaker: 0
06:05
And so I I said and that meant, you know, I was gonna be Alfred Hitchcock or John Ford or Howard Hawks, you know, big Hollywood directors. And I went to Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, which was a brand new experimental school. Came in its year in 1971, and all of the teachers there were social meh still photographers and filmmakers.
Speaker: 0
06:26
And they reminded me correctly that there is as much drama in what is and what was as anything the human imagination makes up. Right? Mhmm. And so fiction’s fine, but all of a bryden, my molecules are rearranged again. I’m no longer just a filmmaker going to hopefully go to Hollywood.
Speaker: 0
06:43
I’m now a documentary filmmaker, and all of that merged with this latent, Joe, I I don’t know how to describe it, love of my country and its history. I mean, where everybody else growing up were reading novels and and stuff like that. I was reading encyclopedias and reading histories and trying to get at some aspect of who we are.
Speaker: 0
07:03
And I think every single film that I’ve made has asked the same question. Who are we? Who are those strange and complicated people who like to call themselves Americans? And what does an investigation of the past tell us about not only where we’ve been, but where we are and where we may be going, which is the great gift of history.
Speaker: 0
07:22
It’s the best teacher we have it, as you know.
Speaker: 1
07:26
One of the more fascinating things about documentary work and particularly your work is it provides this entertainment pathway to education, where it’s engrossing and gripping and fascinating, and it’s really well edited, and there’s music, and there’s recreations of these scenes, and it makes becoming educated fascinating.
Speaker: 0
07:52
Yes.
Speaker: 1
07:52
It it makes it ai, where instead of the stale, boring classrooms a lot of children face, if they could be exposed to something like your piece on Vietnam
Speaker: 0
08:03
Right.
Speaker: 1
08:03
Was it eighteen hours?
Speaker: 0
08:04
Eighteen hours. 10 to 10 episodes. Yeah.
Speaker: 1
08:06
I mean, that that piece on Vietnam is so fascinating. It’s it’s so incredible. And to to see those the people that survived it express some like, there’s this one moment where one of the guys is realizing that they’re about and he it’s just the very simple statement he goes, okay.
Speaker: 1
08:24
Here we go. We’re going to war. And you could see it in his face, him recalling that. And you’re like, you don’t get that from the written word, seeing that man’s face, him recounting it.
Speaker: 0
08:36
And you don’t get it from churning it out either. So I spent five and a half years working on the civil war, and I really was, like, daunted by it. But the all of the five or six films that I’ve made, the Brooklyn Bridge, wouldn’t have been built without this new metal called steel, which the the civil war helped to promote the use of.
Speaker: 0
08:55
The film on the celibate religious sect, the shakers, wouldn’t have declined so precipitously, not because they were celibate. Celibate celibacy exists in lots of religious traditions, but because a country that had just murdered 650,000 of its own people was not interested after the civil war in the questions of the soul survival in the in the, intensity that it had before the civil war.
Speaker: 0
09:18
Next film I made was on the Statue Of Liberty, and it was originally a gift from the French to missus Lincoln to commemorate the survival of the union despite her husband’s ultimate sacrifice. Next film was on Huey Long, the turbulent southern demagogue. He came from a North Louisiana parish that refused to secede from the Confederacy.
Speaker: 0
09:36
I mean, refused to secede from the union. They saw the Confederacy, the ownership of slaves, as as a as a rich man’s cause. And so they became a hotbed of kind of radicalism and populism and later would spawn this swamp thing called Huey Long. You know, we made a film in the history of the congress. Obviously, the most important time in the congress was when, you know, there were two congresses.
Speaker: 0
09:58
One in in in, Washington, obviously. One in Montgomery and then later Richmond. And so I began to see the centrality. And after the civil war was done, and it was really just brought to life by those voices of the people that what you’re talking about, well, well, here we go.
Speaker: 0
10:13
You’re like Yeah. We didn’t sana do another film on war. The ai, both north and south, who’d been in it, who said, here we go, were they said they’d seen the elephant. That’s how they described it. They said they’d seen the elephant. I assume it was the most exotic thing they could think of.
Speaker: 0
10:31
That’s what combat was, something that no one else experiences, Seeing the elephant. And we just even removed from it, we’re just looking at still photographs, still got us to our core. And we just sort of said, we’re not gonna do any more war films. And then at the end of the nineties, the civil war came out in 1990.
Speaker: 0
10:47
The end of the nineties, we were working on lots of things, baseball and jazz and biographies on Frank Lloyd Wright, Lewis and Clark, and and Mark Twain, and all sorts of stuff, Jack Johnson later on. I heard that lots of graduating seniors, high school students walking off the podium with a diploma, Think we fought with the Germans against the Russians in the second World War.
Speaker: 0
11:07
And that a thousand veterans American veterans of the second World War were dying each day in Meh. And I was like, fuck. You know? We’re losing them. And and ai the way, that figure today is so small. It’s just actuarially true that it’s not a thousand anymore.
Speaker: 0
11:27
It’s maybe five or six today, and pretty soon it will be nobody. And there will be no meh, and so I wanted to make a film about that. Before the ink was die dry on the World War two film, I said we’re doing Vietnam. And before the ink was dry, meaning we’re locking it and we’re mixing it and doing all the stuff we have to do, Ten and a half years on Vietnam.
Speaker: 0
11:49
It came out in in September of seventeen. In in December of fifteen, Barack Obama still has thirteen months left in his presidency. I said we’re doing the revolution. And I am now speaking to you where we are almost done with it. We’re still mixing. We’re still mastering. We’re still ai Wow. Some stuff.
Speaker: 0
12:09
But what it allowed us to do in all of the cases of all the war is get exactly at that thing that you’re talking about. What is what actually takes place in war? What is this thing? Like, life is vivified to a to an extent that we can’t describe. Like, our imminent death right now as we speak is not a possibility. But if we’re on the front lines, it is at any moment. And life is vivified.
Speaker: 0
12:36
We understand why people come home and can’t compartmentalize it. We understand why people have problems. We’re amazed at the people who who don’t. It obviously brings out the worst. We’re the most dangerous species on this planet, clearly. But it brings out the best. Right? And it and it’s it’s worth pursuing.
Speaker: 0
12:56
And I think particularly when you take most recently, we speak so many years studying the American Revolution. We we kind of accept the violence of the Civil War. We accept the violence of the century wars. But this American Revolution, you know, they’re in breeches, and they’re in in in in stockings, and they have wigs, and the ideas are too important.
Speaker: 0
13:18
We don’t wanna admit that this was as bloody per capita as our civil war, that it was in fact a civil war in ways that even our civil war wasn’t. Our civil war was a sectional war, north and south, and that we were forged in ai. And it’s okay. Those ideas, those big ideas that we seemingly wanna protect ai, like, putting in a bug in amber, you know, guys in Philadelphia thinking great thoughts, It doesn’t in any way get diminished.
Speaker: 0
13:46
In fact, it it enlarges. It makes them more inspiring and more exhilarating. The understanding that what happened when our country was formed is one of the most important events in the entire history of humankind. I mean, you and I were talking about some of the punctuated equilibriums of comets or meteors or striking this, you know, ice ages.
Speaker: 0
14:07
I mean, the Ecclesiastes, the old testament sai there’s nothing new under the sun. There will and I agree with that. Human nature doesn’t change. But for a few minutes, right here, we started something that was brand new. Thomas Paine sai, do it ai, not since the time of Noah do we have a chance to to do this.
Speaker: 0
14:24
And so we’ve just plowed ourselves into hearing not just those top down voices, the bold faced names that we all know, the Washingtons and the Thomas Banes and the Jeffersons and the and the, John Adams, but also the people you’ve never heard of. Right? Point 01% of people have a painting made of them or a drawing.
Speaker: 0
14:44
Everybody else is visually anonymous, but somewhere they wrote their name down, somewhere they’re in a church record, somewhere they’re here, somewhere they wrote a memoir and they’re got handed down. And so we could bring to life a 14 year old kid who joins, the militia surrounding the British in Cambridge after Lexington and Concord, a 15 year old who is from Connecticut who fights during the war, a a 10 year old girl who’s, you know, from 10 to 16, from Yorktown, who’s a refugee for most of the time as her family’s well-to-do circumstances are diminished as she has to be on the road because Yorktown is so vulnerable to attack from British in addition to all of this.
Speaker: 0
15:23
And who are the native players? Who are the black players? Who are the four the the Germans, the hired soldiers? You know, they’re real people. Who are the Irish and Scottish and Welsh, grunts of the British arya? Who are the generals? Who are the the the diplomats? Who are the French?
Speaker: 0
15:41
And and and then if you charge yourself with that, you can’t turn that out in in a year and a half. You have to spend a decade marinating that stuff, finding out what’s too meh. You know, you don’t wanna make an encyclopedia. Well, I mean, you started off by talking about entertainment, that that that you could make something that is, you know, technically educational, entertaining, this is a good story.
Speaker: 0
16:06
I mean, the word history is mostly made up of the word story plus high, which is really which is a really good way to begin a story. Right? Yeah. Sai. And then we begin the thing. And so I’ve tried to treat it as that way.
Speaker: 0
16:18
I understand, and PBS is really good, and one of the reasons to stay with them is that they can reach every classroom in the country. So today’s a school day in America, and hundreds of classrooms are showing a little bit of the civil war, a little bit of baseball, a little bit of jazz, Lewis and Clark, the Roosevelts, country music, you name it.
Speaker: 0
16:34
Yeah. And I love that idea that it isn’t ai broadcast television or even just the release of anything ai Skywriting, the breeze and and then all of a sudden, you can’t see the words anymore. I like the fact that a film I made thirty five years ago in the civil war is, like, as durable now as it was then. That’s all PBS.
Speaker: 1
16:52
That’s amazing. It’s it really is. And and it is so cool that they do show these in classrooms because I think that same moment where you had where you saw your father cry, where it gave him some sort of a vehicle to express emotions that he couldn’t show in real life, this will give children a way to be educated, but also entertained, and it will spark this sort of it it gives them a pathway to may maybe children that are, like, very bored with school and just can’t wait to get out.
Speaker: 1
17:24
All of a sudden, you have this spark of excitement and a pathway to, like, maybe education is cool. Like, maybe there’s something about this that’s actually fun.
Speaker: 0
17:34
Exactly.
Speaker: 1
17:35
This episode is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. Speed dating is an interesting concept, isn’t it? Setting an allotted amount of time to get to know as many people as you can. It increases your chances of finding a good match, and there’s not a whole lot of room for bullshit.
Speaker: 1
17:49
You have to cut to the chase to find what you’re looking for. Wouldn’t it be nice if you had something like that when it comes to hiring for your business? Well, good news. There’s ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter has a new ZipIntro feature that helps speed up the hiring process, connecting you with qualified candidates faster. You can try it for free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.
Speaker: 1
18:15
As soon as you post your job, ZipIntro will get to work. You could even be talking to candidates in back to back calls the very next day. All you have to do is pick a ai, and it’ll start scheduling top talent for you to meet. Enjoy the benefits of speed hiring with the new ZipIntro feature only from ZipRecruiter, rated the number one hiring site based on g two. Try ZipIntro for free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.
Speaker: 1
18:46
Again, that’s ziprecruiter.com/rogan. Zip intro post jobs today, talk to qualified candidates tomorrow.
Speaker: 0
18:56
Exactly. And we have meh a lot of what is fun about it. We’ve we’ve sort of taken history out. We’ve taken civics out. We don’t know about ethics. We don’t know about values. We’ve we’ve placed everything over into one sort of set of educational prerogatives forgetting that you wanna build, as our founders said, these well rounded citizens. Remember, we invented that.
Speaker: 0
19:17
Everybody up into the point of of our revolution were subjects. Right? Mhmm. And Jefferson says a few phrases, beyond the famous sentence. He goes, all experience has shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer ai evils are sufferable. Meaning, the whole history of human beings is like, okay.
Speaker: 0
19:38
I’m gonna be under the boot of an authoritarian. I just you know, that’s my lot. I’m just gonna accept it. Yeah. And he’s going, no.
Speaker: 0
19:44
Central to the success of this new thing you were creating, citizens, was the responsibility to educate and to be educated and to do that your lifelong. In fact, he could have said Jefferson could have said life, liberty, and property. He didn’t. He said the pursuit of happiness. Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
20:03
That was not the the chasing of objects, things in a marketplace of objects, but it was ai learning in a marketplace of ideas. It was making the story of how we ai virtue, and they use that word all the time. They imported it from the classical. They went over the dark ages, over the middle ages, over the medieval period, and pulled back from classical times this idea of virtue, of temperance, of tolerance, and all of that.
Speaker: 0
20:31
There’s a wonderful moment when John Adams, who’s the big worrier of the revolution, he’s always worrying. He’s saying, I just don’t know if there’s if there’s enough virtue to have a republic. Everybody is so ambitious and and so greedy and so out to do this. And so for him, if we were gonna create this new thing, something new under the sun, you know, the world started over again, as Thomas Paine is suggesting, an asylum for mankind, he called it, then maybe you had to figure out how to educate your stuff.
Speaker: 0
21:05
And so when you go back and say, what have we lost? Whether we’re just we’re now just repeating are we trying to get to the test? Are we trying to make a well rounded human being? So if I tell you, in 1838, there is this lawyer in Springfield, Illinois who is just a few days short of his 20 birthday, who is addressing the young men’s Ai on an afternoon.
Speaker: 0
21:29
And the topic is foreign policy. And he says, when shall we expect the approach of danger? Shall some transatlantic giant step the earth and crush us with a blow? Then he answered his own question. Never.
Speaker: 0
21:43
All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa could not ai force take a drink from the Ohio River ram make a track in the Blue Ridge in the trial of a thousand years. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of free men, we shall live through all time or die by suicide. Woah.
Speaker: 0
22:04
You know who said that? That’s Abraham Lincoln. He would come the closest to overseeing our near national suicide in the civil war. But he understood, here you got these two magnificent oceans, big, relatively benign neighbors, north and south. And so what we’ve been able to do is incubate so many extraordinary things, but we’ve also been able to incubate lots of less than extraordinary things.
Speaker: 0
22:28
And he was saying it’s those less than extraordinary things are gonna trip us up or we’ll live forever. Mhmm. Because if you think about it, the greatest naval invasion in history, you know, 06/06/1944, d day, Normandy, nobody can do that for us. Nobody’s gonna land at Montauk.
Speaker: 0
22:49
Nobody’s gonna land at, you know, Sai Augustine. Nobody’s gonna land at Galveston and and help us. Right? We’ll sink or swim by the extent to which we are knowledgeable of and adhere to the blessings that we received from that founding generation. The sacrifice made not by those bold faced names, but by the people that you’ve never heard of that we are trying to to tell you about the John Greenwood, the 14 year old Pfeiffer, Joseph Blum Martin, the 15 year old kid from Connecticut, Betsy Tyler, you know, loyalists too.
Speaker: 0
23:24
I mean, we’re we’re we’re umpires, Joe. We we we call balls and strikes. You know what? Being be a loyalist in the revolution is is what what it’d be like saying, well, you’re conservative. Right?
Speaker: 0
23:33
Well, you you you think I I live under the greatest, political system, the British constitutional monarchy. Why would I wanna change this great life, this great prosperity I have for this idea that, a, sounds foolhardy and radical, but also, b, has zero chance of working out.
Speaker: 0
23:51
Zero chance of working out. Right? At Lexington, two hundred and fifty years ago on April 19, the chances of the Patriots prevailing are zero. And to tell the story of how it went from zero to 100% is scary, violent, complicated, lots of undertow, and as exhilarating as you could possibly imagine.
Speaker: 1
24:19
There’s a great line in the, trailer for this piece on the revolutionary war. We sai it’s the war that was fought in history for the unalienable rights.
Speaker: 0
24:31
Proclaiming the unalienable rights of all people. Now let’s let’s be honest. Thomas Jefferson meant all white men of property free of debt. But the words are beautiful, the words are vague, and the door got opened to ram, and everybody else put their foot in it. Women put their foot in it.
Speaker: 0
24:47
The poor, the not landed people, the folks the craftsman who just had a regular job, black people, native you know, so and it it has sponsored revolutions all around the world, democratic revolutions that the greatest thing that we invented was the idea that we could govern ourselves, that we have no longer be under the boot of a an authoritarian master who had just set himself up ai King George, you know, because of hereditary privilege, you know, his his grandfather and his grandfather and his father and his uncle and going back.
Speaker: 0
25:21
And and and on what basis? Is it talent? Is it is it, showing the things? And so all of these people that we consider the bold faced names of our of our revolution, the Washingtons and the Jeffersons and the Patrick Henrys and the John Adams and the they didn’t know they were those people.
Speaker: 0
25:41
Mhmm. Ai? They didn’t know that. They were a planter and they were a businessman and they were a lawyer and they were this guy and a planter or a ai. And they were just risking their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor for something much bigger than anything else.
Speaker: 1
25:58
And it’s also the incredibly complex system of checks and balances that they divide to prevent tyranny.
Speaker: 0
26:05
Oh, it’s so unbelievably beautiful. I can’t believe you brought that up. So we have a a technical problem, which I’ll share with you, or I thought it was a technical problem, which is the ai, if you’re making a film called the American Revolution, the climax is the Vatsal of Yorktown.
Speaker: 0
26:19
Happens in October of seventeen eighty one. The British don’t leave New York in for two more years until 1783. They’re occupying New York, which they took over in the summer of seventy sai. And our articles of convention are doing nothing. Our articles of confederation are doing nothing.
Speaker: 0
26:38
They’re toothless. They can’t be a government. And so in 1787, we have this constitutional convention that happens in Philadelphia, four months. They hammered together the shortest constitution in the world, and it is exactly that. Jefferson’s writing in to from Paris who representing our interests going, but what about this?
Speaker: 0
26:57
What about they’re trying to check the possibility of somebody being, somebody who would try to take advantage of the system and and rig it to their own benefit. And so all of those elaborately beautiful checks and balances, arya one is the legislative. Article two is the executive. It delineates article three, the judicial.
Speaker: 0
27:19
It delineates what the responsibilities are arya the way in which the system has worked and fits and starts with lots of problems. And and and, you know, there’s something encouraging about seeing how divided Americans were back then because we’re always wringing our hands. Oh, we’re so divided. Okay.
Speaker: 0
27:36
Human beings are ai. And and my my feeling is that if you succumb to argument, right, which is what we do. The novelist Richard Powers sai, the best arguments in the world, and that’s all we do is argue. The best arguments in the world won’t change a single person’s point of view.
Speaker: 0
27:54
The only thing that can do that, that is to say change somebody’s point of view, is a good story. Because a good story allows contradiction and undertow. You can have a George Washington who is complex, flawed, rash, makes terrible tactical decisions on the battlefield, and yet without him, historian after historian after historian says without him, we don’t have a country.
Speaker: 0
28:19
And you can take that and put that in the bag. And at the same time, understand the dimensions of we all have feet of clay. We’re all flawed in in some way. And to to try to design a narrative that isn’t, you know, filled with that kind of mourning and again sanitized Madison Avenue kind of view of American history, nor is it that unforgiving revisionism that wants to throw out anybody who did something bad back then.
Speaker: 0
28:47
You you then permit a world to exist in which they suddenly seem familiar to you. Like, you can argue with other people and see that you get nowhere. But you also know if you’re married or you have kids or you have friends or you’re in business that you actually are more engaged in story and tolerance and understanding and listening.
Speaker: 0
29:08
And so part of our job as filmmakers, strangely enough, is not to impose ourselves on the material. As I said before, we’re umpires calling balls and strikes. It’s to listen to the material. What it what is it telling us? What is it saying about this circumstances of, say, the resistance in Boston in the early days leading up to the revolution? To try to understand nuance.
Speaker: 0
29:34
Every school kid knows that when the 60 or 70 people, ai, all white males, both rich and poor in Boston dumped its 40 tons of tea, 40 tons of tea in the harbor, they were dressed crudely as Native Americans. And if you ask a kid, why were they dressed that way? Well, you know, just to ai, to put the blame on somebody else.
Speaker: 0
29:56
It was to say, we’re not part of the mother country anymore. Really? We’re we’re here. We’re Aboriginal. We are Americans. We are distinct.
Speaker: 0
30:06
We’ve been having complaints about British citizenship. We’re arguing British law. But all of a bryden, those laws have been broken out into natural laws. And we’re telling you that we’re not trying to blame it on anyone else. Nobody would for a have thought that the Native Americans would have dumped the tea.
Speaker: 0
30:23
They they weren’t burdened by the tea tax. What they were doing was saying, we are and it’s so ironic given the history of our relationship to the dispossession of native lands. Right. They are saying we are Aboriginal. This is what the scholar, for Doloria says. So yeah. Wow.
Speaker: 1
30:40
And then you get adopted Aboriginal.
Speaker: 0
30:43
Right. We’re saying we’re not of the mother country. We’re we’re, in essence, kind of filing divorce papers by dressing as the people who originally inhabited this country dressed. Nobody’s fooled. Nobody’s ai
Speaker: 1
30:57
to figure that out.
Speaker: 0
30:58
It it it it’s listening to scholarship. It’s thinking, of course, that you’re not going to have, no one in the in the right mind is gonna say, oh, the Native Americans did it because they’re protesting the t tax. They’re not paying the t tax. Right? Right. So it’s like it’s you then go and then you talk to a scholar, in this case, Phil Deloria, who’s been studying native stuff, and he goes, just think about it.
Speaker: 0
31:21
You’re dressed crudely as this. You’re making a statement to Britain that we are no longer we’re we’re severing ties. Now this is well before this is, December of seventeen seventy three. The guns are gonna fire in about eighteen months at Lexington, a little bit less than eighteen months at Lexington And Concord on April 19.
Speaker: 0
31:42
But it’s it is all of these little moments that that lead up to boycott of British goods. Women take a huge part of the role of the resistance. You’ve got people like Samuel Adams who is a failure as a brewer and a tax collector. It’s sort of interesting. You can’t make this shit up.
Speaker: 0
32:00
Who is his whole job is to keep his fellow colonists alive to their grievances. When things calm down, the Brit Brits sort of retreat. He goes, oh, no. No. No. It’s just gonna get worse. It’s gonna get worse.
Speaker: 0
32:11
And so you meh these characters that sound an awful lot like characters that occupy our large media speak, and it was occupying the large media space of the colonists from New Hampshire. I live in a tiny village. The Walpole Gazette was read all the way in Georgia. People exchanged ideas and thought about things and were trying to figure out even as late as the even after even after Lexington conquered, even after the Battle of Bunker Hill, which is June of seventy five, even after the other things that were happening, by early seventy six, nobody’s absolutely not nobody, but there’s not a majority will for independence.
Speaker: 0
32:51
Independency sai they called it. And then Thomas Paine comes in and writes this pamphlet, common sense. And all of a sudden people are going, oh, yeah. And by June, there’s a committee of the saloni continental congress, and Franklin’s in charge of it, and there’s John Adams is on the committee, and there’s a 32 year old lawyer from Virginia named Thomas Jefferson who’s given the crack at at at doing this thing.
Speaker: 0
33:15
And what does he write? He writes, we hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable. And Franklin, who’s the old man, the chairman of you will of this little committee goes, uh-uh. We hold these truths to be self evident. Joe, there is nothing in the world less self evident than the idea that all men are created equal, that they’re endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Speaker: 0
33:42
But as someone pointed out, it’s the old lawyer’s dodge. You know, you just you just tell them that it’s self evident, not just sacred and undeniable lovely phrasing on Jefferson’s part. But if you say self evident, then we’re not arguing about this thing. We’re saying that everything that you’re about to hear is without argument, which is a, like, really in your face bold move.
Speaker: 0
34:04
And the intimacy, the human intimacy that gets communicated when you spend even a little amount of time trying to parse this, trying to get at the heart of the dynamics of dumping tea and dressed as Indians or writing these words, you know, that mankind are disposed to suffer ai evils are suffer sufferable, meaning, yeah, we’ve taken it, all this through human history, and guess what?
Speaker: 0
34:30
We’re not gonna take it anymore. When
Speaker: 1
34:33
they devised this system of government, what what were they basing it on? I know part of it was on the Greeks. But, like, what was the how did they make it to the point where even today, we marvel at it?
Speaker: 0
34:46
Yeah. We Two hundred
Speaker: 1
34:47
and fifty years later, people go back and, like, look what they did. This
Speaker: 0
34:50
is extraordinary. It’s extraordinary. So lots of factors. of all, it was true when I said they’re they have experienced at a at a at a reserve and at sort of, as somebody said, salutary neglect. People didn’t pay attention to the colonists. And they had learned suddenly they were more literate than their British compatriots.
Speaker: 0
35:11
They paid less taxes, and they paid it to local stuff, and they were, had land. And, most folks in England and Wales and Scotland and Ireland were living dependent lives. They’d worked the land of somebody else for a thousand years. So they’ve got this British constitutional monarchy, which is a really strong thing, and King George is not a bad guy.
Speaker: 0
35:31
He really does believe that parliament has this role to play in the House of Lords and the House of Arya. They’re they’re they’re kind of the checks and balances that we’d think of. But they’re also in the middle of the ai, where they’re beginning to say that there are certain rights that are natural.
Speaker: 0
35:49
That’s the word that I think Jefferson would use. That is to say, they arya not bestowed by a monarch. They’re natural that all men are created equal. This is big stuff. And this is distilling, in Jefferson’s words in the declaration, a century of enlightenment thinking.
Speaker: 0
36:05
And the enlightenment has been a kind of philosophical and human and kind of governmental dynamic that’s coming out of the Renaissance. Right? We know what the Renaissance is in arya, Leonardo da Vinci, Bernini, you know, all of this stuff, some music, But but what it’s doing on a social scene is it’s and a philosophical scene is is doing that.
Speaker: 0
36:25
And they’re reaching back to antiquity as you sai, and they’re pulling back some of the best ideas of of self discipline, of of temperance, of virtue, all of these sorts of things. But then because they’ve experienced all these years of this misuse and distrust from the mother country 3,000 miles away takes, you know, at least a month for information to get there.
Speaker: 0
36:47
The the Bryden wins with our help, what we call the French and Indian War, which was a global war called the Seven Years War. And they’ve got now the far the biggest, most far flung empire on Earth, but they can’t protect its own colonists who are trying to pour over the Appalachians to take Native American land, and it’s causing uprisings.
Speaker: 0
37:09
And so they sai, you can’t go over 1763. You can’t go over that. And, oh, by the way, we’re broke, so we need you to help us pay for this stuff. But we don’t have any representation there. So native lands, taxation, representation become this thing, and it goes on for so long.
Speaker: 0
37:26
They’ve watched the ineffectiveness of their government while they’re prosecuting the revolution and the ineffectiveness of the articles of confederation that emerges from fighting the war and is trying to figure out how to make it work, that they go into that constitutional convention and they are determined to figure out every possible angle to forestall authoritarianism, to balance their relationships between the states, to have the checks and balances between the three forms of of government, the judicial, the legislative, and the executive.
Speaker: 0
37:59
It it is a beautiful thing. And what was so incredible is that it fostered one of the greatest public debates ever in human history because they had emerged from this bloody, bloody, costly civil war. Civil war means lots of deaths of civilians. That didn’t happen in our civil war except in Missouri and and a little bit of Kansas.
Speaker: 0
38:21
You know, six people died at the siege of Vicksburg, less than 20 at Atlanta, two in Gettysburg, the greatest battle ever fought in in North America. But the American Revolution, lots of their battles in the South in which you might have one British officer leading loyalist troops.
Speaker: 0
38:37
Every person on each side is an American and they’re killing each other. And they’re doing it not just in set battles, but in little guerrilla actions, almost like the Vietcong attacking patrols in in South Vietnam. I mean, it is really bad stuff. And so they say, we’re gonna ratify this, but we want a bill of rights too.
Speaker: 0
38:57
We want to enshrine these things that we fought for. And so you have no establishment of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom to assemble and and and redress grievances, right to bear arms, you know, free and fair trial, end of cruel and unusual punishment.
Speaker: 0
39:17
All these things become the set pieces of I made a film a couple years ago on, The US and the Holocaust. What we knew, when we knew it, what we did, what we didn’t do, what we perhaps what we should have done. And I was at some event, and somebody raised their hand and said, is the holocaust the most important event since the birth of Jesus Christ in world history?
Speaker: 0
39:39
And I just immediately said, no. It’s the American Revolution. It’s the American Revolution. I mean, this is a sea change in the course of human events. And meh, we don’t know enough about it. We don’t know enough of the interiors of it that are complicated. I have in my editing room a neon sign.
Speaker: 0
39:58
I’ve had it for a decade and a half in cursive, lowercase cursive. It sai, it’s complicated. You know, because there’s not a filmmaker on Earth that if, you know, if the scene’s working, you don’t touch it. But we have we have spent the last fifty years touching those scenes. Right? You know what I mean? Going in, maybe it’s lesser, but it’s tyler.
Speaker: 0
40:18
And it’s got more ai. It’s got more contours. It feels like it’s accurate to what actually happened, which is more complicated than our sort of simple binary discussions of what history is.
Speaker: 1
40:34
What it’s just it it’s so hard for people to recognize that that was a civil war. Yeah. Because I don’t I think most people think it was The United States colonists against the British. But the separatists and the loyalists battling it out together, I I think most people are completely unaware of that.
Speaker: 0
40:51
Unaware. We we wrote a, for lack of a better word, a topic sentence early in the film is that, ai get this slightly wrong, but the the American Revolution was not just a dispute between Englishmen over Indian land taxation and representation, but a bloody struggle that involved more than two dozen nations, European as well as Native Meh, that somehow came still to represent some of the highest aspirations of humankind.
Speaker: 0
41:21
So so our ours is ai the fourth global war over the ai of North Meh. And they’re and we’re treating native nations not as them, but as distinct entities. The the Shawnee, for example, in the middle of the centuries, seventeen fifty, are as important an entity on the world trading stage with French or British or others as, say, the state of Virginia or the colony of Virginia is at that time.
Speaker: 0
41:50
Really? And that they’re different from the Delawares, their ai. And they’re different from the Haudenosaunee, the Iroquois Confederacy, the sai, five, and then it was six tribes, the Seneca, the Cayuga, the Onondaga, the Tuscarora, the Oneida, and the Mohawk. And I’ve just walked from west Western New York State all the way into New England, right, and up into Canada.
Speaker: 0
42:13
And they had formed a union of their own that had operated a democracy that had operated for centuries, that had allowed the independence of each of these separate nations, states, and yet yielded to the larger thing when their interests were threatened. Sai, essentially, with regard to foreign policy. And Franklin looks at this and goes, seventeen fifty four, he goes, wow. This is a great idea. We should be doing this.
Speaker: 0
42:42
He’s been the postmaster. He’s he’s the only person who’s been to New Hampshire, and he’s been to to Georgia and all the places in between. He said we should do this. And he calls a conference in Albany, and he’s got a picture of a cut up snake above the dire warning join or ai.
Speaker: 0
42:58
And they pass, seven of the 13 colonies attend, and they pass this thing called the Albany Plan of Union in 1754, and then they go home to try to sell it. And none of the states take it because no one wants to, none of the colonies take it because no one wants to give up their autonomy.
Speaker: 0
43:14
So the plan ai, but twenty years later, join or die is the war cry in the most consequential revolution in in in history. Wow. Isn’t that great? So you’re Amazing. You’re taking the Native American riffing on that, and then as you’re form forming this, you’re bringing in what you’ve had and inherited for decades of centuries of British constitutional monarchy, and you’re borrowing from the meh enlightenment things, and you’ve got biblical references and classical references having to do with the conduct of individuals and personal responsibility.
Speaker: 0
43:45
All of these just utterly Meh, but but also been out there forever, and we end up with what we have, which is this, you know, glorious, wonderful, but also dysfunctional republic.
Speaker: 1
43:59
Yeah. It’s terrible, but it’s the best one out there.
Speaker: 0
44:01
It’s the best one out there. Yeah. That’s exactly right.
Speaker: 1
44:04
When you when you started this project, so you have this idea to start this project, what was your understanding of the revolutionary war, versus what is it like when you really delve into the material and you start to formulate a a plan for this documentary series? Like, how much did you know about it when you started?
Speaker: 0
44:25
I’m pretty well versed in American history, but nothing. I mean, like, I I I’ve I’ve worked on two films where I made the mistake of thinking, I know about this subject, baseball and Vietnam. Because I was a I was grow grew up in the sixties, and I went through it. I lived on a college campus. I knew all the stuff Ai thought.
Speaker: 0
44:42
Was it college as the war was winding down? And I love baseball. Every day of both those productions were daily humiliations of what I didn’t know. Wow. And so what happens is you come in with a humility that I wish to know.
Speaker: 0
44:57
And rather than tell you what I know, the last time I checked, that’s called homework, we would rather share with you our process of discovery. Joe, you cannot believe what we just found out. Can I just meh can I use these these these mugs to tell you how Daniel Morgan won the vatsal of Cowpens against Bannister Tarlton in in in South Carolina just below the North Carolina border, and he trusts to his militia who are unreliable?
Speaker: 0
45:24
Please just fire twice the line of militia, and then you can retreat, then you can run, but please promise me you’re fired twice. And the line of militia, my more in inexperience, please just fire twice and then run behind the line, which are these scraggly kids, teenagers, felons, ne’er do wells, and sons without the chance of, of a, of an inheritance.
Speaker: 0
45:47
Recent immigrants from Ireland and and Germany, and they stop the British. So Tarleton goes, oh, they’re they’re doing what all the militias do. They’re retreating. They’re retreating. They’re retreating.
Speaker: 0
45:58
And then the line comes up and and they go after them and they the the Americans actually attack, which is very rare, an attacking, thing to drive into the British line. Arya gets away, but a huge part of Cornwallis’ army has been diminished. And they’re uttering this war cry that they have, adapted from the Cherokee, from Native American tribes, which is a yell that will reverberate in southern battlefields for decades. Wow.
Speaker: 0
46:27
Wow is right. And, like, I can take I mean, look, there’s Lexington and Concord, and then maybe somebody says Bunker Hill, which is really Breed’s Hill, Bunker Hill too. And then maybe Trenton, he takes over. He ai them on Christmas night. And then maybe some people know that Saratoga is the surrender of an entire British arya that gives the French the confidence to come in on our side and give us the equivalent of $30,000,000,000 plus navy and and soldiers.
Speaker: 0
46:57
And then it’s Yorktown. But there are dozens of battles that we’ll tell you about. Like Germantown is a wonderful thing. The the Battle of Brandywine. What’s the largest battle in the entire the largest vatsal? It’s the Battle of Long Island. George Washington makes a terrible blunder, a tactical blunder.
Speaker: 0
47:15
He leaves his left flank exposed and the British see it and they completely surround him. And then a year later at Brandywine, he leaves his right flank exposed, and they go around. He’s not the greatest tactician, but he is the man of the time. This leadership, this ability to understand subordinate talent, this this this reserve, this kind of confidence.
Speaker: 0
47:37
I mean, you cannot come away from this without extraordinary admiration for this person without whom we don’t have a country. We just literally don’t have a country.
Speaker: 1
47:47
Which is so crazy when you think of ai pivotal figures in human history. There’s this one person, were they not born, were they not in that position at that time, extraordinary circumstances, unusual character.
Speaker: 0
47:59
We have a historian. The only time really in the film that any of our talking heads break the wall you know, we don’t have we don’t have person voices. I mean, we don’t have witnesses. Right. We have hundreds of person voices, but we have some scholars and writers who are on the thing.
Speaker: 0
48:14
And there’s one, Christopher Brown, who just shakes his head. And he goes, like, I’m not a, you know, big fan of the great man theory of history or interpretation of history, but let’s put it this way. I don’t see how The United States survives without Washington’s leadership.
Speaker: 0
48:30
And it’s this wonderful moment in which you go, ai, we don’t have to throw out the heroes in order to do that. More often than not, we sort of elevated these people to a supernatural position that they don’t really necessarily deserve. He deserves it, and yet he’s also deeply flawed feet of clay, as I said. And that’s, to me, what makes a good story.
Speaker: 0
48:53
Like, how is it that he can be tactically so wrong in two extraordinary places? He’s also very rash, Joe. He runs out at Kipps Bay, which is halfway up Manhattan after he’s lost the Vatsal of Long Island. He’s now abandoning, New York, or he’s taking a good number of, of his men up to Harlem.
Speaker: 0
49:10
And at Kipps Bay, which is sort of midtown on the East River, there’s a battle and and we’re just being rolled up. And he comes charging onto the battlefield, and his aids are going crazy, and they’re grabbing the reins of his horse. He’s gonna be killed. If he’s killed, that’s it.
Speaker: 0
49:24
Right? And then later on at the Vatsal of Princeton, and one aide puts his hands over his face thinking, I cannot watch my commander in chief be killed. And in the vatsal of Monmouth Court House in New Jersey, he ai out and just is very present, turns what is a retreat of of of continental soldiers and militiamen into steadying their lines and and basically holding their own against the prime, the elite of the British arya.
Speaker: 0
49:51
And it’s where does that come from? Where who who does that? How did we do and from the very beginning, everybody knew you needed a Virginian. The New Englanders where the war start the war is a is a symphony in three movements. Right?
Speaker: 0
50:07
The the New England is the movement, Vatsal states, and then the Southern states. And there is a sense early on when after Lexington and Concord where we’ve driven the British back into Bryden, and they’ve got ways to get in, but they can’t get out, besides by ship, that we need a real army.
Speaker: 0
50:27
And the army is formed, and it is very obvious from the very start that there could be no other person than George Washington. The New Englanders want a a Virginian. It’s the most populous. It’s the richest state. And they know this person has been around since he’s a 22 year old militia officer who probably fires the shot in the French and Indian War that starts the global conflict that everyone else on Earth calls the seven years war that will set the stage for the American Revolution.
Speaker: 0
50:57
And then he acts bravely in many other situations, and he is denied a commission in the British arya. And he’s like, f you. You know? And then he go and then if and he’s a speculator in Native American land that he doesn’t own. He wants to sell to new colonists.
Speaker: 0
51:14
And when the British put the line of demarcation in 1763 that separates, sai you can’t go over because we can’t afford to protect you, he’s now pissed again. And then he’s still this voice of reason that arrives in Philadelphia just poised and people look to him for leadership.
Speaker: 0
51:31
He’s very good at picking out, you know, that guy He’s got great he’s got great executive, function and great ability to pick subordinates without fear of being overshadowed. One of his great generals, Nathaniel Greene another great general, Benedict Arnold. And we introduced Benedict Arnold in the opening seconds of our our episode.
Speaker: 0
51:51
And it isn’t until you’re a of the way through the and last episode that you go, uh-oh. You know? But he’s a hero at at Quebec City. He’s a hero at the Vatsal of of Saratoga. He’s been painted out of most of the paintings because he became Benedict Arnold. It’s just fascinating.
Speaker: 0
52:08
Ai know that he’s that great Yeah. A general before he becomes Benedict Arnold?
Speaker: 1
52:12
That term, when I was a child, when I was in school, a Benedict Arnold was a traitor.
Speaker: 0
52:17
A traitor.
Speaker: 1
52:18
I think that’s gone now. I think if I brought that up to my children, I said, do you know what a Benedict Arnold is?
Speaker: 0
52:23
Oh, god. They’d they’d say it was a mixture of,
Speaker: 1
52:26
it’s like an Arnold Palmer.
Speaker: 0
52:27
It’s like an Arnold Palmer. It’s a mixture of iced tea and lemonade. Yeah. You know what? That’s so terrifying to me. Weird. Right? And I’m no. It’s it’s what happens when you atrophy this interest in American history, or you think that it could be so simplified that you don’t have to do anything.
Speaker: 0
52:41
I’m that’s my job. I mean, I Ai love it, and I love the fact that we can bring back these things for people, and they can they can experience. And there isn’t a person in the country that’s listening to me now or that we’re going, you know, 35 different cities all around the country talking about this.
Speaker: 0
52:58
We made it for everybody. This is not made for the grader taking American history. The grader making ai. It’s for you. Right. Right.
Speaker: 0
53:07
It’s for anybody who cares about where the country came from and is willing to say, I probably don’t know the full dimensions of this.
Speaker: 1
53:17
It’s probably impossible to teach it in the way that you can vatsal documentary. I think it’s the most effective form of expressing these things. I mean, obviously, there’s some things that can be documented in books, numbers, dates, history, that that would be kind of cumbersome to certain documentaries because it would interfere with the flow of the entertainment aspect of it.
Speaker: 1
53:38
But in terms of absorption, in terms of stimulation and absorption, human beings are much more inclined to take it through one of your long pieces ai the Vietnam one, the eighteen hour piece.
Speaker: 0
53:52
That’s exactly right. I think what happens is that it’s so interesting because we understand as as you’re referencing the power of a book, still the greatest mechanical, invention there is, that it it it can go into some depths, a documentary do. But a documentary can hold lots of different opposing points of view, not make them arguments, but allow people to have different points of view and sort of collect almost like spokes in the wheel.
Speaker: 0
54:16
You wanna get to the hub, that’s the that’s what whatever it is that you’re after. But the wheel is much stronger by all those spokes. And unfortunately, the too often in history or in teaching, we subscribe to one particular theory of history. Right? That it’s gotta be this or it’s gotta be that.
Speaker: 0
54:34
And what we’ve done is we’ve we’ve found the documentary and the storytelling aspects of it hugely, hugely valuable in communicating the complexity of the subject without putting your thumb on the scale and making a political point. Right. We’re just you know, look. I will be totally honest. History doesn’t repeat itself. No event has ever happened ai.
Speaker: 0
54:56
But Mark Twain is supposed to have said, history doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes. If he did say that, he’s exactly right because human nature doesn’t change.
Speaker: 1
55:06
Right.
Speaker: 0
55:06
And so you watch these events. And when we finished working on it, ai I told you, we began this when Barack Obama had a year and a half to go in his presence or a year year and a month to go in his presidency. It’s a totally different world, but and we know that it rhymes. But we never once have concentrated and saying, oh, we’re gonna put our thumb on the scale here.
Speaker: 0
55:26
We want everybody to watch. We have no sai to grind. We’re just, as I’m saying, calling balls and strikes. And when I mean that, it would be like saying, let me tell you about Babe Ruth and Reggie Jackson. They struck out a lot. Thanks thanks so much. Right?
Speaker: 0
55:42
Right? I mean and I’m true I have not told you anything that is not true. Correct? Right.
Speaker: 1
55:47
Sure.
Speaker: 0
55:47
They also hit a hell of a lot of home ones. And so calling balls and strikes is saying that what happens is the way we teach history is the way ESPN does sports highlights. It’s always the home run. Yes. It’s never the guy turned the double play or he doubled some guy off or there was some other thing. It’s always the home run.
Speaker: 0
56:10
And so nobody takes a strike in the in these ai. And what we’re trying to say is, is it better to watch the game Yeah. And see that even Babe Ruth can only come up to bat every nine tyler. And even Babe Ruth fails seven times out of 10. He’s a 300 hitter.
Speaker: 0
56:30
A little bit more than 300 hitter. That’s the great beauty of it. And so I think that we don’t ever now think that he is a failure. We understand that the dynamics of life, the dynamics of this particular game meh that the people who fail seven times out of 10 and do it significantly are in the hall of fame.
Speaker: 0
56:51
I mean, and that’s that’s the beauty of of these storytelling. See, I’m not taking anything away from George Washington by by making it complex. We’re making him human. He’s not he’s not a statue out in the park collecting bird shah. He’s a real breathing human being. He’s one of the richest people in America.
Speaker: 0
57:08
He marries one of the richest people in the Meh America, a widow. He’s and and, like, he’s away. He makes one visit home, I think, to Monticello during the whole I mean, to to to Mount Vernon during the whole war. He’s dedicated to this thing. I mean, he doesn’t have to do this. Right? He’s he’s committed to this project of us.
Speaker: 0
57:30
And that’s the ultimate point I wanna make about not just this film or Vietnam or the all the things we’ve been talking about is that I’ve had the great privilege of making films about The US for nearly fifty years, Joe. But I’ve also made films about us. That is to sai, the lowercase, two letter, plural pronoun, all of the intimacy of us and we and our, and all of the majesty and the complexity and the contradiction and even the controversy of The US.
Speaker: 0
58:01
And that is a privileged space to be operating in, to be having been given the permission to do this for nearly fifty years is is just great. I think I have the best job in the country. And I’m always happy to meet somebody who’s willing to contradict me. But it’s only because you have a chance to work hard at telling the story. I mean, we lock the picture back in January.
Speaker: 0
58:24
That means you’re not gonna do any more work on it. We’ve unlocked it hundreds of times just to make it better. As some historians said, I’m I’m not sure if if you can be that categorical, and then we put in a perhaps. Right? Or you you find out that image isn’t as as stunning as we thought it could be. Could we swap that out? Oh, yeah. That works better than before.
Speaker: 0
58:43
Even after we were done done. And I like the ability that by the time we’re letting it go, it’s like your kids are still, you know, licking the smudge off their face and
Speaker: 1
58:53
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
58:53
You know, making sure that their their hair is is tied up in a nice bow and, you know, have a good day, sweetie. You know?
Speaker: 1
58:59
Yeah. Well, I think that gratitude that you have towards your work and this dedication to truth, Because there’s, one of the problems with problematic historical figures is we tend to use modern ideological perspectives when we describe these people. And, you know, we try to show that we have a a disdain for the way they live their lives and the choices they made in perspective with how we do today.
Speaker: 1
59:32
You know? And the the problem with that is it comes off political or ideological or
Speaker: 0
59:38
Exactly. And you lose
Speaker: 1
59:40
the real understanding of the complexities of history That’s
Speaker: 0
59:43
right.
Speaker: 1
59:43
And of these human beings that lived in a very different time. 1776, even though it’s only three people ago, is a very you know, people lived to be a 103 people ago. So it’s a very different time.
Speaker: 0
59:55
It’s a very different ai, and you make a really, really good point. When you take the judgments of what we know now, you can apply them, and then you end up with what I call that unforgiving revisionism where you throw out some significant people with the bathwater revisionism.
Speaker: 0
01:00:12
But let me just tell you, they all knew slavery was wrong. They all knew it was wrong, and they still did it. And there’s a historian in Annette Gordon Reed who just says, you know, found slavery is foundational to Thomas Jefferson, and he knew all his life it was wrong and said it and wrote about it and tried to put in something to end the slave trade and in the Declaration of Independence, which no no one would have.
Speaker: 0
01:00:33
And she goes, well, how could how could somebody do something they knew was wrong? She goes, well, that’s a question for all of us. And so Jefferson’s neighbor freed all his slaves and urged him do it, and he didn’t, and his cousin freed all his slaves. So there’s there’s already that.
Speaker: 0
01:00:51
The question is, if you are just taking the judgments of today to cancel somebody, you’ve just missed the possibility of getting to know George Washington or getting to know Thomas Jefferson. And if you only do people who are, perfect, you’re either lying about them or you’re you got very few characters. You know? Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:01:15
I meh, because I don’t know about you. I’m not. I presume you’re not. I don’t think you know anybody who’s perfect. I don’t know anybody who’s perfect.
Speaker: 0
01:01:24
And so then it’s ai history becomes, honey, how was your day? You did it doesn’t begin, I back slowly down the driveway avoiding the garbage can at the curb. You know? Unless you get t boned in case that’s exactly the way to do it. You edit human experience and you tolerate the vast experiences that human beings are are are so complex. And it’s the it’s the interest. It was very interesting.
Speaker: 0
01:01:53
We did an update of our baseball series called the inning. And and and being a from New England and being a Red Sox fan, the whole thing was just in disguise to be able to do the Red Sox come back in 02/2004. But we were dealing with the great Atlanta team in in the nineties and the great Joe Torre led Yankees and and then, Sosa and Maguire and then Bonds and then steroids and whatever.
Speaker: 0
01:02:14
At the end of it, we’re really trying to come to something about steroids and try to figure out how to deal with it. And Thomas Boswell, now retired as a great ai for the Washington Post sai, Ai think it’s Keith’s writing about William Shakespeare, who’s a pretty good playwright, said that Shakespeare had negative capability.
Speaker: 0
01:02:37
That means he could hold intention the positive and negative aspects of a character for as long as you possibly could without making that quick and facile and easy judgment that we make all the time in our lives. When the guy cuts us off, we give him the finger, you know, we yell, f you. What whatever that is, we make judgments about it.
Speaker: 0
01:02:55
And Shakespeare had that ability even with the darkest characters, you know, the, Ai and and the, Richard the third, you know, people who are deep and dark. He had negative capability. He sai, that’s what we need to grow in order to understand the steroid era, in order to understand how to to deal with all of that.
Speaker: 0
01:03:16
And I I think that it that in a way, all of us have to kind of grow that negative capability, that ability to distinguish that nobody’s perfect. And that if you if you superimpose this kind of abstract sets of judgment, nobody passes the test. Right. No one passes the test.
Speaker: 1
01:03:34
That sort of performative purity test too, I Ai think it’s a real problem with our current culture where I think this is a sort of a natural progression of an improvement of ai, because we could all agree that society is far more just today than it was in 1776. And we know we’re on this path, but it’s a very bumbling, stumbling
Speaker: 0
01:03:59
Certainly.
Speaker: 1
01:04:00
Fail, figure out why you failed, kind of succeed, but then also
Speaker: 0
01:04:04
Take a few steps back? Yeah.
Speaker: 1
01:04:06
It’s consistent. And I think in this process of this, unfortunately, you have performative virtue.
Speaker: 0
01:04:16
That’s correct.
Speaker: 1
01:04:16
And this is a lot of people that sana tear down statues and throw paint on, you know, paintings and and do things where they’re trying to show that I am better than the people who came before me. And the problem with doing that in regards to history is we don’t learn anything if you’re not truthful.
Speaker: 1
01:04:33
If we don’t give this sort of, like, a really objective analysis of all the factors that were taking place with these extraordinary human beings who were experiencing this thing that was wholly unique on this new continent and with this new idea of forming this experiment in self government that hadn’t existed before.
Speaker: 1
01:04:52
And that you’re gonna you you have to say you have to do it the way you do it. It’s really the only way.
Speaker: 0
01:04:59
I think it’s the only way, and it takes time. And I am very I have to acknowledge that there’s no other place on the dial that dates me, you know, than PBS. Right? Where I have the time to do it. It’s it’s sort of like an NIH grant. Like, here, we’d like you to explore the possible cure to this disease. Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
01:05:18
Can you have it next Thursday? Well, no. You can have it next Thursday. Right. That’s what Hollywood says.
Speaker: 0
01:05:22
I need it out because the other Marvel thing is coming out at the same time. What you need is we sana set you up with a certain set of circumstances that are gonna permit you to have the best possibility of of of doing this. And so we’ve always hit our marks. We’ve always come if if we haven’t been in budget, it’s because we’ve expanded the film, and then I’ve gone out and raised the money.
Speaker: 0
01:05:44
So no one else was responsible for the fact that we decided Vietnam is not gonna be seven episodes. It’s gonna be eight. And, oh, you know what? It’s gonna be ten. And that’s eighteen hours, and that’s, you know, the way the Vietnam and it had to do with listening to the material, understanding how it spoke to us, you know, committing ourselves to recording Vietnamese voices, not just South Vietnamese soldiers and South Vietnamese civilians, but Viet Cong guerrillas, North Vietnamese soldiers, North Vietnamese civilians, as well as the range of Americans.
Speaker: 0
01:06:12
And so one of my favorite scenes is is a North Vietnamese soldier and a Viet Cong soldier and an American all saying exactly the same thing about the same moment in in a battle early battle before there were technically boots on the ground. This was an ai Meh adviser. But they’re they’re all talking about a helicopter flying over this one hedge. And the Viet and the Vietcong guy is behind the hedge.
Speaker: 0
01:06:35
The South Vietnamese officer is is, you know, next to the American guy, and they all have an experience of war that is exactly the same. And I love that. Yeah. I love that.
Speaker: 1
01:06:50
What was your piece?
Speaker: 0
01:06:52
Brooklyn Bridge. I had, Ai started Arya year was this? So it came out. It was broadcast in, ’81 or ’82. Ai been working on it since ’77. I looked 12 years old, and I was trying to sell people the Brooklyn Bridge. And people people people were, you know, telling me, oh, this child is trying to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge. No.
Speaker: 0
01:07:12
And I used to keep these two big thick three wing binders on my desk all filled with rejections for that one film. I mean, literally, hundreds of rejections. But I had read David McCullough’s, The Great Bridge, the epic story of the building of the Brooklyn Bridge. And I went out to my partners.
Speaker: 0
01:07:27
We just founded our con company where called Florentine Films. We were starving. We’d, like, maybe get get a day’s work or two days work a month as cinematographers and sound meh and grips, and we were paying the rent. And that was that. And I said, we’re gonna do this, and I’ll raise all the money.
Speaker: 0
01:07:42
And and I did, and it got I moved up to New Hampshire so I could live on nothing in ’79 and and ’80. And I I both those years, I made less than $2,500. Wow. And, chopped all the wood for my stove, split it, carried it, kept the stoves going. You wake up in the middle of of the night and, you know, 4AM in in February, and and you go, I just heard the heater kick on.
Speaker: 0
01:08:06
I gotta go down and and feed the stove. But when it came out, I got nominated for an Academy Award. And that that was the sign to me that, like, I needed to, I’d hit a fork in the road and, like, Yogi Berra said, you take it. It was to not go back to New York, to not go back to LA, but to say Ai gonna be staying here because this is labor intensive.
Speaker: 0
01:08:29
We’re gonna have to raise grants to do this stuff. I’m not looking for investors. We’re looking for underwriting so that we arya liberated from the suits that would come in and give the notes and say, oh, you need to be less sexy ram more sexy or longer or shorter or more violent or less violent.
Speaker: 0
01:08:45
I can sit here and tell you with a great deal of bryden not just for me, but on behalf of the extraordinary people that work with meh, and some of them have been for fifty years and some of them for thirty years and some of them for forty and, you know, a lot of people that these are director’s cuts, that we haven’t let it go.
Speaker: 0
01:09:04
And they’re the way the country has responded to them, like the Civil War series, still 35 years old. It’s still the highest rated program in the history of public television.
Speaker: 1
01:09:13
That’s incredible. How did you have that clarity of vision as a young man to recognize that working in isolation in a small town was the best option? Because I would imagine if you had aspirations to being a filmmaker when you were younger, the the the call of part of an an enormous organization, you know, ai, being respected by your peers in this enormous ai, that had to be at least somewhat attractive.
Speaker: 1
01:09:44
But how did you have the clarity to realize that that was not the correct path for you?
Speaker: 0
01:09:48
I can’t take credit for it. You know, I went to Hampshire College. My teachers were social documentary still photographers. I had a mentor named Jerome Liebling, and he was so firmly rooted in a kind of you know, another word we’ve been talking about virtue. Another word is honor or honorable that is not engaged, and people don’t really use it in ordinary conversation.
Speaker: 0
01:10:12
He just instilled in all of us, I believe, all of his students, a sense of of honor. So there was this responsibility to follow it through, to work really hard. I mean, I don’t know anybody that works harder than us. You know, we really work seven days a week. We love it. I put my head on the pillow.
Speaker: 0
01:10:29
I wanna know that my girls are okay, my daughters, and I wanna know that I’ve made it feel better. You know, in some way, she Seven days a week. Seven days a week. And it’s not that you can’t take a day off and you can’t do something, but you’re always thinking about this stuff and you wanna make them better.
Speaker: 0
01:10:42
And it was it’s very funny. We’re out in the road and we’re showing the clips and, you know, we’ve seen these clips a gazillion ai. And and I’m talking to Sana Ai, the co director, and and we just look at each other simultaneously and say, gotta get rid of that. We have to change that shot.
Speaker: 0
01:10:56
And so suddenly, we’re working with an editor who happens to be in Paris this semester and the editor that’s in New York, and we’re changing things. And I love the fact that we did that. You know? I’m actually embarrassed that I’m telling you about it because I feel like in some ways I’m advertising the fact that that’s what we do.
Speaker: 0
01:11:14
I’m just trying to say that somewhere along the line, I’ve made the opposite of decision of what was sort of career wise supposed to be what I was supposed to do. In fact, Robert Penn Warren, the the the poet and novelist, told me that he looked at me once and he just said, careerism is death.
Speaker: 0
01:11:34
And I’ve never used the worry word career. I’ve always said my professional life because careerism suggests that you’re that you’re following some sort of rut, and that’s not what I wanted to do. And so ai the
Speaker: 1
01:11:46
mean by rut?
Speaker: 0
01:11:47
By by just, you
Speaker: 1
01:11:48
know A path?
Speaker: 0
01:11:49
A carved path? A carved path that’s already well worn. I mean, look. If you wanna be a doctor or a lawyer, you you gotta follow some well worn paths just by virtue of that. Everybody that I know that’s working in documentary that has been working at it for a long time and makes their living from it have come from completely unique paths.
Speaker: 0
01:12:10
It’s been their own way. And I like the fact that I made this no. I’m not gonna go back to New York. Ai, no. Why would I move to LA?
Speaker: 0
01:12:17
I’m gonna be here in this little town in New Hampshire where any number of Oscar nominations and Grammys and Emmys means zero to the people that I live with. It’s like, did you shovel the lawn the the the walk of the of the lady next door who’s not doing so well? Did you do this?
Speaker: 0
01:12:37
Are you a good neighbor? That’s that’s the stuff that matters, and it’s a good place to raise kids as well. And then the splendid ai. There’s a great tradition, as you know, in American history of the way in which wildness, nature becomes part of the American catechism, that it’s possible, Walt Whitman is saying, that you can worship god more closely in nature than in cathedrals made by man.
Speaker: 0
01:13:04
This is the American catechism of being out in nature, and it it manifests itself in different people who are aware of the power of nature. It the nature reminds you of your insignificance.
Speaker: 1
01:13:16
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:13:17
And and that is in spiriting. This is paradoxical. Right? That’s in spiriting. Even though it you’re feeling insignificant, it’s inspiriting just as the egotist in our midst is diminished by his or her self regard. Right? Right. So anybody who says, I’m this, it’s actually diminished.
Speaker: 0
01:13:36
The person who is humble is humiliated by their atomic insignificance as one person said about Mount Denali in Alaska in the nineteen teens, a a reporter, is actually inspirited by that. And I wish to be inspirited because I think that’s the only condition in which we’re then able to make the kinds of decisions, the creative decisions, the personnel decisions, the sort of the thoughtfulness or to have that regard for not necessarily following the well worn path.
Speaker: 0
01:14:09
It’s just amazing. Does that make sense? It does.
Speaker: 1
01:14:11
It does make sense. It resonates. It it resonates completely. The the natural art of nature, the the the true majesty of experiencing the vastness of the mountains and of the woods and of the it it it humbles you in a way that nothing else does, and it grounds you in a way of recognizing and I I don’t wanna say your insignificance, your relative insignificance, but it puts like, it’s not just you.
Speaker: 1
01:14:45
This whole thing is massive.
Speaker: 0
01:14:47
My best friend And you’re so
Speaker: 1
01:14:48
fortunate to experience Oh,
Speaker: 0
01:14:49
you know how fortunate I feel so grateful, Joe. You know, my best friend once said to me, when we were much, much younger, we’d been friends for more than fifty years, he said, there’s only one center of the universe, and you’re not it. It was a great gift. It was a really great gift.
Speaker: 0
01:15:09
And I don’t know what I was doing or whether I was even doing anything that was inviting it, but he just wanted me to remember Yeah. That there’s no center of the universe.
Speaker: 1
01:15:19
Well, you also get to see the stars too.
Speaker: 0
01:15:21
Yeah. Out there. And that’s another thing. I was thinking, you know, there is that the beauty Emily Dickinson called sunsets and sunrises the far theatricals of day. It’s like a perfect description of it. But when you go out and it’s 10 below zero in my town and I’m up in, a mile and a half out of town, which has five or six street lights, so there’s no glare, and you see the Milky Way and you just you are just what what can you do but just be humbled by the vastness of the universe and how relatively insignificant our lives are?
Speaker: 0
01:16:00
But that in itself compels you, drives you to try to do something that would have not significance, but just would add something. So so I live in a a state. Politics comes through all the time. Everybody’s got a lawn sign. Right? Left, right, center. My lawn sign says love multiplies.
Speaker: 0
01:16:22
It’s the only functioning theory of the entire universe. It is what it’s all about. Right? It doesn’t matter what religion, what philosophy you might subscribe to or not. Thomas Jefferson says in our film, if my neighbor believes in 20 gods or no god at all, it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. Right?
Speaker: 0
01:16:44
Like, we are so religiously intolerant today. Oh, well, I know that if I had been born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, I’d still be a born again Christian. No. You wouldn’t. You’d be a Shiite. You know? I mean, a Sunni. And and you’d be at war with the with the Shiites across the border in Iran. You know?
Speaker: 0
01:17:02
I’m sorry to break the news to you. Yeah. And and that all of them, all the great religions have the same thing in mind. And it’s so that
Speaker: 1
01:17:10
problem that people have with this rigid perspective that they would be so arrogant as to believe that they would be unique in that environment.
Speaker: 0
01:17:17
Right.
Speaker: 1
01:17:18
That that no, I would get it. I would understand it. Like, no. No.
Speaker: 0
01:17:21
You ain’t. That’s crazy. And and who’s to say I mean, what was essential about the founders, particularly Jefferson, is that they were deists. And while they all had their own particular, mostly protestant denominations that they were had come out of. And and I think still, to some extent, in some cases, practice, less so Jefferson, is that they believed that there was a supreme being who was disinterested in the affairs of man and did not distinguish between faith.
Speaker: 0
01:17:53
So that, you know, you see the baseball player who hits a home run and crosses home bryden and looks up and thanks. They never do that when they hit into a, game ending double play in the inning. Right? They don’t say, oh, thank you, Ai, for giving me that. I’ve only seen that once. Pedro Sana had given up a a fairly significant lead, not the entire lead, to the Yankees in in one of those great playoffs.
Speaker: 0
01:18:16
And as he walked off and was pulled by the manager, he walked off and looked up, and I I spoke to him about it. I sai, I’ve never seen anything like that. But this idea that all of our affairs are governed in that way is not what many of the founders believed in, that it is our obligation to lead that virtuous ai.
Speaker: 0
01:18:34
Don’t need to keep bringing you back there. Yes. Moves you closer up the stairway to heaven, up the ray of creation
Speaker: 1
01:18:41
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:18:42
To God. And that that your it’s it’s your movement, not that supreme being’s movement towards you. Oh, let’s make sure that’s a ground root double. Oh, let’s you know, that’s not happening.
Speaker: 1
01:18:54
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:18:54
It is the ongoing chaos of the sequence of events and human nature, and we’ve got to, a, be aware of the sort of incredible current, the force of the current of that human nature, but also the way in which my individuality, my will, the discipline, the virtue that I might be able to have could in some ways be singular and do something significant. Not because of that, but in order to be closer to that higher thing. And that’s where they’re all talking about it, that they want the founders ai emotions.
Speaker: 0
01:19:33
As I said, not sentimentality, not nostalgia. Those are the enemies of anything, but the higher emotion. Sometimes we say that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. What is the difference between that? If you’ve added up all the sum of the parts and it comes here, what’s that?
Speaker: 0
01:19:51
And what it means is that as much as to build a table, to build a bridge arya highway, one and one always has to equal two. The things that matter in our lives are where one and one equals three, where we are able to see something that’s bigger, that something is produced by the collision of two musical notes, by two images in a documentary, by the conversation between two human beings, whatever in which something is possible.
Speaker: 0
01:20:21
I’m interested in whatever energy that creates, and with whom? I mean, you you just don’t know that that person at the convenience store that you just kinda, like, don’t even look and don’t even think about has a life as important as yours. You’re driving on a highway. We’re coming down from Dallas this morning on thirty five, you know, and thousands, thousands of cars going out of the direction.
Speaker: 0
01:20:45
The person in that car is looking, and their life is as full as what I’m seeing out of my eyes. And I know sitting here that you’re seeing something totally different than what I’m seeing, and that that life is as full. And and I think good history, good friendship, good storytelling, good conversation, all have, at its base, the respect for the other point of view, the ability to listen, and that kind of desire to be better.
Speaker: 0
01:21:14
And in our country, we’ve actually got lots of blueprints for it. We got lots of plans. They’re they’re out there. It’s in the declaration. It’s in the constitution.
Speaker: 0
01:21:22
It’s in the bill of rights. It’s here. It’s in that speech. It’s in the, you know, the the Lincoln speak. You know?
Speaker: 0
01:21:27
We’re gonna live forever or die by suicide. Alright? Or then he’s got two speeches, Lincoln does. One’s a message to congress in ’62, what we’d call the State of the Union address, and he says, fellow citizens, we cannot escape history. The fiery trial through which we pass will light us down in honor or dishonor to the latest generation.
Speaker: 0
01:21:48
And then a few seconds later, he goes, the dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. As our case is new, let us think anew.
Speaker: 1
01:21:57
Wow.
Speaker: 0
01:21:57
He’s both those things. Right? Yeah. We cannot escape history and, guess what, the dogmas of the past. He’s in his inaugural, one of the most famous addresses of all time. He’s got old testament righteousness. You know, if if if we have to spend another 500 years drawn with the sword, the blood that is drawn with the lash, meaning fighting to end slavery.
Speaker: 0
01:22:19
We’ll do it. And then he stops very old testament. He stops on a dime and turns to this new testament ending, the peroration, which sai, with malice towards none, with charity for all. You know? And then it it has that kind of unbelievable generosity in it and this ability to say, a ago, I’m willing to keep this going for however long it takes to end this scourge of slavery.
Speaker: 0
01:22:46
That whatever drawn by the lash, drawn by the sword, we will do. It’s just an amazing ability to understand us. And he took he’s the one who reached back over the constitution and plucked Jefferson back into significance. And so when he gives the Gettysburg Address, four score and seven years after the the, eighty seven years after the signing of the declaration, he’s creating the two point o operating system that we have now.
Speaker: 0
01:23:14
We we really do mean it, that all men are created equal. And that now, because of the ai, there’s not a proper word in that entire address. You know, the guy before him, Edward Everett, noted order, spoke for more than two hours. And he spoke for two minutes. And Everett wrote him and he said, mister president, I should flatter myself if I thought I came to the heart of the matter in two hours as you did in two minutes.
Speaker: 0
01:23:37
Wow. It is. There’s so many wows in the work that we have. And people sai, well, what you what what what’d you learn differently? And you go, oh ai god. Are you kidding? Every day is this revelation, this sort of tsunami that breaks over you of new information.
Speaker: 0
01:23:52
And then it’s just, what is it that I can sai? You’d you’d assume. You’d presume completely understandably that making a documentary film on the American Revolution is additive. Right? You’re building this thing. It’s not. I live in New Hampshire. We make maple syrup. We it takes 40 gallons of sap to make one gallon of maple syrup.
Speaker: 0
01:24:15
And so it’s all reductive. We will we have twelve hours in this six part series, and we’ve got more than five hundred hours of material filming reenactors for years. Some of them dressed in French uniforms, some of them dressed in in militias, some of them in British, some of them in in, you know, continental, some of them German Hessians, some of them native, all of that stuff.
Speaker: 0
01:24:41
And then we’re using it to help the building blocks of doing that. At the same time, we’ve collected more than 12,000 of paintings and drawings. We’ve we’ve taken maps. We got more maps in this than in all the other films we’ve made combined. Sometimes we’re just taking an old archival map and leaving it alone.
Speaker: 0
01:24:57
Sometimes we’re taking an old archival map and just putting red and blue ai showing the movement of of British and continental soldiers. Sometimes we’re taking maps and sort of making our own hybrid map that gives us a little bit more control. But all of these things, we’re just practicing.
Speaker: 0
01:25:13
I mean, I I looked at something earlier today, which was just a minute change on a map that we highlight where a British admiral wanted to attack all these seaport towns in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and Maine. And the last one is Machias, which is up near the Canadian border, and we weren’t seeing it.
Speaker: 0
01:25:34
So we are trying to figure out how to light up Marblehead and Cape Ann and Gloucester and Portsmouth, New Hampshire and Saco, Maine was then the Maine Department of Massachusetts, and then Falmouth, which is now Portland, Maine, and Machias. And so we we’ll spend months trying to just get that one thing right. No one if we hadn’t done it, no one would care except for us. Right.
Speaker: 0
01:25:58
Except for us. Right? Yeah. It’s that little thing. You know, I have friends who are woodworkers, and they’d never hide a mistake. Right?
Speaker: 1
01:26:08
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:26:08
They’d never hide a mistake. It always there’s a there’s a kind of craftsmanship to all of that. You know, out in the woods by yourself, just how you relate to nature, a kind of purity, a ai of, intention that you have in relationship to it. I know you you know all of that.
Speaker: 1
01:26:25
Yeah. I I think one of the things that’s fascinating is that the isolation in which you work and the environment in which you live, which does highlight the majesty of nature and and and the the humility of it all, it you’re in the expression of your work, you’re giving this vision to people that a lot of them are living in this world that creates uniquely anxious and disconnected people because we’re living in these urban environments without nature, because we’re of light pollution, we see no stars.
Speaker: 1
01:27:04
It’s I I think it’s one of the reasons why we’re one of the most confused societies ever. And arya, and I think documentary film work is clearly arya. And especially art in an under in in providing an understanding of, like, the true events of history.
Speaker: 0
01:27:25
Yes.
Speaker: 1
01:27:25
It gives people a sense of what it really means to be a human being in a different way. It illuminates these aspects of humanity in a different way that allows people just this ai glimpse into, like, what are we made out of? Like, what what is it about us that makes us who we arya, and why do we do what we do?
Speaker: 0
01:27:45
I I I can’t imagine any human being could say it better than that, Joe. I think that’s exactly right. This disconnection that we feel has come from the fact that we have become transactional beings.
Speaker: 1
01:27:57
Yes.
Speaker: 0
01:27:58
Nothing is transformational.
Speaker: 1
01:27:59
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:28:00
And that we yearn nonetheless for that kind of transformation that takes place in our lives. And as Americans, those of us fortunate enough to be Meh, with all the problems that are attendant to that statement, we have this glorious past that has the ability to take us out of that stupor, that take us out of that rut to be able to say and with the exception of the film on Leonardo, the 40 or so films that I’ve done, some of them are hour long, some of them are twenty hours long, are all about us.
Speaker: 0
01:28:35
Right? All about us. And the thing that I was describing about The US and us is that I realized there’s only us. There’s no them. All of our world is about them, of creating a them. The artificiality that that, despots or or autocrats always have to make a them.
Speaker: 0
01:28:56
There’s gotta be an enemy out there in order to do that. There’s only us. Right. And the important obligation that we have is to is to tell our stories to everybody. That is to say, I do not wish to preach to the congregation, whatever my congregation is. I do not wish to preach to the choir.
Speaker: 0
01:29:19
I wish to sai, we have an extraordinary country. I mean, I’m I’m I’m interested in its voices, I realize. I’m interested in its complicated voices, the true, honest, complicated voices of American history that’s unafraid of controversy and tragedy, but equally drawn to those stories and moments that suggest an abiding faith in the human spirit, and particularly the remarkable role this republic plays in the positive progress of mankind.
Speaker: 0
01:29:51
That’s that’s my play that’s my sandbox. Wow. You know? It’s
Speaker: 1
01:29:56
a great sandbox.
Speaker: 0
01:29:57
It’s a great sandbox. You know? It’s really it’s great. And and, you know, there’s there’s implied discipline in that. You know? Work with people. I mean, for decades and decades and we work really hard and we wanna do a good job and it’s sincere in that regard. And because as I sai, it’s PBS with one foot tentatively in the marketplace and the other proudly out.
Speaker: 0
01:30:17
You can make decisions that don’t have to do whether with, you know, whether it’s gonna enrich your bank account. I mean, there arya so many ways to measure richness that don’t have to do with the bottom line.
Speaker: 1
01:30:29
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:30:29
And, you know, one of the things that Americans have done, we’ve incubated lots of great ideas because of those two oceans and those two relatively benign one of the things and de Tocqueville noticed this when he came through in the eighteen thirties, went so into money. And the almighty dollar, he called it, that was the religion of America. And and that has its cost.
Speaker: 0
01:30:49
It obviously has some nice attributes, but it has a spiritual cost. It has a spiritual cost that is, profound. You know, the old testament again said, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to reach the kingdom of heaven. Yeah. And that’s, that’s tough for Americans to hear. It is.
Speaker: 0
01:31:14
It is so tough for Americans to hear, particularly since we have so many preachers who are certain that it’s okay to be both, you know? And at at some point, you have to realize, you know, something is lost and there is, richness in relationships. There’s richness in children.
Speaker: 0
01:31:33
There’s richness in arya, in associations, in knowledge. In I mean, your curiosity is so, palpable. You know, I was listening to you speaking to my friend Elliot West who’s written about the about the buffalo and native peoples and the sort of prehistory of of the American West.
Speaker: 0
01:31:54
And you can just hear there is this preternatural sort of interest in curiosity and, like, how does it work? We’re all given a really short period of ai, and the bad news is maybe it’s the bad news, maybe it’s also the good news, is none of us are getting out of here alive.
Speaker: 0
01:32:12
None of us. And it then it comes back to us. What are what are we gonna do? Yeah. What are we gonna do? And it doesn’t matter.
Speaker: 0
01:32:21
You don’t have to make documentary films. You don’t have to have radio shows. You just you can raise a child. You can tend a garden. You can build a bridge. You know? All of these things are legitimate.
Speaker: 0
01:32:31
It just requires your full attention
Speaker: 1
01:32:35
Yes.
Speaker: 0
01:32:35
And willingness to engage in that, whatever it might be.
Speaker: 1
01:32:40
Whatever it is.
Speaker: 0
01:32:40
I I’ve got a friend in my little town. I’ve known him for forty years. I think we probably have opposite political views. I don’t know. But I I adore this man. He built stone walls. He’s like, if you come to my house and you see the walls that he’s built, it’s like, you know, you don’t need to go to Chartres or Notre Dame and just say, woah.
Speaker: 0
01:33:04
Dougie did this really great job here. Yeah. You know? And and and you just love him for that dedication to saying, I could just do this in this moment to the best of my ability. People always say, do you ever go back to your earlier films and wanna change it? And I go, no. Right?
Speaker: 0
01:33:21
It’s like it’s like a photo album where you go back and you’re wearing a paisley shirt with a big collar and you go, who the hell thought that was a good look? But you don’t tear that picture out of the album. You say, that’s who I was.
Speaker: 1
01:33:34
That’s the time.
Speaker: 0
01:33:35
That’s the time. That’s who I was.
Speaker: 1
01:33:37
What a extraordinary hypocrisy to have a rich preacher. I was thinking that while you’re saying that. You know, based upon that biblical quote, what a bizarre, like, blatant in your face hypocrisy to have a rich preacher.
Speaker: 0
01:33:56
Jesus Christ did not intend to start a religion. Other people who liked what he said started a religion long after he was crucified. So religions themselves, it is so interesting that all of them that have at the root of their, their philosophy the exact same thing, exact same thing, all of them, you know, about do unto others.
Speaker: 0
01:34:21
It’s essentially about love. And, and meh, religions seem to be sometimes the cause of most of the the pain in there. It means that somewhere along the line ram the original message to the expression, stuff gets corrupted. And you can convince yourself that having, as a guru in Oregon, 52 Rolls Royces. I know.
Speaker: 0
01:34:44
Or You know, like
Speaker: 1
01:34:45
of a giant arena where you, have your congregation meet you at every Sunday. It’s just such a uniquely American thing, the megachurch pastor. And uniquely sort of adapted to this bizarre society where the bottom line is numbers. It’s ones and zeros on a ledger.
Speaker: 0
01:35:06
It’s important. You know, let’s not downplay it.
Speaker: 1
01:35:08
Oh, yeah. It’s better than not having any money.
Speaker: 0
01:35:10
It’s better than not having any money. But it
Speaker: 1
01:35:12
shouldn’t be a job.
Speaker: 0
01:35:12
Shelby Foote, who was our talking head in the civil war, said that money the only thing that could buy you is privacy and service. Meaning, you know, you can get somebody to mow your lawn if you need that to happen, and you can be a little bit private. But if you think it’s gonna be doing a lot, lot more than that, you’ve already begun to atrophy those, that awareness
Speaker: 1
01:35:34
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:35:34
Of being alive that I think everybody wants to feel that sense of vivifying Mhmm. Oneness.
Speaker: 1
01:35:41
It’s also a foolish pursuit to try to be better than people by just having more numbers. It’s a it’s a really crazy thing
Speaker: 0
01:35:49
people do. Poor in The United States, the studies have shown give away well more of their disposable income. You know, if you got a $100 and your friend comes up and says, hey, man, I need a $100, you give a $100. If you got a thousand bucks and somebody goes up and says, hey, I want a $100, you go, well, then I will not have a thousand, I will have only 900.
Speaker: 0
01:36:11
And this works all the way up to a 100,000,000,000. You’re right? I know I know that is. It’s it’s it’s sai interesting that that somehow this is what we think is or or even the folks who are dedicated to spending, prolonging their lives with these these other things. Yeah. It really is the quality of life is the much more important thing. Right. You know? How generous you are. You know?
Speaker: 0
01:36:39
I always tell my girls when they’re in trouble, I sai the three things, and and and one is this won’t last, get help from others, and be kind to yourself. You know? Just there’s no yes buts to those. I mean, which is where when you’re a teenager, you’re anxious, there’s there’s always or an adult. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:37:00
There’s always, a kind of a yes but, but, you know, just things will change. It always does. There’s always change. Maybe it gets worse. Maybe it gets better.
Speaker: 0
01:37:08
Probably it gets better. And it it’s no harm in reaching out to other people. And and the hardest thing of all is to be kind to yourself.
Speaker: 1
01:37:15
Yes. I say the same things, and I also say ai something that you love, not that people love you for.
Speaker: 0
01:37:22
That’s right.
Speaker: 1
01:37:23
Find the thing that you whatever it is, like, that you’re uniquely drawn to, and let that change over time. If you don’t want if you don’t love that anymore and there’s a new thing that you love, pursue that. But find the thing that really calls to you.
Speaker: 0
01:37:37
This is what Robert Penn Warren meant when he said to me, careerism is death. He just was saying, you gotta find that thing. And people, when I talk to students, they wanna know how you know, what the secret is. I go, there’s only two secrets. One is to know yourself, and that may be understanding that I thought I wanted to be a filmmaker, but I don’t have anything to say.
Speaker: 0
01:37:57
And and it’s perfectly legitimate to do something else, to change that thing if if you do it, and the other is to persevere because there’s, in every single situation, much more many more people wanting to be in front of a mic every day than there are the possibility of being in front of the mic every day.
Speaker: 0
01:38:17
And so you have to work at it really hard. You can’t make assumptions about it. Sometimes you have to do, you know, I Sai sort of felt like moving to New Hampshire was in the godfather going to the mattresses. You know, it’s like, okay. I got handed a I needed a job, and I was just so worried that I was gonna put the film that I had shot for this film in the Brooklyn Bridge on top of my refrigerator, and I would just wake up and I’d be 45 years old.
Speaker: 0
01:38:41
And I would have, you know, not not finished it. And so I got offered a job, which was ai, you know, being offered $800,000 a year today. And I I sai, no. And I moved to New Hampshire where I could live for nothing and finish the film. And How
Speaker: 1
01:38:55
did you choose New Hampshire?
Speaker: 0
01:38:57
I had a lot of I had gone to school in Western Massachusetts and had a lot of friends, sort of hippies and others that sort of after sort of alternative stuff, that after they had not some had gone to New York and pursued sort of traditional, professional lives, but others had become book salesmen or opened a natural food store or were a weaver or whatever it might be. And so a lot of them gravitated, in Southern Vermont and Southern New Hampshire. Little kind of nice little nook.
Speaker: 0
01:39:24
And so I ended up going to this town, and had literally I I mean, I walked in. I rented the house for the few years, few years and, bought it after my daughters were born. And I’ve lived I’ve been in the same bedroom for forty six years.
Speaker: 1
01:39:39
Wow.
Speaker: 0
01:39:40
And it’s and I don’t feel cut off or starved. I I know every part of the country. My films have covered every part of the country and part of the shoe leather that we have to do with PBS, you know, because they don’t have the big budgets to smather the the American Revolution coming November 16 over every bus and subway and billboard is you go out and you talk to people.
Speaker: 0
01:40:02
And and that puts you in touch. And at the same time, you you have this place to retreat and restore. And every morning, I take a three mile walk with my dog into the into the, you know, what looks like century America. Wow. You know?
Speaker: 0
01:40:19
I mean, how talk about rich. That’s pretty rich. Right? Right.
Speaker: 1
01:40:23
You can’t buy that.
Speaker: 0
01:40:24
You cannot buy that.
Speaker: 1
01:40:25
Yeah. That’s really so important. Really because it’s ai it’s the greatest perspective enhancer ever.
Speaker: 0
01:40:31
It is.
Speaker: 1
01:40:32
I I always say that about going to the mountains. There’s there’s nothing different. There’s nothing there’s nothing about it that you can recreate, artificially. Like, you you you have to go to the actual source of nature, the true source of nature to really appreciate that. I think it’s like a vitamin.
Speaker: 1
01:40:55
I think just like you get vitamin d from the sun, I think you get something vatsal pure nature.
Speaker: 0
01:41:03
I agree. Capital
Speaker: 1
01:41:04
n Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:41:04
Nature. I agree completely. Nature. I think, you know, Meh, you know, manifest destiny basically says, see that, you know, that river? Let’s dammit. See that forest? Let’s calculate the board feet. See that canyon? What minerals can be extracted? And that’s okay. And we’ve done that with 98% of the of the Continental United States.
Speaker: 0
01:41:25
But we also, in the midst of all of that, set aside these places that were so spectacularly beautiful, like Yosemite or Yellowstone or the Grand Canyon or Zion or Bryce Or Canyon or the Everglades or Acadia or Smokies, and just said, I want my children and my children’s children’s children to be able to see these.
Speaker: 0
01:41:46
That’s one of the
Speaker: 1
01:41:46
most extraordinary things about this country is what Teddy Roosevelt did with national lands.
Speaker: 0
01:41:51
We for the that’s why I said it’s the it’s the declaration applied to the no other countries. We invented national parks. Every other country is every other country has followed suit because we were saying land does not belong to a monarch or to the nobleman or to the very rich.
Speaker: 0
01:42:08
And just just reverse engineer that for a and say, okay. We don’t have national parks. So Yosemite and Zion are gated communities. You can’t you maybe have one little observational place along the Grand Canyon, to look. The Everglades was long ago drained in his golf courses and strip malls and and apartments.
Speaker: 0
01:42:28
It’s one of the most diverse ecological environments on Earth as flat as it is. It’s just spectacularly diverse. It’s kind of a
Speaker: 1
01:42:35
mess now.
Speaker: 0
01:42:36
And and the, and Yellowstone would be a down on its luck heyday in the nineteen fifties amusement place called Geyser World. You know? And so but it’s not that. We you you and I and everyone within the sound of my voice own the most beautiful spots on the continent, and I would argue in many cases, the most beautiful spots on the earth
Speaker: 1
01:43:02
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:43:03
Is pretty great. And it gives us that unfettered ability to go into nature, to get off the trail, which ai, we can admit it. There’s nothing wrong with that. 90% of the people stay within a 100 yards of any trail, but to get off the trail and go out and see the magnificence of this planet.
Speaker: 0
01:43:21
You know, the Colorado River. Yeah, you stand and you know, the thing I like about the parks is that it isn’t just what you see, it’s who you see it with. Like, you stand on the rim of the Grand Canyon, and the Colorado River exposes Precambrian Vishnu schist that is 1,700,000,000 years old.
Speaker: 0
01:43:40
That’s almost half the age of the planet itself. But the Grand Canyon works if you also are holding somebody’s hand. Right? It’s like who you see it with becomes central to the experience of it. Mural called it a grand geological library, all of the strata.
Speaker: 0
01:44:02
It was like a library of telling stories of of what was going on. It’s why I love American sports. I really love them. And but I focus on baseball because in football, the description is, oh, you know, Joe Montana threw to Jerry Rice with a few seconds left and we scored a touchdown and we won.
Speaker: 0
01:44:20
Or Michael Jordan hit the three pointer at the buzzer, tongue wagging, and we won. But the baseball story always begins. My mom or my dad took me to this game, and I remember walking out and seeing the green of the thing. And then Babe Ruth hit a home run or Hank Aaron hit a home run or somebody, you know, pitched the perfect game.
Speaker: 0
01:44:40
It it’s all gauged with who you see it with as well as what the thing is. Wow.
Speaker: 1
01:44:47
Yeah. Baseball is a unique American pastime because it’s boring. It it Because, you know, it’s exciting.
Speaker: 0
01:44:56
It’s not it’s not for those of us moments. Yeah. It’s not for those of us who love it. And it was always the national pastime. It’s just it’s had competition. I think one of the reasons why we sort of relegated to this thing is that it most of the other forms of entertainment, particularly in sports, are a little bit more fast moving.
Speaker: 0
01:45:13
Yeah. George Will said to me though, who’s a big foot football fan, he says football has two of the worst features of American ai, violence punctuated by frequent committee meetings. Right? Ai? What a great quote. Ai a fantastic quote. Yeah. No. But it but baseball has this thing.
Speaker: 0
01:45:32
It’s the only it’s the only sport in which the defense has the ball. Right? Mhmm. The person scores, not the ball. Right. And where do you go? Home. Home.
Speaker: 0
01:45:41
Yeah. And statistics matter. Like, maybe you know how many yards Tom Brady has, the greatest of all time.
Speaker: 1
01:45:49
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
01:45:49
Probably you don’t. But you know how many home runs Babe Ruth hit and how many home runs Hank Aaron hit. And you know, these are things that matter. And if you look up the nineteen nineteen World Series, it says that the Cincinnati Red Stockings won the nineteen nineteen World Series.
Speaker: 0
01:46:05
There’s no asterisk, but then those numbers require you to tell a story about the Chicago Ai Sai, known to us forever as the Black Sox, who took money from Arnold Rothstein and other gamblers to throw the nineteen nineteen World Series and give it to the much lesser team, the Cincinnati Red Stockings.
Speaker: 0
01:46:26
It is great that the statistics matter. A 300 hitter means the same thing to my dad as it does to my grandfather and my great great grandfather and my great great great great grandfather. But you still have to tell stories.
Speaker: 1
01:46:41
Yeah. It’s I mean, it the stories are so important to people too. I mean, it it it does it just it’s something that is a part of their life that they tune into to give their life more meaning. And that’s the something that I never understood about team sports when I was younger because I never liked them.
Speaker: 1
01:47:01
Because I was always in I always felt like I don’t like team sports because I don’t wanna lose because Billy drops the ball in the back in the outfield. Like, I don’t wanna be a loser because somebody else fucked up. I ai to be entirely dependent upon me. Then after a while, I started realizing, like, no.
Speaker: 1
01:47:17
This there’s a richness to being a fan. There’s a there’s a quality of life that comes there’s a experience that comes from you everyone being united in this thing, like, wanting the team to win. It doesn’t exist in individual sports.
Speaker: 0
01:47:35
It doesn’t. I I agree with you completely. There’s something wonderful. I was just talking to my best friend about this this the other day, that that that I my daughter was at school, and she was the co captain, my oldest daughter, of the of her softball game. And twenty five, thirty years ago, we went to some misty Saturday morning game, and it was ai they were winning three to two in the bottom of whatever the last inning was.
Speaker: 0
01:47:59
And the other team had the bases loaded and no outs, and we got 3 outs. And it was ai the girls just immediately burst into tears, but it was just an amazing thing. Or just you’re driving in a in a, you know, a suburban or or a city arya, and there’s a ball ball game going on, and you’re kinda slow.
Speaker: 0
01:48:18
You lift your foot off the accelerator as the as the pitch goes. You know? As it goes, there’s something suspended. As the pitch is heading from the pitcher to the bat or something, everything stops, and possibility is suddenly there in front of you. That’s why I love the game so much.
Speaker: 1
01:48:33
It’s just a game that if you try to introduce it today, it would be very difficult to sell.
Speaker: 0
01:48:38
You know, it’s so funny. I I get to more often than not and haven’t been in a while because I’m such a dull boy and working so much to Fenway Park. And it’s always just filled with people, and it’s always got lots of kids, and they’re always there because they wanna be. My screensaver of of my phone are my two daughters vatsal meh ai two youngest daughters at a Meh Sox game, you know, ten or fifteen years ago.
Speaker: 0
01:49:02
I haven’t been taking it off the thing. You know? This one’s now a sophomore at Georgetown University, and this one is going into into grade. And but they were, like, eight and and and, and 13 then. So it’s look at the expressions on their face. It’s just pure joy. Pure joy.
Speaker: 1
01:49:22
Yeah. It’s, I mean, it really is uniquely American.
Speaker: 0
01:49:26
And it’s accompanied nearly every decade of our national narrative. Mhmm. Even into the century, there are bits of pieces in which there seems to be some speak and ball game. And then after before the civil war and the decades before the civil war, they begin to combine rounders, sort of a British school yard game with cricket and and and do something that’s a lot better than both called baseball.
Speaker: 0
01:49:51
And and you know what? There’s a guy in 1858 named Pete Ai. He said, you know, they don’t play baseball the way they used to when I was a kid. This is 1858. I don’t mean they don’t play it with the same with the same rules or the same they just lost the spirit of it.
Speaker: 0
01:50:08
So we’ve always been saying something’s wrong, something’s gone out of the game. Yeah. It’s not it’s not quite right, and there’s always not true. And just it it continues on.
Speaker: 1
01:50:20
The steroid era to me was really fascinating because one of the things about baseball being so uniquely American is that the idea of someone cheating at this uniquely American thing was particularly offensive. Whereas, at the same time, people were 100% taking steroids for football.
Speaker: 0
01:50:41
Oh, yeah. And it was Bill Romanowski was, you know, there was bottom of the fold of the New York Ai. But as soon as a baseball player, it was implicated. It was the top of the fold. And that told you even though the NFL had long overtaken baseball as kind of the national pastime or football had had done that.
Speaker: 0
01:50:59
And I think it has to do with the sense that it I mean, it does allow stealing of bases, but you’re absolutely right. There is Well, that’s a strategy. There there is that wonderful thing about baseball that it seems ai pure. It seems American. And to
Speaker: 1
01:51:15
cheat at that is offensive. And
Speaker: 0
01:51:16
to cheat at that. And that’s why, you know, I I used to sai, out of some I I I’m embarrassed by the kind of arrogance of it. I used to say, well, they should not they should let Pete Rose in after sai the hall of fame after he dies. Now he’s died. And I’m I’m still I I I sort of feel ai, who am I to say that? Certainly, the hall of fame isn’t ai a list of angels. Right.
Speaker: 0
01:51:39
But I also still am not sure he should go in or Shoeless Joe Jackson as much as you wanna resurrect the great story of the of the most, promising of of the Chicago Ai Stockings in 1919 that threw the the World Series, the Black Stockings. Ai don’t know. I mean, it’s very complicated. Will will, Roger Clemens? Will some of these other people that we know were juicing? Barry Bonds, where Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:52:05
You know, we he was Barry Bonds doing interviews is clearly or arguably the greatest player that’s ever played baseball. Up and you could even say to the moment he decide he looks at Maguire and says that he knows he’s got tons more talent than them, and they’re getting all the attention.
Speaker: 0
01:52:24
And he says, I can do this. He’s still got he’s he’s right then, he’s a ballot hall of famer and would arguably if he just stopped right then and just quit and said whatever. But decisions are made, and then it becomes back to Shakespeare Yeah. Negative capability. And can you hold intention the great prodigious gifts and the, in this case, the sort of shortcut of the way in which these gifts were corrupted?
Speaker: 1
01:52:55
What was so uniquely Meh, there was congressional hearings on steroid use in a sport Yeah. Which was very strange. And, again, while sai, it’s ubiquitously used in football.
Speaker: 0
01:53:08
And you also live in a society in which you take a pill to, deal with erections. You take a pill for this. You take a pill sleep. You take a pill to sleep, to wake up. We arya all drugged. And and and once person made in our inning the update to the series on baseball that came out in ’94, inning came out in 2,010, they said, look, you know, what if you’re a scrap scraping, you know, middle infielder, second baseman, shortstop, And the everybody’s taking steroids in the clubhouse.
Speaker: 0
01:53:38
Everybody knows about it. The baseball has no rules against it right now, until and and it’s the difference between you getting that four year $28,000,000 contract that in which your family is set for ai. You’re from the Dominican Republic. You’re from, you know, wherever you’re from, and maybe ending up in triple a, and that’s it.
Speaker: 1
01:53:57
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:53:58
And then you you realize and and you’re being told by every signal of society, take something to be better. Yes. This then complicates the entire dynamic of our of our judgments, of the facility of saying, oh, I’m really absolutely this. I I know this. You know? Ai I and I realize the more I go, the more disappointed I am in the arrogance of my certainty before. You know?
Speaker: 0
01:54:25
I think one of the big things is, you know, we think that the opposite of faith is doubt. Doubt is central to faith. The opposite of faith is certainty, which destroys the mystery of the unknown. And so I Ai I’m always taken aback, sometimes more often in retrospect than in the moment when I could possibly do something about it, that I have been more certain about something and and less trying to see it from another person’s point of view or from the other side of the coin or whatever it might be.
Speaker: 0
01:55:00
Or maybe there’s many different facets to to these things. As we were talking about with regard to the revolution and slavery and and how what responsibility of imposing the morality of this moment on the previous moment. How much did that previous moment already understand the morality of it, which they did? What what what’s the right answer?
Speaker: 0
01:55:20
And I think I think staying open to the questions Ai know in filmmaking has made us better filmmakers. And ai not a royal we. I I don’t do this alone. There are a lot of people that that I work with. They’re handmaids.
Speaker: 0
01:55:32
It’s a small little nucleus of people, but it it they they deserve credits, writers and codirectors and coproducers and and and people who are digging in the ai, cinematographer Ai worked with for fifty two years.
Speaker: 1
01:55:45
I think this is so important for people to hear because I think this very unique and noble perspective that you have is why your work resonates so much with people.
Speaker: 0
01:55:56
I agree. I think what it is is that whatever I don’t wanna say ai. But whatever discipline has been imposed on the process of whatever it is we do, people recognize that.
Speaker: 1
01:56:11
Yes.
Speaker: 0
01:56:11
And they know that they can see something. They may not like all the aspects of it because it is complicated, and and and you do see not just the intimacy of us, but you also see the complexity and the contradiction and the controversy along with the majesty of The US. It’s all there. But I do think that they know that we have earned their attention. That’s the biggest thing we have. Like, you know this. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:56:43
You’re you’re you’re asking an extraordinary amount of people right this You’re asking them to devote their attention. I mean, my the longest episode I’ve ever done is, like, in two hours and twenty minutes, two hours and thirty minutes. That’s that required every skill I had to be able to make that over ten years of an episode, the episode of of World War two, a film called The War.
Speaker: 0
01:57:06
But mostly, it’s two hours, and it is a supreme compliment if somebody will give me their attention for that amount of ai, and then maybe for 10 episodes or nine episodes, or in the case of the American Revolution, just six for a total of twelve hours. That is a huge, huge responsibility of trying to keep ai to earn someone’s attention.
Speaker: 0
01:57:28
And that our that’s our job is really just making sure that that person who does not know, who’s ignorant but curious, which is, of course, perfectly fine. If you’re willfully ignorant, I really can’t help you. But if you’re curious and ignorant, then we sana make sure that if you’ve given us your attention for this two hours of the episode of the revolution and then stay for all twelve hours that, you know, we wanna make sure that we’ve earned it in in in the simplest way, that the equation is not at all above.
Speaker: 0
01:58:01
There’s no communication in this world. You already know this. Except among equals. Like, if I look up or down, already Ai dislocated the possibility. And the only communication is among equals. Yeah. And that’s you treat your audience like they know something.
Speaker: 0
01:58:20
Not not that they’re familiar with the subject, but they’re not stupid, and they don’t they don’t have to be added some sort of pablum. You don’t have to simplify it. It can be complex. Because if it is, it’ll they’ll recognize either themselves or they’ll recognize somebody that they know that’s very close to them.
Speaker: 0
01:58:38
And that’s the essence of good story, is it’s human beings telling stories about other human beings and what they do that has a resonance that vatsal accrues ai the layers of a pearl imperceptively. You can’t identify, but you know. And, of course, a pearl is based on an irritant, a grain of sand that’s bothering the hell out of that, you know, oyster.
Speaker: 0
01:58:59
Right? Yeah. You’ve you’ve you’ve you’ve created this gem out of the friction and irritation and resistance, and perseverance of having to do something.
Speaker: 1
01:59:10
I think one of the most uniquely American stories that you’ve told is the story of Jack Johnson.
Speaker: 0
01:59:15
Yeah. It’s, you know, it’s interesting because one of the great themes in American history is race. I mean, it’s obvious because we were founded on the ideal that all men are created equal, and the guy who wrote that sentence owned hundreds of human beings and didn’t see fit in his ai to free them.
Speaker: 0
01:59:33
But you also have individuality. And what is with Jack Johnson, like a like a good back boxing match, you have a black man who also just wants to be a man, wants to be fully himself. Now the society doesn’t really want him to do that, and they’re gonna put lots of constraints, And he’s gonna overcome those constraints.
Speaker: 0
01:59:52
And then when he does, they’re gonna find another way to box him in. But James Earl Jones was really great on this. He he was he was almost saying, do not just be constantly distracted by the question of race. This is somebody who wanted to be a man, his own person, and that a great deal of Jack Johnson and all the travails and all the things that he went through, and all the great great great great, skill.
Speaker: 0
02:00:18
I mean, Muhammad Ali, we made a film on Ali too, which I’m really, really proud of. But, he’s clearly studied Jack Johnson. He knew. They would watch those films. Rope a Dope is Jack Johnson. A lot of that making, the wearing your opponent out is Jack Johnson from, you know, an earlier century.
Speaker: 0
02:00:37
And this is a time I mean, his heyday is between nineteen o five and 1915 when more African Americans were lynched for looking sideways at somebody. Mhmm. And he’s openly defeating every great white hope that came at him and
Speaker: 1
02:00:52
And dating white women.
Speaker: 0
02:00:53
Dating white women and marrying white women. Yeah. And so, you you know, we called the film it’s you know, mostly, we ai to have, ai of boring things, like the American Revolution, Brooklyn Bridge, the Vietnam War. But we call that film, Unforgivable Blackness, the ai and fall of Jack Johnson. And I did that because the great black scholar, W. E. B.
Speaker: 0
02:01:16
Du Bois, at the turn of the century, said boxing is in great disfavor. Jack Johnson seems to be the cause. But Jack Dunson did nothing that no other boxer or sportsman or even senator has done. Why then has it come has it come to him? It all comes down then to his unforgivable blackness. That by taking the crown, by defeating all comers, it was an unacceptable situation.
Speaker: 0
02:01:45
When in those days, being the heavyweight champion was there was a sense of this was the supreme masculinity of the world, and that everyone went out of their way ram John Sullivan to others to avoid fighting a black man. And finally, somebody paid Tommy Burns guaranteed $30,000 to fight Jack Johnson on Boxing Day, the day of What was that
Speaker: 1
02:02:07
worth today?
Speaker: 0
02:02:09
Oh ai god. Oh my god. Meh and millions of dollars. Jack only got $5,000, but he’s happy to do it. He’s been, going after Tommy Burns. No relation. And Tommy Burns was a pseudonym. A guy can’t remember his name. A Canadian. Anyway, in in in Australia, they fight on the day after Christmas nineteen o eight, and and Jack Johnson just toyed.
Speaker: 0
02:02:28
He could probably could’ve taken care of him in the inning, and he just keeps it going. They finally cut the newsreels off. They actually stop the fight because they do not want the public to see this. And when after having digested, I think is a good word, all of the white hopes that were thrown at him in the intervening, intervening year and a half, they finally convinced Jim Jeffries, the guy who’d retired undefeated, the previous champion before Tommy Burns to come out.
Speaker: 0
02:02:58
And in Reno on 07/04/1910, the fight of the century, Jack Johnson defeated, at you know, no one thought it would happen, Jim Jeffries. And there were riots all across the country, all across the country, white on black riots. The the Los Angeles Times wrote theirs their their lead, editorial was a word to the black man. Do not lift your chest up too high.
Speaker: 0
02:03:24
Do not put your face up to the sun. Do not you are still the same lowly person you were yesterday just because Jack Johnson. And, I mean, the idea that that, you know, it it goes back to this issue. Washington knew what was wrong. Jefferson knew what was wrong.
Speaker: 0
02:03:43
They made so much money. It was really hard to do this. I mean, Jefferson himself said slavery is like holding a wolf by the ears. You don’t like it, but you don’t dare let it go. Right? And so what happens is that somebody like an Abraham Lincoln is born antislavery. Right?
Speaker: 0
02:04:06
But they’re also a developing abolitionist movement. So now they want to abolish slavery. They’re not just against it and understand that it’s a moral God never nowhere does God say that vatsal black people are inferior to white people. But what happens is, even though most of the slavers know that it’s wrong, but there’s so many good profits to make, what happens when the abolitionists come along that they begin to make arguments that slavery is actually good and that black people are in fact inferior.
Speaker: 0
02:04:39
And so one of the reasons why the civil war happens is this sense of threat to their economic power, which are the 4,000,000 people in the 9,000,000 populated South that are owned by other human beings. And it’s a it’s an extraordinary dynamic. We face it today, the reverberations.
Speaker: 0
02:04:57
And Jack Johnson, I think, is one of those magnificent cases where he it just he defies your ability to put it in a neat cubbyhole. It defies your ability to make it binary. Like, we live in this media culture. Right? We live in a computer world. Everything’s a one or a zero.
Speaker: 0
02:05:12
Everything’s a red state or a blue state. Everything’s young or old, gay or straight. It’s not that way. Right. And so to tell a complex story of history, particularly ai of Jack Johnson, is is just to have your molecules rearranged.
Speaker: 1
02:05:26
Yes.
Speaker: 0
02:05:27
You know, it really is exhilarating. Ai I I probably sai that word too many times. No. It’s it’s exhilarating.
Speaker: 1
02:05:34
Yeah. I think he’s also one of the rare cultural figures that, where a sports figure defines a tyler, much like Muhammad Ali defined the the Vietnam era. Like, Muhammad Ali, when when I was a child, my parents were hippies, and they never cared about sports at all, except when Muhammad Ali lost to Leon Spinks and then had the rematch.
Speaker: 1
02:05:58
We all watched. Yeah. I I remember this being a child thinking how strange it was that my parents were so invested in Muhammad Ali. But what they were invested in is this man that risked his entire career and livelihood. They took his livelihood for three years for protesting the Vietnam War and refusing to go fight. And it was a big thing because he was a cultural hero.
Speaker: 0
02:06:22
That’s right.
Speaker: 1
02:06:23
It wasn’t just that he was the best boxer ever. He was also this guy that said, I’m not doing this. The the Vietnamese people didn’t do anything to me. I’m not participating in this. I’m not gonna go kill anybody. I’m not doing this. And we were all ai, yes. And then they took his livelihood away, and he became a martyr. He became a hero.
Speaker: 1
02:06:42
And, you know, spoke out against the war, and then it was three solid years in his prime before he came back.
Speaker: 0
02:06:50
Yeah. It’s it’s an amazing story. And we told it, just a few years ago in a four part eight hour series. I I I, I agree with you 100%. I’m a little bit older. I remember when Sonny Liston and and and, Ben, Cassius Clay fought in Ai. And he was such a new commodity. He was rocking the boat with a with this verbal onslaught Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
02:07:15
That we were, for a nanosecond, sorry that Sonny Liston lost because he was the person that we are familiar with. We knew this kind of black sana, and we did not know this other scarier vatsal person. And almost instantly and my dad was an anthropologist. I mean, this was boxing. He was not doing this thing. But from then on, we became just loyal.
Speaker: 0
02:07:40
We watched all the stuff through the sixties and then saw his opposition into the war. And then he said, you know, you could come and mow me down with a machine gun. I’m not going to go. And and and the ABC did some interviews with black soldiers in Vietnam, and they all to a person said, this is why I’m fighting. This is why I’m here.
Speaker: 0
02:07:59
I’m fighting for him to say Ai don’t wanna be here. Wow. And I just I I just thought it was great. And I also wanted to do this because nobody people had done certain ai. People had done his fight with the government. I wanted to do soup to nuts.
Speaker: 0
02:08:13
We wanted to do soup to nuts. My daughter oldest daughter, Sarah, and my son-in-law, David McMahon, we made the film from birth to the death. This guy is, in the late sixties, the most hated man in America for that stance that you were describing about the and he dies the most beloved person on the planet.
Speaker: 0
02:08:30
Mhmm. And I really love the idea. I love the opportunity of being able to show how that happened in the midst of you know, they call it the sweet science, but there are some ai. Those the the three fights with Frasier are, like, as brutal as anything you could ever possibly imagine.
Speaker: 0
02:08:50
And and what they went through and what he ultimately clearly, in retrospect, lost as a result of winning two of the three of the ai, is is one of those miraculous stories. And I agree. Like, Jack Johnson is is defining an age and so interesting that it’s in a marginalized, activity. Like, even back then, like heavyweight boxing.
Speaker: 1
02:09:15
Well, marginalized ai still elevated. The heavyweight champion of the world was still the baddest man on the planet, and people still wanted to watch it. But it was thought to be a a back room
Speaker: 0
02:09:28
Yes. Sort of
Speaker: 1
02:09:28
darkly lit, dingy pursuit. It you learned it in the dangerous gyms. It’s not something that you learn on a college campus with educated professors and analysts that have reviewed proper technique, which is how they teach in Russia. You know? The Russia has a very, like, technical version of and what they do in America as well too now, but not back then.
Speaker: 1
02:09:54
Now back then, it was dark, dingy gyms, mob run systems.
Speaker: 0
02:09:59
The sporting world, and you were there. There were gamblers. There were women of the night. Yeah. It was, you know, money was being exchanged.
Speaker: 1
02:10:06
Mob stuff.
Speaker: 0
02:10:06
Lots of, lots of, throne fights and and, it was in the interest. It was so interesting that that emerged this person who was so resolutely himself just as Muhammad Ali would be a few kids later. It’s why I’m drawn to it. I’m not a big fan of boxing, but you’re it’s irresistible. You can’t take your eyes away from these two men when they’re fighting.
Speaker: 0
02:10:27
They’re, of all, spectacular specimens, and they are amazing fighters. They changed the whole dynamic. And as you said, there’s no greater boxer than Muhammad Ali.
Speaker: 1
02:10:38
Well, the really terrible thing is Muhammad Ali’s best years were taken from him. Yeah. Because if you go to 1967, I I’ve talked about this numerous times on the podcast, when he fought Cleveland, big big cat Williams. Yeah. That fight was one of the most extraordinary performances of any heavyweight ever. It was Cleveland was a dangerous ai, like vicious knockout puncher. He was a real specimen himself.
Speaker: 0
02:11:02
Yes, he was.
Speaker: 1
02:11:02
And Ali toyed with him. I mean, toyed with him. Just boxed his face off, knocked him out moving backwards, just just picked him apart, popped him, and showed movement and speed and agility and technique that we had never seen from a heavyweight ever.
Speaker: 0
02:11:19
He was the greatest.
Speaker: 1
02:11:21
The greatest.
Speaker: 0
02:11:21
The greatest.
Speaker: 1
02:11:22
And then three solid years of ai.
Speaker: 0
02:11:26
Yeah. I think this is what makes him so great. This is like Ted Williams, only much bigger because Ted Williams loses a lot of time to World War two and to Korea and comes back and, you know, still hits, you know, three fifty or whatever it is he hits for the the Red Sai, having lost what you’d consider the prime of his career in in his early days in World War two.
Speaker: 0
02:11:47
And then and and as a ai, this is not like the goodwill ambassador. He’s flying fighter bombing runs.
Speaker: 1
02:11:54
You know
Speaker: 0
02:11:54
what I mean? He’s like, really, it’s ai time he cannot come back, and he’s he’s a magnificent stuff, but it’s not denying it as they did in both Jack Johnson. They took away his ai. And he and he was fallow from 1912 to 1915. And then ai, they put him in the ring in Havana with Jess Willard, who’s a younger ai. He’s a 105 degrees, a 110 degrees on the canvas.
Speaker: 0
02:12:17
They’re gonna go 40 rounds after the 26. This guy who’s got ten years on Jess Willard, he’s 37, Willard’s 27. You know, Willard finally gets in a thing and and this, like, oh, thank god. And they would not let another black man fight for heavyweight champion until he was not Jack Johnson.
Speaker: 0
02:12:35
That is to sai, until he was Joe Louis, light skinned, couldn’t be seen with a white woman, couldn’t smile at his victories. And and and Louis agreed to all of this. Sai that it was the unspoken, unwritten rule that you couldn’t be an in your face black meh. And that sort of obtained for a couple of decades.
Speaker: 0
02:12:54
And then Ali came, and he said
Speaker: 1
02:12:55
Broke them all.
Speaker: 0
02:12:56
A bolt them all. And and, essentially, based it, they used to say when he was training, Ali was training, there’d be ghost in the house, ghost in the house, and that meant that Jack Johnson was there. Oh, wow. And that Ali had to be that much better.
Speaker: 1
02:13:12
Wow.
Speaker: 0
02:13:13
Ghost in the house.
Speaker: 1
02:13:14
Wow. The Ali of three years later was a completely different fighter, unfortunately. Physically, he didn’t look the same because he didn’t train for three years. He didn’t do anything, and he lost everything. I mean, he still was one of the greatest. I mean, still was able to beat Joe Louis, still was able to beat George Foreman, but he is a different fighter. He didn’t move the same way.
Speaker: 1
02:13:34
He didn’t have the same physical build. He didn’t look as good. He’d lost three solid years in his prime of training.
Speaker: 0
02:13:42
And it makes those post Vietnam years even more spectacular.
Speaker: 1
02:13:48
We think
Speaker: 0
02:13:49
that he could prevail over or Frazier and over. I mean, that the the rumble in the jungle is just Crazy. Crazy. Crazy. What he did. Yeah. What he did. Well,
Speaker: 1
02:14:00
nobody thought he was gonna win.
Speaker: 0
02:14:01
No one thought he was gonna win.
Speaker: 1
02:14:02
Including Hunter s Thompson who famously sabotaged his career by not covering the fight. He was sent over there to cover the fight and instead decided to just swim in the pool and drink.
Speaker: 0
02:14:11
Yeah.
Speaker: 1
02:14:12
Because he didn’t wanna watch Ali get destroyed. Yep. Meanwhile, he missed
Speaker: 0
02:14:16
One of the greatest fights of I remember Ai was in college still, and we got, soundless black and white footage of the ai, some of it in slow motion. And my film teacher showed it to us and none of us were interested. I was like, woah. This is stuff I did with my dad ten years before.
Speaker: 0
02:14:37
And it was him delivering a blow to Foreman and seeing in slow motion this halo of sweat coming off the afro of George Foreman. I mean, I will never forget just the speak almost the beauty of of of this incredibly brutal sport.
Speaker: 1
02:15:03
Yeah. Incredibly brutal bryden. But in those moments, it it elevated everybody who watched it. That’s the crazy irony of it all. It’s ai in this brutality, this beat down of another man, everybody who watched it was elevated.
Speaker: 0
02:15:17
It’s it’s,
Speaker: 1
02:15:18
because someone did something that we thought was impossible. Exactly. And it was that person who did it, this guy who stood up against the Vietnam War. And, you know, at the time, we didn’t realize how bad the Vietnam War would look retrospectively.
Speaker: 0
02:15:33
Yeah. No. He he did not enjoy any benefit of the doubt. In this. It was really It was a trade. Another time of division and people exploiting division Right. And making them. He was the worst them that there possibly could be. And I think the fact that he was able to stick to his guns, I I mean, he could have said, okay.
Speaker: 0
02:15:54
I will go and do goodwill stuff, and it would have been all over. He said, no. I’m not going to.
Speaker: 1
02:16:00
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:16:00
Famously, no Vietnamese ever called me the n word.
Speaker: 1
02:16:03
Yeah. And just the fact that at the time, we didn’t understand. We were still locked into this perception of military conflict being like World War two That’s
Speaker: 0
02:16:14
right.
Speaker: 1
02:16:14
Where it’s imperative to save the world from communism, And that there was a real problem, there’s a real threat to the American way of life and America as a whole that was going on in Vietnam, which now seems absurd.
Speaker: 0
02:16:27
It seems absurd. There’s a wonderful parallel. I mean, when I when when when I said that Twain said that history doesn’t repeat itself, but it ai, Like, we have a failed invasion of Canada in in the in the American Revolution. There’s a big debate over inoculation. There’s an eclipse that takes place, you know, all of this sort of stuff.
Speaker: 0
02:16:44
And there’s always an interesting thing is that, particularly in New Jersey and South Carolina, the British are always talking about, we have now pacified New Jersey, the province of New Jersey. We have now pacified the province of South Ai, and then all of a sudden they have to admit that it’s unpacified because the patriots have taken over and done all this guerrilla warfare that has made it un pacified.
Speaker: 0
02:17:06
And at one point, George the third and many others within the British government are worried about what we would call the domino theory. If we lose them, then we’re gonna lose Ireland. And if we lose Ireland, we’re gonna lose Gibraltar, and we’re gonna lose the the subcontinent of India.
Speaker: 0
02:17:19
And we’re gonna lose and so you go, there’s nothing new under the sun. Right?
Speaker: 1
02:17:24
New under the sun.
Speaker: 0
02:17:25
It’s Yeah.
Speaker: 1
02:17:27
The Vietnam War and your eighteen hour piece on the Vietnam War is is one of the more confusing aspects of The United States history. Because it it like, looking at it today, it doesn’t make any sense how we sold this.
Speaker: 0
02:17:43
No. And and every president from Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, even Ford never told us the complete truth about
Speaker: 1
02:17:51
it. Right.
Speaker: 0
02:17:52
And and and did stuff that got Americans killed and lots of other people killed over what would have been where there’s a Geneva Convention in ’54 that basically said we could separate into two places. And in two years, we had an election, which everyone knew Ho Chi Minh would win.
Speaker: 0
02:18:10
If we left it at that, we’d be talking about 3,000,000 people still walking the earth at least.
Speaker: 1
02:18:16
Crazy.
Speaker: 0
02:18:17
Crazy. And the communist Ai and the Soviets were very suspicious of Ho Chi Minh. They thought he’s not a communist. He’s just a a nationalist. And he knew I’ll tell you. The day that the the Japanese surrendered in Tokyo Bay officially was, 09/02/1945, that same day in Bryden Square in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh declared Vietnamese independence, and he quoted Thomas Jefferson.
Speaker: 0
02:18:52
Woah. And standing next to him were OSS guys. By the September, the state department having realized, oh, this this World War two is over, but we’re gonna be in a new they didn’t call it cold war yet, but we’re gonna be in an epic struggle all around the world with communism.
Speaker: 0
02:19:10
And this guy has been to Moscow and whatever, so he must be a communist. And so all of a sudden, the state department, the OSS, had saved his life. They parachuted into Northern Vietnam looking for people that could could mobilize, in their help, against the Japanese and found a sick and dying Ho Chi Minh, we don’t know what it is, malaria or whatever, treated him and brought him back.
Speaker: 0
02:19:32
And he was he he he didn’t see us as the enemy. And meh, we in those two years, in ’56 when they should have held an election, we had already decided to place our our our our bets with, Ngo Ding Diem, who was a corrupt South Vietnamese politician who would eventually be assassinated by, you know, a general who would be a one in a series of generals until we got Chu and Quay, and those were the people who took us out of it or or were on their watch when when the North Vietnamese, you know, finally, united their country.
Speaker: 0
02:20:06
It it’s it’s just and the lying, you know, that we have the tapes of Johnson and of Nixon, and and it it just you know, there’s an arrogance to record yourself for posterity, you know, and you be careful what you say that some of the things that not all of them have been listened to.
Speaker: 0
02:20:25
They haven’t all been transcribed. And we were fortunate to spend a lot of time just listening and listening and finding just some stuff that, you know, if if Nixon and Kissinger had walked into the peace talks that were already started in January of sixty nine and taken the terms that the North Vietnamese were offering, they would have had better terms than what they had in ’73, and there would be fewer Meh, a lot more Americans alive, 25,000 more Americans alive, something like that, and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese Laotians and Cambodians.
Speaker: 0
02:20:54
But they didn’t wanna be the president to to lose a war. In fact, they’d already soured the South Vietnamese, they sai, as Humphrey was coming up in in the polls. He only lost by point seven, points of a percentage, in in the election. He’d been way behind. It was making a lot of speed.
Speaker: 0
02:21:14
A lot of it had to do with what people perceived as progress in Paris. And the Nixon administration or not the administration, the the Republican party, the Nixon’s, election came, reached out through an intermediary to the South Vietnamese government and said, boycott the talks in Paris.
Speaker: 0
02:21:30
And and if you’d had another week or two to the election, you would have had Hubert Humphrey as president. Or or if they hadn’t reached out to the South Vietnamese and and Johnson got it on tape. They were taping the the South Vietnamese embassy in Washington and the palace in Saigon, and he knew it. And he calls up Nixon. There’s a tape.
Speaker: 0
02:21:51
And he goes and he goes, oh, I would never do anything like that. And Johnson either pissed off at Humphrey because he’s not as much as a hawk as Johnson had become ram more than likely unwilling to admit to your allies that you had been taping them in their own embassy in Washington and their own palace in Saigon, did not tell the truth of what he knew, that Richard Nixon had essentially reached out to a foreign power at the time of a national election to try to influence that election.
Speaker: 0
02:22:21
Wow. Yeah. I mean, it’s just endless.
Speaker: 1
02:22:24
And the reverberations, like, the the one thing that it did that I think is, like, so pivotal is it destroyed the faith that The United States citizens had
Speaker: 0
02:22:34
In its government Yes. Telling them the truth. Yeah.
Speaker: 1
02:22:37
And in engaging in military activities. Because we had always thought we were a just government. We were a just society. And then if we got into World War two, it was to save the world. If we got into Vietnam, it was to save the world. Oh, no. It wasn’t. Not only that, we got in on a lie. We got literally got into the war on a false flag.
Speaker: 0
02:22:55
That’s exactly right. Sai
Speaker: 1
02:22:55
it was entirely engineered. And then there was also the heroin production, which was a big part of the whole thing. There’s the the heroin trade, there was money that was being allocated to various individuals through the heroin trade that was facilitating a lot of it. It’s very confusing stuff.
Speaker: 1
02:23:12
When you look at it over time and you look back at it, you’re like, what what would Ai States look like had clear heads prevailed?
Speaker: 0
02:23:22
Absolutely.
Speaker: 1
02:23:23
What would we look like today?
Speaker: 0
02:23:24
The counterfact well, I think we’d be less divided. I think a good deal of the divisions now were sort of born in there that entrenched, positions that people take now. I think there’s also a sense you know, the Pentagon Papers were McNamara going to a gentleman that we, interviewed, Robert Bryden, and saying, I need to find out all the decisions.
Speaker: 0
02:23:45
And he learned not only was he lying at at times, you know, going and getting battlefield reports and then coming back and saying it’s all rosy, but everybody had been lying back to the Truman administration about what was going on. And it was just a series of ai. And that’s what when they asked the RAND Corporation to sort of analyze some of the data, that’s when Daniel Ellsberg, who worked for the Rand Corporation, surreptitiously, illegally copied them and then released them, to various newspapers.
Speaker: 0
02:24:16
And they became, you know, what we call the Pentagon Papers, but they were always the Pentagon Papers. And they detail exactly what you just ai, just a complete bryden you know, presence of both parties, a military industrial I mean, you know, when when when Eisenhower leaves, just before he leaves, he warns of the military industrial complex.
Speaker: 0
02:24:38
Yeah. He’s not saying this is something that happened last Thursday. Right. He’s saying this happened the second World War two was over.
Speaker: 1
02:24:46
Well, even before that, Smedley Butler talked about it in ’33.
Speaker: 0
02:24:49
People there was so much money to be made that nobody wanted to to ramp down the the armaments. And so you end up having these proxy wars. You end up having, you know, these places where you’re going to not have, a hot war because that means the end of the world in in a world of nuclear, weapons.
Speaker: 0
02:25:10
But you’re gonna ai these proxy wars in different places. And in Kennedy, it’s a doctrine that Eisenhower and Kennedy and they all sort of embrace and figure out that they that they can do it. And then, of course, Johnson who you know, Kennedy inherits 700 ai from Eisenhower. Johnson inherits 17,000 advisers now, in quotes, when he comes in.
Speaker: 0
02:25:32
And he still has to wait until he wins reelection overwhelmingly a year later, and it’s only into the following March of sixty five that he commits ground forces, first army and and first marines and then then army, to Vietnam. And then we have the boots on the ground. Even though we’d had boots on the ground for a long time and engaged in combat, these ai were very much engaged in in that sort of stuff.
Speaker: 0
02:25:57
And then it just get escalates. You know, at vatsal peak, it’s well over 550,000 soldiers and American soldiers in the country. Insane.
Speaker: 1
02:26:05
Insane. It’s also, you know, the coming to fruition of Eisenhower’s warnings. And then this inspires this counterculture of the nineteen sixties that sure reshapes art, reshapes culture, reshapes rock and roll
Speaker: 0
02:26:22
Politics.
Speaker: 1
02:26:22
Politics, everything. Everything changes. And then, you know, Nixon comes along and to stop the anti war movement, to stop the civil rights movement, puts these sweeping Schedule one drug acts on all these different, you know, psilocybin, all these LSD, all these different things that they believe these people were involved in sai that they could start arresting people and sort of throw water on the entire movement, and it’s effective.
Speaker: 0
02:26:51
It is so interesting to look. And I’ve got a in my office, this wonderful two framed maps, if you will. And they’re the inter ai of the various two parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, over time. So the Republicans are the party of Abraham Lincoln, the party of emancipation, of whatever, and the party that invented progressivism in the part of the century.
Speaker: 0
02:27:14
Democrats had been not that place. But in the sixties, it began to change, thanks to Lyndon Johnson of Austin, Texas, who who understood that it was the right thing to do to to put in those civil rights and voting rights acts and other things that we call part of his great society by a film, by the way, that we’re working on now.
Speaker: 0
02:27:35
It will be out in a few years. But, he knew that the bargain would be to give up, the solid South. I mean, you woke up on election day if you’re a Democrat, and you had every one of the states of the former Confederacy, all of them, all of them in your in your tyler, and that’s flipped.
Speaker: 0
02:27:53
And now you wake up on on election day, and you more or less have had have all the states of the former Confederacy on the Republican side who abandoned what they were about. And it’s interesting to see in which for self interest, for whatever I mean, Nixon begins it. Jackie Robinson is a Lincoln Republican.
Speaker: 0
02:28:12
Didn’t go over as many black people did to FDR during the New Deal. He was supporting Nixon for president, but Nixon wouldn’t come to to, Arya campaign. Wow. So he ended up voting for Kennedy, and and he and Goldwater fully understood that we’re just going to now switch the Republican Party and go after just white voters who are disinfected with changes in civil rights.
Speaker: 0
02:28:38
And so it’s it’s an interesting story of the way in which parties can change places and be the the very opposite of the thing they were Yeah. Just a few years before.
Speaker: 1
02:28:50
Yeah. Because they’re all gross.
Speaker: 0
02:28:54
Well, I just find the thing is, you know, the bad word is progressive today. And that’s this is this is the you know, the Republican Party, invented progressivism. And and they joined forces with some more liberal Democrats in the big cities. Right? But the opposition to the civil rights bill, is coming from Southern Democrats.
Speaker: 0
02:29:15
And it’s it’s it’s Lyndon Johnson knowing that he will have to use every bit of his powers of persuasion to get it over, and he will require lots of Republican votes, and he does. So you you do have something positive happening in American history where the two parties are coming together and not just lockstep where every single Republican votes for something and every single Democrat votes against it.
Speaker: 0
02:29:38
And you you just feel like somebody’s they’re from two different planets.
Speaker: 1
02:29:43
Yeah. Another thing about the Vietnam War that’s so crazy is, like, we’ve kind of accepted the fact that the United States military does things overseas that we don’t want them to do. Because after that war, it sort of set the stage for Afghanistan, Iraq, all all the those especially Afghanistan, ai, this prolonged twenty year completely complete failure, especially in how we withdrew from it.
Speaker: 1
02:30:12
It’s like we’ve we’ve lost a lot of faith in the decisions that are made.
Speaker: 0
02:30:17
I I actually think you have young officers ai Colin Powell who are learning the lessons of Vietnam. And so what you find is extraordinary reticence in the late seventies and the eighties and the early nineties. So the first Gulf War is very much a, a reflection of Vietnam chastened by the excesses of Vietnam. We’re gonna do it with a coalition.
Speaker: 0
02:30:41
You know, we’re gonna do it with one arm tied behind our back. We’re gonna stop a little bit sooner. We’re not gonna have the full destruction of this. All these sorts of things are in Vietnam inherited. But then real politic comes in, and then all of a sudden you realize we’re in Afghanistan because of of nine eleven. We’re pursuing this person.
Speaker: 0
02:31:01
It’s not we had a chance to get him. We missed him. It was not our fault. And we then switched the focus to Iraq and then ended up in both places in a kind of, you know, terrific stalemate that, as you say, just was, I think, back to being Vietnam. I mean, I always say this that if we, you know, we made our film on Vietnam, it came out in 2017.
Speaker: 0
02:31:25
If I had done the film ten years, and this is why history requires perspective. If I had done it ten years after the fall of Saigon in in, 1985, there’s a recession going on in The United States. It’s not big, but we talk about the Pacific Ram. Japan is ascendant. We think Japan is gonna be the best thing.
Speaker: 0
02:31:46
Vietnam would be this ball and chain that we would be dragging around us forever. If Ai waited twenty years to 1995, we’re the sole superpower, we’re in the middle of a the arya, to that point, largest peacetime economic expansion in the history of our country. And Vietnam would always be important, but it it wouldn’t be this symbol of our of our decline. Right?
Speaker: 0
02:32:11
If I’d waited thirty years to twenty o five when we are bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq and people are beginning to use the language of the Vietnam and getting stuck in these unwanted, perpetual, never ending wars, you have another view. And so the do good history is to actually get some distance and perspective.
Speaker: 0
02:32:32
So you can look at look at the Vietnam War from the mountain top of ’85 and ’95 and 2005 and then realize Sai still got other experiences. New scholarship has come. Classified material has been released. More of those tapes have been listened to. There’s been, a mellowing among the veterans and a willingness to speak.
Speaker: 0
02:32:52
Gold star mothers ai they can’t hide their grief. There we have one in the film. She can’t she knows that by telling her story, she will help thousands of other people who’ve lost their children. We can interview soldiers from other sides of the conflict that seem to speak exactly like our soldiers and that you’ve begin to develop a way to see it more holistically than in just a kind of journalistic and almost political response.
Speaker: 0
02:33:20
So that was bad. We did that badly that we did this poorly. You can see it for this hugely, hugely complex machine that it was. It just ate up human beings and ate up credibility, as you’re saying, that The United States had built up as the greatest power on earth and and certainly the good guy in in what we euphemistically call the good war.
Speaker: 0
02:33:44
That good war is the worst war ever. More 60,000,000 people whose lives were extinguished in World War two. But as we said it in our film about World War two called the war, one of our pilots said it was a necessary war. And that’s what we should be thinking about ai, necessary ones, not the ones that are going to, you know, have all these ulterior things that you described.
Speaker: 1
02:34:07
And it’s also, like, unwinding all that bad and sort of reshaping America’s perspective and the way the world perceives us takes so much time. And I think we lost so much of that post nine eleven. I think nine eleven had the entire world in our sympathies.
Speaker: 0
02:34:25
I agree.
Speaker: 1
02:34:26
We we were we we had been attacked. The whole world thought of us as being, like, this shining light. Like, wow, we have to stand against this. Then we go and invade Iraq, and everyone’s, like, what are you doing? Yeah. Like, what is this? There’s really no weapons of mass destruction. It’s all a lie.
Speaker: 0
02:34:44
The the thing that the Depression did is it got used to Americans doing without, and it made it very easy for Americans to segue into the second World War because it was about shared sacrifice. Something they’d learned on a domestic level, they can now learn it on an international level. Mhmm. And they did that.
Speaker: 0
02:35:05
We had an opportunity at 09:11, it seems to meh. And I haven’t made a film about it, and I imagine once we get enough years out, it might be interesting to sort of look at that. We had an opportunity to collectively turn the energy that we had, the grief and the and the sense of purpose, even anger of that moment, as well as the world’s unabashed symphony sympathy for what we’ve done and turn it into something productive.
Speaker: 0
02:35:37
And yet we didn’t. We then as you were saying, we moved into sort of rationales and justifications for, Iraq that were, as we know in retrospect, completely fraudulent.
Speaker: 1
02:35:49
Yeah. From the outside, like, me looking at your work, I get anxiety just thinking about the daunting task of taking on these subjects. Ai I know you have 10 for some of them to, like, really ruminate and really figure it out. But what is your process like? How do you begin?
Speaker: 1
02:36:07
Like, you said you’re gonna do something on Lyndon Johnson or if you’re gonna do something in Vietnam. Like, how do you what does day one look like?
Speaker: 0
02:36:15
Day one is making sure that you’re looking yourself in the mirror and you’re gonna commit to that because I’m now off like a congressman trying to raise money from foundations and corporations and individuals of wealth and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and things like that. But you’re immediately reading. You’re immediately talking to scholars who’ve spent their life maybe on this aspect or that aspect of Vietnam.
Speaker: 0
02:36:37
We had, I think, it was 23 scholars all who knew one speak. And I knew we were onto something when we’d have these screenings. And a scholar would comment and all the other 22 would, like, whip over like they hadn’t heard that. And so the the film would do that. It’s daunting.
Speaker: 0
02:36:53
I asked Shelby Foote about US Ram, and he said, Grant had what they call 04:00 in the morning courage. That meant you could tell wake him at 04:00 in the morning and tell him the enemy had turned his left flank, and he’d be as cool as a cucumber. And so what you develop is 04:00 in the morning courage. You wake up and go and we’re still doing it. I’m still waking up.
Speaker: 0
02:37:12
I didn’t like the way that sound, and why didn’t we trail that stuff? So you just put one foot in the other. You trust to process. Process is a really important thing. We’re all impatient, and impatience kills process. Just like comparison is the thief of joy, if if you’re impatient, then process is squandered.
Speaker: 0
02:37:33
And process teaches you really important things of how to relate to subject, how to collect the material, and then how to figure out how to digest that material into something that’s a cohesive story that I can give to you who may be ignorant of that story. But it’s daunting. It’s ai, and I wouldn’t have it any other way. You know?
Speaker: 0
02:37:54
And I think I’m speaking for the people who work with me because there’s something everybody responds at three in the morning. You know? Everybody says, yeah. What what what do we do that? We can we can fix this. We’ll find an alternative to that to make it better.
Speaker: 0
02:38:08
And sometimes it’s the niggling tiny things or sometimes it’s really big to have the courage to take out an entire scene that really is working really well, but destabilizes the film a half an hour later. And I I did that in our Mark Twain film. I took out this beautiful prose thing from ai on the Mississippi called Ai Town Drowsing about Hannibal, this disguised Hannibal sort of waking up from its slumbers as it sees the puff of smoke north as the steamboat’s coming down, and the whole town is industry and activity and loading and unloading and whatever.
Speaker: 0
02:38:39
And then by the time the puff of smoke is around the bend south, everybody’s back asleep again. It was called it was just fantastic and written. It was so beautifully. Mark Twain is, like, never wrote a bad word. And, and I I just realized we weren’t getting out of the early biographical stuff soon enough.
Speaker: 0
02:38:58
And I I said to my partner on the film, the co producer and the ai, who’d found that quote from from Ai on the Mississippi, I said, we’re taking it out. And he looks so hurt and so pained. I said, look, I’ll put it back in if you want it. So we left it out, and I thought it worked, Brian. He came to me, looked sad. I said, I’ll put it back in.
Speaker: 0
02:39:18
And for about six months, we went back and And then finally, he came to me and he said, you were right. And I said, you can put it in the book. We’ll put it in the DVD extras. We’ll do all the things that you need to do. But that’s the kind of 04:00 in the morning courage you need to do is take out something that ai it, Joe. It worked so well.
Speaker: 0
02:39:38
And yet you remember the movie Amadeus? Too many notes. Too many notes. You know? And you just go, you gotta you gotta do that.
Speaker: 0
02:39:45
I’d rather the reason why we have the it’s complicated is because there’s not a filmmaker on Earth that doesn’t wanna change a scene that’s working. But we have spent our entire professional lives changing scenes that were working when we found out new, ai, sort of contradictory information. And maybe it made the scene less.
Speaker: 0
02:40:05
Maybe the scene disappeared, but it actually serves the honor and the virtue of whatever that story requires. And this is true. So many things in the American Revolution that that that are close to me because we’re just coming off the months and months of these unbelievable sacrifices of having to take out one phrase of a sentence or changing one little thing just to help fine tune it.
Speaker: 0
02:40:28
Nobody would notice. If I left it in and you looked at it twice and then I took it out the time, I don’t think you’d notice it, but Ai notice it. So I’d wanted to to be and and that’s the the beauty of public broadcasting too is that it gives you that chance to do that. There’s not a suit the
Speaker: 1
02:40:44
only platform that would allow you to do it that way.
Speaker: 0
02:40:46
I I I don’t think there is another platform. I assume that a list directors in Hollywood who have, you know, the final sai, enjoy vatsal Steven Speak, who is, you know, one of the great directors of all times, I’m sure. But there’s still suits that are coming in. There’s still people who are giving him notes.
Speaker: 1
02:41:04
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:41:05
We get notes from scholars. We get notes that are sorta like this. You’ve got lots of voices of loyalists in there, and that’s really good because people tend to ignore the loyalists. They’re just a de facto bad people, and you don’t make them bad people. But you don’t have a loyalist who goes through several episodes that you follow throughout the film.
Speaker: 0
02:41:25
So we had this loyalist quote in our episode in the Vatsal of Bennington, where this guy named John Peters, who’s been in Vermont, been driven out by the patriots. He’s gone to Canada. He’s formed a revolution. The family, his ai, and small infant kids are driven out. They find a British patrol boat somehow on Lake Champlain.
Speaker: 0
02:41:44
They reunite. He starts a regiment, a loyalist regiment, his 15 year old son. They find themselves with Burgoyne’s army around Bennington, where they’ve been told there’s great loyalist sympathies and not that many patriots. It’s the opposite. There’s no loyalist sympathies or none that anybody is speaking up for and there are lots of patriots.
Speaker: 0
02:42:03
And they’re defeated, but at one moment, this man, John Peters, is on a parapet of a quickly made redoubt of a that you they’ve put up to try to repel the attacking Americans. And he hears the voice of a man named Jeremiah Post who is saying, Peters, you ram Tory, which is the other insult that you would give to a loyalist.
Speaker: 0
02:42:25
And, he recognizes the voice of his best friend growing up and cousin of his sister. And at that moment, Jeremiah Post, the the the, rebel, the patriot, stabs him with the bayonet into his into his bone, but it’s deflected by the bone of the rib cage. At that moment, as Peter said, I was obliged to destroy him, and he kills him with his pistol. Wow. That’s the American Revolution.
Speaker: 0
02:42:55
So we had that quote, and it was ai, woah. But why don’t we go and put John Peters in episode one, in episode two, in episode three, in episode four, and then episode six when he’s leaving and moving to Nova Scotia permanently and not gonna be a part of this New Deal. But you wanna know what the American Revolution about it? Killing your best friend on a hill west of Bennington, Vermont. Right? You know what I mean?
Speaker: 0
02:43:25
I mean, we say kind of without thinking about the civil war, brother against brother. You know? And it’s I guess it’s true a few ai. But the revolution is like that. Henry Knox, who’s this sort of big amiable bookseller who Washington somehow figures out, picks out of a crowd, and he said, oh, go to Ticonderoga and get those cannon we captured earlier in the year and bring them back here.
Speaker: 0
02:43:46
I I I gotta drive the British out of Bryden. And Knox does. Sleds, impossible, hundreds of miles over land and over Lake George and, you know, terrible weather and he gets it there. But he’s married to this young woman named Lucy whose parents are loyalists, and so she loses in the revolution her father, her mother, her brother, and her sisters.
Speaker: 0
02:44:09
That’s the choice she made by marrying Henry Knox, this sweetheart of a bookseller who learned most of his stuff about artillery and gun emplacements from the books in his bookstore and from serving as, you know, in the local militia. And he puts the guns he gets the guns up top, and the British wake up and go, uh-oh. We’re out of here.
Speaker: 0
02:44:30
And they go to they go up to Nova Scotia to regroup. Massachusetts thinks the war is over. They thank general Washington for his service and enjoy his retirement. He goes, are you kidding me? I’m going to New York, which is exactly right because that’s where the British will attack next.
Speaker: 0
02:44:45
And the largest battle of the American Revolution is the Battle of Long Island. And I won’t spoil it for you, what happens.
Speaker: 1
02:44:52
Please don’t. Ken Burns, your national treasure. Thank you so much.
Speaker: 0
02:44:57
Thank you, Joe. This is
Speaker: 1
02:44:58
Really appreciate you being here. I really enjoyed it. And, like I said, I’ve been a giant fan of your work for a long ai, so this is a huge treat for me. Thank you. Thank you. Bye. Bye, everybody ai.
