You can listen to the #2231 – Jimmy Corseti & Dan Richards using Speak’s shareable media player:
#2231 – Jimmy Corseti & Dan Richards Podcast Episode Description
Jimmy Corsetti and Dan Richards are independent researchers whose YouTube channels, “Bright Insight” and “DeDunking the Past,” respectively, examine lost civilizations and alternative history.
www.youtube.com/c/BrightInsight
www.youtube.com/@DeDunking
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
This interactive media player was created automatically by Speak. Want to generate intelligent media players yourself? Sign up for Speak!
#2231 – Jimmy Corseti & Dan Richards Podcast Episode Summary
In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, Joe Rogan hosts Jimmy Corsetti, who revisits a previous discussion about climate data, specifically addressing a controversy that arose from his last appearance. Corsetti mentions a hit piece by Media Matters, funded by George Soros, accusing him of climate change denial. He clarifies his stance, emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives in understanding climate data.
The episode also touches on the broader theme of misinformation and media bias. Rogan criticizes mainstream media outlets like CNN and MSNBC for their declining ratings, attributing this to their perceived dishonesty and echo chamber effect. He argues that podcasts offer a more truthful and diverse platform, which is why they are gaining popularity.
Another significant topic is the labeling of individuals with controversial opinions. Rogan discusses how people are often unfairly labeled as Holocaust deniers or anti-Semites when they present alternative historical perspectives. He cites an example involving a podcast guest discussing Winston Churchill’s role in World War II, which led to accusations of Holocaust denial.
Throughout the episode, Rogan emphasizes the importance of open dialogue and considering multiple viewpoints. He argues that the media’s failure to do so is contributing to its decline. The recurring theme is the need for honest, balanced discussions in media and the role of podcasts in providing this platform.
Overall, the episode encourages critical thinking and challenges the audience to question mainstream narratives, highlighting the value of diverse perspectives in understanding complex issues.
This summary was created automatically by Speak. Want to transcribe, analyze and summarize yourself? Sign up for Speak!
#2231 – Jimmy Corseti & Dan Richards Podcast Episode Transcript (Unedited)
Speaker: 0
00:01
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
Speaker: 1
00:03
The Joe Rogan experience.
Speaker: 0
00:06
Showing my day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day. Gentlemen, mister Crosetti. How are you, sir? Very nice to meet you by the way.
Speaker: 2
00:16
Nice to meet you too, Joe. Thanks a lot.
Speaker: 0
00:17
Thank you very much for that video. We talked about it before but I wanna say it publicly. The debunking of the debunking by, Flint Dibble. And you really nailed him on so many of those things that he was dishonest about And it just I wish we knew in real time, but, unfortunately, you know, it’s, it takes a lot of research to be able to figure out what he was telling the truth about and what he wasn’t.
Speaker: 0
00:39
Yeah. You know?
Speaker: 2
00:40
Well, thank oh, thank you. That I was, Tell
Speaker: 0
00:43
everybody your site too. You’re Oh,
Speaker: 2
00:44
oh, dedunking. The dedunking the past does my email, dedunking on YouTube or on Twitter. That’s with 2 d’s like my x. Not not debunking. Sorry. Keep this
Speaker: 3
00:55
d keep
Speaker: 0
00:55
this Sorry. That’s okay.
Speaker: 2
00:56
I’m sorry.
Speaker: 4
00:57
Dedunking, not debunking. Right. Dan Richards.
Speaker: 2
00:59
Dedunking. Dan Richards. Thank you. Yeah. The the thing with with Flint, it was actually funny. The the the moment that I knew that he was lying about the science was when you asked him about the feralization of plants. That’s where they roll back into being no longer domesticated. He was, oh, it’ll just take 1,000 of years. It’s Like, no. No. No. No.
Speaker: 2
01:16
I’ve researched this and I know better. And he was just knee jerking straight in. Oh, just 1,000 of years. And when you pressed him, he’s, like, well, I don’t know for sure.
Speaker: 0
01:23
Well, that’s a bummer because that’s his field of study, which is really kind of crazy. It’s a really fascinating thing that seeds do adapt to, agriculture. They adapt to the fact that they it’s better for the survival of the plant if one you develop agriculture, if they’re more robust and they stay on the plant.
Speaker: 0
01:40
It’s better for the wild if they break off easy and they can scatter better and they can, you know, proliferate.
Speaker: 2
01:45
Yeah. It’s it’s it’s it’s really basic if you think about it. I mean, if it stays on the plant after
Speaker: 3
01:50
Mhmm.
Speaker: 4
01:50
After it’s ripe, it’s just sitting there waiting for the first thing to come
Speaker: 0
01:54
along and eat it. That whole natural selection thing when it comes to plants is so fascinating. But the question was so simple. If you stopped having agriculture and these plants just grew wild, would they go back to the same characteristics of wild plants? And he was, like, no, there’s no evidence of that.
Speaker: 0
02:08
But then I saw your video and then I looked at some other stuff and there’s quite a bit of evidence of it, particularly with wild rice. Right?
Speaker: 2
02:13
Yes. And particularly with wild rice. Yes. There’s that one it looks like. Out of any of them, if there’s a possibility that one was, domesticated and then went back to the wild and then was domesticated again, it would be rice. That shows multiple types. There’s different ways the seeds can break off. Right?
Speaker: 2
02:28
They can break in different points of the plant or they can just fall straight out and, rice shows numerous paths there where, wheat only has one genetic pathway to that seed shatter where the seed falls off. So it’s, they get pretty complicated but, rice does rice does have a lot of genetic possibilities for that.
Speaker: 2
02:45
Now I’m not a geneticist so I’m sure that somebody’s gonna come and, you know, say that it’s a pseudo crap. But, ultimately, at the end of the day, Flint was treating it as a debate whereas you and Graham were both trying to sift to the truth. And that’s why he was not gonna give Graham one little corner, one little shred of possibility of being right anywhere when in reality, it’s it’s a lot of it’s just like everything else in life.
Speaker: 2
03:07
It’s a lot of gray.
Speaker: 0
03:08
Well, it’s also this whole subject of the past is it’s so obviously confusing. Because when you look at I watched your your video today, the Baalbek video. Just looking at the enormous size of those stones, there’s no reasonable explanation how people like, what what is that dated to?
Speaker: 0
03:30
Like, what what year do they believe it was made?
Speaker: 4
03:32
This is where it gets fun is because they credited to the Romans and the Phoenicians. However, there’s it goes beyond the sophistication, the capabilities what the Romans were known to have, whether it’s the existence of the screw jack for lifting the stones. But Baalbek, which is located in Lebanon and I had the great privilege of going there in September of last last year, exactly 1 month before things kicked off in Israel, with the whole Hamas thing.
Speaker: 4
03:55
And if I hadn’t got there then, I wouldn’t have no chance. Like, right now, Israel’s bombing Lebanon, and so it’s a dangerous place. But Baalbek, if there was one example, one ancient site on earth that is evidence of a lost ancient advanced civilization and by advanced, I’m not talking about space lasers here.
Speaker: 4
04:13
I’m talking about more sophisticated than what we were taught in school for the known capabilities. And Baalbek has the largest stones that were ever quarried in human history, the largest stones that were lifted, stacked, and transported in human history, and the largest stone columns in all of classical history.
Speaker: 4
04:29
And we’re talking so the trilithon stones, 3 stones, 900 tons apiece or 800 metric tons, and they were moved a half a mile from the quarry. They were lifting stacked approximately 30 feet off the ground. And when I say stacked, they were perfectly lined up. And, Jamie, it’s in my folder of Baalbek if you wanna show some of these, and they’re absolutely massive.
Speaker: 4
04:50
So let me tell you right here, and I, of course, have, the gentleman there who I’ll tell you about later highlighted just to kinda show you for perspective. Like, that’s someone right there. It’s 5 foot 11. Those stones that are highlighted in red are the trilithon stones. But these pictures do not do it justice because it’s taken through an ultra wide camera lens.
Speaker: 4
05:08
From the top to bottom of the red highlighted stones is 14 feet, and they’re 62 feet long or 62 feet, excuse me. Like, it that there’s me.
Speaker: 0
05:19
And It’s so crazy. It’s it’s hard to tell because of the perspective, and people need to kind of understand how a wide angle lens sort of distorts things
Speaker: 3
05:27
Yes.
Speaker: 0
05:27
By showing you this enormous field of view. But when you’re looking at something that’s 14 feet long and 60 excuse me, 60 62 feet long and 14 feet high, like, what is the weight of that? What’s the overall weight?
Speaker: 4
05:41
900 imperial tons or 800 metric tons. And to anyone listening, a metric ton is 22100 pounds, 1,000 kilograms, and an imperial ton is £2,000. So that’s £1,700,000 each of them, and there’s 3 of them. And if you were to go to the quarry, there’s ones that are 1200 tons and even 1500 tons that are 20 feet tall. This is mind boggling.
Speaker: 4
06:05
Like, Jamie, if you wanna just scroll through some of the other photos to kinda give Joe the perspective and the audience the perspective.
Speaker: 0
06:12
Those are clearly cut stones that were moved into place and moved 23 feet above the ground.
Speaker: 4
06:19
Right. And technically 30 feet because there’s stones that are actually below the ground there that you can’t see because it’s submerged under the earth. So, technically, it was 30 feet, but 23 off 23 feet off the ground today. And right there, this highlights so not only is that 14 feet from top to bottom, which you would never realize when you’re looking at this, and these are confirmed measurements, by the way.
Speaker: 4
06:39
This is right out of encyclopedias. But notice how they’re completely flush, nice and even with each other. And the this exceeds the known capabilities of what the Romans had. And it’s worth mentioning that this site is some 24 100 miles from Rome, the capital. And if they’re gonna say that this was created by the Romans, one, people need to understand that the Romans were renowned for documenting everything, yet this site is not credited to anybody.
Speaker: 4
07:05
They don’t know exactly who did it or when, but yet the academics are clue in, conclude that it had to have been the Romans or the Phoenicians because, of course, there was no one before them. And with this photo right here, let me say something else. There is evidence of at least 2, but arguably 3 different architectures that were done at this site.
Speaker: 4
07:23
And I would conclude that this is evidence that this site existed in prehistoric times. There’s also I could show you encyclopedias that talk about Baalbek being prehistoric in nature, dating back 11000 years of human history. And what I argue is that it was built up it was found by the Romans and the Phoenicians and built upon later.
Speaker: 4
07:41
And right here is evidence for all that have eyes to see. Look how they obviously use broken stones and constructed on top of it. Why would you go from making the most advanced stones in history that far exceed anything you see in Rome? For example, if you were to go to the Colosseum, as magnificent as that is, it is a architecture of mathematics and just brilliance.
Speaker: 4
08:03
But this right here, why would they use the why would they for all the feats of Roman history, why would they have the most, impressive feats over 2,000 miles away from the capital? In fact, let me just say this. When I’m talking about 900 ton stones, the largest stone in all of Rome is 53 tons.
Speaker: 4
08:22
It’s the Trajan’s, capital block that make up the Trajan’s column, 53 tons. This is 15 times heavier.
Speaker: 2
08:29
There’s a number of things too. Now I’m not a huge believer in ancient technology. I’m sorry.
Speaker: 3
08:33
No worries. I’m not
Speaker: 2
08:33
a big believer in ancient technology as Jimmy’s well aware. But,
Speaker: 4
08:37
Which is why it’s important that you’re here because people are gonna hear multiple perspectives.
Speaker: 2
08:40
Yeah. That’s where, I can tell you some things about, Baalbek that are still interesting to me. One of them is you don’t see the Roman foot in those stones, which is weird. You would expect to see some sort of breakdown of the Roman foot in these measurements, but they’re not there at Baalbek.
Speaker: 2
08:54
They are there on the stones that were quarried from the
Speaker: 3
08:57
Roman foot.
Speaker: 0
08:57
Foot, what you’re saying is that there’s a different measurement what they considered a foot. It’s not 12 inches.
Speaker: 2
09:02
Correct. There’s a a Roman unit of measurement that they would use in construction. And it see it we don’t see it in those stones in the trilithon in but there’s 3 stones that were quarried and left in the ground. All of those stones show signs of, using the Roman foot.
Speaker: 4
09:16
Yeah. Jamie, will you scroll over to them?
Speaker: 2
09:18
So that right off the bat shows to me that the ones that were installed were not built by the Romans but the ones that were quarried were made by the Romans. They were trying to quarry out, stones to to match it. Right here. Another thing is That’s crazy. Roman architecture always uses the most impressive things right in the front.
Speaker: 2
09:36
You walk in the front of the thing and that’s where you’re gonna see the biggest stones, the most impressive for obvious reasons. These are in the back, completely on the opposite end of the entrance. So we have to collect from what you told me, you’d kind of have to look for them if you don’t know where they’re at. Right?
Speaker: 2
09:48
Like, you can’t just show up on the site and they say here’s the trilithon.
Speaker: 4
09:51
Well, let me tell you a quick story real quick. So I had the pleasure of going there with some people, and I’ll tell you about it later. I won’t do the name drop just yet. But Dory, who lives in Lebanon, he toured us around, and he had been to the site three times before when we went to assist 4th time.
Speaker: 4
10:07
He did not know of the existence of the trilithon stones. They’re around back. You gotta walk probably a third of a mile to get there. They don’t even bring the tours around to the trilithon stones. He had no idea what I was talking about the night before dinner.
Speaker: 4
10:19
I’m trying to explain to him, like, the trilithon stones, the 900 ton stones. And I had to show him a picture. He had never seen them before.
Speaker: 0
10:25
How how do they not show the tourists this?
Speaker: 4
10:29
That’s an excellent question. It now you do have to walk. To be honest, it’s like a 12, 15 minute walk, to go around to get there. I mean, it’s part of the platform, but you have to go all the way around, and some people just don’t feel like making the walk. And when we were there, we were totally alone for a half hour with these stones, not a single person. There was hundreds of people at the site.
Speaker: 4
10:47
Not a single one of them came around back. Now just to clarify what the audience is seeing right now, this is at the quarry, which is a half mile away. This is where all the stones originate from. And this one right here is what’s called the stone of the pregnant woman. It is 1200 tons.
Speaker: 4
11:01
As you can see, it’s 14 feet tall, which is the same height. So in those trilithon stones I was showing you a moment ago, this the only difference is that this one’s 68 feet long. It’s virtually the same size except for just a few feet shorter, but it’s the same height. So that gentleman right there, Pierre, who’s a wonderful man, is 6 foot tall, and look at him just dwarfed by this stone. 1200 tons. Insane.
Speaker: 0
11:23
Right. And it’s not from there.
Speaker: 4
11:26
Well, no. The it is. This was core so this is This is at the quarry.
Speaker: 0
11:29
Gotcha. So the the so this one’s at the quarry and but the ones that were placed, where are they from?
Speaker: 4
11:35
This quarry, which is a half mile away.
Speaker: 2
11:37
So this is So they
Speaker: 0
11:38
moved £1,800,000 a half a mile?
Speaker: 4
11:43
3 of them. And that doesn’t include the 2 dozen that are 350 tons apiece. That doesn’t include the 9 that are 600 tons apiece. Nine stones that are 600 tons apiece are somehow a side note to the trilithon stones. And let me just tell you this. This is something Jamie, if you scroll over a few to the articles involving because this is what the audience needs to understand.
Speaker: 4
12:04
A lot of people hear these numbers, and they don’t wrap their head around exactly how important this is, which is that the, go to the article involving the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Okay. It’s in the same folder of Baalbek. And the largest stone moved in modern times is 340 tons.
Speaker: 4
12:23
And we’re gonna come back to all these photos too because it’s extremely important, there’s some details in here.
Speaker: 0
12:29
That’s the one at that Goofy Museum in LA? Yes. Which is, by the way, a very Goofy Museum. Yeah.
Speaker: 4
12:36
I haven’t been there.
Speaker: 0
12:36
It’s so dumb. It’s so dumb. It’s there’s a an acrylic box that’s on the ground Yeah. That you’re supposed to interpret as art. It’s just a box that’s just sitting there. It’s one of those places where you go there and you go, what is my tax dollars going to? Jamie, go motherfuckers.
Speaker: 4
12:51
Go to the other folder that’s moving stones. So let me just while he’s looking for that, let me explain to you.
Speaker: 0
12:57
I saw the video on that, and so to what this is is there was a suspended stone Yeah. That’s an enormous stone that they placed there as part of their art piece. Yeah. And this thing was
Speaker: 4
13:08
Not that one. Not that, Jamie.
Speaker: 0
13:09
Go. This just failed.
Speaker: 4
13:10
That’s that’s a yeah. We’ll we’ll play that video in a little bit. It’s pretty funny.
Speaker: 0
13:14
They had to move this stone. It was 4 miles an hour. It’s the fastest they can move it. They had to build a structure around the stone to move it. Yes. And this fucking insanely huge truck.
Speaker: 4
13:26
Let me tell you. So the details, it is a 200 and so they had to custom build a trailer truck around the stone itself. Tell Jamie what Jamie, look under the moving stones folder.
Speaker: 5
13:36
There’s not folder. It’s just a video.
Speaker: 4
13:39
Go to let’s see here. Scroll down a little bit. Go to Ramesseum statue. Man, these silly you’re using a Mac. It doesn’t show you the preview of the of the pictures.
Speaker: 0
13:51
Silly Mac.
Speaker: 4
13:52
Keep looking until you find the of a big red truck, but I’ll tell the audience why you’re looking for it, exactly what we’re talking about here. So, yeah, keep going. Alright. Back back There we go. You’re on it. Go back a little bit. Go back to the article 3 go go left, like, 3 times.
Speaker: 4
14:08
Right there. Go back or right there. So this one stone, 340 tons, they call it the largest operation of its kind since the Egyptians built the pyramids. They had to custom build a 200 and 60 foot long trailer truck that consists of 196 semi truck wheels. It has 44 axles. It’s 32 feet long.
Speaker: 4
14:27
It took a year of planning. It cost $10,000,000. It took 9 days to move this 340 ton stone.
Speaker: 0
14:33
What a great use of taxpayers’ money. $2,000,000 that there’s no way they needed that money for LA.
Speaker: 4
14:39
Yeah. Who cares about potholes and homeless people?
Speaker: 0
14:41
No way. I mean, this is more important.
Speaker: 4
14:44
And so this is what’s so important is that this the largest stone moved in human history is is at the Ramesseum. Inexplicably moved 170 miles from the quarry in Aswan. And here’s the significance of this. Brother, the this stone at the lodge Los Angeles County Museum of Art is 1 third of the weight.
Speaker: 4
15:08
1 the the stone at the Ram Museum is 3 times heavier.
Speaker: 0
15:12
And how far did they move that stone?
Speaker: 4
15:15
The this one at the No. The the one the Ramesan? 170 miles, and the other one was moved a 106 miles.
Speaker: 0
15:21
A 170 miles. And It’s £2,000,000.
Speaker: 4
15:25
And so this is where things get really fun is that, they say, the academics, they say that the stones would have been moved on tree logs because that’s their best guess. And it’s not an unreasonable guess, but when you look into the nuance details so I really nerded out hard on this.
Speaker: 4
15:42
There’s a lot of people are you familiar with the Mohs scale of hardness? No. So it’s the measurement of stone, and it’s often used by alternative, ancient history buffs to say that, hey, copper based tooling could not have been utilized to cut granite stone like the that’s been claimed.
Speaker: 4
15:58
And there’s no evidence that the Egyptians that the Egyptians never told us they use bronze tooling to cut the stones and make up the granite stones within the pyramid. And so I started asking him, like, wait a second. If they’re gonna say that they moved a £2,200,000 stone on tree logs.
Speaker: 4
16:14
Well, they say that it was the cedar the the Lebanon cedar trees. Well, I nerded out on this, and there’s something called the Jengka scale of hardness, which measures the hardness of of wood, and it’s often used for if you’re gonna pick, wood flooring in your house.
Speaker: 0
16:29
Very soft wood.
Speaker: 4
16:30
It’s one of the softest on Earth. Not the softest, but it’s so soft that it would never even be considered for flooring in your house because your furniture and your heels would dent it immediately. And if you were to put significant weight on it, whatever that weight is, it would either crush it, crumble it, or at least dent it out of a circle or being a circular nature to roll on.
Speaker: 4
16:47
And so when you look into the nuanced details involving the mysterious accomplishments of the ancients, it becomes abundantly clear. Like, if I had one thesis, is that the true history of mankind was more advanced than what we’re taught in school. Now how advanced? That’s the fun topic, and we we’ll dive into that here in the next couple hours.
Speaker: 4
17:06
But the the the reality is that there’s evidence for all who have eyes to see that there I mean, again, brother, a 1,000 metric ton statue, and this is this is right out of encyclopedias.
Speaker: 0
17:17
Show the statue. So this is the statue. It somehow or another fell.
Speaker: 4
17:21
Yeah. So it was a seated statue. That’s me in front of it, and it’s broken into multiple pieces.
Speaker: 0
17:27
There’s some images, Jamie, of what it originally looked like.
Speaker: 4
17:31
Look. So that foot, it’s up to my belly button. Like, the top of the foot. That’s just the foot. There’s another picture that would an illustration that would show you would’ve what it would’ve looked like when it was full. There it is. Go back one. So that’s what it looks like from an aerial shot now. It’s completely toppled over. God knows what would have taken to knock this thing over.
Speaker: 4
17:51
They would they say, oh, probably an earthquake. It was a seated statue. I if it was a standing statue, I so that
Speaker: 0
17:57
That’s what it looked like originally.
Speaker: 4
17:59
That’s what they yes. And, again, a 1000 metric tons is £2,200,000. How it got knocked over in itself to me might be indicators of some sort of cataclysm, but that’s a side point. But the point is this. It was moved a 170 miles. They do not the Egyptians did not articulate, illustrate, or describe how they would have done so.
Speaker: 0
18:19
And Isn’t that part of the problem with, like, the burning of the Library of Alexandria as all that information was lost forever?
Speaker: 4
18:25
Yes. Or here’s the thing.
Speaker: 3
18:27
Let me
Speaker: 4
18:27
say this real quick. Brother, the Library of Alexandria was, like, thousands of years before the Great Pyramid. Like, the Library of Alexandria was just after was it 47, AD or BC that it got destroyed is believed something around there, so 2000 years ago. This statue is 3000 years old according to the academics. So this is a 1000 years before the Library of Alexandria.
Speaker: 4
18:48
So, yeah, it’s not unreasonable to suggest that they would have had information about how they constructed these things. In fact, I want to believe that they did.
Speaker: 2
18:55
But they might not have. Gone.
Speaker: 4
18:56
Yeah. They might not have. What were you gonna say, Jay?
Speaker: 2
18:57
Oh, oh, well, you’re talking about the we look at the way that they move the stones like you’re talking about the cedar. They moved one stone in human history that was really big. The biggest stone ever moved was, the thunder stone. It was moved by Catherine the Great’s
Speaker: 4
19:11
people. Late 1700?
Speaker: 2
19:12
Late 1700. They, used a big team of people, and they moved this thing. I I it’s not very far, like, 10 miles, 8 miles, something like that.
Speaker: 4
19:20
Nine miles? And how much
Speaker: 2
19:21
was the ocean?
Speaker: 4
19:21
And it took 9 months.
Speaker: 2
19:23
And when they were pulling this thing on the ground, they had to consistently try metallurgy different types of ball bearings for it to roll on because the ones they were moving would keep being crushed. And then they had to use screw jacks that are just like you jack
Speaker: 0
19:35
up a house floor with, like a sub floor.
Speaker: 2
19:37
They would use these screw jacks to lift the statue back up and put it on bearings. Well, the Romans didn’t have a screw jack. The we had metallurgy with trying different kinds of ball bearings and shit. That’s something way outside. I mean, the 1700 the 1700, we’re talking right at the cusp of them actually making structural steel. Know, this is the beginning of iron bridges and shit.
Speaker: 2
19:56
They were actually making good metallurgy then and it still took trial and error to move this stone. And it’s that stone is basically the same size as the ones at Baalbek, a tiny bit bigger. But the same kind of issues where they would have had to have jacked that thing up, they would have had to which would have took steel or hard, hard metal.
Speaker: 2
20:12
They would basically, they had to have some highly advanced metallurgy for the time. Not as good as we have now, but 1700 level of metallurgy. That’s what it would have taken.
Speaker: 4
20:22
And the Romans did not have that level
Speaker: 2
20:25
of such as close.
Speaker: 4
20:26
So that’s the thing. So there’s something that you inform me of, Dan, and this is let me just give you a shout out. Hey, everybody. Go subscribe to Dedunking on YouTube. Your channel is a gold mine that is bringing you are bridging together the facts that the alternative theorists are presenting as well as the academics, and you’re differentiating the truth and your truth, and your channel is so valuable.
Speaker: 4
20:46
And what you taught me is that the invention of the screw jack was utilized in order to lift that thunder stone, the bronze horseman, on top of that those metal rails. So with the Egyptian or excuse me. The Romans didn’t have that. That wasn’t invented until 1000 of years later.
Speaker: 4
21:02
So without that screw jack, they would have never been able to lift it in the 1st place.
Speaker: 2
21:07
That stone would have just sat there because yeah.
Speaker: 0
21:09
You said something that you don’t believe in ancient technology.
Speaker: 2
21:12
I don’t believe in ancient high technology in the regards that, generally speaking, when you start getting Put this microphone.
Speaker: 3
21:18
So sorry.
Speaker: 2
21:18
It’s okay. Put it like
Speaker: 0
21:19
a fist from
Speaker: 3
21:20
your face.
Speaker: 2
21:20
I’m so sorry about that. It’s okay. That I don’t I’m not a believer in ancient high technology in regards that I don’t believe, like I don’t even even ancient steam engines would be, like, pushing it. When you start talking, like, really advanced stuff, I tend to be tend to look for other, explanations.
Speaker: 2
21:36
I tend to look for you know, stone was the premier building material for hominids for, like, 1000000 of years, literally 1000000 of years. So father passed to his son how to do this sort of thing, and eventually, you get to a point where we start working with metal and that that kinda just dies off.
Speaker: 2
21:52
We quit doing that for a while. And then a 1000 years goes by and we look at what our ancestors used to do and we’re like, holy shit. But I honestly think a lot of the stuff that if we just saw how they did it, we would just be like, well, fuck. Why didn’t I think of that? But
Speaker: 0
22:05
But wait a minute. When you’re talking about moving things that are a 1,000 tons and you’re moving them through the mountains, like, how? I I mean I mean Why wouldn’t you believe in some
Speaker: 2
22:14
sort of ancient technology?
Speaker: 0
22:16
Let’s put
Speaker: 2
22:16
it this way. I’m not opposed to the idea, but we need to get there first. Like, if we’re going like, we’re talking about the the thunder stone or the Baalbek stones. Going from like, I feel like we need to exhaust every other possibility before we can start hanging our hat on something
Speaker: 0
22:31
bigger. What other possibilities could you even conceive of?
Speaker: 2
22:34
That’s I’ve I’ve been open to the conversation.
Speaker: 0
22:37
But it is technology. Right? Well, I’m
Speaker: 2
22:38
I’m not yeah. It would
Speaker: 0
22:39
be form of very sophisticated technology if you’re gonna move something that heavy.
Speaker: 2
22:44
It would be definitely something bigger better than we know, or different than we know. But, like, like, I I give example that I’ve used it with Jim before was, you know, when, this, World War 2 ended, America ended all their sniper schools overseas, to to tighten the budget.
Speaker: 2
23:00
And when Vietnam started, we didn’t have any sniper schools. And the NCOs on the ground say, hey, we need trained snipers. They had to actually recruit snipers, shooters from the American Olympic team because we didn’t have trained snipers anymore. In 20 years, we had better tools, but worse, results because of the lack of skills.
Speaker: 2
23:19
So I’m I’m of the opinion that there’s some
Speaker: 0
23:22
You you right. But the sniper is something that we’re all very well aware of. It’s conceivable. It’s obvious how you would do it. It’s you could explain it to the layperson.
Speaker: 2
23:32
Yeah. You you can. But it was something that still there was a skill set that was lost in just 20 years. That’s all. I I think that, I think that like a lot of things, you see a lot of the ideas for moving the big rocks. So some guys will use, like, like, they think they’re, like, vac like, water pressure vacuums were used to pull rocks up tubes and all you see all kinds of of interesting hypothesis that use lower tech means that I tend to think most of them I think that don’t work but I tend to to think that those would be the direction we should be looking before we go to ancient high technology.
Speaker: 2
24:03
And again, the reason the reason that I think that is, because if we do get to ancient high technology, we really need to have eliminated everything else by by we get there in order to be taken seriously. I guess that’s kind of how I look at it. I’m a more skeptical person.
Speaker: 4
24:17
Real quick. So let’s let’s let’s back up to this. Let’s see if we agree on this. Would you agree that what we were taught in school that the ancients were more sophisticated than the described narrative? Yeah. Absolutely. Then there you go. So we’re on the same page because it’s like, what’s technology? Like, do they have space lasers and hydraulics? I’m not suggesting that. Was technology. Right? A horse saddle technology.
Speaker: 4
24:37
Technology. Right? So they had something else.
Speaker: 2
24:39
No. Yeah. They definitely when when I guess Yeah. Like, when I get to the when I think when most people think high technology, like you say, space lasers and stuff, powered powered things, like something where they were no longer using human power or water power, something they were harnessing energy or doing sophisticated chemistry, things like that’s where I start to be like, well, I I need more evidence to go that far with it.
Speaker: 2
24:59
However, the moving of the big rocks is something that I’m I’m quick to say. But in order to do it, we would need if we were to do it, we would need technology well outside of what they had available to them at the time. And and in my opinion, if you look at those like this at Baalbek, which will go back to that, you’ve got the 3 big stones that were put in a wall that don’t have the Roman human unit of measurement used.
Speaker: 2
25:21
And we got 3 big rocks in the ground that do have the Roman unit of measurement. I think that they gave up. They realized they weren’t able to do it. They had one group carving them and the guy’s tasked to move them. Looked at, what the fuck are you guys on?
Speaker: 2
25:31
But ain’t no way we’re moving these things. You’re on crack.
Speaker: 4
25:33
And the fact that it’s undocumented, like, the foundation of Baalbek is completely undocumented. The the go ahead.
Speaker: 0
25:40
You were saying something about dating it to 11000 years.
Speaker: 4
25:43
There is so, Jamie, if you go to the Baalbek folder, you’ll find an encyclopedia article that describes the evidence of human habitation at Baalbek dating back 9000 BC, which is 11000 years ago. And I’m not suggesting these stones were created back then. I’m open to it.
Speaker: 0
26:00
What is the evidence? Like, what kind of evidence? Pottery?
Speaker: 4
26:03
Oh, sure. I’d have to go read through the scientific article, but it’s Right. Cubans were there 11000 years ago.
Speaker: 3
26:09
Yes.
Speaker: 4
26:09
Right. Okay. And the fact that they don’t document when the when the Romans were yeah. See, right there. And there’s another
Speaker: 0
26:16
History that dates back at least 11000 years encompassing significant periods such as prehistoric, Canaanite, Hellenistic, and Roman errors after Alexander the Great conquered the city in 334 BCE. He renamed it Heliopolis? Heliopolis?
Speaker: 4
26:30
Heliopolis.
Speaker: 0
26:31
Heliopolis, Greek for sun city. The city flourished under Roman rule. It,
Speaker: 4
26:37
Now let me say this real quick. Jamie, will you go to the picture of the the mountains in this folder? So the this is something that’s unbelievable alright. So just scroll through all these photos of the mountains because here’s something that people need to understand that is unbelievably significant, which is that all at Baalbek, there are approximately 200 rose granite columns that were transported from the Aswan quarry in Egypt, which is 700 miles as the bird flies.
Speaker: 4
27:01
And what’s wild is that the only way to get them to Baalbek because the Baalbek is located in the middle of the Lebanon mountains, and it has an average elevation of 8,000 feet with peaks reaching over 10,000 feet. As you can see, there’s a freaking ski resort there, which I couldn’t believe when I was driving there. There was literally the ski lifts. I went there in September.
Speaker: 4
27:21
So they had to bring all of those multi ton, columns stone columns from Egypt, and the only way to get there was over these mountains, which is mind blowing.
Speaker: 0
27:30
And what you’re saying by how how the crow flies as the crow flies, what people need to understand is that doesn’t take into account elevation changes.
Speaker: 4
27:37
Right.
Speaker: 0
27:38
So if you’re if you have a flat line like a bird and you’re flying from one point to another, that’s 700 miles. But if you have to go up and down and up and down and up and down, it’s significantly larger in when the measurement, it’s not 700 miles. It’s probably double that.
Speaker: 4
27:54
Right. And that’s an excellent point. And it’s like then the question is like, why would they do this? Like, why would they
Speaker: 2
28:00
go out
Speaker: 4
28:00
of there? How and why?
Speaker: 0
28:02
How why is, like, it’s cool.
Speaker: 2
28:04
But how how is Yeah.
Speaker: 3
28:06
The
Speaker: 0
28:06
real question. Like, how do I mean, obviously, we built things because it’s cool. Right.
Speaker: 4
28:09
You know,
Speaker: 0
28:10
if you go to the Acropolis and the Parthenon, you go, why did they do it? Well, it’s fucking cool. You know? But, like, people like to leave cool shit behind. Right. But
Speaker: 2
28:17
you look at Baalbek, so so a lot of interesting things about it. Like, it has the largest temple of Jupiter out of anywhere on the Roman Empire. Generally speaking, it’s got some of the biggest temples in the Roman Empire period, but it’s a far flung corner of their empire. And it’s not an important city, really.
Speaker: 2
28:31
I mean, it semi important in the region, but it’s certainly no Cairo or anything.
Speaker: 0
28:35
Right.
Speaker: 2
28:36
The whole but but it has all these huge temples. My opinion is my thinking is that they showed up and there was this massive stonework there. And these are the Romans. They can’t have you these can’t have the locals thinking their ancestors were better than the Romans, so they fucking hijack it.
Speaker: 2
28:50
We just build big shit on top of it. This is now ours. We plan our stamp on it. This is a Roman building. This is all Roman now.
Speaker: 2
28:57
This was never your ancestors. This was always ours. And then the locals don’t ever you can’t look to their forefathers or whatever legends they had in a couple of generations, just the power of Rome.
Speaker: 0
29:06
Well, even the, Parthenon, it’s built on the Acropolis. And the Acropolis is older than the Parthenon. And it’s you know, who made that? Everybody just shrugs their shoulders. Other folks?
Speaker: 3
29:20
Stay away from the mysteries. We have all
Speaker: 2
29:22
the building we put up here.
Speaker: 4
29:24
You know, what’s interesting about Baalbek as well is that it’s in the Bible. The Lebanon mountains are mentioned 103 times in the Bible. I am not a Bible thumper. I am a believer in a divine creation. I’m proud to say it because I’ve seen the proof of my own life. However, what’s interesting is about Baalbek is that they said that it was created by Baal, which is, like, this demon entity in the Bible. Woah.
Speaker: 4
29:46
And they declare it as the world’s first civilization after the flood, and it was created by giants as punishment for what their iniquities of the flood.
Speaker: 2
29:54
Oh, wow.
Speaker: 4
29:55
And I have an article about it, Jamie. If you scroll through,
Speaker: 0
29:57
you’ll find it. Now we’re in the Anunnaki territory.
Speaker: 4
29:59
There you go. Right? Exactly. The extinction
Speaker: 2
30:01
has entered the chest.
Speaker: 4
30:02
Hold on. Go back to those cranes. Let me tell you this. So what you’re looking at here is the Romans’ most sophisticated crane in their history. It had a max lifting capacity of 6.6 tons. In other words, to lift just one of those trilithon stones, you would need 133 of these, which is obviously completely not feasible whatsoever.
Speaker: 4
30:23
You couldn’t you you wouldn’t have the space to do it, and it’s just ridiculous to suggest you would coordinate through 133 cranes around it. So what is what I’m trying to say is that it’s further suggestive evidence that the Romans didn’t build it because they didn’t have the capability to lift stones of that mass.
Speaker: 0
30:37
Yeah. That’s still pretty fascinating. The Romans were able to build a crane that could lift 6 tons.
Speaker: 2
30:41
That’s amazing.
Speaker: 0
30:42
But but not enough to even lift the stones that were inside the king’s chamber.
Speaker: 3
30:47
Mhmm.
Speaker: 4
30:47
Right? So let me let me put this into perspective. So the largest stones inside the the king’s chamber of the Great Pyramid are approximately 80 tons imperial. So actually, 78 tons imperial or 70 tons metric removed some 500 miles from the Aswan quarry and lift and stacked 100 of feet above the ground.
Speaker: 4
31:04
But here’s what’s wild is that those stones, the largest stones in the Great Pyramid compared to the trolithon stones, the trolithon stones are 15 times heavier. Not not not twice as heavy.
Speaker: 3
31:17
Those stones
Speaker: 4
31:17
times as heavy, not 10 times as heavy.
Speaker: 2
31:19
As a guy who’s skeptical of that stuff, ancient high technology, there’s a couple of things that make it where it’s like I I straight up can’t explain. Baalbek is one of them. You can when you can you could use those cranes and lay them on their side and drag that stone across the ground.
Speaker: 2
31:32
That’s exactly what they did with the thunder stone, Catherine the Great’s time. But then you are tasked with lifting that son of a bitch, and all of a sudden you’re right back to where you started. You can drag it across however you want, but when you get to picking it up 14 feet off the ground
Speaker: 4
31:44
And they dragged it on those those rails, though.
Speaker: 2
31:46
Yeah. The sophisticated rails went
Speaker: 0
31:48
more than 23 feet off the ground.
Speaker: 2
31:49
Oh, yeah. 30 feet. Right. Yeah.
Speaker: 4
31:51
It is 30 feet, as documented. I have 23 feet illustrated because it’s where the ground is now. Right. But it it’s the the foundation of it goes subsurface. So it’s like, you know, with these details, like, there’s a reason why there is a growing interest in the mysteries of lost ancient civilizations because smart people of all kinds of walks of life are looking into the nuance details and realizing, like, oh, wait a second.
Speaker: 4
32:15
Like, when Graham Hawk Graham Hancock says that there’s a missing chapter of human history, like, this is reality. We don’t know how they built the Great Pyramid. It isn’t it is a fact that the Egyptians left us with no explanation of any kind. Out of the tens of thousands of hieroglyphs all over, Egypt, not a single one of them describes how they constructed the pyramid or how they cut granite stones.
Speaker: 4
32:35
Not one.
Speaker: 2
32:36
Yeah. There’s not there’s there’s big lacks of big gaps in the knowledge is where we end up having these kinds of discussions. And I think to go back to where we first started, we mentioned, Flint at the beginning. It problem in my opinion that most people that see things
Speaker: 3
32:49
kind of like I do as opposed to like Jimmy or yourself does where they’re
Speaker: 2
32:50
looking where it’s I I kind of need to take my steps to get to that ancient high technology. They end up going that just straight debunker route. And then they get skeptical. They that skeptical, they get cynical. They turn into assholes. They turn into they’re looking for ways to
Speaker: 0
33:07
Deal to authority.
Speaker: 2
33:08
Shoot this down. I just fuck your idea. Right? Just so your idea is wrong or so I know what the implications are instead of saying, well, you know, maybe there’s other implications. Let’s have a discussion about it. They just go straight to, no. This is impossible. This is stupid. Make fun of the person. Compare it to flat eartherism. Compare it to aliens.
Speaker: 2
33:24
Oh, and Well, in
Speaker: 0
33:26
this case, even worse. Yeah. In Flint’s case, he’s even worse. He he’s somehow or another connected to white supremacists.
Speaker: 2
33:31
It’s not just Flint. It’s that fucking John Hoops, man. He’s the one that started that shit. He’s he’s, that guy, Wikipedia. And we can talk about that for a quick second. John Hoops is a professor for the university for Kansas University, and he is been on been one of the earliest editors of Wikipedia consistently.
Speaker: 2
33:49
Graham Hancock’s page, Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis page, all kinds of, pseudoarchaeology and and all pyramids and Atlantis, all that shit. He’s got locked. He he it’s not just that he edits it. Him and his buddies edit it, and you can’t go in and edit it. There’s a scientist from the comet research group that tried to edit the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis page and was told he can’t because it’s a conflict of interest.
Speaker: 2
34:10
A fucking scientist that works on this shit is a conflict of interest, but a scientist from outside the field isn’t.
Speaker: 4
34:17
By the way, John Hoops studied at Harvard and Yale. He got his undergrad, I believe, from Harvard and his PhD from Yale or vice versa. This is this is significant because he’s controlling the information.
Speaker: 2
34:28
And he he hides this stuff too. If he he’ll tell you that you’ll he’ll tell I watched him tell Forbes, hey. You you guys need to cite Wikipedia instead of just because they said the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis and they just made a real quick article about it with no skepticism.
Speaker: 2
34:41
He says you need to cite Wikipedia as well. He edits the Wikipedia page and doesn’t mention that he edits it when he tells people to go look at the fucking text.
Speaker: 0
34:49
What’s his motivation for debunking this stuff?
Speaker: 2
34:52
He doesn’t like Graham Hancock. He doesn’t he think he same kind of thing. He thinks pseudo archaeology is all the isms. He if you believe in ancient high technology or you believe in Atlantis, you must be a white supremacist, a racist, a misogynist, a con
Speaker: 0
35:03
Let’s forget about Atlantis for a minute, but I definitely wanna talk about it. But the what you’re seeing is impossible. It’s essentially impossible with today’s technology. When you’re talking about those stones that were moved 700 miles through the mountains, if you tried to bring some engineers together in the United States in 2024, the best the brightest, and said, here’s your project.
Speaker: 0
35:22
They would say, fuck you.
Speaker: 3
35:24
You you you you you you need
Speaker: 2
35:25
to levels of money to figure
Speaker: 5
35:27
out. Right?
Speaker: 0
35:27
You you would need super billionaire money, and even then, I don’t know how you would do it. I I just don’t I can’t conceivably think of a way. And that’s what’s so interesting about this stuff is that whatever they did was not just complicated for the time. It was so beyond our imagination of what was possible at the time that it’s beyond our imagination of what’s possible today.
Speaker: 4
35:53
Right.
Speaker: 0
35:53
So it just it throws this these facts, the physical facts about the size and the location they were brought from, that fly in the face of logic and credibility in our understanding of what’s possible, not just then, but today. So for anybody to say, oh, we’ve figured this out. Hey, man. Fuck you.
Speaker: 0
36:15
You definitely haven’t, and the problem is that you have these fucking names attached to you, Harvard and Yale, and you’ve decided because there’s a group of people that have been studying this stuff, and they fucking wrote some shit down, and you studied what they wrote down, and you did your own studying.
Speaker: 0
36:30
You got a degree. You’re the guy. You’re the only one. And it’s these same fucking weirdo weasels that put their pronouns in their Twitter bio, and they’re just crackpots. They’re crackpots masquerading as intellectuals. Yes. Because the things that they’re saying are completely bizarre. They’re all 100% of them are captured by this woke ideology.
Speaker: 5
36:54
More than 100%.
Speaker: 0
36:55
They’re weird people, man, because they exist in this structure that’s been completely compromised, and that’s our education. Higher education systems have been completely compromised. And this is not to say that they don’t teach you amazing stuff about medicine and science. Of course, they do. But they are also in a cult.
Speaker: 4
37:11
It it is it is a total cult behavior. And, honestly, it’s their religion that when it is
Speaker: 0
37:16
a religion mostly atheists. Yes.
Speaker: 4
37:19
They are let let me just share this. So with the biggest critics and the naysayers of alternative theories, there’s a common denominator. Like, when you mentioned the pronouns in their profile Yeah. Almost all of them have it, and they’re not trans. And if you look at their political ideologies, it is extremely left, and these people are visceral. They’re toxic.
Speaker: 4
37:37
And that meme just make a side point that I almost forgot is when we’re talking about Wikipedia, a lot of people say, well, that’s why you don’t look at Wikipedia. You don’t trust it. Who cares about Wikipedia? I’m, like, excuse me. It shows up at the top of Google on anything that you search, so it cannot be ignored.
Speaker: 4
37:51
And when you’re talking a moment ago about the impossibility of the movement of these stones, I wanna just emphasize this point one more time, which is that movement of that 340 ton stone at the lodge Los Angeles County Museum of Art is one third the weight of the largest stones in ancient history.
Speaker: 4
38:07
And when you look at what it took to do it so it’s like when people you know, when you’re using the word impossible, it’s like, listen. What what it took for us to do that and it was a third of the weight, and he had to custom build this 200 60 foot long truck with 196 wheels.
Speaker: 0
38:20
Have internal combustion engines. Hydraulics. Have roads that are flat and
Speaker: 2
38:24
Far better metal, far better ropes. Yeah. And Hold on. Thousands of years of experience.
Speaker: 4
38:28
The roads the one reason why they had to go a 106 miles is because they had to go around different roads because most roads couldn’t support the weight. Like like Yes. This one people that look into this. Like, don’t listen to Jimmy the YouTuber. Like, look into the details on yourself, and you realize, like, this is completely inexplicable.
Speaker: 4
38:45
And it’s so important now because we’re living at a time where people are starting to realize that not everything we were taught was true. In fact, a lot of things you see in the mainstream media nowadays have been utterly debunked. It’s all propaganda.
Speaker: 0
38:57
And Right. And, like, about history. Yep. About, you know, recent history that’s easily proven, and the mainstream media will tell false narratives.
Speaker: 2
39:06
Right. Absolutely.
Speaker: 0
39:06
And so we know that people lie. So we know that people lie. We know that people love to be in a position of authority to be the only people that are allowed to dis distribute the truth. We know that.
Speaker: 4
39:17
Do you wanna get provocative real quick? Sure. So there nowadays, there’s a lot of conjecture about the historical accuracy of different things involving World War 2. And, Jamie, if you were to go to the Baalbek folder or, in fact, go to the folder called swastika. So this is something that I got tremendous heat for.
Speaker: 4
39:36
Whereas that when I went to Baalbek, I noticed that there were swastikas all over the place. And I’m like, well, that’s interesting. That’s ancient symbol. Mhmm. The the what a lot of people are not aware of is that the swastika is prehistoric.
Speaker: 4
39:48
It’s found on 5 continents around the world and dates back approximately 10000 years. It is found in Europe, Africa, Asia, North, and South America, all before transoceanic sea travel was thought to be possible. If you scroll through the images, Jamie, you’ll kinda give the audience an understanding. Now let me let me preface this whole conversation with this. Fuck Hitler. He he right?
Speaker: 4
40:10
Like, he, of course.
Speaker: 0
40:11
Fuck Nazis. God. I love all that.
Speaker: 4
40:13
Right? He stole the symbol, which was a symbol of peace, and he bastardized it. So this right here, I took this photo. You’d almost think it’s photoshopped in. This is this is a photo. This is real. And I’m like, well, this is fascinating. I put this up on Twitter, and I said, did, Hitler know something about ancient history that we don’t? And the reason why and this was a sincere question.
Speaker: 4
40:33
Everyone started calling me a Nazi. I was spreading dangerous Nazism for it. No. This is a grown up conversation. Hitler was a very intel he was evil, but he was intelligent, and the Nazis were arguably the most technologically advanced country at that time in World War 2, the jet engine, rockets.
Speaker: 4
40:51
And for some reason, for reasons that I cannot find a definitive answer on, is why was Hitler so into an archaeology? They call it Nazi archaeology. And the the mainstream people will say, oh, well, it’s he weaponized. He was trying to get this Aryan thing going to unite people and just create an enemy.
Speaker: 2
41:09
They’ll kick it to Himmler a lot. They’ll say that Himmler was the one that was really into that shit. Yep.
Speaker: 4
41:14
And so that’s, by the way, that’s Peru, like, 800 years ago. You’ll find the Native Americans, the Pima Indians, the Navajo, the Apache, there’s actually,
Speaker: 0
41:24
a Hindu temple in Los Angeles that was, near my old house. Yeah. And we went to visit it. You could actually have weddings there, and they had to have a sign up explaining why there are so many swastikas on the building. I went to The swastikas all
Speaker: 3
41:37
over it.
Speaker: 4
41:37
I went to Japan. It’s the same thing there. They have swastikas on different tribes.
Speaker: 0
41:40
Okinawan karate when I was a kid. Okinawan karate, one of their patches was a swastika. Yeah. And this was when I was a kid. So this is in the eighties when I was studying martial when I first started studying martial arts. You could get these Okinawan karate patches that had a swastika on it. Had nothing to do with Hitler. It had to do with Japan.
Speaker: 4
41:59
Right.
Speaker: 2
41:59
Well So sorry. Go ahead.
Speaker: 4
42:01
Alright. So real quick while Jamie’s on this slide, this is from the Hopewell Mound people, which is in modern day Ohio, and that dates back 22100 years ago.
Speaker: 0
42:09
Jesus Christ. This is from modern day Ohio 2 1000 years ago?
Speaker: 4
42:14
22100 years ago. And so here’s the point that I’m making about the swastika, is that look. People debate on whether it was the Milky Way galaxy, the Big Dipper, whatever you wanna say its origins were. I do not think that it’s a coincidence that a symbol is so specific as it is, is found on 5 continents around the world before transoceanic sea travel was said to be possible.
Speaker: 4
42:33
Because just to remind the audience, it wasn’t till 14/92 when Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue. End of. And it’s, like, no. This, I believe, this is strong suggestive evidence that humans were traversing the continents and the oceans 1000 of years before we were taught in school, which is evidence of being more advanced than we were taught in school.
Speaker: 3
42:53
Right.
Speaker: 0
42:53
Right. Now what did they think this thing was?
Speaker: 2
42:56
Well, I I have an idea about that. I mean, it’s it’s not it was just Dan’s idea, but, the four the four directions across, it’s the root of the swastika. That’s pretty commonly used, even in Native American culture as, like, your cardinal points. Right? This is north, south, east, west.
Speaker: 2
43:10
So this could be a symbol for the passage of time. Here’s the sky is turning. The the cardinal points turn.
Speaker: 0
43:17
Rotation of the earth Exactly. Along with the points of the the compass.
Speaker: 2
43:21
Exactly. That’s that’s what I that but that’s just an idea. I mean, that doesn’t, it doesn’t really add a whole lot of context to it as far as,
Speaker: 4
43:29
you know, I I Why
Speaker: 0
43:30
not just have a cross then? Up, down, left, right. Isn’t it crazy that a geometric pattern is evil? Yeah. Not just a geometric pattern, but a mustache? Like,
Speaker: 3
43:38
it’s it’s like it’s Deeply offensive.
Speaker: 0
43:40
It’s it’s funny. It’s crazy. It is. Like, your beard is fine. Nobody has any problems with it. But imagine, like, if, like, oh, you have a wizard beard and you believe in child sacrifice.
Speaker: 3
43:50
Oh, yeah. You know, like, look at crazy.
Speaker: 0
43:53
It’s very strange what we’ve done, and, obviously, that’s how horrific Hitler was.
Speaker: 4
43:58
So here’s something people need to understand. I wanna emphasize this point. Hitler people need to look in the details. He was looking for giants in Africa. They did they they set a mission to
Speaker: 0
44:08
be also on meth.
Speaker: 3
44:09
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean Okay. I’d be looking for giants in Africa, dude. I’m like, bro,
Speaker: 0
44:13
we’re gonna go find dinosaurs. We fucking go.
Speaker: 3
44:17
I I love it.
Speaker: 4
44:19
The thing is, though, it’s like I have not found an answer on why he was looking for the ark of the covenant covenant. He was looking for Thor’s hammer and the holy grail. Yeah. And and the thing is to me, I’m like, I don’t what did hit I feel like there’s something that they knew about ancient history that we don’t.
Speaker: 4
44:36
I don’t know if this is true or not, but I want I feel like I can’t find a straight answer. And let me tell you this. If you go googling for answers on Hitler’s interest in archaeology
Speaker: 0
44:45
the FBI comes knocking at you. Sure.
Speaker: 3
44:47
What do you have to do, Jimmy?
Speaker: 4
44:48
You’re gonna find the same article. So this is actually kind of explosive. About 2 years ago, I made a video about Google, sabotaging their search results. Because remember how it’ll show you if you Google some topic, it’ll say there’s, like, a 1,000,000,000 results? Yes. So I made a video on this, and they would max out at it didn’t used to be this way because I remember watching a video years ago of people going thousands of pages to find some blog spot on some topic.
Speaker: 4
45:11
It then became limited. I did the experiment myself many times on on benign topics such as pancakes was one of them. I typed in pancakes. It had, like, a 1000000000 like, 700,000,000 results, and then it only go back to page 41. And then it would recycle all those pages before, the dozens of pages, would recycle some of the same exact mainstream articles.
Speaker: 3
45:31
Mhmm.
Speaker: 4
45:31
And so I did this on all kinds of topics. And now Google has since removed the page numbers. And so you can only just go see more, see more, see more. And so if you Google any type of topic and if you’re looking for answers on this, they’re gonna keep sending you the same regurgitated mainstream articles.
Speaker: 4
45:48
So I can’t find a reliable answer on why Hitler was so invested in ancient history. And, again, I don’t give a shit about his Aryan stuff. Like
Speaker: 0
45:57
Right. Why was he into the occult? Why was he Right. Yeah.
Speaker: 4
46:00
I wanna know why he was looking for the Ark of the Covenant.
Speaker: 0
46:02
Well, obviously, they their engineering was insane. I mean, to this like, look, so many of our best vehicles that we buy today, the most coveted vehicles came out of Nazi Germany Yeah. And originally Audi. Right? Volkswagen, which is Porsche, you know, BMW, Bavarian Motor Works. I mean, all that shit came from the fucking Nazis. I mean, have you ever seen Hitler’s race car? No.
Speaker: 0
46:25
Hitler had an Audi race car. Really? Yeah, man. It’s worth, like, a shit ton of money. See if you can find Hitler’s race car.
Speaker: 0
46:32
But this was, I mean, their engineering was superior. This is the reason why we had Operation Paperclip. So Operation Paperclip, we brought over all of the best knock Nazi rocket scientists.
Speaker: 2
46:44
The ones with the Thomas Edison.
Speaker: 0
46:45
Yeah. They that’s how we got NASA. Yeah. We got NASA essentially from Nazis.
Speaker: 2
46:50
That’s still the v 2 to put people on the on the moon. I mean,
Speaker: 0
46:53
basically I had an yeah. That’s his original race car. Isn’t that fucking crazy?
Speaker: 2
46:56
But that was basically a v 2 rocket.
Speaker: 0
46:58
Audi. Right? Is that is that what was the oh, it’s a Mercedes Benz? Did he have more than 1? I I believe he had a later one that that’s it. That’s the one.
Speaker: 3
47:07
Wow.
Speaker: 0
47:08
So that one had the Audi symbol in the front of it. Woah.
Speaker: 4
47:10
Can you just clarify your pronouns so I know not to be offended that you’re interested in this?
Speaker: 0
47:14
I’m me, him. I’m an American man. We’re coming to your town. So look at that photograph. Click on that. Auto Union. I guess that was what Audi’s original name was. Isn’t that crazy? Look at that car. It’s
Speaker: 4
47:31
pretty sharp. Wow.
Speaker: 0
47:32
Pretty fucking dope. I mean, imagine in 1938. Oh my god. It’s probably worth it says it’s worth £5,500,000.
Speaker: 2
47:39
And illegal to sell on so many markets.
Speaker: 0
47:41
Is that pounds? Is that what that is? That little sign?
Speaker: 2
47:44
So many things. They would be like, oh, that’s Hitler’s card. No.
Speaker: 3
47:46
I’m sorry.
Speaker: 2
47:47
We can’t have you listing that here, buddy. Sorry.
Speaker: 0
47:49
Tom Segura bought Bert Kreischer a cup that apparently was one of Hitler’s cups.
Speaker: 4
47:54
Like one that he handled?
Speaker: 3
47:56
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
47:56
Really? Allegedly. But, you know, how the fuck do you
Speaker: 3
47:58
Let’s get
Speaker: 4
47:58
him in the studio and see this thing.
Speaker: 0
48:00
Yeah. But if you have that, you’re a monster. But if you had, Genghis Khan’s sword, you’re fucking cool.
Speaker: 4
48:06
Yeah. That’s actually an interesting that’s a good comparison. I mean,
Speaker: 0
48:08
he killed a lot more people. He killed 10% of the population of Earth.
Speaker: 2
48:12
But he did it long enough ago that you don’t hear anybody talking about it.
Speaker: 0
48:15
He raped so many people that his DNA is in a giant percentage of people today.
Speaker: 4
48:18
It’s like 20% of
Speaker: 2
48:19
them. It’s
Speaker: 4
48:20
something that’s like
Speaker: 0
48:21
some number. We’ve done it before. I forget what the numbers are, but they’re really nutty. But the point is is there’s something particularly disgusting to us about that one genocide, and it’s it’s really interesting. And, you know, you you you wonder, like, how long it’s going to take.
Speaker: 0
48:37
We we Dan Carlin has talked about this in-depth because, he talks about the Mongols and that it’s so far in the past. You know, we’re talking about, like, 1200, AD. It’s so far in the past that we look at it with almost like an objective perspective instead of a moral perspective.
Speaker: 0
48:55
So we say, you know, one thing that ding Genghis Khan did that was great, he opened up trade to the east and he was a believer of all religions. You could practice anything. You didn’t impose anything on people.
Speaker: 2
49:06
Yeah. But he fucking killed everybody.
Speaker: 0
49:08
Like, if you’re alive back then, he’s way worse than Hitler. He killed 10% of the population of Earth, but the Nazis were so recent. You know, we have grandfathers that are alive today that fought World War 2, and they can tell you,
Speaker: 2
49:21
you know, like, hey,
Speaker: 0
49:22
man. I fucking remember this shit. And and then we have Jews like Ari Shaffir’s dad who was in the concentration camps. Ari Shaffir’s dad has a tattoo in his arm.
Speaker: 4
49:30
That’s wild.
Speaker: 0
49:31
Yeah. His dad’s in his eighties, I believe. Well, that’s
Speaker: 2
49:34
that that recent memory is a big part. I can see the Hunter s Thompson stuff on your wall. Do you you read his book of Hells Angels. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You remember him talking about that aspect of it? Mhmm. That, the the bikers the Hells Angels rocked Nazi memorabilia. The guy he asked the guy why?
Speaker: 2
49:50
Why don’t you and he’s like, because my dad fought the Nazis and he fucking hates this. So I I wear this because Christ. I wear this just to piss off my dad.
Speaker: 0
49:58
A lot of that. This is contrarian.
Speaker: 2
50:00
But that’s that’s but my point is is that, you know, he wouldn’t a, Genghis Kong symbol wouldn’t be doing any good. Right? Right. It’s this this has this has an emotional attachment. Genghis Kong’s mustache would be fine on me. Right? People might laugh at me a little bit,
Speaker: 0
50:12
but I don’t even know what it looked like. Yeah. See it. I can see the picture. Yeah. Right.
Speaker: 3
50:16
Yeah. They don’t know what he
Speaker: 4
50:16
looks like. Yeah. They don’t know.
Speaker: 3
50:19
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
50:19
It’s pretty wild. It’s the the Nazi thing. The the fact that it’s so horrific, it just, like, puts any anyone who has anything to say that’s coloring outside the lines, you get labeled the holocaust denier and anti Semite. You know, though the worst labels that they can put on you. And a good example of that is, that that podcast oh, god. I forget his name.
Speaker: 0
50:45
But it was the Tucker Carlson controversy where he had this guy in his podcast and he was talking about, what William Churchill’s role in the holocaust was because they had put these embargos on Germany and basically starving everybody to death. And they just started calling him a Holocaust denier. And this is, like, not what he was talking about at all. That’s not what he was saying at all.
Speaker: 0
51:08
He was just saying, no. There’s a there’s a multifaceted explanation for why they decided to exterminate all these Jews and part of it was because of an embargo Mhmm. Where they were starving people out. What is his
Speaker: 2
51:21
Darrell Cooper.
Speaker: 0
51:22
Darrell Cooper. And what is his podcast called? It’s excellent. I listen to it all the time, but my brain is not working right now. I just got out of the gym. I’m on Meathead mode.
Speaker: 4
51:32
It’s something I know what you’re talking. I I can’t I’ve drawn a blank on it as well. Martyrmaid?
Speaker: 0
51:36
Martyrmaid. That’s right. Martyrmaid. And he’s Martyrmaid on Twitter and Instagram. And, you know, to call that guy an anti Seminar or a Holocaust scenario is so stupid. He’s a brilliant guy, and his podcast is excellent. And he’s really sensitive and well balanced, and he gives a very comprehensive view of things.
Speaker: 0
51:53
It’s not in any way, like, prejudiced. It’s a great podcast. But you’re not allowed
Speaker: 2
51:58
to color outside the lines. Well, yeah, that’s all
Speaker: 3
52:00
he’s he he was just saying that Churchill was one of the villains.
Speaker: 0
52:01
Yeah. And that’s very that’s that’s realistic. Like,
Speaker: 2
52:03
the multiple different reasons for that. You you tighten up their belt, they’re gonna that’s not gonna be passed to the top. That’s gonna go straight to the people in the camps. Exactly. It’s it’s real it’s and that’s no brainer shit.
Speaker: 3
52:16
Right.
Speaker: 2
52:16
And that’s not just just to
Speaker: 3
52:17
put it
Speaker: 0
52:18
in the murder of all those Jews. That’s not what
Speaker: 2
52:20
he’s doing.
Speaker: 3
52:21
It’s just
Speaker: 0
52:21
that’s what’s so crazy about stifling
Speaker: 5
52:25
discourse.
Speaker: 3
52:25
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
52:26
Because it’s because that was a fascinating conversation. We should be considering that. Like, wow. That’s crazy. There were so many factors. There’s so many horrible things going on altogether.
Speaker: 2
52:33
Well, they say you’re supposed to learn from history, but how the fuck are you gonna learn from history if you actually take the lessons out of it? Right. I mean, this is important thing here. You’d think about this right now with the the stuff in the Middle East in the last 20 years.
Speaker: 2
52:44
We every time we put an embargo on there, we aren’t we’re not starving Saddam Hussein. We’re starving the people in his freaking prison. So remember that.
Speaker: 0
52:51
Dave Smith was talking about on a podcast recently that during the Clinton administration, the embargo’s starved to death 500,000 children.
Speaker: 3
52:59
Yeah.
Speaker: 2
52:59
See, that’s fucked. Yeah. And that’s worth remembering. And it doesn’t if if having that conversation makes somebody call you a holocaust denier, that person should be out of the conversation in my opinion. Right. And like you were saying, academia is chock full of those kinds of stuff right now.
Speaker: 0
53:12
Shame. They should be shamed by people who wanna know the the whole picture.
Speaker: 2
53:17
It’s the opposite of knowledge.
Speaker: 0
53:19
Right. It’s it’s certainly not condoning holocausts. It’s fucking it’s so stupid to not be looking at everything.
Speaker: 4
53:26
The good news is that people are waking up to this. A lot of people think just like us where they’re objective enough to understand that, like, well, that’s silly.
Speaker: 3
53:33
Yeah.
Speaker: 4
53:33
And so they’re putting themselves in a corner in this echo chamber where people just aren’t listening to many more. Like Yeah. But when it comes to, like, mainstream archaeology, we call it big archaeology, establishment archaeology, they’re putting themselves into a corner where people like, if you’re gonna if I’m gonna ask questions about the swastika and you’re gonna say I’m spreading dangerous Nazism, some people buy into it, but I’ve noticed that most people are, like, no, he’s asking a question.
Speaker: 3
53:53
Well, we
Speaker: 0
53:53
have the Internet now. We have shows like yours and yours and mine where you can have conversations about things, and and people get to see, oh, these people that are in control, they’re all loons and they’re all telling us that you have to think this one way or you’re the the worst person on earth, and I don’t buy it.
Speaker: 0
54:10
No. It’s it’s a dumb way to look at the world.
Speaker: 2
54:13
It’s un American. Sorry to It really is. Flag for a second. But, yeah, I It really is. Proud to be I live in a country where I can have somebody with their pronouns in their fucking bio and somebody not with their plan. We can both yell at each other and not have us end up in jail over it.
Speaker: 0
54:26
It’s also this position that people have when they’re teachers, when they’re educators, and they have this position, you know, and I can speak to it a little bit from martial arts. Because in martial arts, when when I first started doing martial arts, it was in 19 eighties. In the 19 eighties, every discipline believed they had the very best discipline.
Speaker: 0
54:48
All the judo people thought judo was the only martial art you needed to know. All the karate people thought karate was it. Taekwondo people where I came from, they all believed in Taekwondo. And it took UFC. The UFC to slam everything together and go, oh, Jesus.
Speaker: 0
55:03
Half of this stuff is fucking useless.
Speaker: 2
55:05
Yep. And, you
Speaker: 0
55:06
know, and some of it’s not useless. Right? There were some things from like, Jon Jones won the UFC heavyweight title this past weekend with a taekwondo kick.
Speaker: 4
55:14
It was amazing. Yeah. That was unbelievable.
Speaker: 0
55:16
And so I was so happy because that was my thing. So me watching him do that was like, yes. Why aren’t more people doing this? Like, you guys should have been doing this from the beginning. It’s the most powerful kick in the sport. But the this the you were in trouble if you trained in other disciplines. Like, Bruce Lee was a heretic.
Speaker: 3
55:33
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
55:34
And he’s probably one of the most important figures in martial arts, not just because he induced introduced people to it like myself who became martial artists because I was a Bruce Lee fan. He also combined all kinds of different martial arts, and that was Jeet Kune Do.
Speaker: 3
55:49
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
55:49
He developed a style that was essentially he took western boxing. Some judo that he learned in karate and all these different techniques and just tried to find what is the absolute best thing for just fighting. And that was, he was a heretic. Like, he was his life was threatened for that. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
56:05
And it’s because the educators want to be the only people that can distribute information, and they don’t wanna be challenged. When I was in high school,
Speaker: 2
56:14
I had a teacher.
Speaker: 0
56:15
He was his name was mister Holman. He was a very nice guy, but he was a smart guy that wanted to be the only smart guy. And he was great talking to me because I was a stupid kid. But, unfortunately, one day, I had watched a documentary, and I have I’ve always had a a very good ability to recall things.
Speaker: 0
56:34
And we were, we’re in class, and he was talking about the pollution in Lake Erie. And
Speaker: 3
56:41
I
Speaker: 0
56:41
had just watched a documentary about the extensive work that they had done to clean up Lake Erie and that they’d made these huge strides in removing pollution and crap and all these different things from Lake Erie. And he was talking about stuff that he had learned in school 20 years prior.
Speaker: 0
56:58
And so when I was I said, well, you know, there’s a PBS documentary, and I I brought this up in class where there’s been this extensive work, and they talked about the amazing accomplishments of cleaning up Lake Erie, and he got so mad at me. I’m like, you’re not mad at me, man. You’re mad at PBS. Like, I don’t fucking do any research. I watched a documentary.
Speaker: 0
57:16
But back then, you could say you don’t know what you’re talking about, and I couldn’t pull my phone out and go, oh, for but what? Look at that. Right? Fucking you could watch it, dude. Like, they these people have done an amazing work cleaning up Lake Erie.
Speaker: 2
57:29
Yep.
Speaker: 0
57:29
But he didn’t want anyone else to have any information other what he should have said is, that’s fascinating. I haven’t seen that documentary. Can you do could you recall the name of it?
Speaker: 3
57:39
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
57:39
And let’s see if we can get it, maybe show it to the class. Right. I’m gonna try to do that because that’s great.
Speaker: 2
57:44
Step 4.
Speaker: 0
57:44
That’s a good sign. What I’m talking about is what Lake Erie had become because of industrial engineering and because of pollution and waste that was coming from all these plants. So he was true he was correct, but time had changed, and he did not like that I knew that, and he didn’t know that.
Speaker: 0
58:01
And I remember being in that class going, this is so crazy. This is my fucking science teacher. My science teacher doesn’t want details. He doesn’t want facts.
Speaker: 4
58:07
This happened to me. So I was in the military years ago, and it wasn’t long after I got home from Iraq, and I was going to warrior leadership course, which is to become an e five sergeant. And back then, they were teaching ABC, which is airway bleeding, what was the other one, circulation or whatever, and, for emergency medical, response if someone’s dying.
Speaker: 4
58:27
And they had since updated where bleeding is the most important thing to focus on because soldiers were bleeding out. And during this warriors warrior leadership course, they’re teaching the core the class. 30 people, wrong information that has since outdated. I try to interject to say, oh, this is what they’re teaching now. It was the same exact thing that happened. He didn’t stop. You know? No.
Speaker: 4
58:45
This is what the this is what’s written down right here. I’m like, no. But that’s not even what they’re teaching in theater right now. Like, I’m trying to this is this is medical emergency stuff that could save someone’s life, and he didn’t wanna hear it one bit. I couldn’t believe it.
Speaker: 4
58:56
I was astonished.
Speaker: 0
58:57
He should have said that’s interesting. I did not know that. We need to update what we’re showing you. These three factors are the same, but now we know. Thank you, Jimmy. Now we know that bleeding is more primary. That should be the that’s the response of a real leader.
Speaker: 4
59:11
Right.
Speaker: 0
59:11
And they’re a real leader. You would look this you’re always gonna have blowhards in your class that are gonna wanna hear their own voice. They wanna talk about stuff and and chime in and correct people and but you gotta let a certain amount of that, and that’s the Internet.
Speaker: 0
59:23
And people don’t like that, and that’s why they wanted to ban people from Twitter. They don’t like these people coming along that have ideas that like, the great Barrington declaration where they you know, the the government actually conspired to get these people removed from Twitter.
Speaker: 0
59:37
And we know that because Elon, thank God, bought Twitter and changed discourse. But the this this was a concerted effort to take these people who were brilliant people, who had degrees, were experts in this field that they were discussing, and they decided they were gonna remove them because they didn’t go along with the narrative, and they were confusing people in a time where they were trying to force vaccinations on everyone.
Speaker: 4
01:00:04
Right.
Speaker: 2
01:00:04
The emotion side of it from the individual levels, like what you guys described, you have a teacher that was emotional reaction. That’s a huge part of it. But when the, like, that’s a huge part of it when especially with archaeology because a lot of it’s not really hard science.
Speaker: 2
01:00:19
A lot of it’s like I’ve got this arrowhead here and I’ve conjured up this story. And so now it’s my story and you’re not attacking the science. You’re attacking me. But But it gets even worse when you look at it what they get like this hate for Graham Hancock and so in particular, Graham Hancock.
Speaker: 2
01:00:31
They that makes it where it’s like you can’t trust a damn word that comes out of their mouth when they’re discussing. Like, if we were talking back to the martial arts, you know, one of the things that came out was Aikido was just ass. It’s no good at all for, like, man to man combat. It’s what was it for, like, samurais that have been knocked off a horse or some shit?
Speaker: 0
01:00:48
Well, it was designed to redistribute the energy of your attacker.
Speaker: 2
01:00:53
Okay.
Speaker: 0
01:00:54
So if someone’s coming at you with a sword, if you don’t have a sword and a guy swings a sword and you’re fast enough to get away from the path of the sword and grab the guy’s arm or body and manipulate him to the ground to remove his sword, It’s essentially a disarming
Speaker: 2
01:01:10
Okay. So it’s not the best thing
Speaker: 0
01:01:12
in the world. Work against a wrestler.
Speaker: 2
01:01:14
Okay. So So now now
Speaker: 0
01:01:16
that makes it way better. And now Wrestling is the if you wanna find out the best way to take a person to the ground and control, we 100% know it’s wrestling. Yeah.
Speaker: 4
01:01:24
You just grab them. Go. Ancient sport in the world that dates back to the Sumerians.
Speaker: 0
01:01:27
And by the way, wrestling in wrestling, I include judo. I I I include different forms of jujitsu that were ancient because these allowed people to manipulate limbs and to control joints, which allowed them also to take people down and submit them. But the point is, you you, you know, had a bunch of people believing that this one goofy ass martial art was the end all be all because of a good Steven Seagal movie.
Speaker: 0
01:01:54
Exactly. No. No.
Speaker: 2
01:01:55
And and what my point was there is it’s like you’re you’re considered pretty much an expert in martial arts. You’re not not like you’re you’re a professional announcer for UFC. You know your shit. So if I watched you say Steven Seagal, you know, his martial arts, it’s fucking Aikido, man. I don’t know what to tell you.
Speaker: 0
01:02:10
Yeah. But I would not do that. I would tell you Steven Seagal was really good. Yeah. Really good at Aikido.
Speaker: 2
01:02:15
But if you were if you, if you hated Steven Seagal, if you were one of his many haters, you could just attack Aikido without ever saying his name and just be digging him a ditch. Right? You could just be burying him without ever mentioning Steven Seagal’s name. You could just attack Aikido. Aikido is a shit martial art. It’s it’s not effective.
Speaker: 2
01:02:33
It’s not very good. And then by extension, you’re making Steven Seagal look bad. And this is one of their favorite tactics to do to Hancock.
Speaker: 4
01:02:39
They Yes.
Speaker: 2
01:02:39
They will attack this idea is racist. It’s inherently bullshit. They don’t have to mention Hancock’s names. Now it’s just they just groomed the 2 they’re so insidious this way. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:02:48
And they connect they’re they’re connecting Hancock to white supremacy and aliens is the dumbest one. Because first of all, he never said nothing about aliens. And not only that, not only does he not think of it as white people built this stuff, he thinks it’s the people that live there, but they live there a long ass time ago.
Speaker: 0
01:03:06
It’s the same fucking people. It’s Africans.
Speaker: 2
01:03:08
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:03:08
Whoever built the pyramids, they were Africans. Like, I’m an American.
Speaker: 3
01:03:13
Yeah. You know?
Speaker: 4
01:03:13
Let me just remind the audience.
Speaker: 0
01:03:14
Where they lived.
Speaker: 4
01:03:15
Egypt is in Africa. Yeah. In case you’re wondering.
Speaker: 0
01:03:19
Yeah. They that is Northern Africa, and it’s the most sophisticated construction we have ever witnessed on the face of the earth. Yeah. Anybody that disagrees, you you need to really study what they accomplished in just in the great pyramid. It’s mind boggling precision. It’s not just the incredible feat of moving massive stones 100 of miles through the mountains.
Speaker: 0
01:03:40
It’s the mind boggling precision of the construction of these these buildings that is it’s so crazy. It’s almost like they made it so nutty that even if everything dissolved and expired, it would give us at least some clue that maybe something happened. Maybe people had achieved a level of sophistication.
Speaker: 0
01:04:03
And my thought is, and this is just a a guess, is that as we move towards metal and we move towards using different kinds of combustion engines and electronics. We moved in a very specific area of technology, and we were allowed to do this because things have been relatively peaceful for a couple 100 years. Okay?
Speaker: 0
01:04:28
Relatively peaceful for and, also, there’s war in other places, so it allowed us to spend our time here devising ways to fuck up people over there. That’s the Manhattan Project. Right? But if you have a completely different avenue that thinking goes in and innovation goes in, and instead of combustion engines and electronics, you have something that we haven’t even considered.
Speaker: 0
01:04:54
And that to me seems like what Egypt is. It seems to me that they have this incredibly fertile area. So if people look at Egypt now, you’re looking at all the sand and all the shit. That is not what it looked like. In the the 1000 of years before the construction of the pyramid, it was a rainforest, and it was fertile.
Speaker: 0
01:05:12
And so my thought is these people probably had plenty of food Yeah. And so they didn’t have to go anywhere. And so they weren’t attacked that often. The Nubians conquered them, and that’s when the statue started changing looking more southern African. But you you’re you have these people that live at this incredibly resource rich place, and they were able to spend thousands of years there.
Speaker: 0
01:05:33
And I think in those thousands of years, they devised methods that we still haven’t even considered because we went in a different path, and we we can’t consider any other paths. We consider our path, and we say, well, we’re the furthest. We live we live today. Okay. So those fuckers in the past, they’re basically cave people. Right?
Speaker: 0
01:05:53
That’s how we look at it.
Speaker: 4
01:05:54
That’s yeah. They look them like dumb people playing the stones. Oh, they were silly. Yeah. They they use stones because they weren’t smart enough to use metal.
Speaker: 5
01:06:00
It’s like
Speaker: 4
01:06:00
when you look at the details of stone, it’s like, you could say it’s more impressive.
Speaker: 0
01:06:04
But we wanted to talk about Gobekli Tepe. And Gobekli Tepe is not just fascinating in its construction, but also in the timeline. Because the timeline fucked everything up.
Speaker: 3
01:06:13
Oh, yes.
Speaker: 0
01:06:13
I remember when Graham Hancock and Zawe Hawass were having that big debate with that other guy who’s an archaeologist. The American guy is very smug. But he’s like, what evidence do you have of a civilization that lived 10000 years ago? Well, you have one now. Yeah. So you have to shut the fuck up because you were wrong. So in the 19 nineties, a sheep herder finds a stone.
Speaker: 0
01:06:32
He starts kicking it and moving it around. He realizes, wow, this is a big ass stone. I probably bring in some smart dudes to figure this out, and they start digging, and they go, oh, Jesus. This is these huge circles of giant stone columns with 3 d carved animals on them at a time that we thought people were living in teepees. Right?
Speaker: 0
01:06:52
We thought people had stone tools. We didn’t think there was any metal.
Speaker: 2
01:06:55
We thought it had to be done the opposite way around. We thought you needed to be a hunter gatherer or a farmer, and then you could build. And now they they had to flip that entire shit on its ear. Well, actually, maybe.
Speaker: 0
01:07:06
I think they only flipped that shit on its ear to try to make it look like they were right about the timeline of hunter gatherers. Completely agree. And to ignore the possibility of an ancient civilization before Mesopotamia.
Speaker: 2
01:07:17
I completely agree.
Speaker: 0
01:07:18
Because it’s the only thing that makes sense. There’s no way when you’re just struggling to find food. Okay? And if you ever go on a fishing trip or a hunting trip, it’s fucking hard to get food when we have modern stuff. It’s hard to get food with a rifle.
Speaker: 4
01:07:30
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:07:30
Right? So these people were getting food, and they somehow or another in between them while, like, running around trying to shoot rabbits with a bow and arrow. They figured out how to make these massive stone columns and and put them in position and and move them in circles
Speaker: 2
01:07:47
and And
Speaker: 4
01:07:48
hundreds of them.
Speaker: 2
01:07:48
Pretty great artists too doing some relief carvings. I mean, that’s some that’s not the same as just carving it. Animals that weren’t local
Speaker: 0
01:07:55
to the area. We’re just like, what how do you even fucking know this is a thing? What is this?
Speaker: 4
01:07:59
So Gobekli Tepe, brother, if there is such a thing as an ancient conspiracy theory, it’s it’s this. So I remember hearing Graham Hancock come on your show back in, like, 2015 or 2017, and he was talking about Gobekli Tepe. And at that time, he had shared that the site was only approximately 5% excavated. It’s the first video on my channel.
Speaker: 4
01:08:24
It’s, like, August 2017, and I shared the details of it. These these pillars dates back 11,600 years. It appears to be purposely buried at the same time of the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe. This is fascinating. And, you know, excavations were continuing, so I’m, like, okay.
Speaker: 4
01:08:41
I’m gonna back burn this topic of Gobekli Tepe for a little while, let them further their excavations, and I’ll revisit this later when there’s something new to share. So earlier this summer, I’m like, alright. Let me let me revisit Gobekli Tepe and see what’s new there. And I was astonished to learn that that 5% figure was still the same. Have you heard this?
Speaker: 0
01:09:01
Yeah. I’ve watched your videos on it. Yeah.
Speaker: 4
01:09:03
YouTube channel, Bright Insight. Subscribe. Yeah. It’s Don’t forget to subscribe. Undeniably strange.
Speaker: 0
01:09:09
Your videos are undeniably strange. So here’s some images where you could see, what it kinda looks like along with this, globalheritagefund.org, story on it. So So it sells 5%, 5%.
Speaker: 4
01:09:21
And that figure is still the same as of 2023. I had partnered 1. There’s a, lady who does tours there and corroborate the 5% figure, and then there’s a gentleman named Hugh Newman who’s an author and also leads tours. And he communicated with me that what they were gonna do, and I couldn’t believe this, they’re gonna defer a full scale excavation for, quote, future generations with a 150 year estimated time frame for a full excavation of Gobekli Tepe.
Speaker: 4
01:09:49
And I’m like, wait a second. Are are you serious? Like, this makes no sense. We’re talking about arguably not just the world’s oldest ancient site, but arguably the most mysterious because it’s like you were saying, it’s not supposed to exist. Based on everything we’re taught in school, it’s supposed to be the Sumerians. And then you have the site of Gobekli Tepe made up of sophisticated pillars and concentric surface.
Speaker: 0
01:10:08
At least 5000 years older.
Speaker: 4
01:10:10
Yeah. That older than almost 7000 years older than Stonehenge, and Stonehenge is a mystery of itself.
Speaker: 3
01:10:16
Right.
Speaker: 4
01:10:17
So I start looking in I start googling and looking into the details. I’m, like, this doesn’t make any sense. How could there possibly be how could they defer excavations for future generations when this may be the most important ancient site on earth involving our lost our mysterious lost ancient past.
Speaker: 4
01:10:32
And so I started digging into this, and I couldn’t believe what I found. So they were doing large scale excavations, but that has since ceased. Just to clarify, they are still excavating Gobekli Tepe, but they have rolled and dialed back the large scale excavations of the years prior, and they are focusing on conservation and tourism management of the site.
Speaker: 4
01:10:52
And like I said, with a 150 year time frame, and I’m, like, wait a second. I can’t and I have all the screenshots in that folder.
Speaker: 0
01:10:58
Because of funding?
Speaker: 4
01:11:00
Absolutely not. So not only have they never claimed that it’s related to funding, but this is where things get bizarre is that there’s a Turkish conglomerate called the Doge’s Group, which consists of 250 companies within Turkey. It’s a $1,000,000,000 industry, and they’re the ones that took over management and funding of the site back in 2017. And they announced this at all places.
Speaker: 4
01:11:24
The World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in 2016 is when they announced this partnership. Initial funding of $15,000,000. At that time, they set up the infrastructure for tourism, roads, sidewalks, walkways, roofing platforms. And since then is when they dialed back the excavations.
Speaker: 4
01:11:43
And I’m like, this makes absolutely no sense. So it has let me just be crystal clear here. It has nothing to do with funding, and they’ve never claimed it has anything to do with funding. But their excuses, they have said, one of which is that, well, we wanna wait for, future technologies to develop so we can more safely excavate the site.
Speaker: 4
01:12:03
And I’m like, wait a second. Hold on a second. We’re talking about pillars buried in dirt. It’s 2024. Do not tell me that we do not have the technological capability to to dig rocks up.
Speaker: 0
01:12:15
What would be an alternative explanation?
Speaker: 4
01:12:17
So okay, this is where things get fun. Oh, boy. So
Speaker: 2
01:12:25
Rabbit hole. Here we go. Fun.
Speaker: 3
01:12:26
Let me I love
Speaker: 0
01:12:27
a good rabbit hole.
Speaker: 4
01:12:28
Let me say a couple of things before I get into it. One of which is that them saying that they’re waiting for a future technology to develop to safely excavate the site, I’m like, what type of magical shovel or pressure water hose are we talking about here? Vacuum with dirt vacuum.
Speaker: 4
01:12:43
And and since they’re saying that they’re continuing to excavate the site
Speaker: 3
01:12:48
today Yeah.
Speaker: 4
01:12:49
Since they’re saying they continue to excavate the site today, I’m like, well, which is it? Are you saying that you’re doing so in unsafe methods? And I already know that’s not the answer because there’s been no issue with destructing the site, from digging it up. It’s not like they broke a pillar and, like, oh, dang. Wait a second. We need to walk this back. We’re not doing things safely.
Speaker: 4
01:13:06
That’s not that’s not the case here. So there are a few explanations here.
Speaker: 3
01:13:11
Okay.
Speaker: 0
01:13:11
Here’s what I wanna hear.
Speaker: 4
01:13:12
So one of which is that I the most logical explanation, this is the less conspiratorial one, which is that it has to do with money. You have this Turkish conglomerate of people that are saturated with members of the World Economic Forum. For example, the CEO of the Doge’s group is a long time member of the World Economic Forum.
Speaker: 4
01:13:30
Let me back burn the World Economic Forum for a half a second. They’re business people. They took over the site, and it’s all about money now. Back in 2019, Gobekli Tepe had approximately 19,000 visitors yearly. Now it’s at a half a1000000. They’re focused if nothing else, they’re just trying to bring revenue in.
Speaker: 4
01:13:50
It’s all about money. Yeah. They don’t care about XUV, rest
Speaker: 2
01:13:53
of the site.
Speaker: 0
01:13:53
15 more million. It’s not gonna bring 15 more 1,000,000 in revenue.
Speaker: 4
01:13:56
Right. And and they just want their money back. Okay.
Speaker: 0
01:13:58
Right. Okay.
Speaker: 4
01:13:59
I’m like, well, this is That makes sense. It does make sense.
Speaker: 2
01:14:02
Better way in on that real quick. And also, the mystery plays that site is probably the 2nd most popular place in the planet with people like ourselves. And, the more mystery is there, the more money it’s the more like, you know, we deal deal in mystery. So if there’s if they excavate everything and we know everything there is about that side and it’s all super mundane and there’s nothing cool about it anymore, that that that tit dries up and there’s no more money out.
Speaker: 0
01:14:25
Could it ever stop being
Speaker: 2
01:14:26
I agree. I agree. I agree. I agree with that. But
Speaker: 0
01:14:29
That one doesn’t make any sense.
Speaker: 2
01:14:30
That’s a Zahi Hawass kind of thing. He he’s of the same opinion where, I I think this a lot of the same things, excuse me, happened in Egypt for the same reason. Zahi Hawass is quoted with saying that, those new age people, it doesn’t matter what happens in Egypt. The new age people, they come. It’s about tourism.
Speaker: 2
01:14:45
Ever since the Arab Spring tourism in Egypt’s been lower. So I think a lot of the same like the we’re gonna talk in a minute about the the hidden chamber in the pyramid that they’ve located and still haven’t excavated for whatever fucking reason. I think that might be part of it.
Speaker: 2
01:14:56
If if you wanna get super mundane and not conspiratorial, it’s just a simple the tourists keep coming while there’s a mystery there. As soon as we open that up, it’s just an empty empty chamber. I mean Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:15:06
I don’t think. I don’t buy that.
Speaker: 4
01:15:08
Me either?
Speaker: 0
01:15:08
The mystery of the structures themselves that we have completely excavated is just so fascinating.
Speaker: 4
01:15:13
So let me be clear on Gobekli Tepe. It’s somewhere between 5 10% excavated, which means that
Speaker: 0
01:15:20
So here’s it says some archaeological sites that are where only 10% or less have been uncovered.
Speaker: 4
01:15:25
None of which date back anywhere near remotely as old as Gobekli Tepe. And so just to put this into perspective, Gobekli Tepe, according to ground penetrating radar, consists of approximately 200 t shaped pillars. Only 72 of them have been on earth. And as of just a few years ago, they’re they’re dialing that back to fully excavate them, which again, the 150 year time frame.
Speaker: 4
01:15:46
And I’m like, this is entirely unacceptable. It is there could be hidden answers about our lost ancient past waiting to be discovered on these pillars because all the pillars are trying to tell us some sort of story. They all have depictions, animals, all kinds of things on there.
Speaker: 0
01:16:00
There’s the shaman with the bag. Right. Which is seen interesting.
Speaker: 4
01:16:04
Right? We’ve seen that from the Sumerians. We’ve seen it in South America. The bag thing is very fascinating. It is. It’s hotly debated.
Speaker: 0
01:16:11
It was yeah. I’m I’m sure. I don’t I mean, you could say maybe it’s a tool bag. You could say maybe it’s psychedelics he’s gotten that bag. You know?
Speaker: 4
01:16:17
Academics say it’s just water. The water? It’s a water it’s a water bucket.
Speaker: 2
01:16:21
You guys familiar with the work of Martin Swettman? Excuse You guys familiar with the work of Martin Swetman?
Speaker: 0
01:16:25
No. I am not.
Speaker: 2
01:16:26
He’s the one that, he was on ancient apocalypse season 1 for a minute. He’s the guy who’s the, made basically a star map of go that pillar 43. And in his opinion, those 3 handbags at the top were 3 sunrises. And if that’s the case, that would almost make sense because then they’re like a picture of an Assyrian holding that would be like holding of astronomical knowledge.
Speaker: 2
01:16:47
Like, this this symbol could have been a symbol of knowledge of astronomy, which is one thing honestly about Gobekli. Book bag.
Speaker: 3
01:16:54
It could
Speaker: 2
01:16:54
have been a book bag. Right?
Speaker: 0
01:16:55
I mean, it kinda makes sense. They probably had to travel around with their books.
Speaker: 4
01:17:00
So here’s the thing. That pillar, that’s just one pillar of 200. And here we are debating. We don’t even know what it is. It’s all conjecture.
Speaker: 0
01:17:07
Pull that up, Jamie, so we can see what that pillar looks like.
Speaker: 4
01:17:09
So this Gobekli Tepe situation is far more, bizarre than than we’ve described so far.
Speaker: 0
01:17:16
I think the logical explanation, though, is that you have massive tourist revenue coming to see it as is. Why spend more money and excavate these things?
Speaker: 4
01:17:24
I think that’s the
Speaker: 0
01:17:24
most the pillar.
Speaker: 4
01:17:25
I think that’s the most logical explanation, but it could be more insidious than that. Because so one pillar. That’s just that’s pillar 43, the most debated one of them all, and there’s approximately 128 more pillars that are still buried in the earth.
Speaker: 0
01:17:40
What’s that bird doing holding the earth?
Speaker: 2
01:17:41
Yep. That that, doctor Martin doctor Martin Swetman, his first paper on Gobekli Tepe’s pillar 43, he’s got Scorpio on the bottom. He believes that’s Sagittarius, that that’s the sun. And if, that that’s one basically, it’s a star map denoting the time that the comet smacked the earth is is what he believes.
Speaker: 2
01:18:00
Each one of those v’s, his latest paper on it. Each one of those v symbols is a day. Each one of in his opinion, each one of those boxes is a month and there is, basically a full year denoting the whole thing the way he’s broke. That’s very interesting stuff. And one
Speaker: 3
01:18:16
of the
Speaker: 0
01:18:16
things
Speaker: 2
01:18:16
that’s wild to me when we talk about like the the lack of further excavations is almost every pillar we bring up has new new symbology, new symbols, new iconography. If we’re trying to find some sort of ancient proto language or something, we’re gonna we need more symbols. We need more things on earth. Sure.
Speaker: 3
01:18:33
Yeah. And
Speaker: 2
01:18:33
that’s completely opposed by the mainstream archaeology. The idea that these guys had any sort of written language is fucking ridiculous.
Speaker: 3
01:18:40
But
Speaker: 0
01:18:41
What are the theories involved in you know, I know it’s been theorized that it was purposely covered in dirt.
Speaker: 4
01:18:48
It really looks like it. If you look at pictures of the excavation, it looks like it was all piled in with stones and dirt because if it was some sort of natural event, it would have destroyed the call the the pillars. The pillars are are preserved. So it wasn’t just blown in with dust.
Speaker: 4
01:19:02
If you look at its gravel and, like, as Graham Hancock has explained that Klaus Schmidt, the original, excavator of the site before his untimely passing in 2014, it the people that have worked the site believe it was intentionally buried. That is debated in the in academia today.
Speaker: 0
01:19:16
But isn’t there also carbon isotope dating of the ground soil that shows it’s the same age throughout the entire whatever feet it is of the the dirt that’s covering it?
Speaker: 4
01:19:25
And so it it’s very apparent that it was purposely buried. And what’s interesting about that is that it coincides exactly with the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe. So if you want an alternative idea, the on so okay.
Speaker: 0
01:19:38
We could talk mudslides?
Speaker: 4
01:19:40
No. Because it would destroy those those pillars.
Speaker: 0
01:19:42
Knock them over at least.
Speaker: 4
01:19:43
Yeah. That’s that I’ve seen that in Iraq with the statues. So we’ll share let’s talk about this in a second. This is so this is where things get wild. So that
Speaker: 0
01:19:53
That’s before the excavation. This is an aerial photo from what year is this?
Speaker: 4
01:19:57
That should be 2,004. Or ex no. No. Excuse me.
Speaker: 3
01:20:00
That’d be no. No.
Speaker: 4
01:20:01
Before 1994. They started excavations in 1994, 1995.
Speaker: 0
01:20:05
So that is when it was just dirt. Correct. Everybody thought it was just a regular hillside, which is makes you wonder how many more there
Speaker: 2
01:20:12
out there.
Speaker: 4
01:20:12
Well, they’re finding dozens of other sites around Turkey.
Speaker: 2
01:20:14
Oh, yeah. They’re even older. Place.
Speaker: 0
01:20:16
And Even older. Even older.
Speaker: 4
01:20:18
So let me tell you a few different things about Gobekli Tepe. When you bring up pictures of the pillars, notice how they all annotate animals on them? Yeah. Now this is a fun topic, and I have a few other things to share. One of which is that if you wanna talk about reasons not to excavate it, I’ll give you two possibilities. And this is just conjecture.
Speaker: 4
01:20:36
I don’t know what the answer is. Let me say this up front. But part of it could have a religious implication as well as a climate change implication. Let me start with that. So we know it is an established fact that the Younger Dryas climate catastrophe happened between 12,801,100 years ago.
Speaker: 4
01:20:53
We know that there was vast changes in weather patterns throughout the northern hemisphere. The only part of it that’s debated and as well as near extinction events or extinction events of many different, mammals in North America, but what we know is that something happened, whatever it is, is what’s debated, whether it’s a cosmic impact, whether it’s a pole shift, whether it’s sun cycles, all kinds of conjecture all the way around.
Speaker: 4
01:21:16
But when I mentioned the WEF, they are the biggest proponents of the man made climate change narrative. They’re the ones that wanna get rid of gas powered stoves. They want us to get rid of vehicles. They are pushing their initiatives around the world, and they believe that we’re destroying the planet.
Speaker: 4
01:21:32
I’m not saying they’re entirely wrong, but I don’t agree with their ways of going about it, but that’s a side point. But here’s the thing. When you look at the legend of Noah’s flood and the Noah and Noah’s ark or excuse me, Noah’s ark and the flood, so I’m not suggesting that there was a flood that covered every mountain on earth, and nor am I suggesting that there was a boat that housed every species of animal on earth.
Speaker: 4
01:21:55
However, if Noah’s ark existed, many believe that it was, crashed onto Mount Ararat, which is also in Turkey. And something fascinating is that in the bible, in Genesis 8/20, some of the first verses after Noah emerged from the flood is that he was said to have constructed an altar to the lord where he sacrificed some of every clean animal and some of every clean bird.
Speaker: 4
01:22:17
Gobekli Tepe is in Turkey, and every single one of those pillars annotates animals. And some have suggested that it could be Noah’s altar. Now that could be one reason why they won’t wanna excavate it is because Turkey is an an Islamic country. And if it there were if there was some Christian, religious belief that was corroborated, they might not want that to happen.
Speaker: 4
01:22:40
Another possibility is that the site itself might corroborate the Younger Dry Ice climate catastrophe. And when we’re in a time frame where they don’t they don’t like talking academics, they don’t like talking about cataclysms. They wanna pretend they don’t they didn’t happen.
Speaker: 4
01:22:55
They want everything to be man made climate change. They don’t ever talk about the Sahara being green 5000 years ago, like when you’re talking about Egypt being a rainforest.
Speaker: 0
01:23:03
They find whale bones in the Sahara.
Speaker: 4
01:23:05
Oh, dojo. Those are 30,000,000 years old, so stop talking about
Speaker: 3
01:23:08
it. Crazy? You
Speaker: 4
01:23:09
know no bone.
Speaker: 2
01:23:10
It’s amazing when you think about it.
Speaker: 4
01:23:12
Yeah. And so as far as the climate change narrative, there there could be a possibility that they don’t want the evidence of a of a prehistoric civilization that was more advanced than what we ever thought to believe that might corroborate some Christian narratives. And if nothing else, they don’t want it to be brought into the discussion of modern day climate change because notice on the topic of climate change, they never mentioned natural stuff.
Speaker: 4
01:23:37
They don’t discuss the Milankovitch cycles, which consists of 3 variables. One of which is the earth’s precession, the other is the earth’s tilt, and the other is the distance from, the earth from the sun. All three of those variables are constantly changing every single day, although immeasurable day by day. They happen over tens of 1000 of years.
Speaker: 4
01:23:55
But each individual of those variables impact climate on earth. For example, when it talk about the green Sahara, they believe the most likely reason has to do with Earth’s precessional cycle. I’m like, well, wait a second. Where is this in the conversation of modern day climate change?
Speaker: 4
01:24:10
If we’re talking about us destroying the planet, I would just like any answer as far as where these three variables are in the conversation.
Speaker: 0
01:24:16
Did you see the Washington Post’s very, inconvenient data that they published about the temperature of Earth?
Speaker: 4
01:24:23
No. Please tell me.
Speaker: 0
01:24:24
Did you find the Washington Post, climate study? They found that we we’re in a massive cooling period. If you go back,
Speaker: 3
01:24:33
you
Speaker: 0
01:24:33
know, x amount of 100000 years and you look at, like, what’s happening to yeah. It goes in cycles, but that’s what it looks like now.
Speaker: 4
01:24:41
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:24:41
Temperature’s Earth’s climate over the last 485000000 years. Look at the the dip we’re in. Yeah. Then look how it’s never static. It’s down and up and down and up and down and up all throughout the history of the Earth, which is measurable. It’s not to say that we don’t have an impact on it.
Speaker: 2
01:24:56
We definitely do Pretty sharp pretty sharp increase there, but yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:24:59
So Here’s the thing. Even if we didn’t but there’s sharp increases in the past. Look at those back.
Speaker: 2
01:25:04
Other ones. Yep. Look at,
Speaker: 0
01:25:04
you know, look at 390,000,000 years ago.
Speaker: 2
01:25:07
Look at that giant peak.
Speaker: 0
01:25:09
That’s fucking crazy. That that’s straight up and down.
Speaker: 3
01:25:12
Yep.
Speaker: 0
01:25:12
It’s always happened. It’s not like it’s static and then industrial engineering comes along and then you see this big increase. Oh, boy. What are we doing to the earth? No. It’s like even if we didn’t do anything, we have no control over the temperature of the earth. And what’s really terrifying, Randall Carlson talks about this all the time, is global cooling.
Speaker: 3
01:25:32
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
01:25:32
That’s what’s really terrifying. When global warming happens, oh, no. You gotta move out of Malibu. You’re gonna be okay? AGM. You gotta move to the places where it used to be cold, and now it’s warm because humans have always been nomadic. That’s the whole reason
Speaker: 2
01:25:45
why we’re not in Africa anymore. Fucking kill us all.
Speaker: 0
01:25:47
Right. So global killing will kill global cooling will kill everything. And we we came Randall talks about this that we came very close at one point in human history. We came very close to losing the The auto exchange. That’s required to to literally keep life.
Speaker: 4
01:26:03
Yeah. Jamie, will you bring up my ice age or ice folder? So I have an update from you from the last time I was on your podcast. Go over to the graph. It should be one of the first slides in it. That one. Go right hang out right there for a second. So when I was on your show last time, Joe, I discussed I said something very specific where I said, I think the this is with my exact words.
Speaker: 4
01:26:24
I think the data might indicate that cold is more often than it’s hot. And do you know what happened after that? I was gonna send this to you, but I held off because you’ve seen enough hit pieces. So, there was a hit piece done on me by Media Matters, which was funded by George Soros and their networking of Vox and other they did this hit piece on me to say that Jimmy Corsetti was on Joe Rogan spreading climate change denial and inaccurate information.
Speaker: 4
01:26:47
The only thing if you could bring that back up, Jimmy, please. The only thing that I said wrong is that I said the data might indicate that the earth is cold more often than hot. Excuse me. No. The the data absolutely definitively shows that Earth is cold more often than it’s hot. And what you’re looking at here is straight out of the Utah geological survey.
Speaker: 4
01:27:06
It’s prestigious. It’s found at the top of Google. And what you’re looking at here is data from the last 450,000 years corroborated from data taken from ice core samples from Antarctica as well as Greenland. And what it shows is that not only are we in the middle of a 3000000 year old ice age, there’s something called glacials and interglacials.
Speaker: 4
01:27:25
Glacials are where it’s cold and the glaciers grow. Interglacials are where things warm and glaciers recede. What you’re seeing here is 4, arguably 5, interglacial periods over just the last 450000 years, so never mind 100 of 1000000 of years ago. What it shows is that the periods of cooling last 7 to 9 times longer than interglacials, which are periods of warming. And here’s what the fun part.
Speaker: 4
01:27:50
Interglacials last anywhere from 10 to 30000 years, and our warming started 11,600 years ago, which means that we’re already in the window for potential catastrophe for things to start cooling again. So when I was on your show last time and I was mentioning Elon Musk talking about ice ages being a deep, deep rabbit hole. Do you remember that?
Speaker: 4
01:28:07
He was talking about it. Well, I know what he’s talking about. It’s this. It means that we’re already in the window where things could start cooling again. And when it does, we’re in a lot of trouble. I think and I can’t speak on his behalf. I would god. I gotta tell you.
Speaker: 4
01:28:21
Next time, could you just text him and ask him if he thinks it’s related to pole shifts? I need to tighten up my study on this because I’m like, I think because let me tell you something. Let me share something right now that you’ve never heard on this show before. You hear everyone talking about cosmic impact hypothesis. You hear people talking about sun cycles.
Speaker: 4
01:28:37
Not a lot of people have been on here talking about pull shifts. Let me give a quick shout out to Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers. I recommend maybe you link up with him. Nobody has researched the topic of pull shifts and sun cycles as much as him, and he brought something to my attention I had never heard before.
Speaker: 4
01:28:53
Jamie, the very first slide that you showed was of the Gothenburg excursion. So there was a partial pole flip right in the middle. See how it dates between 1,300,712,003?
Speaker: 3
01:29:04
Mhmm.
Speaker: 4
01:29:04
So the Younger Dry started 12,800 years ago, and it’s right in the middle of that ballpark range. We already know it is established science that when geomagnetic pole excursions happen, it changes weather patterns on earth on earth as well as the ocean current. Jamie, if you wanna Google, there’s a space.com article titled that in 2025, some scientists are suggesting that the Earth’s ocean currents may stop. Have you heard this?
Speaker: 0
01:29:32
No.
Speaker: 4
01:29:34
Okay. And nowhere in the articles do they mention anything about Polish scursion, So people need to understand that we’re already in the middle of a of a poll excursion, which is a partial pole flip, which means that things are shifting inside the earth. It’s also known that that can cause changes in ocean current. Now most mainstream articles, let me just be fair and tell you what they’ll say.
Speaker: 4
01:29:51
They’ll say that, oh, no. It’s related to man made climate change. We’re we’re changing the currents of the ocean. I don’t believe that. But yeah. Hit don’t allow.
Speaker: 4
01:30:00
Don’t let them take your data. Look at this. Nowhere in this article did explain why, but here’s the thing. People need to understand that the number one thing that affects weather on earth is, of course, the sun. The second thing is ocean currents.
Speaker: 4
01:30:15
It’s the reason why it’s it’s the reason why England is relatively temperate.
Speaker: 3
01:30:20
Go back
Speaker: 0
01:30:20
to that, Jamie.
Speaker: 4
01:30:23
It’s the reason why England is relatively temperate is because the gulf stream flows up there, and it keeps it relatively warm. It could be
Speaker: 0
01:30:29
The way it says it here, key Atlantic current could collapse soon, impacting the entire world for centuries to come, leading climate scientists warn. So just by saying climate scientists, you’re already implying, at least, this is the result of climate change.
Speaker: 4
01:30:44
Right. That’s what they
Speaker: 0
01:30:45
Which further fuels this agenda that man made climate change is the cost is the cause of all of our woes. Right. And this is a narrative that you’re consistently hearing. And, again, to be real clear that someone’s gonna say something about this, this is not to dismiss pollution.
Speaker: 0
01:30:59
This is not to dismiss our impact on the atmosphere of the Earth and what we’re doing with coal plants and all the bullshit that we’re doing. For sure, we’re doing bad things. Right. Also, if we weren’t, we have no control over this thing. Right.
Speaker: 0
01:31:13
This thing is constantly moving, and both of those things need to be looked at at the same time. The problem is this whole narrative of climate science has been adopted by these same fucking people that want Twitter pronouns. It’s the same peep it’s the same sort of thing. And if you have anything to say about it, if you wanna talk about a swastika being an ancient symbol, now you’re a Nazi.
Speaker: 0
01:31:35
If you now you’re a climate denier. You’re a vaccine denier. This or that. You’re a holocaust denier. It’s like the same kind of stupid shit.
Speaker: 0
01:31:43
And, unfortunately, with this one, this one is uniquely tied to money. Mhmm. This one is uniquely tied to green agendas and the enormous amount of funding that is going towards these green agendas and people that are profiting off of spreading this narrative.
Speaker: 4
01:32:03
Bing bing bing.
Speaker: 0
01:32:04
Philanthropapitalists that are making 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars promoting this idea of climate change being our primary problem. And if you deny it, you’re a science denier.
Speaker: 4
01:32:16
Yeah. And the reason why you shouldn’t listen to these people is because they’re leaving out the key data involving Earth’s historical Earth’s historical climate data. Yeah. They’re not including all these other details. Right. And so I think people need to look at pole shifts because it’s very interesting in this alternative realm that you have people that are proponents of the of the, cosmic impact hypothesis.
Speaker: 4
01:32:38
You have doctor Robert Schoch with the sun cycles. You have other people talking about pole shifts. I think people should consider that all the above are correct, and let me explain why. When pole shifts happen, earth shields are diminished. We’re in the middle of a pole shift right now. The earth shields are diminishing, and it’s been happening since the 1800. It’s been accelerating over the last few decades.
Speaker: 4
01:32:59
This is scientific data. The the North Pole is shifting at, like, almost 40 miles a year when it was half that just a decade ago. And when the earth shields diminish, we’re we are more susceptible to cosmic impacts
Speaker: 0
01:33:12
because less miles a year?
Speaker: 4
01:33:13
Google it. It this is real. Wow.
Speaker: 0
01:33:16
It’s happening. Idea. I thought it was feet a year.
Speaker: 4
01:33:18
Now the mainstream will say, don’t worry. It’s still another 1000 years away. I’m like, they actually can’t prove that because we’ve never we’ve never been we haven’t been alive to document a pole shift. But what I’m trying to say is that we should consider the pole shifting. Brother, ask Elon Musk his thoughts on this sometime.
Speaker: 0
01:33:32
Well, he actually just tweeted something about it recently.
Speaker: 4
01:33:35
What’d he say?
Speaker: 0
01:33:35
He tweeted something about the magnetic poles.
Speaker: 4
01:33:39
Oh my god.
Speaker: 0
01:33:39
Yeah. He tweeted something about,
Speaker: 2
01:33:42
the he actually retreated the
Speaker: 0
01:33:44
the core of the Earth.
Speaker: 2
01:33:44
What’s his face? I forget his name, but you were just Ben Davidson? Ben Davidson. I’m pretty sure he retweeted Ben Davidson.
Speaker: 4
01:33:48
Oh, we need to find that out if that’s the case, because here’s the thing.
Speaker: 0
01:33:51
He tweets so much, though. It takes so long to go through his tweets. I I don’t know.
Speaker: 2
01:33:55
He does it
Speaker: 4
01:33:55
too much. It’s less effective because I’m like, I miss stuff. And and I follow him, closely, actually.
Speaker: 2
01:34:00
You’re like There he goes.
Speaker: 4
01:34:01
Yep. Look at this.
Speaker: 2
01:34:01
Oh, it’s a little bit of fiber crystal. Solid bronze.
Speaker: 0
01:34:04
Which a vast ball, molten rock, Earth’s core, which generates most of our magnetic field is, 85% iron and moves independently from the surface plates, which is why the magnetic pole changes position.
Speaker: 4
01:34:16
I love Brian Romelli. If if I’m saying his name right, we follow each other. He’s a great guy. I think Elon Musk is giving a hint here because you remember how the northern lights were visible as far south as Mexico recent in the dust last few months?
Speaker: 0
01:34:28
That was from solar activity. Right?
Speaker: 4
01:34:30
Right. But the reason why it’s more visible now is because the earth shields are diminishing. This is I’m not making this isn’t, like, from Bob’s website. This is this is this is mainstream science. Again, Ben Davidson has taught me a lot on this, and he was actually on with Alex Jones not long ago.
Speaker: 4
01:34:45
And he really blew Alex Jones’ mind. He vetted him. And so what I’m trying to say here is that, like, this is not being brought into the equation of man made climate change
Speaker: 3
01:34:53
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:34:54
At all. Well, because of all the things we were talking about, the educators wanna be the only ones that distribute the information, and they don’t wanna look at the full picture. They only wanna look at this one thing for the greater good of all of us. It’s better if you just get people to only focus on getting an electric car.
Speaker: 2
01:35:09
Yep. Right.
Speaker: 3
01:35:09
Which
Speaker: 2
01:35:09
is Well, like, I’ve I’ve never I’ve always ever since I started doing this stuff, I’ve had people that are like, hey, man, you fact check scientists. We want you in the climate change debate. And I’ve always had the opinion of like, look, I’m talking about big old rocks and move 0 sum there’s zero skin in the game.
Speaker: 2
01:35:23
And if if I’m wrong about that, nothing changes. But if I’m wrong about climate change and I get a bunch of people, I feel a little like, it’s
Speaker: 4
01:35:30
It’s not your area of expertise.
Speaker: 2
01:35:31
It’s not my area of expertise and there’s too much skin in the game. Right. But when I did the the debunking of Flint Dibbles debunking of Graham, the part about the metallurgy, I spoke with an ice core specialist. But a handful of these dudes on the planet. Literally, just a handful of
Speaker: 0
01:35:45
That was a very important part of your debunking.
Speaker: 2
01:35:47
Oh, thanks. I I appreciate that.
Speaker: 4
01:35:49
You’re the guy that blew the roof on that.
Speaker: 3
01:35:51
Yeah.
Speaker: 4
01:35:51
You’re the guy that contacted firsthand.
Speaker: 0
01:35:53
Well, Well, let’s just explain what you did.
Speaker: 2
01:35:54
Well, I I spent an hour on a Zoom chat with the dude because, what Flynn had said was that there was no proof of metallurgy in the ice age. And, well, of course, there’s no proof of it, but there he said that we can prove definitively there was no metallurgy. And that’s where it’s like well, no, because they look for levels of lead and levels of lead with that graph you just showed with the interglacial periods, lead follows that.
Speaker: 2
01:36:14
Because when there’s more dust on the ground, the reason they believe is there more dust on the ground, more gets kicked up, more ends up in the glaciers. But that’s the same dirt that would be kicked up if they were digging for iron. Right? So either way, you’re gonna end up with more lead in the glaciers.
Speaker: 2
01:36:28
So I talked to this ice core specialist for an hour on Zoom and I’m like, man, so I’ve flushed this out for you. Explain to me. So he explains to me how they determine whether or not lead’s from an anthropogenic origin or if it’s natural and that’s based on if there’s an archaeological site that they can match the other isotopes to.
Speaker: 2
01:36:43
He went through all the troubles with it. He even even lamented having he’s got other people in his field that are hardcore anti pseudoscience because they’re, you know, climate change deniers are dealing with it. So he’s all he’s like and he’s like some of these guys are just too zealous, overzealous with it. I I get where you’re coming from.
Speaker: 2
01:36:59
But then I put the video out and Flint contacts the dude and next thing you know, well, you know, I didn’t exactly say it though. He he doesn’t change what he says. He just kind of implies that I wasn’t quite being accurate. He doesn’t he doesn’t give a full anything. It’s just it makes it vague all of a sudden and it’s quite clear. He was pressured from a fucking archaeologist. He’s a climate he’s a climate scientist.
Speaker: 2
01:37:20
Why do you care? Because they’re all part of the same little Twitter
Speaker: 0
01:37:25
keyboard warrior. Yeah. Twitter cult members.
Speaker: 2
01:37:28
Yeah. And that that right there changed my attitude on, like, it changed my attitude on the whole global warming thing. I was like, it’s probably accurate. And I was like, you know, I don’t fucking know. I’m gonna have to dig into this some because I don’t trust you sons of bitches anymore.
Speaker: 2
01:37:40
I know that if somebody pressured him from upstairs, he would have crumpled like a bag because he sure did when Flint pushed him.
Speaker: 0
01:37:47
So the the issue is that it’s not like there’s one explanation that could conceivably have caused this massive cataclysm. There’s probably a lot of variables. Just like there’s always been. I mean, we we we always like to conveniently ignore super volcanoes.
Speaker: 3
01:38:05
On one
Speaker: 0
01:38:05
of those blows, the whole the whole world’s fucked. The country’s dead. Everyone’s fucked.
Speaker: 4
01:38:09
You should consider the possibility that that’s related to poll shifts as well, and I could give you a point. There’s one that happened you know, I’ve heard you talk about before, the Toba super eruption. Yeah. Did you know that happened at the same time of a of a geomagnetic pole excursion?
Speaker: 0
01:38:22
Oh, boy. It makes sense. You’re having all
Speaker: 4
01:38:25
this movement. There’s movement inside the earth. A full pole shift is when they believe that the innermost the innermost portion of the molten within the earth core shifts. A geomagnetic pole excursion is a partial pole flip, which they theorize is related to the outer portion of the mantle. The earth’s crust sits on top of molten everything.
Speaker: 4
01:38:44
And when that shifts, it it it shifts our compasses, and it’s not unreasonable to suggest that when something shifts inside the earth, it would affect things on the surface. I touch I touched on this in the last time I was on, but when it comes to earthquakes, as an example, some originate in the crust, which is, like, 28 miles at its thickest, I believe, or on average, and others originate in the molten outer portion of the mantle.
Speaker: 4
01:39:09
Well, if something shifts inside the earth, why wouldn’t it cause issues on the surface, whether it be earthquakes or volcanic activity? And some volcanic activity involving supervolcanoes coincides with geomagnetic pole excursions. And so when I was on your show last time talking about poll shifts along with the ice ages, I was part of the same topic.
Speaker: 4
01:39:29
Why is it that Media Matters, funded by George Soros, decided to do a hit piece on Jimmy Corsetti, the YouTuber? Brother, they came after me hard on this, which I, to be honest, I relished over. I was like, this is hilarious.
Speaker: 0
01:39:41
I’m like Well, they don’t understand that it’s actually good publicity.
Speaker: 4
01:39:44
It is. And it
Speaker: 0
01:39:44
makes me feel like credible anymore. No.
Speaker: 4
01:39:46
Right. And it makes me feel like I’m over the target because what’s that saying about you get the most flack when you’re over it? So, like, I’m like, it makes me think that I’m on to something because nowhere in any of these climate change topics, you know, as far as, like, the narratives on it, do they mention anything natural involving whether it be poll shifts.
Speaker: 4
01:40:04
They sure as hell don’t bring up the green Sahara. They don’t bring anywhere into the equation. They don’t bring up the scientific fact that the earth was warmer 4000 years ago. There’s Nobel Prize Laureates that have been speaking out about this. There’s 2 of them, doctor Clowser, and there’s another gentleman. I’m gonna draw blankly in the top of my head. But, like, they’ve shared this data.
Speaker: 4
01:40:21
This is scientific fact, and they’re getting shunned and ridiculed for it.
Speaker: 0
01:40:25
Yeah. The problem is there’s there’s a consensus that’s been politically accepted, and and it and it’s been talked about so much. It’s a political talking point. And if they lose that political talking point, they lose a large percentage of their platform.
Speaker: 2
01:40:40
Oh, yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:40:40
Right? There’s so many parts of the liberal, the leftist platform that they they need to to have these narratives, and one of them is climate change. And that Donald Trump is a climate change denier. The right ring people are climate change deniers.
Speaker: 2
01:40:57
Ergo science deniers, ergo racists, ergo
Speaker: 0
01:40:59
It’s very it’s very, very, very, very stupid, and it’s bad for all of us because I think we all need to have an understanding of how delicate our environment is and how delicate life on Earth is and that it is this constantly changing thing that has never been static. We know that. We know about the dinosaurs.
Speaker: 0
01:41:17
We know about all these different things that we know about the ice age, but we don’t truly have, a comprehensive narrative that everyone accepts. It’s become politicized.
Speaker: 3
01:41:27
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:41:28
And it’s become politicized by the worst people because they’re the cultists.
Speaker: 2
01:41:31
Yeah. They’re the ones that made not the only ones, but, you know, I I’m a lot less political than a lot of people in this community. And, I said it when when COVID first started getting bad and you could see it on the Internet, I was real quick to say, man, we’re gonna be fucking locked down for years, guys.
Speaker: 2
01:41:45
And everybody’s laughing at me, but it’s like it’s a political football. Neither side neither side is going to to drop a square. We don’t live in a society of political compromise anymore. We live in a society of give them an inch, they take a mile. Either side is going to concede 1 fucking inch on this, and we’re going to be dealing with the same argument 3 years from now.
Speaker: 2
01:42:05
And lo and behold, you were dealing and
Speaker: 0
01:42:06
That’s what’s crazy about this is that data has become politicized.
Speaker: 2
01:42:10
Uh-huh.
Speaker: 0
01:42:11
Science and data and knowledge has become politicized.
Speaker: 2
01:42:14
Over 80,000 papers were retracted last year. 80,000 scientific papers. Wow. Oh, the like, 60% of them were medical. The top 10 most still cited papers that have been retracted are all medical. The medical community is is fucked right now from from COVID. It turned in on itself and just started. And if you look at their papers and stuff, it’s insane.
Speaker: 2
01:42:36
They’re they are all at each other’s throats in all kinds of different ways, still citing retracted papers and all kinds of goofy little shit because it became a foot a political football. We could see it on TikTok. You watch a you watch a nurse come out there and she’s gonna be doing a little TikTok and you could just look.
Speaker: 2
01:42:51
Is that a donkey next to her name or an elephant? If it’s an elephant, she gonna tell you there’s nobody in this hospital, it’s fucking empty. If it’s a donkey, she can tell you about the body outside a machine outside making corpse starch out of the fucking dead people that they’re they can’t bury him as fast as they’re dying.
Speaker: 2
01:43:05
It’s it was so openly, easily from the average Joe could look right through it. Could just see if this is a fucking this is just a an argument between the two parties, isn’t it? And they’re just transferred this to the medical problem.
Speaker: 0
01:43:18
Well, you remember in the beginning days of the pandemic when they were really fear mongering, when they gave a preposterous number of people that were gonna die from COVID? Yes. And what was the percentage at the high point? Was it, like, 3 a half percent or something like that, or was it 30%?
Speaker: 0
01:43:33
It was something there’s a compilation video, Jamie. See if you could find it where they’re dunking on Donald Trump. Mhmm. Because Donald Trump said Heard it’s less than 1%. Mhmm. He was right.
Speaker: 4
01:43:44
It’s He was totally correct.
Speaker: 3
01:43:45
Quite
Speaker: 0
01:43:45
a bit less than 1%.
Speaker: 4
01:43:46
He was right about the UV stuff too.
Speaker: 3
01:43:48
But he tried
Speaker: 0
01:43:48
to think they were trying to say that it was 34%. I think that’s what they were saying. It’s 3.4 or 34. I can’t remember which. But they were repeating it ad nauseam on television that this was going to be the death rate of people that got COVID. It’s one of the things that justified the lockdowns. If it really was less than 1%, people go, what’s so it’s like, what’s the flu?
Speaker: 0
01:44:08
And then you get into the flu, you go, well, what’s the percentage difference? It’s like 50% difference? Okay. What are we doing? Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:44:13
The flu is it a bad flu? Is that what this is? This is like a bad flu. But you can’t say that or you’re some kind of anti science heritage. Yep. You’re a terrible person. You’re killing grandmas.
Speaker: 4
01:44:23
You know, if you wanna mix it up, Jamie, there’s a video. So last time I was on, I mentioned a clip of Donald Trump talking about it’s gonna get cold again. Mhmm. And I we couldn’t find the clip at the time, but I have it in my folder, Jamie. It’s just Donald Trump. It’s in the front with all the other folders.
Speaker: 0
01:44:37
Step at a time. Okay. I’ll try to find that video of them all repeating the same thing over and over again. It’s Brian Stelter, that little weasel on CNN constantly repeating the fact that Donald Trump doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He was right. He was absolutely correct.
Speaker: 4
01:44:53
Well, Donald Trump doesn’t just say things out of his butt like people make him out to believe. I’m not saying he doesn’t talk in that way.
Speaker: 3
01:44:58
Few things. Oh, okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Rant.
Speaker: 0
01:45:01
When he’s a rancher. If you’re a rancher, you run the it’s like you’re a podcaster.
Speaker: 2
01:45:04
You’re you’re running
Speaker: 3
01:45:05
the raccoon.
Speaker: 2
01:45:05
You’re talking out your ass every now
Speaker: 4
01:45:06
and then. He wasn’t talking out of his butt with the UV killing off bacteria and viruses.
Speaker: 0
01:45:11
No. No. He just said it in a way that wasn’t logical. He said, like, you get the light into your body,
Speaker: 3
01:45:16
and it was, like,
Speaker: 0
01:45:17
what is he talking about? But, no. They figured out how to get LED lights into lungs to Right. Kill viruses.
Speaker: 2
01:45:23
Yeah. And a little
Speaker: 5
01:45:24
specific thing to look because typing in Donald Trump COVID compilation video gives me a bunch of Right.
Speaker: 3
01:45:29
COVID, death
Speaker: 0
01:45:31
rate death rate is what’s important. Death rate comp compilation versus the media. And see as the the media was the one that were dunking on him for say then they were coming over this ridiculously high rate that turned out to not be accurate at all.
Speaker: 2
01:45:45
Well, I think we have these those people, like, those people, the the leftists or whatever you wanna call them, the the Flint Dibbles of the fucking world. These guys are, they like, we’re talking about with climate change and everything else, they don’t want to leave anything in there that could let the other side have anything.
Speaker: 2
01:46:01
They assume that the average rank and Joe rank and file Joe public is dumb as hell. Right. They they I mean, one of the things they’ll always say about ancient apocalypse complain about. They’ll be like, well, he goes on there and he talks shit about archaeologists and everybody’s gonna believe everything he says because it’s so well made.
Speaker: 2
01:46:16
It’s like, man,
Speaker: 0
01:46:17
I just do that at all.
Speaker: 2
01:46:18
And and and in the first season, he did talk a little shit about archaeologists. But the the the bottom to me, what if I’m watching this anything, I don’t care what it is. If the person says, you know, mainstream scientists disagree with me here, but here’s what I have to say.
Speaker: 2
01:46:33
All my alarm bells go off and that tells me I cannot hang my hat on what this motherfucker saying. I gotta go Google it. Right? That’s what Graham does over and over again. Main street Mark Yellow just disagree with me.
Speaker: 2
01:46:41
So for them to say everybody in the country is just everybody in the world is just gonna believe this.
Speaker: 0
01:46:46
It’s nuts. So it’s 3.4%. So this is it. So give me some volume here.
Speaker: 2
01:46:50
Been a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. I think the number is way under 1%.
Speaker: 1
01:46:55
So to fact check, the World Health Organization says the coronavirus death rate is 3.4%. President Trump lies that the World Health Organization is wrong.
Speaker: 6
01:47:04
The number is 3.4%. 3.4% is
Speaker: 4
01:47:06
what it’s being reported around.
Speaker: 0
01:47:08
My boy, Sanjay.
Speaker: 6
01:47:10
The death rate. The percentage is 3.4%, and no hunch from the president can change that. Trump lied about the most World Health Organization estimate that the global death rate of coronavirus is 3.4%.
Speaker: 4
01:47:20
Jesus.
Speaker: 7
01:47:21
The 3.4% death rate was wrong, and WHO data later updated it to
Speaker: 2
01:47:26
a fraction of one percent.
Speaker: 0
01:47:27
Let’s go back into history.
Speaker: 3
01:47:29
Trump has a hunch
Speaker: 6
01:47:30
that the death rate is lower than 1%.
Speaker: 2
01:47:32
Way under 1%. Way under 1%.
Speaker: 3
01:47:34
Will someone put a mozzarella stick in
Speaker: 4
01:47:36
this stupid hole? Trump lied to viewers about the mortality rate.
Speaker: 2
01:47:39
Way under 1%.
Speaker: 1
01:47:40
False False information.
Speaker: 6
01:47:42
And spreading disinformation. Misinformation. Dangerous. Disinformation.
Speaker: 3
01:47:45
If you’re president of the United States, you have the world’s greatest scientists at your disposal. You listen to them.
Speaker: 7
01:47:49
Leading scientists, including doctor Fauci, wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%.
Speaker: 2
01:47:59
Way under 1%.
Speaker: 0
01:48:00
Why are you See, this is we we’ve seen enough. These people are fucking puppets, man. They’re they’re they’re puppets, and they willfully, gleefully repeat these narratives.
Speaker: 4
01:48:11
Yep.
Speaker: 0
01:48:12
And instead of saying, well, where did you get that information? Who are you talking to? Let’s find out if that’s correct. Why does the World Health Organization think it’s 3.4%. Is there any nefarious intent behind this whole idea of it killing everybody that’s forcing some enormously profitable venture, like forcing everybody to take these fucking new vaccines you guys developed?
Speaker: 0
01:48:36
Right. Like, is that could that be factored in? Maybe. Well, no. Only you only hear that it’s factored in once everybody’s profited and got out, including Bill Gates.
Speaker: 4
01:48:46
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:48:46
Bill Gates who’s on television telling everybody get the vaccine, you won’t get COVID, and then afterwards, ah, it didn’t work. After he had unloaded all of his stock, he thought it wasn’t effective, and it turns out COVID wasn’t as bad as we thought it was. Well, you guys are really responsible for a bunch of people taking a medication that was unproven. You’re responsible for all the side effects.
Speaker: 0
01:49:05
You’re responsible for all these and you’re responsible for fear mongering, lying, closing down businesses, ruining economies, changing the political structure of the country.
Speaker: 3
01:49:15
They need
Speaker: 4
01:49:16
to be held to account.
Speaker: 2
01:49:17
I think so.
Speaker: 4
01:49:17
I’m not gonna forget this, and a lot of other people want people’s lives were destroyed, and it is I mean, there needs to be there needs to be a reckoning.
Speaker: 0
01:49:27
Elon recently said that he’s still his pronouns are still prosecute Fauci.
Speaker: 4
01:49:31
I love it. I love it. He’s has
Speaker: 0
01:49:33
a real real possibility of making an impact.
Speaker: 4
01:49:36
Yeah. Oh, yes. He does.
Speaker: 0
01:49:37
I mean, they they listen to him. Yeah.
Speaker: 3
01:49:39
But, sir,
Speaker: 2
01:49:39
when it comes to the when it comes to the, the economic side of it, I honestly think if out of everything, if it, whether the jab notwithstanding, just strictly from a top down perspective, those guys I mean
Speaker: 0
01:49:52
It’s the most immense transfer of wealth in modern history.
Speaker: 2
01:49:55
Amazon, Walmart, eBay, all these motherfuckers cleaned house. And you know what shut down in Spokane? We lost white elephant. This guy had started in the forties after World War 2. He would buy surplus and put it in and put it in this store. He had fishing wars for 30¢, fucking transformers from the eighties. I was buying in 2,000, it’s all on eBay. Had all kinds of shit there.
Speaker: 2
01:50:12
And he went out of business because he had to close his doors. All everything.
Speaker: 0
01:50:15
Everything. Restaurants in California and
Speaker: 2
01:50:17
You can’t even go to fucking Walmart at 2 in the morning like we did. Like, everything’s closed now at at at a certain time compared to where it was.
Speaker: 0
01:50:24
Everything’s changed. Important because the coronavirus doesn’t stay up.
Speaker: 3
01:50:28
It doesn’t stay up. That’s when you
Speaker: 4
01:50:29
sleep. And it doesn’t exist when you walk to your table Well and sit down. All
Speaker: 2
01:50:32
the homeless people need a place to hang out, and so Walmart parking lot at 2 AM, that’s when they show up.
Speaker: 0
01:50:37
I meant that actually the opposite. The coronavirus comes out at night.
Speaker: 3
01:50:40
But it doesn’t even like, the the
Speaker: 0
01:50:42
whole thing was so dumb because then they allowed Black Lives Matter protests. Like, what about 6 foot distancing? Everybody’s breathing it. They’re screaming and and yelling down the street, and you guys think that’s not gonna spread it?
Speaker: 4
01:50:52
Right.
Speaker: 2
01:50:52
And the brain dead stuff behind the symbolism. I talked about this a long time ago on my channel. The the person that thought of, oh, we’re gonna have this band play. Let’s get them masks that have a big hole in it to show solidarity with everybody audience. I’m a fucking idiot.
Speaker: 0
01:51:06
It’s like everybody’s just gonna look at that and be like, how about people swimming?
Speaker: 2
01:51:09
So we don’t need masks.
Speaker: 3
01:51:10
God. Swim with masks on.
Speaker: 4
01:51:12
It hurts me to see those clips. That COVID was one of the biggest IQ tests out in in modern times, I
Speaker: 0
01:51:18
feel like. It was really a compliance test. Yeah. That’s what it was.
Speaker: 2
01:51:21
It was a lot a lot of compliance.
Speaker: 0
01:51:23
And check to see how many cowards there are out there that even even though they know something to be true are terrified of the blowback, so they don’t speak about it. And when you do speak about it, you do get attacked. You know, I obviously experienced that, and I was fascinated by it.
Speaker: 0
01:51:36
I mean, it was kind of horrifying to watch, but also fascinating. Like, oh, so this is real. Like, you guys are just completely all lock in step and all full of shit, and you don’t even care that I got better quick.
Speaker: 4
01:51:49
Brought to you by Pfizer.
Speaker: 0
01:51:50
Yeah.
Speaker: 2
01:51:50
And you can watch how the war you can see this from a world perspective too. Different different communities all around the world reacted differently. I remember Yeah. Lots of people’s, oh, why can’t we do, like, Korea and Japan? And well, almost everybody’s wearing a mask over there and they do all this reporting and all this stuff. It’s like, yeah. You ever been there, man?
Speaker: 2
01:52:05
You ever talked to any Koreans or Japanese people? Their fucking culture is lockstep compared to ours. They are very much there’s there’s no counterculture in those communities. There’s counterculture people are all in jail. Right. Right. Right. You you have one community. So, yeah, they’re told to do this.
Speaker: 0
01:52:18
They fucking do it. Well, obviously, the We don’t
Speaker: 2
01:52:21
do that
Speaker: 0
01:52:21
here. Media is so compromised. Oh. So obviously compromised. And, you know, Cali Means has a really good point about this. He was saying that the reason why they spend so much money advertising on cable news is not because it’s effective. It’s because once they do that, now cable news cannot criticize them.
Speaker: 4
01:52:41
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:52:41
It’s it’s so much smarter because it’s like, listen. We’re spending all this money just to make sure that you guys tow the line. That’s what they’re doing. And so the news is not the news. It’s only the news if an advertiser agrees that it’s the news.
Speaker: 2
01:52:58
Yep.
Speaker: 0
01:52:58
And that’s not good.
Speaker: 2
01:53:00
No. It’s not bad for anybody.
Speaker: 0
01:53:02
Left wing, right wing, if you think that somehow or another money gives a fuck about your political persuasion, it’s just it’s so stupid that it got attached to a political ideology and from the most compliant of people. Those are the ones who are the most willing to go along with the narrative because the consequences on the left of of coloring outside the lines, they attack you so hard.
Speaker: 0
01:53:24
They crush you so hard like this murder made situation or any anything anything where you’re stepping outside the line to talk about it. Like, what you experienced just discussing something that turns out to be absolutely correct. They fund a big hit piece about you, which essentially acts as an advertisement for you.
Speaker: 4
01:53:40
Right.
Speaker: 0
01:53:40
It just builds your channel.
Speaker: 4
01:53:41
It’s the Streisand effect.
Speaker: 0
01:53:42
And then people go to your channel and go,
Speaker: 3
01:53:46
this guy’s great. This fucking show is awesome.
Speaker: 0
01:53:46
Like, this is interesting information and just undeniable facts, the undeniable facts, like, that no one can discuss. No one can debate in any way, shape, or form the actual size of these stones, where they came from. This is not under debate. So just the undeniable stuff is unbelievably fascinating. And then when they go to your channel, they go, where’s all the Nazi shit?
Speaker: 0
01:54:06
I’m looking for this I heard this guy’s a Nazi. I’m looking for some Nazi shit. I’m just getting facts.
Speaker: 4
01:54:11
You know, we should go back to Gobekli Tepe, Ganang Padang, and the Great Pyramid because there’s some more stuff involving archaeology and lack of excavations that are actually pretty significant. So going back to Gobekli Tepe, one of the photos that Jamie that you showed earlier was before excavations began, and you noticed that there was no trees there. Right.
Speaker: 4
01:54:30
So one of the controversies is that there’s some 800 trees that were planted on the site a full decade after excavations began, and the the the trees are buried on or were planted on top of ancient ruins, which stand to not only destroy the ruins, but also also highlights the that they can’t excavate what’s underneath them when the trees are there.
Speaker: 4
01:54:52
And so here’s the before and after.
Speaker: 0
01:54:54
So what what’s the conventional explanation for why they planted all these trees over a site that they know is filled with ruins underneath it?
Speaker: 4
01:55:01
So when this proper this was a property owned by farmers, And the Turkish government want to purchase the land for them, and the owners felt that they were being lowballed. So what they did was they planted olive trees on top of the site in order to increase the value of the land, which for me, when I first heard this, I’m like, I don’t understand.
Speaker: 4
01:55:20
This doesn’t make sense to me. Gobekli Tepe is already priceless. It’s the world’s oldest and most mysterious ancient site on Earth. It’s priceless. Now to be fair and, Dan, you’ve you’ve harped on this, and I really It’s
Speaker: 2
01:55:31
government stuff. It’s government stuff. But if the feds are gonna buy your land for a highway, they don’t care what’s underneath. They don’t care what’s an Indian burial ground or what. It’s what’s this land worth? In this city, at this this kind of property, so they made it an orchard instead of a desert.
Speaker: 4
01:55:42
Now here’s the thing, though. Mhmm. Of all things, they planted olive trees, and there’s something that was enacted. It’s called the olive law in Turkey in 19 thirties where it’s illegal to cut down olive trees in Turkey. So I’m like, well, that’s interesting.
Speaker: 2
01:55:56
And let me ask you this real quick. Imagine no. Just imagine being the owner of that property, people coming out, they’re paying you money to check shit out, you’re selling all kinds of stuff and now you’re the government’s gonna take it from you. You’ve had it for 10 fucking years. Now the government’s saying it’s theirs. There’s this. So you go out and you start planting trees.
Speaker: 2
01:56:10
So when you dig a hole to plant that tree, you find an artifacts. Do you put that in the pile of artifacts to hand to Klaus
Speaker: 3
01:56:17
Schmidt, or do you put that in the pile to sell to the antique
Speaker: 2
01:56:18
collector that’s not gonna tell anybody? Obviously, you put in he’s pissed off. I my opinion is that guy sold a ton of fucking artifacts while that was going down. That he just, why wouldn’t you?
Speaker: 0
01:56:31
Now are there artifacts connected to Gobekli Tepe?
Speaker: 2
01:56:34
They they find stuff.
Speaker: 0
01:56:35
Like, what kind of stuff?
Speaker: 2
01:56:36
Like, a little no no pottery or anything, but they have found, like, one of the biggest things is a bunch of chunks of stone. Like, to archaeologists even they call a microchip, which would be like a tiny little piece you get from that’s still technically an artifact. Mhmm.
Speaker: 2
01:56:48
So there’s a lot of that kind of stuff there. A lot of bones that have been charred and things like that, but, there’s nothing too terribly amazing.
Speaker: 0
01:56:56
No tools.
Speaker: 2
01:56:56
That well, not nothing too crazy. But, again, that’s the kind of stuff that would possibly you know, I’m a lot this where my skepticism can get a little cynical. You know, I’m of the opinion if the Antikythera mechanism would have been identified as what it is and they pulled it out of the ocean, it would have never made it to a museum.
Speaker: 2
01:57:11
That there was somebody I I was, like, telling Jim last night we were having dinner. If if the reports of giant bones that you see in the 19 thirties from guys that were over in New Mexico and then they’re bringing them back to the Smithsonian, they just never made it there.
Speaker: 2
01:57:24
If they really did
Speaker: 3
01:57:25
find giant bones, which I’m skeptical of, but if they did, this is probably an advertisement
Speaker: 2
01:57:25
to sell them while they’re traveling of, but if they did, this is probably an advertisement to sell them while they’re
Speaker: 3
01:57:30
traveling these things
Speaker: 2
01:57:30
across the country. Oh, you know, just happened to lose them along the way because this dude came over and bought
Speaker: 3
01:57:32
them.
Speaker: 2
01:57:32
That’s this has been a problem since day 1 and Especially when you think about those kind of, like, one offs.
Speaker: 0
01:57:42
Crazy old school Rockefeller type billionaires
Speaker: 3
01:57:45
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:57:45
Who really love to control information and everything. You know, if you have access to something that’s just undeniably throws the whole timeline into a question or throws a narrative of human beings to question.
Speaker: 2
01:57:57
Now you got some power with that little artifact, don’t you? So it’s yeah. You see, that’s that’s I’m I’m of the opinion that that’s been a problem. Like, I don’t believe in the dendera light. I assume you know what the dendera light is.
Speaker: 0
01:58:06
Well, it’s when you glossed over the antichristra. Oh.
Speaker: 3
01:58:10
How do you say it?
Speaker: 0
01:58:10
The Antikythera. Antikythera. That one is fast.
Speaker: 2
01:58:13
It’s crazy.
Speaker: 0
01:58:14
Because that is how old is it?
Speaker: 2
01:58:15
It’s like through 2000 years old, 3000
Speaker: 3
01:58:17
years old.
Speaker: 0
01:58:18
Old. It’s a hand carved brass machine that you use to it it it attracts the cycles of the moon, the Earth, and different planets in our solar system.
Speaker: 4
01:58:30
Brilliant.
Speaker: 0
01:58:30
Yeah. And they didn’t know what it was and they found it. It was just like some corroded up gears, and then they start doing, some sort of, I mean, I don’t even know how they did it, how they understand all the different pieces of it because it’s all corroded together. But they use some sort of scanning mechanism. Correct? To and see if you can find what it actually looks like.
Speaker: 2
01:58:52
Yeah. You can buy replicas of it nowadays. They make little boxes of the damn thing.
Speaker: 0
01:58:55
Look like when they found it.
Speaker: 3
01:58:57
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
01:58:57
But now show what it looks like when they’ve done a scan of it.
Speaker: 5
01:59:01
Stumbled across something interesting too, and the guy found it. He, heap of dead naked people.
Speaker: 3
01:59:06
Woah. Woah. Woah.
Speaker: 0
01:59:08
Woah. He emerged from the sea shaking in fear and mumbling about a heap of dead naked people. He’s among a group of Greek divers from the eastern Mediterranean island of Simi who were searching for natural sponges. They had sheltered from a violent storm near the tiny island of how do you say it again? Antikythera. Antikythera.
Speaker: 0
01:59:25
Between Crete and mainland Greece, when the storms recited, they died for sponges, chanced upon a shipwreck full of Greek treasures. The most significant wreck of the ancient world have been found up to that point. The dead naked people were marble sculptures scattered on the seafloor along with many other artifacts soon after the discovery prompted the first major underwater archaeological dig in history.
Speaker: 0
01:59:45
So see if you can find what this mechanism looks like, what it actually looks like.
Speaker: 2
01:59:50
There’s there’s a replica
Speaker: 0
01:59:51
of that. So this is the replica of this thing, this incredible piece of engineering from 2000 years ago, where all these gears and all these planets, and you you could figure out where everything was. How? How? How’d they do this? How’d they do this? And this is beyond what we ever thought was available back then.
Speaker: 2
02:00:13
There is a YouTube channel that a guy goes through. I forget his name, but, he does go through, and he he makes one of these with old school tools, but he’s making each gear by hand. He’s making the wire by hand.
Speaker: 0
02:00:23
Boy, that guy’s a dork.
Speaker: 2
02:00:25
He’s a dork. Yes.
Speaker: 0
02:00:26
He’s the greatest Bring him on the show. Greatest possible version of a dork. I mean, in a good way, sir.
Speaker: 2
02:00:31
But it is fun to watch, but it’s, Incredible.
Speaker: 3
02:00:33
But
Speaker: 2
02:00:34
but at the end of the day, it’s the that’s that’s interesting to be able to to recreate it, but the planning of the thing, that’s really where the The
Speaker: 0
02:00:41
engineering, the mathematics. And then you have to take into consideration, what is this based on? What knowledge was available back then that we did not think was? So we’re talking about 2000 years ago. This is the time of Christ. We did not think that they had any kind of machines that were in any way similar to that thing. What else don’t we know?
Speaker: 4
02:01:01
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:01:02
What else is lost? And how much of that stuff is gone? Like, if this is 2000 years ago and it’s that corroded, what is 10000 years due to it? Right? Oh, it’d
Speaker: 4
02:01:10
be oh, it’d be dust at the bottom. Right. And the fact they even found it at the bottom of the ocean is a miracle in itself.
Speaker: 0
02:01:14
This is what’s important to understand, and this is another lie that, Flink Dibble told about the number of shipwrecks that have been found. And not only that, but what would be left over after just a few 1000 years. And that when they find these 1000 year old shipwrecks, they don’t find any wood anymore. You just find the pottery.
Speaker: 0
02:01:34
So you just know where the shipwreck is because there’s a bunch of gold on the ground and some pots. But if you go back 10000 years before that, how much has the surface of the floor of the ocean shifted? How much of that stuff has been covered up? How much is it 10000 years is so long. Now what if it’s 20,000? What if it’s 30,000? To say we don’t know is the correct thing.
Speaker: 0
02:01:59
It’s the correct
Speaker: 3
02:02:00
thing to
Speaker: 0
02:02:00
do, and that’s what nobody wants to do.
Speaker: 2
02:02:02
There’s a there’s a hypothesis. It’s more of a, it’s more of a, like a mental, I forget the name of what you call it, like a a mind teaser, like a way to make your brain think. It’s called the Silurian hypothesis. The Silurians are a doctor who monster that supposedly lived on Earth like 1000000 of years before humans wake up one day and they find all these monkeys running around.
Speaker: 2
02:02:22
They decide they don’t like us. But the hypothesis is how would you determine if there was a species where it advanced civilization that lived on the earth a 1000000 years ago, 5000000 years ago. As soon as we have fossil fuels, there is as long as we have the first bit of oil had been created on the planet, you could have a civilization like ours.
Speaker: 2
02:02:39
So what would you look for? The only conclusion is maybe nuclear stuff if they tested like maybe nuclear power plant, we might still be able to find some radioactive material, but beyond that, not a goddamn thing. After 10,000,000 years, you’re gonna find a fucking bit of it. That’s what their conclusion is. And and this is a scientific thing. This is something that’s a thought tool.
Speaker: 2
02:02:58
That’s what it’s called. It’s something that they use in science, in archaeology, and history, and stuffs presumably to to to look at that problem. But these guys, like Flint, obviously didn’t do that. Like I said, he thinks people are stupid. He said right here on in sitting in this room that, oh, well, you know, it doesn’t matter how long something’s underwater.
Speaker: 2
02:03:15
You might think that it matters how long something’s underwater, but it really does. It’s like, are you fucking kidding me?
Speaker: 3
02:03:20
Of course, it does.
Speaker: 2
02:03:20
Fuck. I feel anybody knows that. This is
Speaker: 3
02:03:22
this is this is
Speaker: 0
02:03:22
this is in terms of whether or not you’re gonna find it. Right? They they haven’t done, like, a comprehensive lidar scan of the bottom of the ocean floor. They just have not done that. That’s not possible right now. But if they did do it, who fucking knows what they’d find down there?
Speaker: 4
02:03:36
Well, here’s where things get nuts is that here we are talking about things as far as tens of 1000 of years. So we do have a site that Graham Hancock highlighted in season 1 of Ancient Apocalypse called Ganang Penang in Indonesia, and Jamie may have a folder on this. So this pyramidal structure could potentially be 27000 years old. It’s hotly debated.
Speaker: 4
02:03:56
But as Graham Hancock highlighted, there is a subterranean tunnel and chamber which may have those those dates, and it’s not being excavated. And a geologist, Danny Nanabajawa I I never pronounce it correctly. Forgive me, Danny. But he is a geologist that analyzed the ground penetrating radar, and he said there’s strong likelihood that it’s man made.
Speaker: 4
02:04:18
Now the the skeptics, the academics will say, well, it’s probably just a lava tube because the structure is volcanic in nature. But something interesting has happened that back in 2014, the Indonesian government said that they were willing to allocate unlimited resources and funding to excavate the site.
Speaker: 4
02:04:37
Something shifted a handful of years ago where they’re not excavating it now. And as of today, there’s no plan in place to find out what that subterranean chamber is. So if it was indeed man made, we don’t know. It could be natural. It could be man made, but we’re never gonna know what it is until we go digging.
Speaker: 4
02:04:54
And right now know
Speaker: 0
02:04:55
for sure is that people occupied the land above it after that.
Speaker: 2
02:04:59
Yeah. 100%.
Speaker: 4
02:05:00
Yeah. A 100% that is a man made structure. It was it was volcanic in nature, but they terraced it. It it it’s it’s a pyramidal like structure. It’s not a pyramid. And we
Speaker: 0
02:05:10
do have examples over and over again of truly ancient things, unexplainable things, where people built more crude versions above it. All
Speaker: 4
02:05:18
over the world.
Speaker: 2
02:05:18
The lava tube. The lava tubes there’s all kinds of places in South America where they have a big pyramid built on top of a spring. The lava tube could have been a cave that was sacred that they just kept embellishing and kept embellishing and kept embellishing, Saying it’s just a lava tube, not a man made tunnel down there as a non sequitur.
Speaker: 2
02:05:35
Anybody who knows anything about ancient history could understand how a sacred site could have a pyramid built on top
Speaker: 3
02:05:40
of it.
Speaker: 0
02:05:41
Let’s take a bathroom break. Yes. We’ll come back. Awesome.
Speaker: 2
02:05:43
Okay.
Speaker: 0
02:05:44
So where were we? We were
Speaker: 2
02:05:45
Well, we’re about the lack
Speaker: 4
02:05:48
of excavations at Ganong Panang. Yeah. And this should segue into something that’s very, very interesting, which is the Great Pyramid of Giza. I’ve already said that Gobekli Tepe is arguably not just the oldest, but the most mysterious ancient site on Earth because it’s not supposed to exist.
Speaker: 4
02:06:02
However, the Great Pyramid of Giza, I would say probably trumps it from the standpoint that it’s just so mysterious, its sophistication, as well as the fact that we have no idea how it was constructed. And it’s arguably the most debated structure in all of human history for 2 standpoints.
Speaker: 4
02:06:20
One of which is that so many people debate on whether it was built to be a tomb for the pharaohs or whether it was some sort of lost technology and had some other purpose, whether it’s energy or whatever
Speaker: 3
02:06:30
it may be.
Speaker: 0
02:06:31
Overdone stuff.
Speaker: 4
02:06:31
Which is a fascinating topic, and I’ll have a story, involving me visiting it there with a certain person that really is it’s a story in itself, but let me say this. So there back in, 8 years ago, back in 2016 through Muan Technology, they discovered that there’s a hidden chamber in the Great Pyramid, which is massive.
Speaker: 4
02:06:51
Jamie, I have a folder on this, the Great Pyramid hidden void. And it was established in 2017 through a scientific study. So we’re talking 7 discovered 8 years ago, corroborated, or 8 years ago corroborated 7 years ago in a study.
Speaker: 2
02:07:06
No Egyptologist debates it at all.
Speaker: 0
02:07:08
Is that a a rough interpretation of the shape?
Speaker: 2
02:07:10
They don’t know the exact shape of it. They’d they’d have an approximate size and an approximate shape.
Speaker: 4
02:07:16
So what now many theorize that it is a second so called grand gallery. It was originally thought to be 30 meters long. Now they have it at over 40 meters long, so almost a 150 feet, and it is above the so called Grand Gallery. And so when they first discovered it, Zahi Hawass came out of the woodwork and, like, denounced it and said this is nothing. You know you know?
Speaker: 4
02:07:38
And they said they’re gonna spend a few years debating with the international community on how to go about it. Brother
Speaker: 2
02:07:43
That’s it.
Speaker: 4
02:07:44
That was 7, 8 years ago, almost rounding up to a decade. And as of today, there is no plan of any kind to go and find out what’s in there.
Speaker: 0
02:07:53
So they would have to go through the walls to get to it? No.
Speaker: 4
02:07:55
Actually, the brother, they could just drill a 1 a half inch diameter hole and set a little tube camera through it, and they could figure out what’s in there by the end of the week.
Speaker: 2
02:08:03
Get an endoscope right there just like when you go to the doctor.
Speaker: 4
02:08:06
And here’s what’s so important about this. Like, we’re talking about the most debated and argue the most important structure in all of human history. Was it a tomb? Was it a lost technology? We have no idea how they even built it. That’s the only thing that’s more debated than that is how did the Egyptians construct the pyramid? So many theories have already been debunked on it.
Speaker: 4
02:08:24
We just don’t know how they did it.
Speaker: 0
02:08:26
2,300 1,000 stones that were supposedly all put in place within 20 years.
Speaker: 4
02:08:31
Right. Right.
Speaker: 3
02:08:32
The reign
Speaker: 0
02:08:32
of the feral coup.
Speaker: 2
02:08:33
The 20 years part, I I’ve referred to that as, like, the gateway drug to becoming the pyramid. It’s that that’s that is that 20 years thing is the stupidest fucking thing. If any guy who’s ever, like, stacked bricks for 5 minutes knows that is absurd. But they just run with that because, you know, you can’t that’s one of the weird things. A written record is more robust to them than the actual, like, science.
Speaker: 2
02:08:55
Like, the carbon dating for the pyramid and the written record are a couple 100 years off. All of the entire 4th dynasty, the carbon dating is a couple 100 years off. They just come up with some explanation for it and stick to that written record.
Speaker: 0
02:09:04
Well, my favorite is when they look at the hieroglyphs that depict pharaohs from 30,000 years ago. And they’re like, oh, that’s all bullshit.
Speaker: 2
02:09:10
Yeah. But the one that a little further down, this is this is important shit here. But up there, nah.
Speaker: 0
02:09:16
Well, why do you think that the 30000 year mark is bullshit, but the 5000 year mark is legit? Like, that is really weird, guys.
Speaker: 3
02:09:23
It is.
Speaker: 0
02:09:23
Like, why are you conveniently ignoring all this other stuff while validating the more recent stuff?
Speaker: 4
02:09:29
Because it contradicts the textbooks they already wrote.
Speaker: 0
02:09:31
It contradicts the educator.
Speaker: 2
02:09:32
And and that that dynamic sorry. Really quick. That dynamic, you mentioned Christopher Dunn. When he saw one of my recent videos about 2 months ago, me and him are gonna start he’s gonna come on my channel and each artifact that he’s covered, we’re gonna discuss 1 at a time.
Speaker: 2
02:09:45
He knows I don’t believe in HNI Technology. And he told me, basically, to summarize what he said is that he is tired of having either yes men or cynics. He wants somebody that doesn’t agree with him to sit down and have a conversation about these things, and that’ll be honest and we can actually get somewhere.
Speaker: 2
02:10:00
And, it was like it was like the guy had been waiting 40 years for and I had a fucking GED, and I worked as an electrician. Well, I don’t fuck I should not be the one sitting in the chair next to the man, but all the all the people qualified to do it wanna treat him like he’s an idiot.
Speaker: 0
02:10:14
Right. And his theory is very fascinating. Always. It was some sort of a power plant generated hydrogen, and it’s feasible.
Speaker: 4
02:10:20
It’s it’s wild. And I gotta tell you, you you know, when you walk through the Great Pyramid, there’s nothing about it that resembles anything like a tomb. It seems like it was some sort of industrial function that had a or a function of some kind. So here’s a story, and I have his permission to share it.
Speaker: 4
02:10:37
So I had the you know, the only thing more wild than than the topic of the mysteries of lost ancient civilizations is the diverse nature of people that are into this topic. So I had the pleasure of connecting with Georges Saint Pierre, the GOAT, the great legendary UFC fighter.
Speaker: 4
02:10:54
And because of him is how I I went with him to Baalbek. He had unique connections, and I was able to go with him and we had connected. And then I went with him from there to Egypt. And we went inside the Great Pyramid. It’s his first time in there.
Speaker: 4
02:11:04
And we basically tipped the we tipped the guard. I’ll just say it. And we had the king’s chamber alone to ourselves for a few minutes. And we’re with Youssef Aweyan, who’s the son of the lead, Hakim Abdalla Aweyan, who was the mentor of John Anthony West. Mhmm. And he was in the pyramid code.
Speaker: 4
02:11:21
And so George laid in the the so called sarcophagus, and Youssef did the ohm. I can’t do it, but you do it with your throat.
Speaker: 2
02:11:31
And he
Speaker: 4
02:11:31
does it inside the box, and it makes the whole granite box vibrate. I’ve experienced it’s wild. It feels it’s the reverberation off the off the stone. So he did that to George George laid in it, and he did it for about a minute. And this is so George comes out of the box. His eyes were wide open, and he said, yeah. There he is. He said, I’m coming out of retirement. I’m gonna win the title.
Speaker: 4
02:11:56
And he just started pacing around the room. So fast forward 3, 4 hours later, I’m in the hotel pool with him.
Speaker: 0
02:12:05
What year was this?
Speaker: 4
02:12:06
Just last year, September of 2023. And just to clarify, at that time, he was considering doing a grappling match. That’s not what he was talking about. He was talking about winning the UFC world title again. So fast forward a few hours later, I’m at the hotel, the Mina House, Marriott Hotel Pool with the pyramids overlooking us, and I’m like, hey, George.
Speaker: 4
02:12:26
You said you’re a thing about coming out of retirement. And he’s like, I’m gonna I love his accent. No, Jimmy. I’m not coming out the retirement. And I said, well, what made you say that? And he’s like and he thought about it. He’s like, it’s just how I felt.
Speaker: 4
02:12:42
So just to clarify, arguably the goat, although him and Jon Jones, I’ve you know, they’re they’re comparable just different, but the goat. And his first inclination out of coming out of the box with his y his eyes wide open was like, I’m coming out of retirement. I’m gonna win the title.
Speaker: 4
02:13:01
And I asked him, and he’s like, no. I’m not gonna do it. It’s just how I felt in the moment. And I’m like, when people talk about it in the context of it being some sort of energy device, some people have speculated that with all these legends of humans living to 100 and even 1000 of years, some people have proposed that maybe it was a DNA restoration.
Speaker: 4
02:13:17
I have no idea what it was. I just don’t think it was a tomb. I think it was something else. I think it was a functional, structure of some kind. But the fact that someone like him with his history and his accomplishments, the fact that that was the first thing that he felt coming out of that box after doing the reverberation thing is a story.
Speaker: 4
02:13:36
Like, I I don’t know what to make of it.
Speaker: 0
02:13:38
I think that’s normal. Yeah? Yeah. Yeah. I think, a guy like that has always got it in the back of his head.
Speaker: 4
02:13:44
That’s a good point.
Speaker: 0
02:13:45
Yeah. I mean, that’s the highlights of his life. When he was, conquering everyone in the welterweight division, he was the greatest fighter on the planet Earth. It’s the highlight of his life. So anytime he gets an elevated feeling. Mhmm. I’m sure that’s one of the reasons why, like, a lot of old fighters, they drink a lot or they do drugs.
Speaker: 3
02:14:04
Right. I
Speaker: 0
02:14:04
think they’re trying to they they experience highs that most people could never imagine.
Speaker: 4
02:14:09
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:14:09
And I think whenever they experience a new high, some new thing, they get in their head, I’m making a fucking comeback. And they want they wanna chase that dragon.
Speaker: 3
02:14:17
They get
Speaker: 2
02:14:18
in the ring with Jake Paul? Sorry.
Speaker: 0
02:14:21
That probably had more to do with money. Yeah. But it’s just this thing that just is in every one of those people.
Speaker: 4
02:14:27
Yeah. That makes sense. Although the fact that he’s laying inside the Great Pyramid and you would almost think that’d be the furthest thing from his mind
Speaker: 0
02:14:36
at the time. An elevated experience. It’s alright. So it’s an elevated experience. It makes him very excited. And when a guy like that, it’s very excited. He thinks about the most exciting thing he’s ever done. He’s like, I’m gonna fucking go do it again.
Speaker: 4
02:14:47
We gotta get you in that box. We gotta get you in the Gary period.
Speaker: 0
02:14:49
I’d like to go in the box. I’d like to go there. I really would. It’s just a matter of carving out the time. Right. I really have to do it, especially if let’s see what happens with the world. But Right. The world just keeps getting sketchier and sketchier in certain parts of the world.
Speaker: 4
02:15:03
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:15:04
You know? Sadly. Yeah. Sadly. But it would be nice to be able to visit.
Speaker: 4
02:15:07
Going back to the point of the this hidden chamber. Yeah. Like, what is so
Speaker: 0
02:15:12
Why would you not wanna explore that?
Speaker: 4
02:15:14
It makes no feasible sense. Like, let’s just say that well, first of all, whether it was a tomb or something else, we could find out by going in there. Maybe there’s another fair maybe there’s a pharaoh in there. Maybe we’d instantly know that, okay, all this conjecture and debate is is now been put aside.
Speaker: 4
02:15:30
We know that sarcophagus. Yes. There could be treasure there.
Speaker: 2
02:15:33
The dude for real.
Speaker: 4
02:15:34
And here’s something else. Right. A lot of conjecture as far as a lost technology. Could there be some sort of evidence of a tooling on how they constructed it? Could there be evidence on how it was constructed itself? Even if it’s a completely empty Rome and nothing else, we still would have learned something new. Right.
Speaker: 3
02:15:49
In
Speaker: 4
02:15:49
fact, I’m I’ve joked to other people like, hey. They could turn this into a pay per view event. I bet you a 100,000,000 people around the world
Speaker: 2
02:15:55
will I was just I was just thinking it. Yeah. Yeah. I know.
Speaker: 4
02:15:57
But even if there’s nothing in it even if there’s nothing in it, still win because we will learn something new.
Speaker: 3
02:16:03
Yeah.
Speaker: 4
02:16:03
And it is like course. The the the academics will say, well, we don’t wanna damage the pyramid anymore. I’m like, okay. I respect that, but the thing is already a wreck. They use tons of dynamite to blast their way in it. The casing stones are all blown off.
Speaker: 2
02:16:15
They drill holes in it on the regular to check things. It’s not
Speaker: 4
02:16:18
I don’t under. So between Gobekli Tepe not being fully excavated, Ganang Padang, as well as the Great Pyramid, arguably the 3 oldest and most mysterious ancient sites on Earth, for some reason, are not being appropriately excavated.
Speaker: 0
02:16:31
Isn’t there a chamber underneath the Sphinx as well? Well, they they probably
Speaker: 2
02:16:35
yeah. There’s there’s something there, but they’re not it’s it’s, Smaller? Smaller and and, Zahi Hawa stuck his nose down in the tiny little chamber that’s down there. They say that there’s supposed to be something more there, but, like, that’s, dicey as far as what they know for sure.
Speaker: 4
02:16:49
They have never released any photos or video or of any kind underneath the Sphinx. So it’s like, okay. Just stick a camera in there with a flashlight and show us that there’s nothing in there.
Speaker: 0
02:16:57
Like, there Or just show us what is in there. It shows the walls.
Speaker: 4
02:17:00
They say they say there’s nothing in there. I’m like, okay. Well, show me show me what nothing looks like.
Speaker: 3
02:17:05
Right.
Speaker: 4
02:17:05
Right. Like, I’m I’m I’m just look. I’m an outsider in this, and I I have an inquisitive mindset.
Speaker: 0
02:17:10
You’re not. You’re a human being on planet Earth, and you’re a part of history.
Speaker: 4
02:17:14
And you know what? Every single person alive has an inherent right to know the true history of our origins, and I don’t care what country you’re born in because people have come after me like, you it is none of your business what’s happening at Gobekli Tepe. You’re not a Turkish citizen. And I say, excuse me. It is a they elected for it to become a world heritage site.
Speaker: 4
02:17:33
So they have thrown that out the window. It is everyone’s
Speaker: 0
02:17:35
It’s everyone’s business.
Speaker: 4
02:17:36
It surely is. That’s silly.
Speaker: 2
02:17:38
Yeah. That’s a silly argument.
Speaker: 3
02:17:38
It’s a
Speaker: 0
02:17:39
silly argument. It doesn’t make any sense. It’s the history
Speaker: 2
02:17:41
of the city. Place to weigh in on Nazi Germany because you don’t live in Germany.
Speaker: 0
02:17:44
That’s off. It’s the people of Earth. It’s like we we have a very fractured understanding of the history of the people on Earth. Gobekli Tepe is an excellent piece of evidence that points to that. We don’t really understand why they did it or who did it. And there’s probably more of those things out there that we missed. The Sahara Desert is the greatest greatest example. Alright.
Speaker: 0
02:18:04
If they did some sort of very comprehensive examination of the Sahara Desert, like say, if technology advances to the point where they can do like some really comprehensive, like, underground scanning of that entire part of the continent, who fucking knows that?
Speaker: 4
02:18:19
Only 5% of the Sahara has been, studied as far as, like like, with say, with the use of LiDAR technology.
Speaker: 3
02:18:26
Right.
Speaker: 4
02:18:26
They’re using it from space, and they keep finding new structures that are prehistoric. They don’t know who made them or when. And throughout the Did they hear from space?
Speaker: 0
02:18:33
Yeah. It’s called lidar from space.
Speaker: 4
02:18:34
Called archaeology from space, and they use satellites. So this is what’s interesting is that they can use satellites with lidar that can penetrate, like, I might be butchering this, but I wanna say 10 meters. I could be off on that, but it’s it’s a substantial amount of depth from a satellite penetrating through dirt. I’m like, who would have thought that could even exist?
Speaker: 0
02:18:53
Right.
Speaker: 2
02:18:53
It’s pretty amazing.
Speaker: 4
02:18:54
That is
Speaker: 0
02:18:55
We have good evidence that they didn’t have that. No.
Speaker: 2
02:18:57
It’s not going
Speaker: 3
02:18:58
to be the satellites.
Speaker: 0
02:18:59
I mean, yes, their orbit would decay.
Speaker: 4
02:19:01
Yeah. It would fly back in town. Yeah. Because ours do.
Speaker: 2
02:19:04
You know, that’s some a couple things about Ganong Padang worth mentioning. The pre when they were excavating like mad, the president was of the opinion the same opinion that doctor Danny Nadiwajawa is that the that, like, he Nadiwajawa wrote a book even like Plato was right and it’s like Atlantis is in Indonesia.
Speaker: 2
02:19:23
So the president of the of, Java back then believed that that was the case and he so he was throwing money at it. When he lost his bid to be reelected and somebody else took over, he was the one that shot everything down. He’s in more lockstep with the archaeologists and stuff, the mainstream guys.
Speaker: 2
02:19:39
So that’s one of the reasons it was a changing of the guard is why all of it just stopped. So one guy was into it, and the next guy ain’t.
Speaker: 4
02:19:46
Well, let me. Okay.
Speaker: 2
02:19:48
Here we go. You
Speaker: 4
02:19:49
just opened up the window. Yep.
Speaker: 2
02:19:50
There it is.
Speaker: 4
02:19:51
Here we go, Jimmy. So the w f conspiracy, it is nothing more than a conspiracy theory. I am not at all convinced that there’s something here with them trying to suppress ancient history. Let me be clear. But there is a correlation between what’s going on at Gobekli Tepe and Ganang Penang that the so this is a government position.
Speaker: 4
02:20:11
The minister of technology, education, research, and technology, something along those lines in Indonesia. This gentleman came into power, I believe, in 2018. His name’s Nikkeem or something Nekarim. I have a slide of him in my Ganang Perang thing. He’s a global shaper within the World Economic Forum, and he is the head decision maker of excavations that would or would not happen, this gentleman, at Ganang Padang.
Speaker: 4
02:20:34
Now let me be clear. I’m not saying he’s suppressing it. All I and I’m not saying that the WEF is trying to suppress our ancient history. All I’m sharing here is that it just so happens that the gentleman that’s in charge of decision making let me be clear. I said it earlier.
Speaker: 4
02:20:49
They went from saying that there will be unlimited resources and funding to excavate Ganong Panang. It stopped. And as of right now, there’s no plan in place to do it. And I’m just sharing that the person who would make that decision or has the power to do so happens to be a global shaper.
Speaker: 4
02:21:04
And Klaus Schwab, the former head of the of the World Economic Forum, I have a video of him gloating about how they’ve infiltrated government cabinets, the media all over the world, and if are enacting their initiatives.
Speaker: 0
02:21:16
Young global leaders.
Speaker: 4
02:21:17
Yes. So they then infiltrated the cabinets. It’s very good. You can eat c bugs. Does.
Speaker: 3
02:21:21
Did you
Speaker: 0
02:21:21
see the photo of him in the bathroom? No. I would love to. No.
Speaker: 4
02:21:24
Please show
Speaker: 0
02:21:25
us. Photo of him in our bathroom here with the fucking crazy Darth Vader outfit on. Oh,
Speaker: 4
02:21:30
yeah. Yeah. That was that was bizarre.
Speaker: 0
02:21:32
Wackiest fucking outfit ever if you’re, you know, so on the nose. I know. If you’re a evil supervillain
Speaker: 4
02:21:38
He looks like a Bond villain. A a Bond James Bond villain.
Speaker: 0
02:21:41
Yeah. More more crazy than that. Like, more crazy than a Bond. Let’s see if you can find that photo. Yeah. More crazy than a Bond villain. Like, a Star Wars villain. Yeah. Like, some
Speaker: 5
02:21:49
He he’s a Sith Lord or something.
Speaker: 0
02:21:51
Be a crazy person to put that fucking thing on and go out in public unless it’s a Halloween costume.
Speaker: 3
02:21:55
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:21:55
Like, it’s a bizarre outfit for you to wear. And if everyone’s worried about these secret societies and people that are in control and pulling the strings in the world, what what are they worried about? They’re worried about fucking crackpots that dress like this. That’s what they’re worried about. Eyes wide shut parties, like that kind of shit. You get that photo?
Speaker: 2
02:22:14
Look at that.
Speaker: 0
02:22:15
Fucking crazy photo.
Speaker: 5
02:22:17
I’m sorry.
Speaker: 0
02:22:17
That photo right there. That’s the one we have
Speaker: 3
02:22:19
in the house room.
Speaker: 2
02:22:19
Christ. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:22:20
In front of the podium at the World Economic Forum. Wow. What is that fucking photo? What is that outfit you’re wearing,
Speaker: 2
02:22:25
sir? That looks like something from some like 19 seventies dystopian film. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:22:30
100%. Like Metropolis or something.
Speaker: 2
02:22:33
Yeah. Yeah. The Yeah. Death Race 2 1,000, the original one.
Speaker: 0
02:22:36
Like, what the fuck is that? That’s so that outfit is so crazy. Wow. Imagine someone
Speaker: 5
02:22:41
I think it was having to do with the event they were at, though.
Speaker: 0
02:22:43
Oh, they’re all
Speaker: 3
02:22:43
for it.
Speaker: 4
02:22:43
He got an honorary doctorate. This is at a a university somewhere in Europe.
Speaker: 0
02:22:47
Fucking crazy that that’s what you wear there anyway. Yeah. What are you doing? You’re dressing like a druid.
Speaker: 2
02:22:52
Well, they even got a magic card of him.
Speaker: 0
02:22:53
Look at that. It’s so weird.
Speaker: 4
02:22:55
So, again, we got another outfit. Look at that.
Speaker: 3
02:22:57
Look at that. Look at that.
Speaker: 5
02:22:58
Says AI says AI.
Speaker: 0
02:22:59
That’s how AI generated. Okay.
Speaker: 4
02:23:00
Okay. So when I look at Gobekli Tepe involving my little w f, conspiracy idea, it is a bit bizarre that that partnership with the Doge’s group was literally announced at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos. And I also should share this, that I may have been banned from Turkey. So, this is this is hilarious. So after my video came out, was his name? Karul.
Speaker: 4
02:23:25
What’s his name, doctor Karul? So the head of, archaeology in Turkey, took great issue with my conspiracy theories on it and has he was quoted in an article saying that I should be sanctioned, and then he followed up with, like, I will be sanctioned. And I’m like, well, how are you gonna keep me out of Gobekli Tepe? Have I been banned from Turkey?
Speaker: 4
02:23:45
Because American citizens don’t need a visa to go into Turkey unless they’re gonna be there more than 90 days. So there’s if I could, I could apply ahead of time. Like, in Egypt, you can apply for your tourism visa ahead of time, and I’d know if I was rejected. He that’s what he said is that I’ll be sanctioned.
Speaker: 4
02:24:00
He was referring to me, and I’m like, okay.
Speaker: 0
02:24:03
What does that mean?
Speaker: 4
02:24:04
Well, it means travel bans. Yeah.
Speaker: 2
02:24:05
I mean, you’re not gonna let him in the country. It’s it’s
Speaker: 4
02:24:07
It means I go to the airport to get rejected at customs potentially.
Speaker: 0
02:24:10
And that is possibly what would happen.
Speaker: 4
02:24:12
He said it will happen. I don’t know that it’s happened. You get
Speaker: 3
02:24:16
a bit of
Speaker: 4
02:24:16
Flights in Turkey are actually a little bit pricey, and I’m like, look, damn it. I’m like, if I’m gonna land there and get turned around, that would suck.
Speaker: 0
02:24:22
Oh, you might be able to make a nice video about it. That’s true.
Speaker: 4
02:24:25
Yeah. Oh, yeah. That would be actually, yeah. Right? That that’s a video. Sure.
Speaker: 0
02:24:28
I mean I mean, it kind of, like, helps you.
Speaker: 4
02:24:31
Right? I’m over the target with Gobekli Tepe.
Speaker: 0
02:24:34
Right. Or at least you’re making them uncomfortable.
Speaker: 3
02:24:36
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:24:36
Right? You’re forcing them to consider why they have chosen this. If it’s just for economic reasons, which does make sense. If so many people are already going there, why should we spend more money? I get that.
Speaker: 4
02:24:46
Well and it it makes sense, and it’s the most likely explanation. It’s probably true. But that means that then this is an issue of either mismanagement or incompetence because they there’s it is inexcusable that because as of right now, their plan is that it will not be fully excavated.
Speaker: 3
02:25:02
Wait. Wait.
Speaker: 5
02:25:03
I was still in finish talking.
Speaker: 4
02:25:04
It will not be fully excavated in any of our lifetimes. And Right. There could potentially be answers involving our ancient past at Gobekli Tepe, and it is entirely inexcusable that we wouldn’t dig it up. And I don’t actually think it will take away from tourism by removing the mystery. No. People are half a 1000000 people a year are visiting it just because.
Speaker: 4
02:25:23
And if they dig it up more of it, in my opinion, that’s more reason to go there.
Speaker: 0
02:25:27
Right.
Speaker: 5
02:25:42
It talks about how the soldiers were using hose to, excavate. They didn’t like that. It mentions the first disbursement of $250 was put out.
Speaker: 4
02:25:54
Is this from 2014, this article?
Speaker: 5
02:25:56
Article because it shows the thing that says unlimited amount of research funding, but it says it was taken from other funding.
Speaker: 3
02:26:02
Mhmm.
Speaker: 5
02:26:02
And then it says that there’s a lack of funding right below it.
Speaker: 2
02:26:07
Archaeologists at other sites bemoan a lack of funding.
Speaker: 4
02:26:09
Let me just say this. My ass. All they gotta do is drill a hole and stick a camera through it into the tube to figure out if it’s a lava tube or something man made. This is not expensive. It could get done for 1,000 of dollars, not 1,000,000 of dollars. And if it is a 27,000 year old pyramidal structure as Graham Hancock has proposed, the data look. The data is not proven.
Speaker: 4
02:26:30
It’s hotly debated, but let me just make this crystal clear. We don’t know what it is. It could potentially be the oldest ancient ruin in on Earth, and we’ll we’re never going to know the answer until we go looking.
Speaker: 2
02:26:43
Yep.
Speaker: 4
02:26:43
And it is entirely unacceptable that we’re not doing it.
Speaker: 2
02:26:45
Well, there’s
Speaker: 4
02:26:46
What is happening?
Speaker: 2
02:26:46
There’s a there’s a thing to to get, like, less conspiratorial, but support it from a very real position. There’s a thing with science with their paradigms. They’ve looked at it from a very long time with, the the origins of earth sciences and history. It was ex they were expected to bear out the bible, prove the bible right. Mhmm. Then evolution and then Darwin and then then it was gradualism.
Speaker: 2
02:27:08
Prove the bible wrong. There is no major global flood. In gradualism, they assume that everything happens slowly. It’s all there’s nothing catastrophic in the record, and that lasted from the late 1700 all the or 1800, excuse me, all the fucking way up until 1980 when the k t dinosaur killing meteor was accepted.
Speaker: 2
02:27:28
Before that, there was no such thing as punctuated equilibrium which is what they call it now. Where which any kid could figure out is the way the fucking world works. The the slow erosion happens on the side of the bank but sometimes there’s a big flood that carves a big chunk of the I mean, this is no brainer shit.
Speaker: 2
02:27:44
And the life moves on a steady pace normally and then every now and again something catastrophic happens. So my point is is that if they think that digging something up is going to change a paradigm that they’re expected to maintain, they’re not gonna fucking dig it up. This, the kind of of opposition that they face to overturning paradigms, like the Clovis first thing.
Speaker: 2
02:28:03
Like, when Flint was on here and he tried to play that one down, not only were careers ruined from that, but one thing you’ll almost never hear mentioned was Clovis first was version 2 of this. Before that, it was the Folsom Point and Folsom First, and many careers were ruined by people that posited that the Americans were people before the fulsome culture.
Speaker: 2
02:28:22
Then they found the club. This is this isn’t some that is not some novel time of of well, you know, there was a scientific debate in a few no. No. No. This is standard operating procedure where it’s always fucking been done. So it’s not a surprising thing that they’re gonna try to hide stuff.
Speaker: 2
02:28:37
It’s not a surprising thing.
Speaker: 0
02:28:38
Human ego Yeah. And and control. It’s humans always want to be the experts, and they always wanna be the one in control of the information. If the information that’s new that’s coming out counters their control and their expertise, they they reject it. And it’s just ego. That’s It’s just ego.
Speaker: 2
02:28:54
It’s just kinda messed up because of I mean, I know scientists are people, but but it should
Speaker: 0
02:28:59
all be what we know now. This is what we know now. And when new information comes along, okay, now we’re thinking about it in a different way. But the problem is they’ve published books. Yeah. And these books, they’ve definitively given dates. We now know. We’ve we are sure that this.
Speaker: 0
02:29:14
What are your thoughts on the dating of the pyramids and how do they date the pyramids? They date the pyramids based on whatever carbon that they could find in between the stones. Obviously, you can’t carbon date stones themselves. So you have to use some sort of organic material that’s around that.
Speaker: 0
02:29:31
The best dating is that
Speaker: 4
02:29:33
the Great Pyramid is somewhere around 45100 years ago. That was from organic material taken between casing stones. You could argue that the casing stones were restored because they even the Romans restored parts of the Sphinx. Right. I don’t know how old the great pyramid is, but if it was constructed 45100 years ago, then our understanding of what was happening on the Giza Plateau at that time is vastly different than the people that were if you look at any academic textbook, they show people wearing loincloths and barefoot constructing the pyramid.
Speaker: 4
02:30:04
And, nah, that’s nah. Well, even hieroglyphs that depict moving statues.
Speaker: 3
02:30:10
It’s a
Speaker: 0
02:30:10
bunch of guys’ sandals pulling a sled.
Speaker: 4
02:30:13
So that depiction, which should be in my Ramesseum folder, Jamie, that one statue was only 58 metric tons.
Speaker: 2
02:30:22
Only? Well, compared to compared to the other Compared to the other Compared to
Speaker: 3
02:30:25
it. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:30:26
It’s still it’s all crazy.
Speaker: 3
02:30:27
Hey. This is what they say.
Speaker: 4
02:30:28
They say, well, they pulled it on a sledge, which is like a a wooden sled. And I’m like, the Ramesseum statue is 15 times heavier than that other one. Yeah. This is what they always show. They always show these naked dudes, yeah. Look at them, bare ass.
Speaker: 0
02:30:42
Heave ho.
Speaker: 4
02:30:44
So Just to be clear. Naked. I know. Because they wanna show them that they’re dumb and primitive and that He wanted
Speaker: 0
02:30:49
a dude with the whip. He’s got some clothes on. Yeah. Right. That guy’s got clothes on. But that’s kind of been debunked. Right? Because one of the things they found is that when they studied the remains that were in the enclosures where the people that worked in the pyramid lived, they’re not slaves.
Speaker: 2
02:31:03
No. They were fed well.
Speaker: 0
02:31:05
Yeah. They were they were fed well, and it seems like they were highly skilled.
Speaker: 2
02:31:08
They had
Speaker: 0
02:31:08
Clearly. Had
Speaker: 2
02:31:09
to have been. I mean, I’ve tried to to suss to me, what’s the most impressive thing about it is the accuracy of the pyramid to itself. It’s like a perfect square with, like, 2 inches of deviation at 756 feet per side. That’s, like, tiny fraction of a percentage off. You’re, like, machine age standards on a fucking gigantic fucking scale.
Speaker: 0
02:31:27
Right.
Speaker: 2
02:31:28
The only thing I could come up with was, and I I have to test it. But, like, if you had a a concave mirror, it creates a little circle of light like a magnifying glass does and will start a fire. At a certain distance, it’s gonna be the same size no matter what. So you could calibrate that and if you had to have everything exactly set up, but if you shot at a target and filled up a perfect circle, you could know it was exact range.
Speaker: 2
02:31:51
That kind of thing would work because you can’t measure this with ropes. You can’t measure the I mean, the rope sag and they’re affected by humidity and stuff. And again, it’s 2 inches at 756 feet. That’s not
Speaker: 0
02:32:02
that’s not you’re not is that Just just taking into account the casings that were removed?
Speaker: 2
02:32:06
Oh, no. It’s not. This is the just the base perimeter of the pyramid. That’s the there’s an outline around the pyramid where it was kinda scratched into the ground, for where they would they think that they used water and stuff to to do leveling, and they generally measure around that to to to my understanding.
Speaker: 0
02:32:24
In any deviation, even in millimeters with each rock as you get up to 2,300,000 stones to build the peak of the pyramid. Any deviation on either side would fuck the whole thing up.
Speaker: 2
02:32:35
Oh, man.
Speaker: 4
02:32:35
It is virtually perfect. Not per quite perfect, but it’s it is virtually perfect.
Speaker: 0
02:32:40
By humans, allegedly, or
Speaker: 2
02:32:43
Anunnaki. Anunnaki.
Speaker: 3
02:32:44
Do you
Speaker: 0
02:32:45
you know, the Anunnaki one is the most fun because, I love those stories. I love Sitchin stuff. It’s just because it’s the the funnest possibility is that human beings were genetically engineered by a superior race that came here to mine gold.
Speaker: 2
02:32:59
It’s it’s I was telling Jim actually last night that, archaeologists frequently refer to the Clovis hypothesis as elegant, and I often tell him that, this is actually Chris histgen’s stuff is even more elegant. It explains why we want gold and silver. I mean, come on. That’s all around the entire world.
Speaker: 0
02:33:14
The gold one’s the weird one because you can’t make any tools out of it. You can’t make weapons out of it, and yet it was the most prized metal.
Speaker: 2
02:33:20
And it works pretty good for me when you get to a higher level of tech all of a sudden. It’s pretty useful, isn’t it?
Speaker: 0
02:33:25
It’s very useful. And then there’s also the idea of suspending particles in the atmosphere.
Speaker: 2
02:33:29
Like Chris talks about. Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:33:30
Right. Which is what Bill Gates wants to
Speaker: 3
02:33:32
do today, that fucking kook. Hey hey, fuckface. There’s a lot of people living here. You don’t get
Speaker: 0
02:33:32
to change the kook. Hey hey, fuckface. There’s a lot of people living here. You don’t get to choose what what the when the shades get put on the earth because you have this goofy climate change narrative. I don’t believe you.
Speaker: 4
02:33:44
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:33:44
I don’t like that you’re even talking about doing this. How about a global vote as whether or not this one asshole created Windows 95 gets to do this?
Speaker: 4
02:33:52
He didn’t create anything. He bought the patent off that IBM guy. I love putting that on blast because it’s like, I think he has I think he suffers from an inferiority complex. I think that he’s jealous of Elon Musk and others. I think he his time
Speaker: 0
02:34:06
in the line shorted Tesla.
Speaker: 4
02:34:08
Yeah. And it makes him look like a massive douche. I think that he is look. He was once the king, the richest man on earth, and now he’s not. And I think that that’s all he wants. I think
Speaker: 0
02:34:18
Again, power, human power and ego, and especially people that have enormous resources and control over things. They don’t wanna relinquish that grip.
Speaker: 2
02:34:25
Yep. Well, yeah.
Speaker: 3
02:34:26
It’s like,
Speaker: 4
02:34:26
bro, he should be living in it all inclusive riding jet skis. You made it, brother. You’re you’re rich.
Speaker: 0
02:34:30
Like Jeff Bezos. Right. Yeah. On that be on the happy was hot girl. God, let’s go.
Speaker: 2
02:34:35
Yeah. Let’s just be happy.
Speaker: 0
02:34:36
That’s what I want out of my billionaires. I want Jeff Bezos. So people criticize him. I’m like, what are you talking about? He’s living the dream. Also, he’s jacked. He has a super high hot girlfriend. He’s got a giant yacht. Fuck yeah.
Speaker: 2
02:34:46
Flying into space with fucking Captain Kirk. Come on. Big
Speaker: 0
02:34:49
old dick rocket.
Speaker: 4
02:34:50
I can’t figure out why he runs the Washington Post because he owns the Washington Post.
Speaker: 3
02:34:54
He’s changed
Speaker: 0
02:34:55
the shit out of it.
Speaker: 4
02:34:55
Has he?
Speaker: 0
02:34:56
Yeah. There’s a big big, to do about it because he released this article that we have to or release a story rather. He he wrote a piece essentially saying that you have to take divergent viewpoints. You have to take a bunch of different perspectives. We can’t just be this left wing echo chamber, and it’s the reason why the business is faltering.
Speaker: 0
02:35:14
I mean, all of these I was just reading something about CNN’s ratings and MSNBC’s ratings post election. They’ve crashed. All these left wing kooks on YouTube are hemorrhaging subscribers
Speaker: 3
02:35:30
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
02:35:30
Where people go, you guys are out of touch. You’re not accurate. You’re delusional. And people are speaking with their subscriptions, and they’re speaking with their purchasing of The Washington Post, and they’re purchasing The New York Times. The New York Times just debunked in the most insane way, debunked RFK Junior’s assertion that the ingredients in Froot Loops are different in Canada than they are in the United States.
Speaker: 0
02:35:56
They fact checked it while saying he was accurate. So their fact check it’s so dumb when you see the I tweeted it. Does the fact check is so dumb because the fact check says it’s not correct. They have the same ingredients except for these harmful chemicals that
Speaker: 3
02:36:15
I’ve made.
Speaker: 2
02:36:15
What’s up? Fuck. Look at this.
Speaker: 0
02:36:17
Mister Kennedy has singled out Froot Loops as an example of a product with too many artificial ingredients, questioning why the Canadian version has fewer than the US version, but he was wrong. The ingredient list is roughly the same, although Canada’s has natural colorings made from blueberries and carrots, while the US product contains red dye 40, yellow 5, and blue 1 as well as butylated hydroxytolines or BHT, a lab made chemical that is used for freshness according to the ingredient label that is the fucking dangerous chemicals that are banned in Canada that we’re trying to get rid of in America and that have r f ked that.
Speaker: 0
02:36:57
So they’re literally saying he was wrong, but he was right.
Speaker: 2
02:37:00
Yeah. That made that made my brain hurt
Speaker: 0
02:37:02
just reading that. It was just like New York
Speaker: 3
02:37:05
fucking times.
Speaker: 2
02:37:06
Well, but PewDiePie hadn’t dressed like a Nazi for a while, so he didn’t have anything to talk about. Right?
Speaker: 0
02:37:10
I don’t know what that’s about.
Speaker: 3
02:37:11
Oh, sorry. But this
Speaker: 0
02:37:12
is what the New York Times is doing. So, of course, you’re gonna hemorrhage subscribers. Of course. You’re crazy. You’re saying something that’s nuts. And, also, what is your motivation? Like, what’s your motivation for removing potentially harmful and toxic chemicals? If someone is trying to do that for the greater health of the population, if we’re saying that these things have been eliminated in other countries because they’ve been proven to be dangerous, What is your motivation for saying he was wrong?
Speaker: 4
02:37:47
Marty.
Speaker: 0
02:37:48
Well And and he what else could it be?
Speaker: 3
02:37:50
No. Clearly, he’s anti
Speaker: 0
02:37:51
brother. Ideology, you know, left wing rejection of RFK Junior because now he’s connected to Trump, which is connected to Nazis. It’s like you you go down this fucking weird rabbit hole with these people, and you’re like, what are you trying to do? Are you trying to remove all leftover credibility? Are you trying to eliminate because you lost so much credibility? Are you trying to kill it all?
Speaker: 0
02:38:14
Are you secretly working for the Chinese?
Speaker: 3
02:38:16
Like, what are you doing?
Speaker: 4
02:38:17
They’re all in. What are you doing? It’s probably backed by Monsanto or something because if you look at, like, these serials
Speaker: 0
02:38:23
crazy state.
Speaker: 2
02:38:23
That what it’s to think that the media was once called the 4th estate in this country is mind boggling, honestly. To think that we used to consider them the 4th estate of government, that it was like this our our father’s generation, that’s what they considered Ted Topple, man.
Speaker: 2
02:38:37
They’re fucking.
Speaker: 0
02:38:38
Well, what I’m hoping is that what Jeff Bezos has said about the Washington Post, and I know what CNN is considering doing, and they’ve made some sort of a trend towards a more objective form of journalism. But they’re still compromised by their the the sponsors. They’re still compromised by the advertisers.
Speaker: 0
02:38:54
They’re they’re so compromised that I don’t know if they can ever get to where they really need to be to compete with actual objective real journalists that are independent because I don’t I don’t think they can. So it’s it’s kind of crazy. It’s like they’re digging their own grave
Speaker: 3
02:39:10
Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:39:11
Every day, and then they’re lashing out at all the other people that aren’t digging their own grave. It’s like you guys are
Speaker: 2
02:39:17
Insane.
Speaker: 0
02:39:17
So crazy.
Speaker: 4
02:39:18
They’re doing it to themselves, and now it’s like what is it? Citizen journalists? How did Elon Musk put it? It’s like you are now the journalist, or how I’m I’m misquoting him. But, X
Speaker: 0
02:39:27
is mainstream media now. That is the mainstream media. That’s where most people are getting their news now.
Speaker: 4
02:39:31
The views speak for itself. You know.
Speaker: 0
02:39:33
Like It’s not just the views. It’s the community notes. The fact that you can actually fact check these things. And then you have all these brilliant people that are participating in this live debate in real time online about what’s real and what’s not.
Speaker: 2
02:39:47
Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:39:47
And you’re finding all specifically with the, like, the the when they found the Twitter files. Oh my god. Christ. The FBI is involved in this? Like, what what the fuck is going on?
Speaker: 3
02:39:57
Yeah.
Speaker: 2
02:39:58
It’s This is so crazy.
Speaker: 0
02:39:59
The FBI is involved in deciding what’s real and what’s not on Twitter. Unreal. And you’re you’re you’re banning journalists? You’re you’re banning scientists? Like, this is really crazy.
Speaker: 4
02:40:11
Yeah. And it’s bad for society. But, you know, it’s caused irreparable harm with misinformation.
Speaker: 0
02:40:16
But it’s not. So it’s bad initially, but then ultimately, it’s good. Because ultimately, we learn who you can and can’t trust. And he said, well, who’s just honest and accurate? Because there’s a lot of money in being honest and accurate.
Speaker: 4
02:40:30
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:40:30
You know, this is what’s crazy. Like, all these independent journalists are doing really well. Well, because they don’t have a fucking giant building in Atlanta that’s filled with a 1,000 workers. Right? Right? So they don’t have the overhead for terrible ratings. Terrible ratings and a massive overhead. Like, you’re kind of fucked. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:40:46
That’s So it’s great for us that it it leads to the rise of and these guys like Matt Taibbi that used to be a part of the system and now are independent. Glenn Greenwald, all these type of people. Michael Shellenberger. People that you can actually trust. They’re gonna tell you the truth because there’s actually money in telling the truth. Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:41:02
It’s a great business model.
Speaker: 4
02:41:03
It’s course corrected and the proof of it and all these other people, you know, whether it’s Tucker Carlson, many, many others, like, that are proof yep. You know?
Speaker: 0
02:41:12
There is a course correction, and the the problem is they’re they’ve dug their heels in so much, and they’ll write articles like that New York Times article. That is so crazy. They updated it. Oh, congratulations.
Speaker: 5
02:41:23
They changed the word wording a little bit. Here’s the here’s what it looked
Speaker: 0
02:41:28
like. They changed it. They got busted. Oh, they said it. Because it got, like, 10,000,000 views on x in a day.
Speaker: 2
02:41:34
They got blasted. It came It
Speaker: 0
02:41:36
got blasted everywhere.
Speaker: 2
02:41:37
Well, that’s Why do they kinda double things in state.
Speaker: 0
02:41:39
What they said here. Why do we have fruitless in this country that have 18 or 19 ingredients? You go to Canada as 2 or 3, mister Kennedy asked. He was wrong on the ingredient count. They are roughly the same.
Speaker: 5
02:41:48
Yeah. That’s what they changed.
Speaker: 0
02:41:50
Oh, but they’re they’re still they’re still missing the whole fucking point. So the ingredient count is roughly the same. So there’s still 19 ingredients in the Canadian version, but it’s all just like sugar and wheat and, like, carrot dye and blueberry dye and whatever the fuck else they have.
Speaker: 2
02:42:08
They found a factual error that they could pull out instead of addressing the need of what he was saying.
Speaker: 0
02:42:12
He looked at it and grabbed it. All these things, these dyes are all illegal in Canada and also illegal in other countries.
Speaker: 4
02:42:20
It’s poison. Cereal is one of the worst things you can consume.
Speaker: 0
02:42:23
But it’s so delicious.
Speaker: 3
02:42:26
But I
Speaker: 0
02:42:26
wonder if it’s just as delicious in Canada, which is crazy. Like, I don’t need it to be flavored or colored by fucking dye when you can get it from beets or whatever.
Speaker: 2
02:42:35
Yeah. The dye the dye thing’s crazy. The red dye 40 is actually kind of a big problem. There’s a lot of kids that have, like, ADD kind of, symptoms from red dye 40.
Speaker: 3
02:42:45
Well, I
Speaker: 0
02:42:45
mean, you’re left alone to your own devices near a child like I was, you just fucking pour bowl after bowl
Speaker: 2
02:42:52
after 0.
Speaker: 3
02:42:53
It’s really, like, really explode. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:42:55
You know, I would eat fucking Captain Crunch until I had a fucking heart attack. So, like, the Lucky Charms
Speaker: 4
02:43:00
Lucky Charms eating just the marshmallows. Oh, yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:43:03
Where’s the this is bullshit. Where’s the marshmallows?
Speaker: 2
02:43:06
The Saturday morning cartoons. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:43:07
Oh my god. Yeah. You’re getting cracked out to Bullwinkle. Oh, yeah. And you’re
Speaker: 4
02:43:11
just eating balls of sugar.
Speaker: 0
02:43:13
Yeah. I mean, we didn’t even know that sugar was bad for you because, again, another fucking conspiracy that turned out to be true. Mhmm. The scientists got bribed by the sugar industry to push all the blame Cholesterol. About saturated fat. Yep. That’s why everybody started using margarine and all this stupid shit.
Speaker: 0
02:43:29
It’s like
Speaker: 2
02:43:29
Oh, eat some plastic. Unless it was Oh, so
Speaker: 3
02:43:31
you know, if
Speaker: 0
02:43:32
you leave margarine out, rats don’t even eat it?
Speaker: 4
02:43:34
I was about to say that. You’ll you’ll see ants will be eating natural butter, but they won’t touch margarine.
Speaker: 0
02:43:38
Yeah. They’re not they eat each other. They don’t fuck with margarine.
Speaker: 4
02:43:41
Like, what is that? For that.
Speaker: 2
02:43:42
It’s glue.
Speaker: 0
02:43:43
It’s a it’s chemical. It’s industrial oil.
Speaker: 4
02:43:46
Yeah. It’s,
Speaker: 0
02:43:46
like, really weird. It used to be used for engine lubricant. We’re like, woah.
Speaker: 2
02:43:50
It was great on toast.
Speaker: 0
02:43:53
It’s just we’re so stupid. We’re so fucking stupid.
Speaker: 2
02:43:57
It’s wild when you think about it. The things that we will do, like the Milgram experiment I’ve mentioned before, the, the experiment they did back after the everybody was wondering here in the states why the Nazis were able to convince rank and file normal people to do fucked up stuff.
Speaker: 2
02:44:10
So they got guys in a lab coat, and they had an actor pretend he was getting shocked as a test subject, but the real test subject was the guy they had quote unquote shocking that guy.
Speaker: 0
02:44:20
And
Speaker: 2
02:44:20
the guy in the lab coat to keep telling him to do it more and and they found about 30% of the people if they were told would shock them all the way up to killing a guy. Yep. Yeah. And that that kind of appeal to authority, the kind of, that kind of worshiping of authority has really they’re they’re gutting it right now and they’re paying the price as
Speaker: 0
02:44:37
Well, it’s just dangerous because authority has a massive responsibility to be accurate. And with that comes humility and the understanding that we don’t know everything. It’s not possible, which is why we’re constantly studying things. And this this need to be accurate and need to be correct and need to be the only one who has access to this information to educate people is preposterous.
Speaker: 0
02:45:00
It’s really crazy, especially when it comes to something like ancient history, which is why your channel is so popular and your channel and Graham Hancock shows are so popular, and why these people that wanna hold on to that throne are so adamant about labeling them with every possible horrible pejorative.
Speaker: 2
02:45:18
Yeah. But, yeah, that’s a a really easy way to to get them out. Like I said, they’re losing authority right now like we’re talking about. We’re talking about mainstream media or legacy media. I guess you could call it falling apart and stuff. What I mentioned about PewDiePie earlier, if you remember about 10 years ago, the, adpocalypse, that that was I think it was actually a Wall Street Journal article, but it was a legacy media that wrote about PewDiePie, and they fucking, like, threw him under the bus.
Speaker: 2
02:45:41
They’re, like, misconstrued him and everything else, and the effects were very real. It slapped YouTube content creators across the board. If you look up Adpocalypse, you’ll you can read all about it.
Speaker: 0
02:45:49
Well, they had they’ve they’ve actually dropped some of the bans on X now, which is great. Yeah. Which is, I think, a sign of the culture shifting also after the election.
Speaker: 2
02:45:59
There’s a
Speaker: 0
02:45:59
lot of realizing that there’s there’s actually a lot of money in advertising there. Like, what are you fucking retarded? Right. So everybody’s there. It’s the number one platform on Earth for people discussing things.
Speaker: 3
02:46:09
It’s the feature.
Speaker: 0
02:46:10
You advertise there? Because you’re trying to you’re trying to bleed that guy out, but you fuck with the wrong dude. He’s crazy. He’s got more money than anybody. He’s like I don’t care. I’m buying it. He bought it for twice what it’s worth. And they’re like, Twitter has lost $20,000,000,000 in value. He’s a terrible businessman. No.
Speaker: 0
02:46:27
He overpaid. He overpaid substantially to try to save free free speech.
Speaker: 2
02:46:32
Yeah. It it just was not this was what you would call an activist investment.
Speaker: 0
02:46:35
Well, he’s just a rare cat who’s willing to do something like that. There’s not a lot of people that are willing to, like, lose 1,000,000,000 on some but when you got 200,000,000,000, you know, like, let’s fucking shift this apple cart.
Speaker: 4
02:46:47
I’m so glad he’s on the right side of history. That guy’s a hero. He’s a living hero, and x is the future. That is gonna be the biggest platform on Earth. That’s his goal. Right? It’s
Speaker: 3
02:46:54
gonna end.
Speaker: 0
02:46:55
Well, it certainly already is and probably will grow, and, you know, they keep saying people are going to blue sky. You know if you go to blue sky and you type, there’s only 2 genders, you’re banned instantly?
Speaker: 4
02:47:04
Yes. I saw this recently. Doing it.
Speaker: 0
02:47:05
Yeah. Blue sky is just the newest echo chamber of the old Twitter.
Speaker: 2
02:47:09
Oh, I
Speaker: 0
02:47:09
saw all these people. King dorks.
Speaker: 2
02:47:11
Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:47:11
They’re gonna go over there and won’t let their brains rot out in an echo chamber.
Speaker: 2
02:47:14
I’ve been picking on all of my friends in the real world that, were laughing at, I forget the name of the the site that, Rumble, when everybody was like, oh, the right wingers are going to Rumble. Now it’s like, and all you guys are running the blue sky. Isn’t it fucking funny how that works? Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:47:31
Shout out to Rumble. Campbell.
Speaker: 4
02:47:32
Rumble’s been so good
Speaker: 3
02:47:33
to me.
Speaker: 4
02:47:34
Let me give Chris Pavlovsky a shout out to CEO of Rumble. I had the pleasure a pleasure of meeting him, and they’ve been treating me real good.
Speaker: 0
02:47:40
Rumble’s great.
Speaker: 4
02:47:41
Yeah. They’re fantastic.
Speaker: 0
02:47:42
They’re full on free speech with whether you’re on the left or the right, whatever it is.
Speaker: 4
02:47:46
Anything I want anything I want within as long as it’s not violence or something like that. Of course. Yeah. So I recommend people.
Speaker: 0
02:47:52
Everything that’s legal, which is what it’s supposed to be, and that’s what the first amendment is supposed to apply to. And this is one of the great things about this administration that’s coming in is that Donald Trump wants to apply the first amendment to all these sites.
Speaker: 0
02:48:04
He wants to stop all this big tech banning, which is, by the way, was terrible for him in 2020. I mean, it really it it’s election interference. It truly is because you’re you’re eliminating one complete side of the argument. It’s supposed to be one side thinks this, the other side thinks that.
Speaker: 0
02:48:23
They get together and discuss it, and you as the person outside of it gets to see who makes a more compelling argument. And the one of wonderful thing about community notes is you get to see whether or not someone’s bullshitting. Right. So let’s find out what’s right and what’s wrong, what’s true, what’s not. Let’s that’s what it’s supposed to be.
Speaker: 0
02:48:41
But the problem with that is then you don’t really have control of the election, and that’s what they found out in 2024. They don’t have control of it anymore. And you can get Beyonce and pay her $10,000,000. It doesn’t fucking work. It doesn’t work anymore. No one cares. No one believes them. They don’t trust them.
Speaker: 0
02:48:55
They make terrible life choices. And you’re like, well, clearly, you’re not a person I’m gonna listen to when it comes to who’s gonna run the fucking world, Taylor Swift. Right? Just shut the fuck up. This is crazy, Eminem. What are you talking about? How much have you locked?
Speaker: 0
02:49:08
I mean, I wanna sit M and M down with, like, a political scholar and, like, tell me what you know about the invasion of Ukraine. What do you know about the coup in 2014? What do you really know about NATO moving weapons closer and closer? What do you know about the violation of the treaty that we have? What the fuck are you doing, man? You shouldn’t be doing this.
Speaker: 0
02:49:24
You this is not the thing for you to be doing here.
Speaker: 4
02:49:27
These people have no idea what they’re talking about. They’re all puppets. They’re all they’re they’re people that don’t do any research on their own, and they’re just told what to think or they’re compromised.
Speaker: 0
02:49:35
Well, I think they were getting paid. And and I think that’s what’s even weirder is that you’re allowed to pay people to endorse you for president, which is crazy.
Speaker: 4
02:49:44
Yeah. Oprah, 2a half 1000000. Not a 1000000. They thought it now it’s 2a half 1000000.
Speaker: 0
02:49:48
I sent that to Jamie, but that seems to be, like, production cost would seem at least slightly elevated for an event. But the weird one was like the Beyonce one. If if it’s true and, you know, there’s a lot of sites reporting it as it is true, but we we tried to look. Jamie, look.
Speaker: 0
02:50:01
This it’s hard to find what’s true and what’s not true because there’s a lot of money that was paid to staff, but it’s, like, unclear what that means. And then there’s it’s it’s unclear where they burned all the money. And then there’s also the money that went to these activist groups.
Speaker: 0
02:50:17
And we’re talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars they paid to people to support the this administration, which is kind of supposed to be the other way around. Aren’t these groups supposed to be paying money to prop up the campaign because the campaign believes in them? No.
Speaker: 0
02:50:33
You’re paying these activist groups to support you, which is just crazy. Also, it didn’t work. It didn’t work at all. You went you went through a 1,000,000,000 plus dollars in 3 months. This is so crazy, and you’re in debt.
Speaker: 4
02:50:48
I think and I think a lot of people made some money in the process. That money went somewhere. Where is
Speaker: 3
02:50:52
it now?
Speaker: 0
02:50:52
Part of the problem with climate change. That’s part of the problem with everything is that it’s profitable to to spit out a narrative Yep. And that there’s a lot of money being moved around, and this is money in politics. And as much as we can get that out, we we need to. And I think one of the most important things about getting that out is this whole thing about pharmaceutical drug companies being able to advertise, which changed in the 19 nineties.
Speaker: 2
02:51:15
We have
Speaker: 0
02:51:16
to recognize that before the 19 nineties, pharmaceutical drugs could not advertise on TV, and guess what? We were taken way less, and we were way healthier.
Speaker: 2
02:51:26
No kidding.
Speaker: 0
02:51:27
Is not good, folks. This is not good. You know? And other than Ozempic, which is, like, at least curbing obesity in this to a certain extent, what what are these drugs are doing good? Like, what it what it if you look at the overall health of people, it’s declining. Yeah. Obesity is rising. Heart attacks are rising.
Speaker: 0
02:51:46
Strokes are all this shit is bad. We’re not moving in the right direction, and yet there’s a tremendous resistance for change.
Speaker: 2
02:51:54
But it’s funny to me that they would spend so much money on this election when, I mean, it’s kind of they it’s kind of clear that when one person’s platform is do this, this, this, this, and this, the other person’s platform is not him. It fucking I mean, that’s like Yeah. You know, that’s like a ride in somebody else’s coattails deliberately. You you she’s she came in with the the platform.
Speaker: 2
02:52:16
I’m just gonna you know, I’m not Trump. So okay. Well, that’s great. But, I mean, once people have pierced through the veil of Trump’s gonna make everything illegal and put everybody that’s not wide into camps and shit, once they’ve got past that, what do you have?
Speaker: 0
02:52:28
Well, it’s also if you’re gonna develop, like, a real platform, like a real you’re you’re gonna run for president Yeah.
Speaker: 2
02:52:35
I I
Speaker: 0
02:52:35
would think you would wanna do that over a long period of time and be very careful about treat it like a defense attorney. Like, if you were prosecuting this as a case, you would wanna have all of your facts that show that you’re correct and have all of your arguments, and you would wanna have mock arguments.
Speaker: 0
02:52:53
If someone comes to you and says, what about this, this, and this? That’s not the case, and this is why that’s not the case. And you would wanna have all your ducks in a row. To me, it’s like a fighter that takes a last minute fight, and they’ve been sitting around drinking beer, and they haven’t gone through a 10 week camp.
Speaker: 0
02:53:07
Like, don’t do it. Don’t do it. You’re not ready for this.
Speaker: 3
02:53:10
Right.
Speaker: 0
02:53:10
And if your only strategy is just like a wild punch, which is basically he’s a liar. Like, meanwhile, you’re lying about him every fucking day. The Russia collusion shit, the very fine people shit, the fucking all the thing about, you know, the the thing about, taking, Liz Cheney and executing her. It’s all lies.
Speaker: 0
02:53:31
You just you guys are just lying, and you’re saying he’s a liar, but yet you’re lying all the time. And you’re doing it like it’s 1995, and there’s no social media. But you can’t do that anymore, especially when the people that are paying attention to the podcast well, guess what?
Speaker: 0
02:53:47
Podcasts are a 100 times bigger than anything you guys have. And people are listening to that, and they know you’re full of shit, and then your numbers decline even further. Yep. So I think they they were saying that CNN what are the what’s how much is CNN down? Because I was seeing this on Twitter, and it’s hard to know whether or not they’re you know, it’s hyperbole or whether or not it’s fact.
Speaker: 0
02:54:06
But they were saying that CNN’s ratings are down, like, 80% of their peak, and MSNBC is some other preposterous number, and and they’re both on the chopping block. CNN is talking about mass layoffs of talent because nobody believes them anymore. So you it’s counterproductive for you to use the same voices, which is why they they got rid of Brian Stelter, and they brought him back.
Speaker: 4
02:54:27
Which was so odd. I’m like, you know, I’m I’m looking forward to
Speaker: 0
02:54:31
Talent is missing. They I mean, they don’t have any talent.
Speaker: 4
02:54:34
They’re They’re all going out of business. They’re gonna have to rebrand. They’re gonna have to get entire new management. Like, I’ll never watch those programs ever again. Those networks, literally never. Like, they’re dead to me now.
Speaker: 0
02:54:42
It’s propaganda. It’s it’s at least a percentage of it is propaganda. That’s unacceptable. That’s unacceptable if you’re the voice of the news in the world. It’s unacceptable Yeah. For you to have a large percentage of what you’re saying to be completely full of shit.
Speaker: 2
02:54:56
You know, it’s funny. You can see the the same pattern of attacks that they throw at Trump being used against Tulsi Gabbard the last time around when she fucking nailed Kamala in the in the debate, and she was just like, you you can stay here and say all cops are bad, but you got hundreds of thousands of people in jail and prison.
Speaker: 0
02:55:12
Leftist viewers deal NBC, CNN, a Trump slump ratings crash. Here’s why. So what’s the numbers? What does it say does it say? The Rachel Maddow Show, for example, easily MSNBC’s top rated program, though it only airs once a week, drew just 1,300,000 viewers on November 10th, 5 days after the election, a drop of 1,000,000 viewers from the month before.
Speaker: 2
02:55:33
Forty percent or so.
Speaker: 0
02:55:34
In the key 25 to 54 demographic, the advertisers most covet, Maddow’s numbers mark the smallest audience since her show has seen her show has seen since April of 2022, and she’s the number one show, which is like, you know, if I only got a 1000000 people watching a show, I’d be so pissed. Hannity nearly quadrupled her with 420,000 views to her meager 109,000. She got a 109,000 people in the 25 to 54.
Speaker: 4
02:56:01
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
02:56:02
And bunch of old cat ladies.
Speaker: 4
02:56:04
And and airports. Yeah. And airports. Right.
Speaker: 0
02:56:08
Outside of Maddow, MSNBC has seen an unprecedented plunge. This is a really bad news. And what is that? For example, on Tuesday, November 11th, a week after the elections, MSNBC attracted its its lowest 25 to 54 demo ratings in 23 years. Over on CNN, the demo number was the lowest it has been since June 27th 2000 when Bill Clinton was president.
Speaker: 0
02:56:32
For the overall week of November 6 through 13, Fox News averaged 2,230,000,000 views, while MSNBC attracted a paltry 550,000, and CNN, just 399,000. Think about how much money is being pumped into CNN. So go scroll back up a little bit. In fact, Fox News, saw its viewership jump by 38% overall since November 5th after dominating election night by topping all networks, drawing more than 10,000,000 viewers.
Speaker: 0
02:57:00
It’s so bad that MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and Mica, or how do you say their name, crawled to Mar a Lago on Friday to kiss Trump’s ring, drawing scorn for their utter shamelessness after years of on air attacks.
Speaker: 4
02:57:15
You know, real quick, let me just you know what they’re not including is that on Rumble, Dan Bongino and and Steven Crowder had the number 1 and number 2 ratings on all of election night. So they’re not they’re just mentioning mainstream networks. They’re they’re leaving out the fact that What
Speaker: 0
02:57:29
did Dan Boggino have?
Speaker: 4
02:57:30
Hit over half a 1000000, real time viewers live, and same with Steam Crowder. They were very comparable. They were the number 1 and number 2, platforms in the world. Really? Yes.
Speaker: 0
02:57:41
So what did CNN have at that night?
Speaker: 4
02:57:43
I can’t I’m not entirely sure, but it was way less. Great. It was way less.
Speaker: 3
02:57:47
No.
Speaker: 4
02:57:47
Yeah? That can’t be Yep. Look it up.
Speaker: 5
02:57:49
I I’m I would agree that online, they probably had the highest, but to compare the world watching CNN and Fox News and MSNBC that night was less than 500,000 is
Speaker: 4
02:57:58
Maybe maybe it’s online streaming I’m referring to.
Speaker: 0
02:58:01
Must be. Because we didn’t just say Fox News had the highest ratings? They were there were 5,500,000? Have anything to
Speaker: 5
02:58:06
do with online. That’s even saying, like, the 200 to 54 year olds call just be people. They’re like, oh, I gotta
Speaker: 0
02:58:10
turn on TV. I was watching online.
Speaker: 4
02:58:13
Okay.
Speaker: 0
02:58:13
Okay. So either way, this is what happened after 2016 as well. You know? Like, when when there or after 2020 rather. Once he’s out of office, you can’t complain about Trump anymore, your ratings crash.
Speaker: 3
02:58:25
Yep.
Speaker: 0
02:58:25
Like, your entire your entire business is operating on fear. It’s like, oh, the orange man.
Speaker: 4
02:58:30
And hatred. I mean, let’s be real. There’s a lot of people just tune in just to get angry.
Speaker: 2
02:58:33
Oh, I hate them. I hate them. I tune in to Joy Reid just to laugh.
Speaker: 0
02:58:36
I like to get blazed. Watch that lady. Like, what the fuck are you saying? Like, when she’s talking about, like, did she spend an entire part of her program comparing Trump to Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini. And MSNBC compared the rally in Madison Square Garden to the Nazi rally from the 19 thirties.
Speaker: 5
02:58:55
Oh my lord.
Speaker: 0
02:58:56
Oh oh, well, they’re all in the same you know, I performed in Madison Square Garden, so that must make me a Nazi as well. Oh, well,
Speaker: 2
02:59:01
you know, obvious when I had
Speaker: 3
02:59:02
a show.
Speaker: 0
02:59:03
Yeah. I was telling jokes.
Speaker: 4
02:59:04
And you just had a guy on your show talking about the swastika on 5 continents around the world 2 1000 years ago.
Speaker: 2
02:59:09
Graham Hancock on.
Speaker: 0
02:59:10
Did Nazi stuff. I
Speaker: 2
02:59:10
know Graham Hancock.
Speaker: 0
02:59:11
Did the Martyr Maid guy.
Speaker: 4
02:59:13
Let me just say this.
Speaker: 0
02:59:14
That’s more Nazi.
Speaker: 4
02:59:15
I encourage everyone to go watch everyone go watch Ancient Apocalypse, Graham and Coats on Netflix. See think for yourself. But one last thing to mention about that is that even John Hoops had compared Ancient Apocalypse, he associated it with Sandy Hook. Yeah. I am not kidding.
Speaker: 4
02:59:29
This was a what? A week ago? 2 weeks ago? Yeah. Oh my god. Disgusting.
Speaker: 2
02:59:33
He he’s talking about
Speaker: 3
02:59:34
my god.
Speaker: 2
02:59:35
The archaeology is a canary in the coal mine, and and you can tell that because you see this horrible thing happened before 911, and therefore, they’re connected. And and Sandy Hook happened before right around the same time as the 2012 thing. Ergo, it’s just like, dude Cuke.
Speaker: 2
02:59:48
I I you know, Alex Jones could give you some advice here, buddy. You’re gonna get fucking sued. Shut your mouth about Sandy Hook, man. Come on.
Speaker: 0
02:59:55
It’s all about the same thing that they do. Let’s say same thing the Flint Deville did, you know, connecting it to white supremacy. Atlantis to white oh, Atlantis. Okay.
Speaker: 2
03:00:03
It’s really
Speaker: 0
03:00:04
a funny We’re we’re out 3 hours plus in, but we we I would feel like we cheated the world if
Speaker: 3
03:00:09
we didn’t talk
Speaker: 0
03:00:10
about the reshot structure.
Speaker: 4
03:00:11
Let’s do it. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
03:00:12
I I love your video, and I I saw I don’t understand Randall’s reluctance to, to accept this as a possibility. It’s very fascinating because there’s so many details. And your video that details the Richard structure, which is an incredibly strange structure. If it’s not man made and if it wasn’t at one point in time,
Speaker: 3
03:00:38
it’s
Speaker: 0
03:00:39
some sort of a a structure that was made by human beings.
Speaker: 4
03:00:42
It doesn’t need to be. So this is one of the things that Randall says, well, it’s a natural feature, so it can’t be Atlantis. I’m, like, well, who built Atlantis? He said it was the god Poseidon. Well, was Poseidon an actual individual? Because if you look at the ancient Greek translation Poseidon, it’s lord of the earth, which I think is a modern day translation for mother nature.
Speaker: 4
03:01:00
And humans have built on natural geological features Sure. Throughout history. If you were to bring up the Richat structure from space, it’s like no other place on Earth. It is a mysterious site. The best the consensus is that it’s volcanic in nature and it’s a collapsed volcanic dome, but it doesn’t match anything else anywhere else on earth as far as volcanic domes go.
Speaker: 4
03:01:21
It matches more than a dozen similarities of the most let me say this. The most consequential similarities to what Plato had described as a lost ancient city of Atlantis, and it’s made up of concentric circles. If it had water, it specifically matches 3 of water and 2 of land. It’s made up of red, black, white color stones.
Speaker: 4
03:01:39
There’s an abundance of gold in Mauretania, elephants, which were described to being on Atlantis. You won’t find gold or elephants in the Azores like Randall promotes. It also has an opening at the south, which, matches the description of Atlantis. There’s mountains to the north, which just so happened to be called the Atlas Mountains, which are in modern day Morocco.
Speaker: 4
03:01:57
Well, Atlas, which is a very unique name, was said to be the very first king of Atlantis, which also happens to be the very first the name of the very first king in Mauritania, which is the where the Rishot structure is located.
Speaker: 0
03:02:09
It’s also covered in salt.
Speaker: 4
03:02:11
Yes. The water was there.
Speaker: 3
03:02:12
And, oh,
Speaker: 4
03:02:13
and there’s another similarity is that Atlantis was said on those mountains that were said to be to the north, which are, again, happen to be named the Atlas Mountains. Well, there was a river that was said to be flowing from those mountains, and there’s a scientific study that say that Tam and Rissett River flowed at the exact time of Atlantis, 11,600 years ago, either right through the Richat Structure or directly north of it.
Speaker: 4
03:02:33
And, and those are just a handful of similarities. It is by far the most likely location of the lost ancient city of Atlantis. Nothing can be concluded either way, but it is something that should not be ignored.
Speaker: 0
03:02:46
Well, it’s certainly really fascinating. It is. And just the fact that there’s these concentric rings that match the description of Atlantis, and it’s in the same spot, And it’s in the it’s the mountains are in the same spot. The opening is in the same spot. I mean
Speaker: 4
03:03:00
Look at that.
Speaker: 0
03:03:01
Whatever that is is really weird.
Speaker: 2
03:03:03
And if
Speaker: 0
03:03:04
you would imagine a city like Atlantis and what the way it was described, that seems a very likely spot for it.
Speaker: 4
03:03:11
And let me tell you something else. A lot of people say, well, it’s not an island, so it couldn’t possibly be Atlantis. But what they leave out is the fact that the ancient Greek word for island was Nessos and Nesson, which had 5 meanings. One of which was island, The other was promontory, peninsula, as well as land within a continent surrounded by lakes, rivers, or springs, which matches the Rishat structure.
Speaker: 4
03:03:32
So it’s like, you know, a lot of people and let me also say this. Because a lot of people and I think all areas should be studied. I’m not debunking the Azores. However, the fact that it’s in the Sahara Desert and that the Egyptians are the ones that came up with the tail of Atlantis, that’s where it originates from which surprises a lot of people.
Speaker: 4
03:03:50
Well, Egypt’s in the Sahara and so is the Rishat structure. And at the time of Atlantis, the Sahara was green. It had one of the largest networks of rivers ever known to exist, as well as the largest freshwater lake. And so if they were if the Egyptians were colonists of a destroyed, civilization, it’s not unreasonable to say that it was in the Sahara.
Speaker: 4
03:04:09
And let me say something else. If Atlantis was described as being busy all day and all night and was a trading post, does it make sense it’d be in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, or is it far more feasible that it would be in the Sahara Desert, which wasn’t a desert at the time?
Speaker: 4
03:04:24
Because if it was said to be busy all day and all night with languages spoken from all over, when where are all these people coming from in the middle of of the Atlantic Ocean to go visit it? It makes far more sense that it would be in that portion, in that region of the world.
Speaker: 0
03:04:40
Have how much work has been done excavating in that area?
Speaker: 2
03:04:43
Almost nothing. Yes.
Speaker: 4
03:04:44
It is they they’re That’s
Speaker: 3
03:04:46
so
Speaker: 4
03:04:46
There’s gold in the Mauritanian desert, and they don’t want anyone touching it. It’s a
Speaker: 2
03:04:50
dangerous place to go.
Speaker: 4
03:04:51
It’s very inhospitable. It’s 205, 50 miles inland, and it is I know people that have gone out there, and it is a dangerous, inhospitable place. There’s no water. It is it’s hard to get to. You get all the money in the world, and you could still die out there.
Speaker: 2
03:05:06
Yeah. It’s it’s not just hard to get to, but, and not just inhospitable. The the it’s kind of war torn, kind of fucked up, kind of the Yeah. The kind of place where you’re not gonna have to worry about somebody playing a tourist trick on you. They’re just gonna take your shit.
Speaker: 3
03:05:18
Right.
Speaker: 2
03:05:18
So it’s
Speaker: 0
03:05:19
Right. Right.
Speaker: 2
03:05:19
Yeah. There’s a lot a lot of it’s a lot of reasons that people aren’t going there. But, it’s really interesting even to me where I’m I’m a lot more skeptical. So I do believe in a lost civilization. I do of and I think that I think it’s really interesting to find so many of those same things in the same area. It’s just uncanny.
Speaker: 2
03:05:36
Unlike like Jim says, when it’s just a stone’s throw away from Egypt really, it’s not it would make sense that they would have that package, a a big chunk of those things so accurately recorded and and to find it right there. It it definitely is one of the things I I harp about my channel all the time. There’s we need more honest skeptics.
Speaker: 2
03:05:55
This is definitely the kind of thing we need real scientists to go out there and do. We don’t need guys to knee jerk and say, well, you attached it to Atlanta, so fuck that noise. It can’t be. We don’t need guys to say, it’s definitely Atlantis, but there’s nothing to see here. We need boots on the ground.
Speaker: 0
03:06:10
How the fuck could Atlantis if it really isn’t Africa be connected to white supremacy?
Speaker: 2
03:06:14
Fuck. Let me touch on this one really quick, Joe. If I can if I can hit this really fast
Speaker: 0
03:06:18
It’s so stupid.
Speaker: 4
03:06:19
Their whole The Africans are black.
Speaker: 2
03:06:21
Hello? Their whole
Speaker: 4
03:06:22
point is that
Speaker: 0
03:06:23
they’re black supremacy.
Speaker: 4
03:06:24
This is what John Anthony West said on your show. He said he’s like, not only did Atlantis exist, but they were black. African supremacy. Look.
Speaker: 2
03:06:32
They did it. They’re the the way that these guys attach the white supremacy thing is they go back to guys from the 1800 that wrote about Atlantis that had some old school views on race. Now they believed in the biblical races and the way that the biblical races came to be something you’ll never find John Hoops or Flint did will tell you because it guts their entire argument.
Speaker: 2
03:06:51
Before the flood, there was one race of humans. After the flood, Noah gets drunk. He 1 3 of his sons are around. 1 of them picks on him, laughs at him. 2 other ones don’t. The one that picked on him was Ham.
Speaker: 2
03:07:05
He had the, African people were considered to be the Hamites. The, Sam, the Semitic people were the in in the middle and then the other one the Jaffa fights which eventually became the Aryans were considered to be the white people. That was the European view of race for up until about a 150 years ago.
Speaker: 2
03:07:22
So 200 years ago a guy writing about Atlantis would not have thought it was an Aryan Atlantis because, Aryan’s didn’t invent didn’t exist until after Noah. It was one of Noah’s sons. So before the flood, there was no Aryan’s. So anytime somebody says that the whole this old school believes in all you gotta do is scratch the surface, you’ll find that’s not the case at all.
Speaker: 2
03:07:42
This guy didn’t believe in a white Atlantis. Ignatius Donnelly did not believe in a white Atlantis despite Flint Dibble making sure to name drop that fucker anytime he gets a chance. Ignite but they’re going to make sure you think that. They’re going to eliminate because the biblical racism are something most people don’t know much about.
Speaker: 4
03:07:58
Listen. Let me just say this one point. I don’t care what their color of their skin was, but the legend comes from Egypt, and they’re fucking brown. So get go get fucked with your racist argument. I don’t care. Like, anyway
Speaker: 0
03:08:09
I don’t get fucked. Gentlemen, thank you very much. It’s been a lot of fun. Joe. Really, really been fun. Jimmy, always great to see you. Good to see you, guys. Very nice
Speaker: 3
03:08:16
to meet you. Nice to meet you too.
Speaker: 0
03:08:17
Thank you for your channel. Both of you guys, fantastic. Dedunking, Bright Insight, awesome channels.
Speaker: 4
03:08:23
Follow me on X, Rumble, and Instagram. Love you all.
Speaker: 2
03:08:26
I’m gonna be the Cosmic Summit speaking this summer if you guys wanna catch me there. Beautiful. Cosmic Summit. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
03:08:31
Beautiful. Alright. Thanks again, Joe. Thanks, everybody. Bye.
Speaker: 4
03:08:33
Bye now.
