You can listen to the Jared Isaacman: What went wrong at NASA | The All-In Interview using Speak’s shareable media player:
Jared Isaacman: What went wrong at NASA | The All-In Interview Podcast Episode Description
(0:00) David Friedberg welcomes Jared Isaacman
(1:10) Jared’s background: billion-dollar founder, pilot, commercial astronaut
(7:15) Relationship with Elon Musk, road to becoming a commercial astronaut
(16:37) Becoming Trump’s nominee to lead NASA, the major issues at NASA and his plan to fix things
(31:52) Breaking down NASA’s proposed budget cuts, the space race against China, private vs public space industry
(48:31) The truth behind Jared’s nomination being withdrawn by President Trump
Follow Jared:
https://x.com/rookisaacman
Follow the besties:
https://x.com/chamath
https://x.com/Jason
https://x.com/DavidSacks
https://x.com/friedberg
Follow on X:
https://x.com/theallinpod
Follow on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/theallinpod
Follow on TikTok:
@theallinpod
Follow on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/allinpod
Intro Music Credit:
https://rb.gy/tppkzl
https://x.com/yung_spielburg
Intro Video Credit:
https://x.com/TheZachEffect
Referenced in the show:
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114605559474286180
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1439412791815950336
This interactive media player was created automatically by Speak. Want to generate intelligent media players yourself? Sign up for Speak!
Jared Isaacman: What went wrong at NASA | The All-In Interview Podcast Episode Top Keywords
Jared Isaacman: What went wrong at NASA | The All-In Interview Podcast Episode Summary
Based on the provided context, the phrase “has joined the group” refers to someone becoming a member of a group, band, club, or team. Throughout the conversation, there are multiple references to joining various groups, inviting members, and welcoming new people. Specific examples include:
– “we joined the band”
– “He should’ve joined the…”
– “Join the team.”
– “Welcome to the club.”
– “add one more bestie.”
– “they’re in, they’re in.”
– “invite you to…”
Continue reading the full guide (click to expand)
These statements all indicate the act of someone joining or being added to a group or collective. However, the context does not specify exactly who “has joined the group” in a particular instance. The general meaning is clear: it signifies the addition of a new member to a group. If you are looking for a specific individual who joined a specific group, that information is not explicitly provided in the context.
This summary was created automatically by Speak. Want to transcribe, analyze and summarize yourself? Sign up for Speak!
Jared Isaacman: What went wrong at NASA | The All-In Interview Podcast Episode Transcript (Unedited)
Speaker: 0
00:00
Jared Isaacman was nominated by President Trump to become the fifteenth administrator of NASA in December. He passed out of the Senate committee in May and was set to be confirmed by the full Sana this week. However, on Friday President Trump withdrew his nomination for Isaacman. We asked Jared to sit down with us for conversation. We dive into everything.
Speaker: 0
00:20
His experiences as a successful entrepreneur, fighter jet pilot, commander of the world’s first all civilian spaceflight, and the first civilian to conduct a spacewalk. What he saw in his six months studying Vatsal, how American government bureaucracy has eroded its performance and puts the nation at risk in the great space race underway with Ai.
Want to run this on your own file?
Upload audio, video, or text and get a transcript, summary, and insights in minutes.
Free trial includes 30 minutes (60 with a work email)
Speaker: 0
00:39
And what really happened? Was it a discovery about prior donations to democratic candidates or an association with Elon Musk that lost him the nomination? Here’s my conversation with Jared Isaacman.
Speaker: 1
00:51
I’m doing all in. Ai, besties. I think that was another epic discussion. People love the interviews. I could hear him talk for hours. Absolutely.
Speaker: 0
01:01
We crush your questions a
Speaker: 1
01:02
minute. We are giving
Speaker: 0
01:03
people ground truth data to underwrite your own opinion.
Speaker: 1
01:06
What’d you guys say? That was fun. I’m doing
Speaker: 0
01:08
all in. Jared, welcome. I, like many space enthusiasts, was thrilled for your nomination to lead NASA as the fifteenth administrator of the agency. Founded in 1958, the year after the Russians put Sputnik into orbit, NASA’s perhaps, in my opinion, the US government’s most pioneering agency, having organized and led our exploration missions to the moon, Mars, the outer solar system, and beyond, as well as the launch of important scientific missions to observe the Earth, to observe our solar system and the deep universe, and of course, the installation and operation of the ISS.
Speaker: 0
01:47
And you seemed really qualified for the job as a business manager, a successful entrepreneur, a flight and space enthusiast. So I’m really curious to hear your views on NASA, the space industry overall, the race with Ai, and frankly, hear a little bit about what the heck just happened With your nomination, a lot of people have a lot of questions that we’d love to hear your point of view on.
Speaker: 0
02:13
So I thank you for joining me today, Jared. I’m thrilled to be here to chat. And as someone who’s just been
Speaker: 1
02:20
a space enthusiast since kindergarten, whether it’s through the lens of commercial space or, you know, the great space race from the ai sixties or NASA of today, like, these are all subjects I get pretty charged up about. So love to chat about.
Speaker: 0
02:34
What inspired you to get into space? You went to Embry Riddle Aeronautical University and you later became an entrepreneur, but were you always kind of obsessed with space and did you always dream of doing what you got to do last year, which is walk in space?
Speaker: 1
02:51
Yeah. So the the this is all my parents’ fault. They, they skimped out on a babysitter as a kid and just put me in front of the TV. So, I was watching movies like Top Gun, The Right Stuff, Space Ram, the movie, you know, nineteen eighties movie where if you go to Space Camp, a robot’s gonna launch you into space.
Speaker: 1
03:08
This was all stuff in, like, my elementary school year. So, I mean, I told you to
Speaker: 0
03:14
my kids, last speak, by the way. So funny that you say that. I I pulled up Space Camp. I had to buy it because it’s not on any of the streaming services to show it to my kids. Yeah.
Speaker: 1
03:22
Okay. I’ve been to Space Camp to, like, speak to the students a number of times and I asked them, like, alright. Raise your hands if you’ve seen the movie Space Camp here and know who Jinx is and like no one raises their hands. And that just goes to show I’m old.
Speaker: 0
03:34
So So you were always into it. Is is that what you wanted to do to work in aeronautical engineering or as a pilot or what were you thinking of doing?
Speaker: 1
03:43
Yeah. I mean, so it kind of interesting start to the story. I mean, I, I started my day job, which is shift four, you know, it’s a it’s pretty large fintech now when I was 16. And I was just like most, you know, as you know, entrepreneurs, you’re you’re burning yourself out, waking up on the keyboard.
Speaker: 1
03:58
And, you know, I sai, I need a hobby in life. So I picked up my passion for flying and I I I basically had parallel careers, you know, in aviation and in and in business. And I started flying air shows in, in 2010 and 2011, and I was flying with a bunch of really talented ex military, even current military ai.
Speaker: 1
04:20
And they were like, you know, you could fly in the, you know, in the international guard or the reserves. And, and I found out, well, wow. It’s amazing. You can fly fighter jets part time and serve the country. You need a college degree. I never had one, so I I started my business at 16.
Speaker: 1
04:32
So that’s actually why I went back to why I went back to school, went to Embry Riddle because it’s sai I mean, it’s an aviation school. I think he graduates, more air force pilots every year than the air force academy. But anyway, that that’s ultimately why I I got my degree.
Speaker: 1
04:46
But my my pursuit’s kind of in parallel of of business and aviation has existed, you know, really since I was a teenager.
Speaker: 0
04:53
Sai you’re running this business. So Shift four, just for those who are listening is a payment processing company that is a public company today, 8 and a half billion dollar market cap. So you’ve built an incredible business. And then on the side, my understanding is you’ve flown like seven thousand hours in fighter jets and you’ve tried to beat the circumnavigation record a couple of times now.
Speaker: 0
05:17
Sai, were you kind of going to work and then on the weekends flying? I mean, how did you kinda balance running a company ai to do that today while balancing this podcast? I can tell you it’s really hard to do that and anything else. It’s ai, how did you how did you do that?
Speaker: 1
05:33
Well, I mean, you know, I again, I started my business at 16. I started flying a couple years after that. You know, this is before you have a, you know, a family and other responsibilities. So, like, literally, all I was doing was working and ai, mostly flying at night, which was great. You know, I did that around the world record flight.
Speaker: 1
05:50
Didn’t get it in o eight, broke it, broke that record in o nine. We did it to raise funds for Make A Wish Foundation, which was which was cool, and it was a great challenge. And then, later on started flying air shows, which was great. And, you know, we did a lot to raise money for Make A Wish there.
Speaker: 1
06:04
And then we we kind of took, the air show flying, which was just maximum fun, super adrenaline, and was ai, we’re we’re doing loops and rolls to music, you know, 10 feet off the ground, 18 inches between our wings. We probably should pivot this to something that keeps the fun factor up but has some commercial intent, also helps the country.
Speaker: 1
06:22
So we started a a a defense company called Draken. We wound up assembling the world’s largest fleet of fighter jets, jets just like this behind meh. And we were professional bad guys for the Department of Defense, the air force. Like, we would fly as aggressors just like in Top Gun, replicating Russian and Chinese, Iranian tactics.
Speaker: 1
06:40
I literally I mean, I remember at Christmas parties in, you know, 2014, ’20 ’15 speak to the to the workforce. Ai was like, I hope you all know, next to commercial space and what Elon’s doing at SpaceX, this is the second coolest company. Like, we get to be professional bad guys all the time. It was awesome. So Ai I again, I’ve had two awesome parallel careers.
Speaker: 1
06:58
But, hey, running two companies, like, nothing compared to Elon. I think I I can’t even he’s gotta be up to, like, a half a dozen CEO titles, in parallel right now, not to mention trying to save the, you know, the country, you know, and get it back on a good fiscal footing.
Speaker: 1
07:12
So it’s my my responsibilities are pale in comparison.
Speaker: 0
07:15
Well, so when did you first meet Elon and how did you meet him?
Speaker: 1
07:18
So it’s interesting and I almost, like, guarantee you wouldn’t, remember it, after well, first, I think, like, in early two thousand. So I started my fintech in 1999. I actually think we were on, like, the same, like, old, it was ai a TV show being interviewed, in the early two thousands, and we that was probably the first handshake.
Speaker: 1
07:37
It was after we set the, we broke the actually, the, I’m sorry. We didn’t break the record. This was in 02/2008, the around the world record. We came up short. Peter Dumanis, doctor Dumanis, reached out and, asked if, if I wanted to go to Baikonur and see a soy Soyuz launch with some of the, ai early commercial space pioneers.
Speaker: 1
07:55
I remember, you know, all the Google founders were on that t u one fifty four, you know, Russian transport. Ai like, man, if if this thing goes down, you’re you’re ai out a lot of, like, a lot of brainpower here. Because there’s Sergey Larry, Eric Schmidt was on it. And that that was, it was coming back from that.
Speaker: 1
08:12
I think there was a charity poker event or something at Elon’s house in, it was early days of of Tesla. So I think I meh him again there. But but really we, you know, ai, we don’t know each other that well. I’ve only spoken to him, you know, a couple dozen times maybe over the years and almost entirely related to my commercial space missions, Inspiration four and Plairston.
Speaker: 0
08:31
Oh, so you’re not, like, super close with him. Because I think there’s this narrative that you and Elon have a secret, you know, deep connection, and he’s one of your best friends. And, you know, that’s kind of like how how your hearing went. When I look on the some of the video clips of how some of the senators were treating you. They’re like, oh, you’re you’re doing this all for Elon.
Speaker: 0
08:48
He’s your best friend.
Speaker: 1
08:50
Yeah. You know, the I think almost every one of the senators on both sides of the aisle made that assumption and asked a lot of questions on that. Ai I said, look. I Elon is one of the most accomplished, if not the most accomplished entrepreneur in modern history. Every one of his companies sets out to solve some of the greatest engineering problems for all humankind.
Speaker: 1
09:07
Even his, you know, ai of super selfless service to the to the government of trying getting us back on, again, like I said, sound fiscal footing. I admire a lot of what he does, but but honestly and I told the senators, my connection is I I I paid his company to go to space ai.
Speaker: 1
09:22
And look, if there was more than just SpaceX out there offering the service and you had competition, I probably would have paid less. Like, it’s like
Speaker: 0
09:29
Right.
Speaker: 1
09:29
So if anything, I’m very pro competition in this regard and, you know, I don’t consider myself beholden to Elon at all. I wanna see all commercial space succeed. I’m a I’m a huge space enthusiast.
Speaker: 0
09:38
Let’s go through that. So you met Elon. Did you get involved as an investor in SpaceX along the way? How did the Inspiration four mission come to be? In 2020,
Speaker: 1
09:48
I did hear that, you know, SpaceX was doing another one of its secondary rounds, and I was connected through, you know, I think it was Citi. And I wound up speaking to the CFO at, at SpaceX, and he’s like, no. Look. The, you know, funding round is closed and, you know, we’re kinda pretty selective on on who we let in. I was like, okay. Great. Well, hey.
Speaker: 1
10:09
You know, back in 02/2008, I actually got the, the first offer to pilot the first Dragon spacecraft, which is wild to think about, like, 02/2008. And, even if I can’t be an investor, you know, at some point or another, I’d I’d love to have an opportunity. And he was like, well, can’t be an investor now, but we could talk about, a human ai mission.
Speaker: 1
10:29
And I had no idea I was gonna have an opportunity to be the first. I assumed there was a lot of people in front and, man, it was, what a privilege to be able to do that, be part of mission design and select a crew of inspiring individuals and raise a quarter of a billion dollars for Sai.
Speaker: 1
10:45
Jude. And it was just a successful mission. It helped open the door for a lot of other commercial missions to come. So awesome experience.
Speaker: 0
10:51
So in 2021, you commanded Inspiration four, which was the first all civilian space ai using the SpaceX Crew Dragon. Yep. And that was just truly ai a momentous mission. It was just so beautiful to watch. And I remember it was also like a tough year because it was a year after COVID.
Speaker: 0
11:10
Sai, it was so great to see that happening. But I had assumed, and I think a lot of people had assumed that you were like a big investor ai that you kind of went from, hey, I’d love to put some money into SpaceX to, oh, I can participate and command the inspiration for and get out there into speak?
Speaker: 0
11:31
Like, that’s
Speaker: 1
11:32
really Not a year
Speaker: 0
11:33
and a half.
Speaker: 1
11:33
Days. Days. Ai like, literally ram that phone call in, you know, October, Inspiration four was born a week or two later. We did a, like, a ceremonial signing at the, at the Crew one launch, which is wild too. And it speaks to the confidence of SpaceX that they were ready to sign up for the first commercial like, the first civilian mission to orbit before they even returned operational capability, for human ai to NASA.
Speaker: 1
12:04
Now they did demo two, of course, with with Bob and Doug, but Crew-one had not flown when SpaceX sai, we’re gonna get this done. And then ten months later, we were in orbit. And it was an incredible experience, and, obviously, we followed it up with a whole development program with Polaris and, and flew a second mission as well.
Speaker: 1
12:22
So
Speaker: 0
12:23
Yeah. So just going back, you said you were made you were given an offer to pilot a Crew Dragon in o eight. Is that correct? When did that happen? How did that happen?
Speaker: 1
12:32
So it was it was right after I came back from that around the world flight. And, again, I said, you know, doctor Diamandis reached out and, we met in the city and he was like, you seem to be, like, ai of thinking the way we think, in in terms of, you know, a more exciting future in transportation and and aerospace.
Speaker: 1
12:49
Now, of course, his interest cover everything from, like, human life extension to he likes to solve a lot of world problems too. Yeah. And it was through those connections and coming out to Baikonur that I did get that, I did get that offer. I saw the agreement. It was funny.
Speaker: 1
13:04
I, I showed it to some of the SpaceX folks when we were talking about Inspiration four. But Yeah. Amazing. Yeah. Just knocked on the door every now and then and got lucky in 2020.
Speaker: 1
13:13
It was certainly through the approach of trying to be an investor, but it it revisited old conversations and moved very quickly.
Speaker: 0
13:19
Kinda funny that a banker called you from Citi and
Speaker: 1
13:22
that led to you Oh, I called the banker.
Speaker: 0
13:25
Oh, you called the banker.
Speaker: 1
13:26
I called the banker trying to get the the contact, like a a recent contact. And that’s, that’s that’s ai hook
Speaker: 0
13:32
me up. I wanna get in. That’s crazy. Yeah. Okay. So then you said, hey, that was a successful mission. You had obviously a good relationship with SpaceX and the operations team there, I’m assuming. And you said, hey, I’d like to come back and, like, Polaris Dawn was formed at that time or did that come together later?
Speaker: 0
13:50
Just for the audience, so last was it September? You were the first private citizen in human history to perform a spacewalk, which, again, another incredible moment. And, you know, I think it was inspiring for people who realized at that moment that perhaps you didn’t need to become an astronaut to be able to walk in space.
Speaker: 0
14:13
I mean, it was really just incredible. But how did the continuation go from Inspiration four to Polaris Dawn?
Speaker: 1
14:19
Yeah. And I I’d love to I mean, Polaris Dawn was filled with we crammed so many really incredible objectives in five days, on top of about 40 science experiments. It was an awesome mission. I’d love to tell you about it. And and it you know? But, yeah. So when we came back from Inspiration four, I thought we checked the box on every objective.
Speaker: 1
14:38
I mean, we navigated the whole, you know, billionaire in in space thing, which at the time with, you know, some of the other, you know, missions that were going off was, was attracting a lot of a lot of heat and really focused it on trying to to do good in the world that, you know, we can make progress in space and try and, you know, make the, you know, mother Earth a better place.
Speaker: 1
14:57
And we focused on raising a lot of money for St. Jude. And, then anyway, like we did and we did three days of science and research experiments. I felt really good. And we were a little bit short on our, on our, you know, our fundraising goal for, Sai. Jude.
Speaker: 1
15:13
I mean, we we set out to raise over $200,000,000. We wound up raising 250,000,000, but we were a little short when we came back. And I was like, man, we almost got everything done. And then Elon sent a tweet right after splashdown, forty minutes after splashdown, and he sai, put me in for 50,000,000. And he already had put in ai.
Speaker: 1
15:29
And we we we exceeded our goal. And I was like, man, we got everything done. We set the bar high. Maybe this is it. And, it was a couple weeks later that I was invited to go to Starbase. This was the second time I went. This was, like, October of twenty one.
Speaker: 1
15:46
And we sat down with a number of folks, including Elon, and we talked about, you know, doing a, like a developmental program where we actually can build things and test things that hadn’t been done in a while. And I remember Elon. He’s like, we we we can build a suit. I know exactly how I would do it. And let’s go up really high.
Speaker: 1
16:03
You know, let’s meh past the Gemini eleven record. Go farther into space than anyone’s gone since we last walked on the moon because it’s it’s different. It’s hard, and we’re gonna learn a lot. And that’s what you need to do when you wanna inspire people is not kinda do the same things over and over again, but but do things that are different and build up to an even grander objective.
Speaker: 1
16:20
And I was like, alright. I’m totally in. And we contemplated other missions, you know, a fall on to Polaris Dawn and then the first crewed flight of Starship. But, the nomination came in and, you know, had to put my my, fun space career on hold to to to for an incredible opportunity to serve the country and contribute to the world’s greatest space agency.
Speaker: 0
16:38
So let’s get into that. How did the conversation lead to you becoming the nominee to administer NASA? Were you in conversations with Elon first? Is that how this con this kind of began for you?
Speaker: 1
16:54
No. So and and I think, like, that’s another thing that, you know, almost every senator wanted to ask is, you know, were you know, weren’t weren’t you Elon’s guy in this? Like, I I have no doubt. I mean, look, he he he helped the president win the election. He he’s was in Air Force One, Marine One.
Speaker: 1
17:09
He was at Mar A Lago throughout the campaign. I’m I’m I’m sure he had inputs. I was getting text messages from generals that I, that I got to know when I built you know, helped build that defense company, Draken. That’s where we flew all the fighter jets and and, you know, they were now positions of influence and said, would you like to serve in the in the administration?
Speaker: 1
17:28
And it and it wasn’t even just NASA. I mean, there were roles from treasury to, the depart you know, to the air force. And I was like, I am honored to contribute anyway. You know, I’ve had I’ve been, you know, relatively apolitical, but if I’ve had one political position that I’ve been pounding the table on since I, since I I was exposed to the defense industry at Draken, it’s the competitiveness of the nation.
Speaker: 1
17:50
And that’s because I saw when we were replicating, you know, enemy tactics in 2015 in fighter jets, the gap between our capabilities and the bad guys was wide. And you felt very confident. And every year, it started to shrink. And it’s like, what is going on here? Why are we paralyzed?
Speaker: 1
18:08
Why are we slowing down while while the Chinese especially are moving wicked fast? And I’ve spoken out about it from time to time on where I think some of the problems are and overconsolidation of the defense industry. So anyway, I I was absolutely honored to have a chance to serve.
Speaker: 1
18:22
I’m sure Elon contributed into the you know, was supportive in it, but it wasn’t a number of folks. And I got a call from Howard Lutnick who’s leading the, transition team, and he did a phone interview. And the next thing you know, like, forty hours later, I was at, Mar A Lago.
Speaker: 0
18:35
He said hop on a plane, come out here. Having a lot of friends of mine who are serving in this administration, your story sounds familiar that folks that are close to this whole group that was sitting at Mar A Lago for several weeks and months after the election. I’ve heard a lot of similar stories that folks got calls saying, hey. Would you like to consider something? And it was very open ended.
Speaker: 0
19:05
It’s ai, we’ve gotten to know you. We trust you. You’re reliable. But most importantly, we’re looking for folks that have experience and acumen in operating a business, in understanding how to manage at scale, and really have a similar sort of belief system, I would say, to the folks that that were stepping in to run this administration.
Speaker: 0
19:23
So I I do think what you’re saying sounds like what I’ve heard. It makes a lot of sense to me. So so you then fly out to Mar A Lago. What was that like?
Speaker: 1
19:32
Oh, man. That was so cool. I mean, it just happened so suddenly. And I I mean, just, you know, ai of put together a quick plan. At that point, I knew it was consideration for NASA administrator, but I’ll tell you in the days leading up to it, I was hearing everything from being at the treasury department in various roles and to, you know, again, to the department of the air force.
Speaker: 1
19:53
But I knew it was Sana, and I was like, well, I gotta I gotta come with a plan. And, and I, you know, put together a one pager for the president, and it was a it was a great interview. I mean, I never really met him in person. I shook his hand kind of once in passing, ten plus years earlier, and the president was incredibly knowledgeable.
Speaker: 1
20:14
I was impressed. He knew a lot about the space program, which makes sense. He I mean, you know, he helped with commercial crew return operational capability to The US with with Bryden, you know, a big push on the Artemis program, created the Speak Force. He knew a lot. He knew a lot about China. He knew we talked a lot about their air force actually, which I thought was interesting.
Speaker: 1
20:34
Some of ai my, you know, defense experience. And, it was incredible. I mean, it was an hour plus long and I, I, I came away with it feeling, you know, really good about the opportunity.
Speaker: 0
20:46
Who coached you on your one pager and what did it say?
Speaker: 1
20:49
Nobody coached me on it. It was, it was just I generally, you know, I’ve had an opportunity to obviously interact with NASA over the last I mean, my my commercial space career now goes on, well, it’ll be it’ll be five years in a in a couple months from when it began. And, you know, during Polaris Dawn, when we were doing suit development, spent a lot of time at NASA using their chambers and facilities, had a lot of, you know, ai of firsthand experience, certainly Kennedy Space Center.
Speaker: 1
21:12
So I had a good starting place, and, I think it really just centered on look. In in in this kind of environment, budgets aren’t getting bigger. We do have to do more with less. The agency is doing a lot of littles, a lot of things that other agencies, departments, companies are capable of doing.
Speaker: 1
21:29
That’s not why the taxpayers fund NASA. Like, NASA’s funded to do the near impossible that no one else can do. Not things that, you know, companies should be doing for their own competitiveness. You know? NASA helps fund, like, engine efficiency programs for, you know, commercial jet engine providers.
Speaker: 1
21:46
It’s like, don’t they need to do that themselves or else they lose to their competitors? Like, why are we funding this? So, basically, like, an idea to kinda go in, stop a lot of the littles that are not needle movers, that are not why the agency exists, and concentrate on the needle movers.
Speaker: 1
22:00
So, you know, that’s leading in the high ground to space. Let’s get let’s, you know, let’s complete our our lunar obligations because that’s a whole another story with with China. At the same time, parallel the the, you know, parallel the capabilities to get to Mars, help commercial industry, develop the the rapid reusable heavy lift capability that allows us to go anywhere, pivot from competing with industry to doing what no company would ever do, which is build nuclear spaceships.
Speaker: 1
22:26
There’s a lot of advantages to it. Nuclear electric propulsion for sure. You know, we don’t have to worry as much about refilling. It’s hyper efficient transport of mass. It opens up, you know, beyond Mars. And and frankly, like, look, it takes the pressure off in situ resource manufacturing.
Speaker: 1
22:42
And if you are gonna do in situ resource manufacturing, you’re gonna need nuclear power. And the farther we get away from the sun, the less reliant we are on solar. A lot of reasons why that should not be a small program in the lab right now doing light bulbs, but should be a billion dollar initiative.
Speaker: 1
22:55
You know, figuring out the space economy and, increasing the rate of world changing discovery, those have been my priorities. It’s what I told briefed the president. It’s what I went through the sana and the hearing on. It’s what we would have tried to concentrate on if
Speaker: 0
23:08
I got the job. There’s a lot in there we should unpack. I wanna just get your perspective on the arc of NASA. You know, NASA is a storied institution, inspirational to many. You and me the same. I still wear a NASA hat with pride often. But, you know, the agency ram an outsider’s perspective feels like it’s become a laggard. It feels like it’s kind of lost a little bit of its luster.
Speaker: 0
23:37
Why is that? Do I have that wrong? And if I don’t, what has happened to the administration of the agency over the decades that’s led to this this moment?
Speaker: 1
23:48
Well, I like you, I love Sana, and I was so excited to to contribute. I was honored that the president nominated me. I mean, you’ve got the best and brightest that show up to work every day and wanna win in the high ground of space, and I would have been thrilled to work alongside him.
Speaker: 1
24:00
You’re totally right. Everything about it, even the just looking at the insignia, how how damn inspiring it is. But NASA’s got problems and, but that’s vatsal look. That’s not unique to them. It’s gonna be government wide.
Speaker: 1
24:12
Whatever I tell you that I think is wrong with NASA, I would guarantee it, you know, is, like, you know, it’s systemic across, every government agency and department. The bureaucracy is super real. No one’s gonna be surprised about that. You know, the you have dozens of layers of leadership. Everybody’s got a deputy.
Speaker: 1
24:30
I mean, you know, things that, you know, I know, like, you know, we know in business that certainly Elon knows and instills in his companies across commercial speak, like ownership. Like, you push ownership down to the lowest levels. You empower the smart people to make good decisions. You know, you give them the tools to make those good decisions.
Speaker: 1
24:46
You hold them accountable when you get them wrong. That does not exist inside NASA or the government. There is so many layers of management. Everybody’s got a deputy. It’s crazy. I would have deleted all that.
Speaker: 1
24:55
Like, not that not that people don’t need to go, but they need to, you know, the the the amount of deputies, assistants, associate assistant to the deputy, the amount of committees, the meetings with 200 people on them, the review boards, ai, a like, all that needs to go, you need so many more doers.
Speaker: 1
25:12
And there’s a lot of them there. They’re really smart, but you you gotta push down, you know, ownership to the absolute lowest level. So you you got this crushing bureaucracy that impedes progress. And then in here’s where congress plays a role, every state’s got some equity that they care about and they protect like hell, and it impedes the big progress.
Speaker: 1
25:30
You know, like, I I tell you, I I love talking to all the senators and the senate was so fair to me, and I ai I would have had a lot of great votes. But you talk to some senators and they’re like, you know, we have a local rocket club that supports these schools and NASA contributes it to every year, and I wanna make sure that continues.
Speaker: 1
25:45
It’s like, well, why can’t you do a car wash for the Rocket Club? Like, this isn’t huge dollars. Why can’t the community raise those funds? And then you might say, well, what’s wrong with a couple Rocket Clubs, you know, to inspire the kids all across the country? Well, well, one turns to 10 turns to thousands and it becomes a distraction. Those are parts to delete.
Speaker: 1
26:03
Those are resources that are draining away from what every senator should care about, which is how do we get to the moon, get to Mars, and shock the world with, you know, with with with world changing headlines. That’s what people are are waiting for from NASA. You know?
Speaker: 0
26:17
%. I mean, man, what you’re saying resonates with me so much. It’s not just NASA. It’s across the federal government. I’ve spent enough time now interacting with folks and meeting with folks and hearing similar stories. It’s just the chaos that that builds with scale, with age, with bureaucracy, with competing interests that all have to be met, and you end up diluting everything away.
Speaker: 0
26:39
It’s so frustrating to hear that.
Speaker: 1
26:41
I think this does play into, why China is is really just moving at at lightning speed right now. They have this immense second mover advantage that is, that is crushing across all technology. You know, when you had the Manhattan Project, we, we had the the technical know how, the will, and the resources to get something done, and we set up facilities where we needed them.
Speaker: 1
27:05
You know, Oak Ridge and Lawrence Livermore and, you know, like, you know, you get, you put the facilities where you need them and the talent where you need them to execute on the mission, and everything builds up logically to it and you and you deliver a win. And we did the same thing with the space program, you know, in the in the in the nineteen sixties.
Speaker: 1
27:23
Well, now all of those national labs and all and sana, honestly, a lot of the facilities within NASA are doing lots of little things for existence. And some of them are relevant to the mission and some are not. And when you try and do something, you know, glorious now, you have to try and repurpose those resources that are super entrenched, and they don’t sana necessarily move.
Speaker: 1
27:43
And then, of course, you have congress that’s protecting their programs. China is literally doing what we are do what we did, you know, in the in the forties and sixties and saying, we’re sana, hey. We’re gonna go after fusion. Or we’re gonna work on new next generation fifth gen nuclear reactors. We’re gonna build sixth gen fighter jets.
Speaker: 1
27:58
And they put the facilities where they belong with the right people and resources. There’s no baggage, and they have this incredible second mover advantage. And they’re able to get things done at lightning speeds because they don’t have all that drag. And we have a lot
Speaker: 0
28:11
of drag. And, again, it’s not just NASA. It’s it’s government wide. And do you think there’s a way to fix it without congress, or is the only way to fix it without congress? Meaning meaning there needs to be no Congress if we have a shot at fixing this, and there needs to be a different governing model.
Speaker: 1
28:31
Yeah. You know, ai, I I think the, I think this is this is why I I absolutely support the the president that, you know, despite all, Sai I mean, I my single largest political donation ever was to was to president Trump in in this, you know, for to support his inauguration. It’s why I got charged up with, you know, with Elon assembling the Doge team. It’s like we do have to shrink the government.
Speaker: 1
28:52
We do have to get rid of all these inefficiencies, these the waste sana the distractions from the mission. Things that we don’t need every taxpayer contributing to. And actually concentrate those dollars, real dollars, on the things that the taxpayers should be fighting for. And when you do that, you know what?
Speaker: 1
29:07
Like, 20,000,000,000 or 25,000,000,000 is actually a lot of money. And that, you know, and I know, like, it’s it’s a super tough budget environment right now and people people hate change. But I’m always surprised when, like, a million is not a million anymore and a billion is not a billion because you do an awful awful lot with that.
Speaker: 1
29:21
So if there was ever a time to get this done, it’s now with president Ram, when when he has the house and the senate behind him, and and I’m not surprised that there is frustration from from people that were really passionate, and and then are so passionate when, when this much time goes by
Speaker: 0
29:38
and we’re not able to get those things done that we thought we we’d be able to. Sai NASA’s budget last year, dollars 25,000,000,000, break it down for us. How was that money being spent? What are the dimensions upon which you would kind of categorize that budget? And we’ll talk about kind of what’s going forward.
Speaker: 1
29:58
Yeah. I mean, look, I I think an incredibly large portion of it is with human space ai and, and specifically, the Artemis program and Sai, and it’s a lot of billions going to a disposable rocket. It is billions that went Ai mean, you’re talking I mean, I think it’s, like, five or 600% overrun to build the mobile launcher two for the next generation SLS.
Speaker: 1
30:22
So Sorry. Just tell us
Speaker: 0
30:24
what SLS is for the audience.
Speaker: 1
30:25
That’s the Speak Launch System, I think, or it’s, they also call it the Senate Launch System, I think. And, it’s spread across, a lot of dollars are spread across some key states. Well, look, just to give you an ai. So SLS is just repurposed shuttle hardware. So, and I don’t blame anyone for putting us down this path because at the time you did not have Blue Origin or SpaceX or any of these other commercial companies doing the things they’re doing today.
Speaker: 1
30:52
But they were ai, let’s, let’s take the shuttle program parts and put it into a program called Constellation, and let’s take the Constellation parts and put it in a program called, SLS. And, and, essentially, again, it’s the it’s it’s it’s it’s it’s the same shuttle motors. It’s the same, solid rocket boosters.
Speaker: 1
31:08
You’re basically taking the tank and putting Orion on top of it. Orion is 20 years old, by the way. It hasn’t flown humans meh. And it’s incredibly expensive and very disposable, but it creates a lot of jobs in certain states. And, and it’s ai sai some and and look, there’s enough hardware now to fly a couple missions and make sure you beat China back to the moon.
Speaker: 1
31:25
But but you can’t be stuck on this forever. This is literally the equivalency, by the way, of taking p 51 Mustangs from World War two and using them in Desert Storm because, we gotta keep the plants open. And that obviously makes no no logical sense whatsoever. For factories, they’re making this stuff that used to make landing ships in World War two that made Saturn rocket that pivoted to shuttle to Sai, and now to believe that you can’t make another pivot is is kinda crazy.
Speaker: 1
31:49
And the right thing you should pivot towards, honestly, is nuclear.
Speaker: 0
31:51
Mhmm. Ai wanna just talk about the the Trump budget proposal for NASA. So this is the NASA budget over the history of Sana. And the proposed budget would basically create the lowest budget since 1961. So they’re proposing to reduce the overall budget from twenty five billion a year down to 19,000,000,000 a year. Were you part of the conversation on building this budget?
Speaker: 0
32:20
And then I’ll highlight some of the features of this budget here in a moment. But did did you, have conversations with the administration as this was being put together and some of these proposals were being considered? I mean, how how deep have you gone in this?
Speaker: 1
32:32
No. You know, when you’re a nominee, you’re actually kept in the dark on a lot of things. You do get briefed on everything that’s going on with every senator, you know, every major program, things that senators could ask you about from a, from ai a one on one perspective, but you’re not given access to sensitive information.
Speaker: 1
32:48
You almost need some deniability when you’re talking to senators on that, or else your nominations can get held up really big time. So I wasn’t aware. I honestly, I was voted out of committee, you know, the Commerce Committee by, you know, Senator Cruz and and, you know, 18 other it was 19 senators in total.
Speaker: 1
33:06
And the next day, the skinny budget came out. And if that skinny budget had come out, you know, again, a day or two earlier, I would I would never have made it out of committee. Because, obviously, as as I think is playing out right now, both sides of the aisle are not happy about the, you know, the budget.
Speaker: 0
33:22
Okay. So in this budget, there’s a proposal to cancel SLS and Orion, terminate numerous robotic science missions, including the Mars sample return mission
Speaker: 1
33:35
Mhmm.
Speaker: 0
33:35
Probes to Venus and several future space telescopes. And it represents the White House’s desire to end the development of a nuclear thermal rocket engine. I guess, having scrutinized this budget, how do you react to what you see being proposed? And does it solve what you’ve identified as some of the challenges in Vatsal, or are those more management challenges?
Speaker: 0
33:57
Does budget create a constraining force here that fixes some of the issues with respect to focus and concentration of capital into the right projects for you from your point of view?
Speaker: 1
34:07
Yeah. Yeah. It’s a it’s a it’s an excellent question. So so first, ai, look, the the the reduction the big budget reduction is a great forcing function for change. And I know there’s a lot of people that probably don’t wanna don’t wanna hear that, but, it is true. That doesn’t mean I would have landed at 19,000,000,000 in this whole thing, but I fully support, the president and, with the goal of shrinking the budget and and and and getting back to responsible footing.
Speaker: 1
34:32
And I do think billions can go a very long way. So, I will just start with that. I I everything you just said directionally is is is kind of in the right direction. We’ve already got paid for enough l Sai hardware that if you were to terminate for convenience now, you got enough to launch, like, two or three of them.
Speaker: 1
34:47
It’s enough to get you back to the moon. Check that box to to make sure that you don’t have any economic or scientific or national security reasons to stay on the moon and and put your energy much more towards, commercial industry. Look. Nuclear thermal propulsion, I’m not a fan of. I like nuclear electric. Nuclear thermal, to test it, you’re spewing radioactive debris here on Earth.
Speaker: 1
35:06
It’s not gonna go over well to anyone, and it doesn’t really solve your refueling problem. You still need to top it off with hydrogen in space if you want a reusable space plug. So I don’t like that either. And and it’s subscale. It’s it’s a fact it’s a program that sits in a lab forever.
Speaker: 1
35:20
Like, what you need in nuclear electric, I’m passionate on the subject, is you you need us to get back to the good old days. Like, we went from the atomic bomb in 1945 to laying the keel on the Nautilus in 1951. ‘5, ‘6 years. We didn’t keep it in the lab forever. We said, you know what? We’re gonna do big bold things. And that’s what we need to be dealing with, in space with when it comes to, to nuclear.
Speaker: 1
35:40
Look, a lot of the science ram, I’m huge fans of. Mars sample return, the best thing to do is when the astronauts get there to bring the samples home. Why would we spend billions to send a robotic mission? We can put that into commercial industry and accelerate their ai. So I’m not I wasn’t a fan of a pure robotic mission on that one.
Speaker: 1
35:57
And, you know, a lot of the big science programs, I wanna see James Webb’s and Hubble telescope programs launching annually, if not more. Flagship ram, definitionally, are billion dollar spends. And if you spend a billion, then you gotta get it right. And that means lots of ai.
Speaker: 1
36:13
And and and we can’t take unnecessary risk. And a billion becomes a 3,000,000,000 program, and it’s never on time. Like, we should be challenging the best and brightest. Give me ten, one hundred million dollar missions a year. Let’s try that and let’s accept that three fail and get act you know, I was gonna introduce, like, time to science as a KPI.
Speaker: 1
36:30
Like, how why don’t why do we accept things taking ten years when they could be a year? Even the decadal process of of prioritizing scientific missions over a ten year span is kind of insane.
Speaker: 0
36:41
%. Hundred %. And I I think a lot of people hear budget cuts, and I I hear this on the NIH side as well now, that the administration and budget cutting is gonna take ai. People are gonna lose lives. We’re gonna lose science. This is an anti science agenda. But the if you can get more efficient with how you deploy capital and how you manage the deployment of that capital and the utilization of that capital, you actually accelerate science.
Speaker: 0
37:09
You accelerate outcomes, and you improve the condition and the prosperity for humanity and for America. And it’s completely a misdirected statement when people say that a budget cut is an anti science movement. It’s about finding the right places that you get more outcomes and redeploy in a smarter, more efficient way. It drives me nuts.
Speaker: 0
37:28
I just see it, you know, all over, right now.
Speaker: 1
37:31
That’s just I mean, it’s just politics.
Speaker: 0
37:32
I do think overfunding leads to complacency, leads to bureaucracy, which actually leads to a slowdown in discovery, a slowdown in invention, a slowdown in progress. Anyway, I’m sorry for my rant.
Speaker: 1
37:43
I agree. Look. As Ai mean, as entrepreneurs, we know, like, some of our probably best decision making is always when we were running low on cash. So, you know, it kinda drives efficiency and, it is a, you know, necessity, mother of all invention there. Yeah. Well, I think that’s just a product of some of our and I’m not familiar with any of the NIH or and I’m I’m not pretending to go deep on that at all.
Speaker: 1
38:00
Just I do think this is kind of a product of of of the politics of our time. It’s a very divided country. You know, people have to take an opposing view and and and go to extremes. People will die over over this, but the government is terrible capital allocators. Come on.
Speaker: 1
38:13
We should all know that. And, you know, we should as taxpayers, we should be contributing to the things that no one else is willing to do, where there is no good business use case or or economic model. You know, it is in you know, if competition is working, they can solve a lot of problems, and we should put our energy to what they won’t solve.
Speaker: 1
38:29
And and look, I think Kratios, by the way, in science, he’s a great leader. I I’ve spoken to him a bunch of times. You know, he he’s not a quack. He doesn’t think wild things like that. He he wants, you know, the golden age of science and discovery. Good science. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
38:42
Good science. Yeah. Absolutely. Well, let’s talk about Artemis. I think this is a big piece that that the American public doesn’t fully grok, that we have this effort. And maybe you can just lay out for us the case for Artemis. Lay out for us the case for Mars. Tell us about the relationship between the two and the timelines.
Speaker: 1
39:04
Sure. And ai, yeah, why are we doing them? Let’s just sai, I I am in the return of the moon camp. That doesn’t mean, like, you know, Ai and I’m I know that, you know, Elon is very focused on on Mars, and he has a lot of great reasons why, including just the survival of our species.
Speaker: 1
39:18
I mean, long term, it is the right move. I remember, during my hearing, one senator was really grilling me a lot of, like, what really, what’s the difference between, you know, moon and Mars? And, you know, isn’t moon the stepping stone? I’m like, well, one’s a planet, you know? And, you know, it has an atmosphere.
Speaker: 1
39:34
And if you looked at the moon, it doesn’t look pretty. I mean, it’s getting beat up all the time and has no protection from, you know, for solar radiation. So reality is, like, you should go to the moon if it because for thirty five years, we said we were going to. And I think that’s very important.
Speaker: 1
39:49
You know, it’s it’s it’s very late in the game to say, well, we did it in the sixties and early seventies. You know, that would have been the fine position to state the entire time that we’ve done it and we’re moving on. But we didn’t. For thirty five years, we said we’re going back and we spent over a hundred billion of taxpayer dollars saying we were gonna do it.
Speaker: 1
40:07
And for us not to be able to do it now and watch Ai do it, like I said, it’s it signals a far greater disease across our our government and and how our system operates, and I don’t think we want that reckoning. So look, we paid for the hardware anyway. We let’s let’s go back, but let’s parallel going to Mars. So that’s what Artemis is really about.
Speaker: 1
40:24
I mean, you can say Artemis is about Mars too, but that’s, like, a hundred years down the line. And like I said, it’s a giant disposable rocket program that repurposes shuttle hardware. It’s incredibly expensive. We signed up a lot of international partners to support it because we like collecting flags, and it doesn’t necessarily always mean that what they’re contributing to is in the best interest of the program.
Speaker: 1
40:43
Case in point, you know, we had, you know, gateway meh, like, we this is going down a rabbit hole of a lot of things because of the shortcomings of the vehicle. But it’s expensive. It’s disposable. It is not the way to do, affordable, repeatable, efficient exploration, whether it’s to moon, Mars, or anywhere else.
Speaker: 1
41:00
So let’s get it done and then focus on the on the right way to go about doing this so that we’re not seeing people walk on the moon every five years or something crazy that it’s happening all the time, which is what we get excited about. What is there to
Speaker: 0
41:12
do on the moon? Why should we go back? What is the purpose?
Speaker: 1
41:15
I think, you know, it’s it’s it’s almost like a you know, if you’re gonna go and commit yourself, take risks in a in a conflict, you know, you want clear objectives. And in my mind, again, aside from the fact that the hardware is already essentially purchased, it’s clear objectives.
Speaker: 1
41:30
Is there any economic, scientific, or national security reasons to be here? And I don’t think we can say that conclusively right now that that there are none. And China is going, and if they were to find something, even a small probability, a 1%, let’s just say ai, it’s Helium three and they’re gonna usher in a new form of power.
Speaker: 1
41:47
Think about how many conflicts that we’ve had over the last century over sources of power, over energy. Do we wanna get that one wrong? And are we willing to take a 1% chance and that could shift the balance of power here on earth? I don’t think so. And And we said we were gonna do it for thirty five years, and we and we speak a hundred billion taxpayer money.
Speaker: 1
42:07
And like I said, the hardware is there. But I think you do it. You make those determinations. Is there scientific, economic, or national security reason to be here? And if not, you move on.
Speaker: 1
42:15
And if companies like Blue Origin and SpaceX and even Rocket Lab are successful with their vehicles, you’re gonna have, like, the optionality to go to the moon. It’s it’s not the the Delta v is a negligible difference between whether you’re going to the moon or Mars.
Speaker: 0
42:27
And we should colonize Mars? We should build a colony on Mars?
Speaker: 1
42:31
I think we need to go there. And by going there, it is, it is the first step on a far grander journey. You know, and, you know, I I I, you know, Elon is obviously very passionate about it, occupy Mars. Like, he knows it’s not the perfect destination. There’s nothing like, you can you know, it’s unlike anything in in Earth’s history.
Speaker: 1
42:50
You know, people say it’s analogs to, you know, the explorers of the fourteen hundreds are putting people in, like, those shipping containers for six months and saying, we know how to live on Mars. It’s bull. You know, you could work your whole life on Mars and you still live in a bubble.
Speaker: 1
43:03
You know, so it’s not gonna like it’s not gonna be an easy way of life, but it is a step in the right direction. Like our destiny is out and among the stars. Like, we will inevitably learn something out there that’s gonna change our thinking, and we’re it’s gonna it’s gonna create a a craving for that knowledge, and we are gonna wanna continue to go out and explore and learn even more.
Speaker: 1
43:23
Mars is the best stop first step on that journey.
Speaker: 0
43:27
So let’s talk about getting there and achieving some of the other missions that we might have as a country, as a species, and the relationship with private industry. Elon believes he can get payload into orbit for $10 per kilogram with the Starship platform, which is call it a roughly hundred X reduction in cost. Yeah.
Speaker: 0
43:50
Maybe more, Maybe ram sai from a depending on the the point at which you’re measuring it, maybe a thousand x reduction in cost. And that unlocks the potential to do these things in an economically viable way, going to the moon, going to Mars. Why shouldn’t NASA be more fully embracing of this private industry capability? Is it because it’s Elon, or is it because it reduces money going to defense contractors?
Speaker: 0
44:20
What is the motivation against going all in on this company, SpaceX, or companies like it that have built these competencies that would have been unfathomable just a few decades ago but are real here today?
Speaker: 1
44:35
Oh, hey. This is such a a deep conversation. So, look. I I one thing I’d say is, like, obviously, I love SpaceX, and they safely put me into space twice and two awesome missions brought me home, and I’m cheering them on. I I’m I’m happy what SpaceX is doing. I’m thrilled about the investments that Blue Origin’s doing, that Rocket Lab is doing, you know, Firefly. So it’s a look.
Speaker: 1
44:57
We have a great industry. So the bryden question is just why isn’t why isn’t NASA leaning more into commercial? Well, ai, it’s NASA’s foresight that gave birth to the commercial crew program that enabled even me to go to space. So, like, they are thinking in that direction, but there are politics in play. The nice thing is is those winds are shifting.
Speaker: 1
45:13
Throughout my, you know, whole confirmation process, you know, you are educated heavily by some very smart political folks. They Sherpa you around every sana. And they were like, look, the you know, a year ago, two years ago, the idea of talking to senators that are in SLS states and and convincing them we need to be looking a little bit more to the future with commercial and maybe pivoting to things like nuclear propulsion would be a nonstarter.
Speaker: 1
45:37
And I’ll tell you they were very reasonable. All of them were very reasonable that they know that you’re you know, this this rocket built on 60 year old technology, that’s 4 and a half billion dollars of launch, has an expiration date. So I do think, like, that ship is turning. It’s just this isn’t ai a this isn’t a speedboat.
Speaker: 1
45:54
The government, you know, it’s it’s turning like it’s a giant, you know, shipping container. It turns a half a degree ai a year. And, and that’s not obviously fast enough for a lot of us. But I would say it’s moving in that, that direction. And then NASA also has to, you know, repurpose its resources on things that a SpaceX or a Blue Origin won’t do.
Speaker: 1
46:13
They’re not gonna put a rock they’re not gonna build a nuclear reactor and launch it. You’re not gonna get the indemnities for that. Even shipping highly enriched uranium is a nightmare. That is what the government should be doing. Like, so NASA should be doing what the commercial industries can’t.
Speaker: 1
46:26
And that, by the way, takes so much stress off a company like SpaceX trying to get to Mars. Like, if you can minimize the number of speak based refueling or the in situ resource manufacturing, look, even when a Starship gets to Mars, you’re betting on, like, you know, a hundred consecutive miracles happening to top to mine propellant there and bring it back.
Speaker: 1
46:45
NASA should be helping. The government should be helping with that because it it creates a lot of other optionality. We could have, you know, nuclear battle stars in low Earth orbit, you know, as part of, Golden Dome. There’s a lot of reasons why, you know, it’s not all SpaceX, all commercial versus NASA. It’s both.
Speaker: 0
47:00
Totally. Ai just to compare, last week, Space Epoch, a Chinese rocket company, completed its first sea recovery test. So much like we saw a few years ago with SpaceX, they had a vertical launch and they landed back in the ocean about a hundred twenty five second flight. The key question a lot of folks are now asking, has China caught up? Is this a space race? Why does it matter? Because isn’t space big enough for everyone?
Speaker: 1
47:27
I mean, the space is the ultimate high ground and the high ground has mattered. You know, it’s had tactical and strategic significance since, like, the beginning of humankind. It matters. I was grateful to have the opportunity to lead, you know, the peaceful exploration, of space, but it’s not all peaceful.
Speaker: 1
47:41
Like, we we we can’t be naive to the fact that it has been ai. And, you know, China leading in this domain makes a difference. There are things of scientific and economic and, again, national security value out there and we we can’t we have to lead, we can’t fall ai. If we fall behind, we may never catch up. So and I am concerned about that, you know, China moving closer to reusability.
Speaker: 1
48:03
They they launch the second most, orbital rockets every year without reusability. You know, thank goodness for for SpaceX or or or we definitely be already behind in that regard. So, I am concerned about it. It it it honestly, it is a race. And ai, yeah, we we the the domain is vitally important. We can’t fall behind.
Speaker: 1
48:21
So that gives them the high ground with respect
Speaker: 0
48:25
to weapons systems, with respect to observation Sensors. Platform, sensors, etcetera. Right? Yeah. Okay. So so let’s talk a little bit about your nomination. You seem Ai would give you my vote. You should be the administrator of NASA. It would be amazing. Thanks. You testified in front of the sana committee on April 9. I think it was a 19 to nine vote to move you out of committee. Yes.
Speaker: 0
48:46
Then there were reports going into this weekend that you were gonna be voted on by the full sana this week and the estimates where you were gonna get 70 confirmation votes or shah was some news report I had read. So it seems like you were gonna fly right through and administer NASA. So then what happened?
Speaker: 0
49:03
So I I mean, I
Speaker: 1
49:04
got a call, Friday of last week that, you know, the, the president has decided to go into a, go in a different direction. It was a, it was a real bummer. And I, I know, like, a number of parties in government need to be notified of that, which, you know, I expected to kinda have just a peaceful weekend.
Speaker: 1
49:26
And the next thing I knew on Saturday, you know, it was, there was a lot of activity on the Internet. But maybe that’s just, like, my perspective because I follow space, and and such. But it was certainly, you know, disappointing. But, you know, the president needs to have, you know, his person that, you know, he counts on to to fulfill the agenda.
Speaker: 1
49:43
And,
Speaker: 0
49:44
meh, Ai, The person that called you, what was what did they tell you was the reason the president was withdrawing his nomination?
Speaker: 1
49:52
Just said the president had decided to go in a different direction. We all served at the pleasure of the president. Now, I mean, I started to get some more details as it went on. I honestly also, like, I’m not, like, I don’t even, like, play dumb on this. Like, I I had a pretty good idea of, you know, that, you know, I don’t think that the timing was much of a coincidence, that, you know, there was other changes going on the same day.
Speaker: 1
50:17
And, you know, it was kind of, obviously, a little bit of a a disappointment.
Speaker: 0
50:22
So are are you referring to Elon?
Speaker: 1
50:26
I I’ve just you know, there was, obviously, there was more than more than one, you know, departure that was covered on that day. And, it became, at least from what Ai heard that it was, there was a, you know, there was and I’m just you know, I read the news same as everybody else, but I Ai, you know, I had obviously, Sai was in the in DC for the last six months getting ready that, you know, there were some people that, you know, that had some access to grind, I guess.
Speaker: 1
50:55
And, and I was a a good visible, target. I know they’re they’re like the the news talks a lot about, like, the, you know, Democratic donations is the cause. That was not a new development. You just Google. You can they’re all public.
Speaker: 0
51:08
The New York Times published an article saying that president Trump knew about your Democratic donations in the past when you received the nomination. So that was actually not news according to the New York Times that that was well understood and well covered. So kind of put the kibosh on that explanation.
Speaker: 0
51:24
So what are the access to ai? Are the access to grind with Elon? Are there ai two factions? Whatever you can kind of provide some color on, I think it would be really helpful to understand because there’s a lot of speculation going on right now. And I would say some folks are really disappointed in some of the transitions that are taking place and some folks are really trying to grok it and understand it.
Speaker: 0
51:42
So anything you can do to help folks understand would be, you know, I think, helpful.
Speaker: 1
51:46
You know, first, I just I wanna be overwhelmingly clear. I I I don’t fault the the president at all. I fully support him. That, you know, the president of The United States, you know, the leader of the free world makes a thousand decisions a day with seconds of information.
Speaker: 1
51:58
He’s gotta get a lot more right than wrong. Sai I don’t I mean, you know, I don’t blame, you know, an influential ai coming in and saying, look. Here’s the facts, and I think we should kill this guy. And the president’s gotta make a call and move on. I think that’s exactly, you know, kind of how it went. It was not the senate at all. You don’t get floor ai, by the way.
Speaker: 1
52:18
You know, there’s a hundred nominees that are, like, waiting for floor time. The only way you get floor time is when a lot of senators, you know, call senator Thune and say, this is our ai, and we gotta move him along. That’s how you know it’s, like, a high you’re gonna get a high vote count. So the sana was very fair, really nice. I I enjoyed that experience.
Speaker: 1
52:36
I, you know, I think you you got one person, and I don’t know the history on, like, what the trigger was or wasn’t, but, you know, decided to to kinda make a move. And and, again, I don’t fault the president for it at all. But, you know, look, in in in terms of donations, I I’ve always been, you know, somewhat of a moderate. I actually like I I am, like, a right leaning.
Speaker: 1
52:58
I I I do support, you know, the president’s agenda. That’s why I made as big of a donation as I did to his cause.
Speaker: 0
53:04
Let me just ask for clarity.
Speaker: 1
53:05
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
53:05
Sorry. Go ahead. Ai was just gonna
Speaker: 1
53:07
say, like, you when you fill out your questionnaire for the senate committee, which is public, it asks you to list every donation. Before you go in front of a single senator, before you do a hearing, you do these, prep sessions at the White House where people pretend to be senators, and they prepped you on the donation question.
Speaker: 1
53:22
So, like, that wasn’t new news. Might have been new to the president at that you know, might have refreshed his memory perhaps, but, Ai don’t I don’t think that was the cause. I think the media has got it pretty accurate.
Speaker: 0
53:32
So was this a shot at Elon by someone that is anti Elon?
Speaker: 1
53:38
I mean, you know, people can draw their their own conclusions. But I I think the direction that people are going is, or thinking on this seems seems to check out to me.
Speaker: 0
53:47
And what is the root of that? Is it vested interest in spending that Elon is advocating gets cut? Is it diametrically opposed philosophical points of view on the role of government? What is the root anti Elon sentiment that is kind of on the other side of the equation here, do you think?
Speaker: 1
54:05
I mean, I think that the, the people overwhelmingly voted for the president to go in and shrink the government and bring about change and get rid of fraud, waste, and abuse, of which I am a % behind the president. And I I believe that that’s what, you know, Elon and Doge was working towards. But people also hate change.
Speaker: 1
54:24
Like, we all know this and, you know, people can, be very protective of their ai. And, you know, when somebody comes in, you know, Elon’s got a playbook, and I think he knows how to get things done. And I and I I think, you know, in a lot of respects that, that rubs some people or, you know, what I think I was one sana, you know, or, had some axes to grind.
Speaker: 1
54:42
I don’t know. And, and, you know, we’re just waiting. I I I don’t I, you know, I don’t I don’t wanna speculate on all this. But
Speaker: 0
54:51
Yeah. No. I mean, I think that that you’ve said enough. And Ai I guess you’ve seen the tweets from Elon today where he was pretty negative about the house bill that is being labeled the big beautiful bill, making the case that it’s actually gonna drive up a government deficit to over 2,000,000,000,000, 2 and a half trillion dollars a year.
Speaker: 0
55:17
It doesn’t make deep enough cuts. There’s a lot of pork in there, a lot of wasteful spending in there. And then the house speaker today responded to Elon saying, hey. We’ve still got a rescission bill coming. We’ve still got an appropriation bill coming where we’re gonna start to fix the budget. But clearly, Elon is now getting vocal about his point of view on this.
Speaker: 0
55:37
Have you spoken with him at all about what’s going on and government spending and his kind of take on things as he’s walked out of the office there?
Speaker: 1
55:45
Well, you know, as, you know, I kinda meh, I’d sai I told the senate too. Like, I’ve only spoken to Elon, you know, I don’t know, a couple dozen times, most of which related to human space ai missions. But when I was talking to him towards the end of last year, it it was all on government efficiency related programs.
Speaker: 1
56:00
And I think Elon got a lot of people excited about Doge, by making, like, one simple point. The interest rate on the national debt exceeds, you know, the DOD budget. That’s scary, and it’s getting worse. And we can’t spend our way out of this problem, which we’ve grown a habit to doing. And I know he’s very passionate about it.
Speaker: 1
56:20
And, you know, he sacrificed a lot along with all the others, you know, at Doge to try and bring about some significant, you know, spending cuts. And then, you know, to see a bill come in, you know, whatever, 1,200 pages or so that, you know, adds, you know, to the deficit, I think, was pretty, you know, pretty disheartening, I suspect.
Speaker: 1
56:38
I mean, I’m not I’m not, you know, I’m not in this, in this fight. And I think, like, trying to codify, like, you know, a handful of billions in cuts probably is, you know, a drop in the in the bucket. So I can’t imagine that’s too exciting.
Speaker: 0
56:54
You think he’s gonna get more vocal?
Speaker: 1
56:56
I have no I I I don’t I wouldn’t presume to know what goes on through his mind. Like I said, I think he spends a lot of time trying to solve a lot of world’s problems. And and a problem for this country, and I think a lot of people agree with it, is that the, you know, the this national debt is just getting way out of
Speaker: 0
57:12
hand. I mean, this has been my case for about four years that if we don’t fix this, it eventually becomes an intractable debt spiral. And, when that happens, all of the wrangling we’re doing over budget, priorities, programs, interests, jobs arya no longer possible. It’s like you’re trying to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Speaker: 0
57:35
You don’t get the choice of what programs to fund when there is no funding, and that’s the unfortunate iceberg we’re running into. Do you think Doge is dead? Any point of view on that?
Speaker: 1
57:46
I mean, it was interesting, you know, obviously, there was kind of the grand exit, this past speak. And then, I don’t know, at least in my Twitter feed, I try and follow a lot of the cabinet secretaries. You know, they were all coming out and saying, you know, Doge lit is alive and well embedded inside the I, you know, I think it was more implying that, like, you know, we’re gonna clean house.
Speaker: 1
58:02
We’re gonna take care of our own house as opposed to letting other people help us do it. Problem is, like, we haven’t been very successful with that historically. So I suspect going into midterms, people don’t wanna, you know, let the other side be pounding the table on Doge. So I I don’t know. I mean, I ai.
Speaker: 1
58:17
I’ve been an outsider nominee, so I have no idea how it’ll play out, but I I I think that some I imagine some people in the government wanna see it go ai late in the night.
Speaker: 0
58:27
Is there a deep state? And does the deep state’s like, is it too big to break?
Speaker: 1
58:35
You know, I don’t I don’t I don’t, like, know what I would classify a deep state or not. Like, there are there are there is an absolutely bloated bureaucracy that, hates change, gets very entrenched, that is happy to ride out, political appointees, like, you know what? You’re gone in three or four years or, you know, you’re or dead before you even ai. We’ll wait you out. So I think there’s some of that.
Speaker: 1
59:04
And then I think there’s some of that in with actual, you know, politicians and political appointees that, advocate like hell for the status quo. And some of it might be good intended because they’re just afraid of what comes next and, you know, why, why take a risk when you’ve got something right now that supposedly works?
Speaker: 1
59:23
And I ask, like, you know, what what if that what if that comes at the competitiveness of the nation and our economic security? What if we get it wrong because you weren’t willing to take some risk and and make changes? So I don’t think they’re necessarily all evil, by the way.
Speaker: 1
59:37
I just think some people get very comfortable in the status quo.
Speaker: 0
59:41
Arya you gonna go back to space?
Speaker: 1
59:44
I, I don’t know. You know, this is ai the first time in twenty six years that I’ve been, you know, really kinda out of work.
Speaker: 0
59:53
I’m
Speaker: 1
59:53
sure I’m definitely gonna go back and help Shift four. I won’t ever rob my CEO of his well deserved, you know, title now. I’ll I’ll probably be an exec chair or something. And, you know, I gotta work. I gotta have a mission. But I’ll find something to to contribute to. And, man, I I love, I love ai, and I love speak, and I like the philanthropic efforts we’ve been doing with St. Jude, so I’ll keep busy.
Speaker: 0
01:00:15
Amazing. Well, look, you’re you’ve been, if nothing, Jared, an inspiration to many. I appreciate your commitment to service, your commitment to charity, your commitment to discovery, And, I sana thank you for the time today. It’s been really great talking with you. Thank you.
Speaker: 1
01:00:29
Meh, thank you. I, I appreciate having the opportunity ai,