You can listen to the Eric Schmidt on AI, the Battle with China, and the Future of America using Speak’s shareable media player:
Eric Schmidt on AI, the Battle with China, and the Future of America Podcast Episode Description
(0:00) Introducing Eric Schmidt
(1:59) Thoughts on remote work and work-life balance
(3:49) Approaching AI: US vs China
(8:04) Relativity Space, rockets, drones, defense, and more
(17:32) Future role of America, and the decline of the West
(21:51) AGI: boom or bust?
Thanks to our partners for making this happen!
Solana – Solana is the high performance network powering internet capital markets, payments, and crypto applications. Connect with investors, crypto founders, and entrepreneurs at Solana’s global flagship event during Abu Dhabi Finance Week & F1: https://solana.com/breakpoint
OKX – The new way to build your crypto portfolio and use it in daily life. We call it the new money app. https://www.okx.com/
Google Cloud – The next generation of unicorns is building on Google Cloud’s industry-leading, fully integrated AI stack: infrastructure, platform, models, agents, and data. https://cloud.google.com/
IREN – IREN AI Cloud, powered by NVIDIA GPUs, provides the scale, performance, and reliability to accelerate your AI journey. https://iren.com/
Oracle – Step into the future of enterprise productivity at Oracle AI Experience Live. https://www.oracle.com/artificial-intelligence/data-ai-events/
Circle – The America-based company behind USDC — a fully-reserved, enterprise-grade stablecoin at the core of the emerging internet financial system. https://www.circle.com/
BVNK – Building stablecoin-powered financial infrastructure that helps businesses send, store, and spend value instantly, anywhere in the world. https://www.bvnk.com/
Continue reading the full guide (click to expand)
Polymarket: https://www.polymarket.com/
Follow Eric:
https://x.com/ericschmidt
Follow the besties:
https://x.com/chamath
https://x.com/Jason
Want to run this on your own file?
Upload audio, video, or text and get a transcript, summary, and insights in minutes.
Free trial includes 30 minutes (60 with a work email)
https://x.com/DavidSacks
https://x.com/friedberg
Follow on X:
https://x.com/theallinpod
Follow on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/theallinpod
Follow on TikTok:
@theallinpod
Follow on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/allinpod
Intro Music Credit:
https://rb.gy/tppkzl
https://x.com/yung_spielburg
This interactive media player was created automatically by Speak. Want to generate intelligent media players yourself? Sign up for Speak!
Eric Schmidt on AI, the Battle with China, and the Future of America Podcast Episode Top Keywords
Eric Schmidt on AI, the Battle with China, and the Future of America Podcast Episode Summary
Based on the provided context, the phrase “has joined the group” refers to someone becoming a member of a group, band, club, or team. Throughout the conversation, there are multiple references to joining various groups, inviting members, and welcoming new people. Specific examples include:
– “we joined the band”
– “He should’ve joined the…”
– “Join the team.”
– “Welcome to the club.”
– “add one more bestie.”
– “they’re in, they’re in.”
– “invite you to…”
These statements all indicate the act of someone joining or being added to a group or collective. However, the context does not specify exactly who “has joined the group” in a particular instance. The general meaning is clear: it signifies the addition of a new member to a group. If you are looking for a specific individual who joined a specific group, that information is not explicitly provided in the context.
This summary was created automatically by Speak. Want to transcribe, analyze and summarize yourself? Sign up for Speak!
Eric Schmidt on AI, the Battle with China, and the Future of America Podcast Episode Transcript (Unedited)
Speaker: 0
00:02
I honestly believe that the AI revolution is underhyped. Now, why is this all important? Eric Schmidt is here. He’s the former Google executive chairman and CEO. These agents are gonna be really powerful, and they’ll start to work together. We’re soon gonna be able to have computers running on their own ai what they want to do.
Speaker: 0
00:20
Now we have the arrival of a new non human intelligence, which is likely to have better reasoning skills than humans can have.
Speaker: 1
00:30
So if you were emperor of the world for one hour
Speaker: 0
00:33
The most important thing I do is make sure that the West wins.
Speaker: 2
00:36
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome
Speaker: 0
00:40
Eric Schmidt.
Speaker: 2
00:44
Yeah. Hi. Looking good. Good to see you.
Speaker: 0
00:51
Good to see you.
Speaker: 3
00:52
Good to see you.
Speaker: 2
00:52
You’re looking schwelt Eric. You’re looking schwelt. Thank you
Speaker: 0
00:56
very much.
Speaker: 2
00:56
Ai
Speaker: 3
00:57
in Capacao.
Speaker: 2
00:57
Oh my god David.
Speaker: 0
00:58
Good to see you. It’s like David
Speaker: 3
00:59
Zach is here as well.
Speaker: 0
01:00
It’s like a it’s like a reunion of all of our former companies David.
Speaker: 2
01:04
Why did you quit after all?
Speaker: 3
01:06
Yes. Ai my old boss. It was
Speaker: 2
01:10
What was it like working with young Friedberg? Take us back. Well,
Speaker: 3
01:14
can I tell a story? We have to come down to Orange County and they’re ai, hey we’re gonna take the plane. It was Eric’s plane. We meh on the plane and then he goes up and flies the plane. I’m in the back of the plane by myself.
Speaker: 2
01:24
Ai it King Air?
Speaker: 3
01:25
I’m like the CEO of Google flying me down to Orange County. It was incredible. That was my first time actually hanging out with Eric.
Speaker: 0
01:32
It was my Gulfstream.
Speaker: 1
01:33
That’s right.
Speaker: 0
01:34
He was way too smart.
Speaker: 2
01:37
Way too smart?
Speaker: 0
01:37
Way too smart.
Speaker: 2
01:38
Was he focused? Did he contribute? Did he move the needle?
Speaker: 0
01:41
No. But he was very smart.
Speaker: 2
01:42
Okay. That’s kind of our consensus on the plot as well.
Speaker: 0
01:47
You guys know this guy well. He’s really that smart. So he taught me more stuff than most of any of the employees at Google. And then you left. Well tell us
Speaker: 3
01:56
what you’ve been doing. Sai
Speaker: 2
01:58
No, no, wait. Before that, I gotta ask you this question. It was a recently deleted video from Stanford. Oh, no. You had a moment of clarity where you said, hey, you know, like at Google, people are ai too much work ai balance. They need to commit. They need to work harder. We had Sergei at the last event. He’s going back to work. So Sergei got the message.
Speaker: 0
02:21
Predicting Sergei’s behavior is something I can fail at. I tried for twenty years. I am not in favor of essentially working at home. And the reason, I mean, many of you guys all work at home to some degree, but your careers are already established. But think about a 20 who has to learn how the world works. And you know, they they come out of Berkeley or Dartmouth and they’re very well educated.
Speaker: 0
02:48
When I think about how much I learned when I was at Sana just listening to these elder people who were five or ten years older than I was argue with each other in person, I don’t know. How do you recreate that in this new thing? And and I’m in favor of work life balance and that’s why people work for the government. Sorry. Strays. Sorry. Sorry.
Speaker: 0
03:11
Sorry. If you’re going to be in tech and you’re going to win, you’re sana have to make some trade offs. And you meh, we’re up against the Chinese. The Chinese work life balance consists of nine $9.06, which is 9AM to 9PM, six days a week. By the way, the Chinese have clarified that this is illegal.
Speaker: 0
03:31
However, they all do it. That’s who you’re competing against.
Speaker: 2
03:35
I brought I brought everybody back to office. It’s so much better.
Speaker: 4
03:38
So it let’s just pick up on that theme.
Speaker: 0
03:40
So You don’t need to defend the government.
Speaker: 4
03:42
No. No. Believe meh, I don’t I don’t see the need to. I’m an unpaid part time ai to the government. So, but, but we are in this high-tech competition with China. They obviously care about AI too. They’re trying to race ahead. How do you, I understand that you recently made made a trip there. How do you, handicap this this this comment?
Speaker: 0
04:03
Well, you and I just talked about this as part of your as your incredibly important work in the White House. I had thought that China and The United States were competing at the peer level in AI and that the good work that you have done and your predecessors did to restrict chips were slowing them down.
Speaker: 0
04:21
They’re really doing something more different than I thought. They’re not pursuing crazy AGI strategies, partly because of the hardware limitations that you put in place, but partly because the depth of their capital markets don’t exist. They can’t raise based on a wing and a prayer $100,000,000 ram, meh equivalent to to build the data centers. They just can’t do it.
Speaker: 0
04:44
And so the result is they’re very focused on taking AI and applying it to everything. And so the concern I have is that while we’re pursuing AGI, which is incredibly interesting and we should talk about it, and all of us will be affected by ai, we better also be competing with the Chinese in day to day stuff.
Speaker: 0
05:02
Right. Consumer apps, this is something you understand very well, Chumath. Consumer apps, robots, and so forth and so on. I saw all the the Shanghai robotics companies, and these guys are attempting to do in robots what they’ve successfully done with electric vehicles. Right?
Speaker: 0
05:18
And their their work ethic is incredible. They’re well funded. It’s not the crazy evaluations that we have in America.
Speaker: 1
05:25
Right.
Speaker: 0
05:25
They can’t raise the capital, but they can win across that. The other thing the Chinese are doing, and I sana emphasize this as a major geopolitical issue, is that my own background is open source. In the is that my own background is open source. In the audience, you all know open source means open code, open weight open weights means open training data.
Speaker: 0
05:42
China is competing with open weights and open training data. And The US is largely and majority focused on closed weights, closed data. That means that the majority of the world, think of it as the Belt and Road initiative, are gonna use Chinese models and not American models.
Speaker: 0
05:58
Now Ai happen to think the West and democracies are correct, and I’d much rather have the proliferation of large language models and that learning be done based on Western values.
Speaker: 1
06:08
Eric, we had a major open source initiative, with Meh. You know, incredible balance sheet, tremendous technical ai, but they seem to have misexecuted and now are taking a step back and reformulating something to your point that looks a little bit more closed source.
Speaker: 0
06:24
It’s not clear. You know, Alex Wang’s a good friend. He’s come in. He’s taken over. He’s obviously incredibly, incredibly capable. I would not hold, keep, I Ai would not say that they’re going fully closed. And I think also they got screwed up because the DeepSeek people, r one, did such a good job. Right?
Speaker: 0
06:44
If you look at the reasoning model in DeepSeek and in particular, their ability to do reinforcement learning forward and back, forward and back, and forward and back, this is a major achievement. And it appears that they’re doing it with less precision than numeric precision than the American models. As a bit of technical things, there’s something called FP64, FP32, FP16.
Speaker: 0
07:06
The American models are typically using 16 bit precision for their training. The Chinese are pushing eight and now even four. Is there something that the American, you know, bigger companies need to be doing in open source so that
Speaker: 1
07:20
we can actually combat this?
Speaker: 0
07:22
Well, a number of the large companies have said that they sana be leaders in open source as well. Sam Altman indicated that the smallest version of the o three model would be released, I believe, open weights, and they have done so. And he told meh, anyway, that this model is much smaller than 10 to the 26.
Speaker: 0
07:41
It’s much easier to train and it will fit or or can fit on your phone. So one path is to say that we’ll have these supercomputers doing AGI, which will always be incredibly expensive and so forth. But we also have to watch to make sure that the proliferation of these models for handheld devices is under American control, whether it’s OpenAI or Meta or Gemini or what have you.
Speaker: 1
08:04
Recently, you, took over Relativity Space. And I think for for the people that don’t know, this is a business that effectively whose ambition is to compete with SpaceX. Ai think
Speaker: 0
08:16
you were the first investor or the earliest investor in it.
Speaker: 1
08:18
It? I was. I’m sorry. It’s okay.
Speaker: 0
08:21
I lost some money in the first I did. What happened?
Speaker: 2
08:23
Did he get ram down?
Speaker: 1
08:24
No. No. No. I mean All
Speaker: 0
08:25
of us did.
Speaker: 1
08:26
All of us. I meh, look. Yeah. I mean, I’ve been very happily, you know, an investor in SpaceX and Swarm and Starlink. Relativity was And
Speaker: 0
08:34
by the way, Swarm’s a big deal. Created Starlink.
Speaker: 1
08:36
Swarm was
Speaker: 0
08:36
a So thank you.
Speaker: 1
08:37
Yep. Swarm has been a really great success for for them and Ai think for the world. But what I was gonna ask you is walk us through the evolution of the space market. Why you decided of all the companies, you have the capital base to kind of put your money anywhere. Why did you pick that? Why did you pick that business?
Speaker: 1
08:55
Why now?
Speaker: 0
08:56
Rockets are really cool and they’re really hard. I had I’m as you know, I’m a pilot, and I know lots about jets. And I had assumed that rockets were as mature as jet engines. They’re not. It is an art and a science. These things are very hard to do. The amounts of power I mean, in our case, the rocket is 4,000,000 pounds of thrust.
Speaker: 0
09:17
You have to hold the thing down to test it, and you can’t even hold it with metal things. You have to have other things to hold it down as well. There’s so much force. Otherwise, it will take off. Another interesting thing about rockets is that a rough number is that 2% of the weight of the rocket is the payload.
Speaker: 0
09:32
18% is roughly the rocket and 80% is the propellant. And my reaction as a new person is you’re telling me you can’t do any better. And the physicists say after sixty years of physics, that’s the best we can do to get out of the gravitation of of the Earth. And so I think rockets are interesting and they’re challenging. There’s always an opportunity for competition. In relativity space’s area, it’s essentially a LEO competitor.
Speaker: 0
09:58
So low Earth orbit ai, that sort of thing. The order book is full. We just have to launch the rocket.
Speaker: 1
10:04
And this entry into space happened and I’m not sure how well known this is. So you can go as far as you want to go into this. But you’ve done a lot as well in Next Generation Warfare as well. Do you want us just to talk about that and how you ended up there and what role that plays and just give us a landscape.
Speaker: 1
10:21
Maybe David asked about the China question, but it’s they’re all kind of almost interrelated.
Speaker: 0
10:25
Well firstly, Ai a softer person, not a hardware person. I explain to people that hardware people go to different schools than software people. And they think slightly differently. So I am always at a limitation in these new industries. I had worked for the secretary of defense and have a top secret clearance in all that.
Speaker: 0
10:41
I was given a medal, etcetera, for trying to help the Pentagon reorganize itself. And when the Ukraine war started, I was watching, and I thought, well, here’s an opportunity to see a country that has no navy, and no, and no air force, how they do this with automation. And indeed, it has been a spectacular success as a matter of innovation, and outnumbered three to one with huge differences in, kinetic strength, weapons, mobilization, and so forth and so on, Ukraine has held on really quite well.
Speaker: 0
11:16
And what’s happening now is you’re seeing essentially the birth of a completely new military national security structure. One way to think about it is that we all, so first place and I’ve I’ve seen it live and I will tell you that real war is much worse than the worst movies you have ever seen about war.
Speaker: 0
11:34
And that’s all I’ll say. It’s really horrific and it’s to be avoided at all cost. And then right. For obvious reasons. And the the and I love all these people say, well, well, you know, the warmongering talk, be careful what you wish for because the other side gets a vote.
Speaker: 0
11:53
When I started working and and trying to understand what Ukraine was doing, Russia was pushed back. And they’ve come back with a very, very strong second and third round. So the enemy gets a vote in this situation. But but to go on, the rough way in which war will evolve is first things will have to be very, very mobile and very much not in fixed places.
Speaker: 0
12:17
This takes out most of the military infrastructure that exists in the world. Things like tanks, of which we’re now building a whole bunch more even stronger tanks here in Meh, don’t make any sense in a world where a two kilogram payload from a, a well armed drone can destroy the tank.
Speaker: 0
12:36
It’s called the kill ratio. And that drone costs retail $5,000, $4,000. The tank, the American tank costs $30,000,000. You can see the the you can send an awful lot of those drones to destroy those tanks. The likely evolution goes something like this.
Speaker: 0
12:52
So first, people learn that drones are like rifles and like artillery. So it’s more efficient to use drones now than to use mortars, grenades, artillery. That’s clear. If you just look at the economics, economics in terms of cost or effectiveness sai it’s called. The next thing that happens is that both sides develop drone capabilities, which is what you’re seeing now. And each then becomes a war of drone against drone.
Speaker: 0
13:19
So you have drone against anti drone. And so then the shift moves to how do you detect the enemy drone and how do you destroy it before it destroys you. So the doctrine ultimately is the drones are forward and the people are behind. And I’ve seen operations in, for example, sitting in Kyiv where the Ukrainians are commanding things over Starlink, I might add, in the distance in the distant war and they’re very, very effective.
Speaker: 0
13:45
So we’ve solved the latency problems. We’ve solved the timing problems and so forth in that area. The ultimate state is very interesting. And I don’t think anyone has foreseen this. If you go back to our conversation about RL and planning, which is what you’re seeing with Ai, let’s say that that we’re on one side and we have a million drones and there’s another side over here that has another million drones.
Speaker: 0
14:07
Each side will use reinforcement learning Ai strategies to do battle plans. But neither side can figure out what the other side’s battle plan is. And therefore, the deterrence against attacking each other will be very high. Today, the way military planners operate is that they count weapons.
Speaker: 0
14:25
They say well you have this many and I have this many and you can do this kind of maneuver and so forth. But in an AI world where you’re doing reinforcement learning, you can’t count what the other side is planning. You can’t see it. You don’t know it. And I believe that that will deter what I view is one of the most horrendous things ever done by humans, which is war.
Speaker: 3
14:43
Because unless there’s a perfect balance between either side, there will be some mutual destruction of the drone supply like there would be with any artillery stock in traditional warfare and whoever’s left ends up winning? Like they’re just
Speaker: 0
14:56
Well, it’s very important to understand that there’s no winners in war. By the time you have a drone battle of the scale I’m describing, the entire infrastructure of your side will be destroyed. The entire infrastructure of the other side will be destroyed. These are lose lose scenarios.
Speaker: 1
15:11
Isn’t there like an equilibrium though that that can also create where there because of that mutually assured destruction, there’s a detente or is that
Speaker: 0
15:19
Well, I’m arguing that it’s not a detente. It’s a deterrence.
Speaker: 1
15:23
Right.
Speaker: 0
15:23
That as deterrence can be understood as I want to hit you, which I don’t. Yeah. But I wanna hit you so meh, but that if I do that, the the penalty is greater than the value of me hitting you. Right. And that’s how deter That’s how deterministic.
Speaker: 1
15:36
But that seems like a great advantage and upside of this move to sort of drones and automation that we don’t have today.
Speaker: 0
15:46
Ai, there are many advantages to moving to drones and automation. One, they’re much, much cheaper. Ai? They’re much, much cheaper.
Speaker: 1
15:53
Yeah.
Speaker: 0
15:53
And two, you can ai algorithms. You can essentially learn and learn and learn. And meh, you can also build training data right, that’s synthetic sai you could be even better than the others. The final question I’ve been asked by our military is what’s the role of the of a traditional land army?
Speaker: 0
16:12
And I wish I could say that all of these human behaviors can occur without humans being vatsal risk. I don’t think so. I think that the way, robot war, essentially drone war will occur is there will be destructive waves, but eventually humans are going to have to cross sai line.
Speaker: 0
16:32
They’re going to have to
Speaker: 2
16:33
After we’ve depleted them. Sai you’re investing in this drone technology and then do you think Optimus and humanoid robots are the next, you volley in this
Speaker: 0
16:45
new warfare? It’s gonna be a long time before humanoid robots, which is what we see in the movies all day. Right? It’ll be a very long time before we see that. What you’re gonna see is very, very fast mobility solutions. Right? Air it’s sana air based solutions and also Hypersonics.
Speaker: 0
17:02
Hypersonics. Also things underwater. There’s a lot of that going on. It’s a different domain. If you look at the, the Maguro and some other boats that the Ukrainians used, they have essentially used USVs to destroy the, Russian fleet in the Black Sea.
Speaker: 0
17:20
This was crucial for them because they needed to be able to export the grain from Odessa around and it’s like 6% or 10% of their economy. Sai very big deal. And they did that with drones.
Speaker: 1
17:31
Eric, it seems like there’s this overarching world view that you have. Meaning, you have this view on AI. There’s all this stuff you’re doing now in drones and warfare, in rocketry. It all converges ai honestly because in the in the next five or ten years, these things will all come to pass.
Speaker: 1
17:49
What is the ai how do you view the world? Like, what is the role of America? What is your role as a as a capitalist, as a technologist, as ai a statesman?
Speaker: 0
18:00
I want America to win. Ai? I am here because the American dream, the people who invested in me, in my case, Berkeley and so forth, people took a chance on me. I want the next generation to have that. I also want you all to meh, I was just in in, as part of the World War two surrender ceremony in in Honolulu and they talked about fighting tyranny.
Speaker: 0
18:28
Ai? We forget that our ancestors or great grandparents or whatever fought the great war to keep liberalism and democracy alive. I want us to do that. How do we do that as Americans? We use our strengths. What are our strengths? We’re chaotic, confusing, loud, you know, but we’re clever. We allocate capital smartly.
Speaker: 0
18:51
We have very deep financial markets. We have this enormous industrial base of universities and entrepreneurs, which are represented here. We should celebrate this. We should stoke it. We should make it go faster and faster. Sai ai lots of time in Europe because of the Ukraine stuff. They are so envious of us.
Speaker: 0
19:08
When you’re in Asia, they arya envious of us. Don’t screw it up, guys. That’s what I want to work on.
Speaker: 3
19:14
Can Ai can I just ask you, outside of this external conflict, we had, a conversation with Alex Karp today and we actually had Tucker Carlson here yesterday and some of the dialogue was around the, I don’t know if the right term is the erosion of the West, that there may be social issues that are brewing in the West that meh be hurting us from the inside? How much do you observe or spend time on these issues and the metric that often is cited now is declining birth rates in the West and that our population and we’re gonna talk with Elon in a few minutes about this.
Speaker: 3
19:49
Oh, sorry.
Speaker: 2
19:50
Oh, you just ruined it.
Speaker: 3
19:51
My bad.
Speaker: 2
19:52
My ai. Oops. There’s your surprise guest.
Speaker: 3
19:55
Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. Sorry. Slip. But,
Speaker: 0
20:02
Elon is a good friend and he’s addressing this issue of population directly himself. Ai off for it.
Speaker: 2
20:12
Good for you.
Speaker: 3
20:13
Is it is it a reflection of something going on? There’s a rise of Mamdani getting elected in New York. Some of the historic values of the West seem to be on, you know, kind of under a a state of transformation right now.
Speaker: 0
20:27
One metric of the success of a society is its ability to reproduce. And so I think this is a legitimate concern of the West. It’s much worse in Asia. The, the Chinese number is about one point o for two parents. In Korea, it’s now down to point seven eight for two. So it’s really important to recognize that we as humans are collectively choosing to depopulate. And the numbers are staggering, right?
Speaker: 0
20:53
And imagine a situation where instead of having growth, you have shrinkage and furthermore they’re getting older. And so as a business, all of a bryden, your revenue is declining and there’s nothing you can do because you can’t innovate with fewer and fewer customers.
Speaker: 2
21:08
So if you just
Speaker: 0
21:09
put it in a business context, ignoring the moral issues which are all very real, it’s just bad. Right? So we have to solve that problem. I happen to be in favor broadly of immigration because I think immigration helps us solve that problem. But as a global mechanism, we have to address that.
Speaker: 0
21:23
In any case, from my perspective, you’re going to have these issues, but America is organized around the concept of American exceptionalism. And as long as we understand that the way we make progress is we invest in the right people, in the right businesses, we have a strong capital market, we invest in the infrastructure that they need, We’ll be fine.
Speaker: 0
21:49
That is my actual opinion.
Speaker: 4
21:51
Can we go back to Ai for a second? So, Eric, I think you can help us get to, let’s call it, a bipartisan understanding of these issues. Ai think you think really clearly about this. You know, in in the wake of ChatGPT launching at the 2022, I think the discourse was really dominated in 2023 and ’24 by this idea of AGI, and that AGI was imminent.
Speaker: 4
22:17
And I think it created almost like a panicky atmosphere in Washington among policy makers. And you saw things ai, we gotta restrict open source because, you know, then China will get it. And, and this is before DeepSeek launched, and then we saw that actually they’re ahead of us in open source.
Speaker: 4
22:32
But it feels like there’s been, a pullback a little bit from the AGI narrative, which I think I think is actually a good thing. I think it’s more conducive to calm rational policy making. What’s your perception of AGI right now? Where where are we on that whole train?
Speaker: 0
22:47
So sai, so first place, the speech that the president delivered about a month ago about AI strategy, which I think you probably wouldn’t say it, but you kinda wrote it for him, was exactly right. Right? So thank you.
Speaker: 2
23:01
David collaborated with
Speaker: 0
23:02
an amazing leader who we
Speaker: 2
23:02
all respect and
Speaker: 0
23:07
Ai nevertheless
Speaker: 4
23:13
Saying I wrote it was was way too strong. I mean, actually But anyway
Speaker: 2
23:16
If you
Speaker: 0
23:17
didn’t if you didn’t write it, then it must have been your twin. But in any case, the you you got you got the emphasis right, which was that investment in research, investment in the ai of stuff that we do is really, really important. I don’t agree with you on this on this AGI thing because there’s this group, which I call the San Francisco, narrative because they all live in San Francisco.
Speaker: 0
23:41
And their narrative goes something like this. Today we’re doing agents. The agentic revolution will change businesses, which I agree with. That what happens is the systems will become recursively self self intelligent. With recursive self improvement, as it’s called, if you have a scale free problem, and a scale free problem, for example, is programming or math where you can just keep doing it, you get these enormous fast gains if you buy enough hardware or do enough software or so forth and so on.
Speaker: 0
24:12
That is still underway. The collective of that says that in the next three ish years, they believe that we will get forms of superintelligence. And the way they define it is basically a savant, a chemist savant, a physics savant, a mathematician savant. I don’t agree with the three years, but I do agree that it’ll be maybe six or seven years.
Speaker: 4
24:36
But if it’s a savant in, you know, a particular area, is that general intelligence?
Speaker: 0
24:41
It’s not general intelligence yet. General intelligence is when it can set its own objective function.
Speaker: 4
24:48
Right. And But there’s no evidence of that.
Speaker: 0
24:51
There’s no evidence right now of the ability to set your own objective function. The the the thinking, and I’m writing a paper on this sai I’ve been studying it, is that the the the technical problem is non stationarity of mathematical proofs. And what what you’re doing is you’re trying to solve against the objective function but the objective function keeps changing which is how humans operate.
Speaker: 0
25:13
Your goal changes every day whereas computers have trouble with that. As a math problem we don’t have an algorithm yet for LMS that can do that. People are working on it. And the the test will be, can you basically, using the information available in nineteen o two, can you derive the same thing that Einstein did with special relativity followed by general relativity?
Speaker: 0
25:37
We cannot do that today. And most people believe that the way this will be solved is through analogy. So the theory of great geniuses is that they understand one area extremely well, and they’re so brilliant, the lady or man can then take their ideas and apply it to a completely different domain.
Speaker: 0
25:58
If we can solve that problem, then I think it’s over. Then we get to AGI, and then it’s a whole different world.
Speaker: 4
26:07
I think one of the reasons why it’s hard to replace a human, and, you know, JK and I debate this, is that humans are end to end. You know, we can do the whole job. You have sort of a complete understanding. You can pivot very easily. AI, at least as we know it today, is not end to end. It has to be prompted. You get an answer. That answer has to be validated.
Speaker: 4
26:28
Then you have to ask a new question because it never gives you exactly what you want. You have to apply more context. You have to go through an iterative loop. Finally, you get to an answer that has business value. The way biology puts it is that AI is not end to end. It’s middle to middle. Humans are end to end.
Speaker: 4
26:43
And so as a result of that, instead of AI replacing all of us, AI will be very synergistic with humans because we can define the objective function, we do the prompting, and we work with it to iterate, and it does a lot of the work in the middle. That seems to me like a very optimistic, less doomeristic take on it.
Speaker: 0
27:04
What you just said is exactly what’s going to happen for the next few years. That each of us will have assistance, which on our command and our prompting, will be incredibly helpful to whatever problem we have. You know, sana, you have people who are using these things for relationship ai, for, you know, talking to their kids. I mean, it’s all crazy stuff.
Speaker: 0
27:23
But the fact that meh, that’s it. To meh, the real question is ai does it cross over to having its own volition, its own ability to seek information and solve new problems. That’s a different animal.
Speaker: 4
27:35
But have we seen any evidence of recursive self improvement yet?
Speaker: 0
27:39
Not yet. I’m I’m I’ve funded a number of startups which claim to be close to it. But of course these are startups and you never know, which tells me it’s ai, ten years
Speaker: 3
27:49
cutting numbers.
Speaker: 2
27:50
What do you
Speaker: 3
27:50
think Google is doing on this front?
Speaker: 0
27:53
Ai, I’m not at Google anymore. Every issue of Gemini is top of the leaderboard. So 2.5 just overcame everybody, and I’m sure there’s another one coming. Demis is working really hard on this question about, scientific discovery. So that’s a that is a path to getting to AGI.
Speaker: 3
28:15
Eric, we appreciate the work you’re doing. We appreciate you being here with us. We appreciate what you’ve done, the impact you’ve had on Silicon Valley, as a ai.
Speaker: 0
28:24
It’s really nice.
Speaker: 3
28:25
Yeah. No. But it’s it’s really been
Speaker: 0
28:26
I am so happy to be part of this. You created this incredible community and there’s all of these smart people that spend all their time listening to you. Very concerning.
Speaker: 2
28:39
Wow. Strain’s Eric. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir. Thanks, Eric. Appreciate you. Cheers. Alright.